logo
Angel Reese Is On The Verge Of A WNBA Suspension

Angel Reese Is On The Verge Of A WNBA Suspension

Yahoo6 hours ago
Angel Reese Is On The Verge Of A WNBA Suspension originally appeared on The Spun.
Angel Reese is on the verge of a WNBA suspension.
The Indiana Fever took on the Chicago Sky on Sunday afternoon. Neither Reese nor Caitlin Clark were in action. The Fever topped the Sky, 93-78, to improve to 14-12 on the season.
Reese, the two-time WNBA All-Star, is on the verge of a suspension. She's been hit with seven technical fouls. However, once she hits eight technical fouls, she'll receive a one-game WNBA suspension.
Meanwhile, the Chicago Sky are working on getting some of Reese's technical fouls reversed, which could give her some breathing room heading into the second half of the season.
Sky head coach Tyler Marsh spoke out about the situation on Sunday.
"We've done our work on our side to try to get a couple of those rescinded in the moment and beyond, and that's up to the league's discretion," Marsh said. "I think, across the board, it's part of the entertainment of the game. It's hard to control the passion in the heat of the moment."
Reese, even suspended for one game, would be a major blow to the Chicago Sky. She's been playing very well as of late, averaging 13.8 points per game to go along with 12.5 rebounds, 3.7 assists, and 1.4 steals. She made the WNBA All-Star Game for the second year in a row.
The Sky, meanwhile, have been struggling. They're 7-18 on the season. Chicago will need to make some big moves in the season's final months to make a playoff push.
Hopefully, for the Chicago Sky's sake, they won't lose Angel Reese for a game - or more - due to a WNBA suspension.
Angel Reese Is On The Verge Of A WNBA Suspension first appeared on The Spun on Jul 27, 2025
This story was originally reported by The Spun on Jul 27, 2025, where it first appeared.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Indiana football's offense was 2nd nationally in scoring. Who needs to step up to keep pace?
Indiana football's offense was 2nd nationally in scoring. Who needs to step up to keep pace?

Indianapolis Star

timea few seconds ago

  • Indianapolis Star

Indiana football's offense was 2nd nationally in scoring. Who needs to step up to keep pace?

Part of what made Indiana football's most historic season last year was an offense among the best in the country. Critique of opponents aside, the Hoosiers did what they needed to: dominated. They finished last season second in scoring offense at 41.3 points per game. IU was 34th in total offense in gaining 426.4 yards per game. They breakdown was they were tied for 31st in passing offense with Baylor at 261.3 yards per game, and their run game was just 63rd at 165.1 yards per contest. Kurtis Rourke was masterful in leading the offense, even doing so on a torn ACL. He led an offense that was seventh in completion efficiency (68.1%). In the first edition of our roundtable, we discussed what Cal transfer quarterback Fernando Mendoza brings to the Hoosiers, and how they may use him differently. Mendoza was third in the ACC in yards passing per game at 273.09, which was 10th nationally. Ahead of him were Syracuse quarterback Kyle McCord who led the nation (367.62) and No. 1 NFL draft pick Cam Ward (331.77) whose Miami Hurricanes were the only team to score more than IU. Now, that doesn't guarantee success, but it is a large reason for why draft analysts and others are high on his addition for IU. But that is only part of the equation. Who may be the X-factor for success? How do new players fit in? Who fills the void for injured Michigan transfer Tyler Morris? IndyStar IU insider Zach Osterman and Herald-Times reporter Michael Niziolek huddled with IndyStar assistant sports editor Aaron Ferguson to discuss Mendoza's impact on IU football. Here is their conversation. Ferguson: Simply put, who needs to emerge among offensive skill positions for this team to play at a consistent level? Niziolek: With Curt Cignetti's focus on production over potential in the transfer portal, IU doesn't have many question marks at the skill positions going into 2025. Maryland transfer running back Roman Hemby is a good example. While he didn't have his best season in 2024, he has 3,268 yards from scrimmage in his career (2,347 rushing) and is probably the best pass-catching back the Hoosiers have had in a long time. He's not the only capable back in the room either with Lee Beebe Jr. and Kaelon Black expected to have prominent roles as well. Things get a little bit dicey at receiver where IU doesn't have the same kind of depth it did at the start of fall camp last year when Donaven McCulley and E.J. Williams Jr. struggled to make the rotation. The Hoosiers didn't miss a beat when they walked away from the team a month into the season. Indiana opens camp in a couple of weeks with five available veteran receivers — Williams happens to be one of them after taking his name out of the portal — and a group of four underclassmen with a combined 23 snaps of experience. It might not matter if IU stays healthy, but it was surprising Cignetti didn't seek out at least one additional receiver in the portal just as some insurance. Osterman: Yeah, I think this conversation has to begin with health. Indiana got uncommonly lucky with injuries last season. None of their top pass catchers missed meaningful time, nor did either of their top two running backs. That's not extraordinary luck — we know Cignetti believes in Derek Owings' ability to manage his roster's health — but it isn't something you can count on every year. Already, Indiana has had to make new plans at slot receiver, where Morris was expected to see significant snaps before a season-ending knee injury suffered in spring ball. The slot is probably the position I'm most curious about. Indiana added Makai Jackson (App State) in the winter and then plugged the Morris hole with Jonathan Brady (Cal) after the spring season. But that was a quietly important position for IU last season. The three players rotating through the slot combined for 104 receptions, 1,238 yards and 12 touchdowns. That is a big chunk of offense to replace, and already Indiana has had to shift gears once this offseason. Brady and Jackson have career resumes that suggest they're capable, but it's an important hole to fill. Niziolek: What I find interesting about Jackson, is that he developed into more of an outside receiver at App State. He lined up on the outside more than 90% of the time last year and the numbers were similar in 2023. I think IU is going to approach the slot receiver position differently this year with everyone rotating through there. Cignetti mentioned that all the receivers except Charlie Becker cross-trained at the position during spring camp. Jackson will also be looking to make up for lost time after being limited for much of spring camp with a hamstring injury that also kept him out of the spring game. Osterman: That's an interesting possibility. And entirely plausible. Honestly, when you consider the backs are also slightly different profile this year (probably fair to say Hemby and Beebe lean a little more toward pass catching than Ty Son Lawton and Justice Ellison did last season), and as we discussed in Part I, Mendoza has more potential mobility, I could see an offense that doesn't operate with total uniformity in 2025 to the way it did in 2024. I don't think there will be wholesale changes but I think it could look discernably different. Ferguson: One named not mentioned yet is Wisconsin transfer Riley Nowakowski, a tight end who was used as a blocker but also caught 11 passes for 74 yards last year in a failed Air Raid experiment. How does he fit into the Cignetti/Mike Shanahan offense, given he has those spread concepts and can be utilized in either phase of the game? Osterman: I'm not sure I'm ready to pin my flag to anything yet at tight end. Zach Horton was the alpha and omega there last season, and he's gone. James Bomba is the holdover from last year who, when healthy, was often utilized as a second end/blocker. IU also added Holden Staes, who on paper looks like the most pass game-oriented of those three. I'm also curious about Nowakowski's time playing fullback, something I don't think he'll do a lot at Indiana but something I'm not sure Indiana would've trusted anyone to do last year, so again, maybe that's another potential new wrinkle. Among those three (plus maybe a freshman if one impresses), I think Indiana has the tools it needs at tight end. I'm just not sure what the division of labor and order of responsibility is in that group. Niziolek: Staes has the greater potential as a receiving threat, but I think Nowakowski has an edge as the more proven inline blocker. Horton's toughness is what earned him such a prominent role in Cignetti's offense going back to when they were at James Madison together. Nowakowski earned a similar reputation at Wisconsin having earned a scholarship and starting role as a former walk-on and he's plenty capable of putting up numbers like Horton did last year (21 catches for 189 yards and four touchdowns). Ferguson: Is there a world where a tight end splits out more to help fill the void at slot, not that it's totally going away but replace whatever expected production came with Morris? Niziolek: Brady is a more direct replacement for Morris, but I think some of the production IU got from its slot receivers last year will go to the running backs. The Hoosiers brought in two of the top pass-catching backs (Hemby and Beebe Jr.) available in the portal. They are capable of moving all over the line of scrimmage and I think you will more screens out to them that might have gone to a guy like Myles Price last year. Indiana's running backs combined for 30 receptions last year, and I don't think it would be all that surprising if Hemby and Beebe double that number. Osterman: Hemby is a real X factor for me for Indiana this year. It might be nearness bias purely because I've seen him shred IU defenses a handful of times in the past. But he always felt like a player with more talent than his offense was equipped to showcase at Maryland, either because of a preference for throwing the ball or because of blocking issues. If Indiana sees similar performance from its offensive line this year, I think as Mike alludes to there, Hemby opens up a lot of fascinating options for Cignetti and Shanahan. Ferguson: If screens and pass-catchers in the backfield are going to diversify the offense, may we see variation in trick plays because they will be so versatile? Osterman: I don't think that's really something Cignetti leans into too much. He'll run them from time to time like any coach, probably to put them on film for future opponents as much as anything else. But I think his offenses tend to stay pretty true to what they're built to do around their personnel, rather than try to overthink stuff too much if that makes sense. Niziolek: Indiana didn't need to resort to trick plays very often last season since the offense operated at such a high level as the second-highest scoring team in the country. Some more versatility in the backfield might lead to a few more getting sprinkled in, but I don't think Cignetti will be desperate to insert them as long as the offense keeps the ball moving.

Highlights of the Nike Deal, Broadcast Partnerships, Kit Sponsorships, and Stadium Naming Rights
Highlights of the Nike Deal, Broadcast Partnerships, Kit Sponsorships, and Stadium Naming Rights

Yahoo

time27 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Highlights of the Nike Deal, Broadcast Partnerships, Kit Sponsorships, and Stadium Naming Rights

Explore the "Business of the NWSL 2025," a detailed report on the women's soccer league's media and sponsorship landscapes. Discover insights on $39.5M in league sponsorship, $60M in media rights, and $66.46M in team sponsorship. Learn about market viewership, team profiles, and social media metrics. Dublin, July 28, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The "The Business of the National Women's Soccer League 2025" report has been added to offering. The main aims of this report is to highlight commercial landscape across NWSL. The report aims to break down the key commercial revenue streams for the league and its affiliated teams. It goes into detail on the key partnerships including its centralized rights with Nike, its four main US broadcasters, front-of-shirt rights, sleeve partnerships and stadium naming "Business of the NWSL 2025" report is part of the the analyst's 'Business of' series of sport competition profiles. The report takes a deep dive into the premier competition for women's domestic soccer in the United States. The report explores the biggest rights across the league, specifically looking at the main media and sponsorship rights attached to the NWSL, as well the main sponsorship rights and annual values of the 14 competing teams. The report also looks at market viewership, profiles individual teams and offers social media following comparisons against teams, other American sports leagues and other soccer NWSL stands to generate $39.5 million from league sponsorship this season. Home market media rights worth $60 million across four main broadcaster deals. Team sponsorship in the league worth $66.46 million in Highlights Overview of the media rights landscape. Global media and sponsor partners explored. Breakdown of the sponsorship deals including annual values. Individual team profiles. Team market comparison by sponsorship. Connected social media followers. Reasons to Buy Soccer is a growing sport in the United States as the country build towards jointly hosting (with Canada and Mexico) the 2026 men's FIFA World Cup . The NWSL, alongside the WNBA (basketball) is the most popular women's sports leagues in the United States and has produced many of the best players in the world over the past decade. Key Topics Covered: 1. Overview2. Media landscape3. League sponsorship landscape4. Kit supplier landscape5. Front-of-shirt landscape6. Sleeve landscape7. Back-of-shirt landscape8. Stadium naming rights landscape9. Team sponsorship overview10. Additional revenue & social media11. AppendixKey Data Tables Home market broadcasters Regional broadcasters International broadcasters NWSL ticket revenue For more information about this report visit About is the world's leading source for international market research reports and market data. We provide you with the latest data on international and regional markets, key industries, the top companies, new products and the latest trends. CONTACT: CONTACT: Laura Wood,Senior Press Manager press@ For E.S.T Office Hours Call 1-917-300-0470 For U.S./ CAN Toll Free Call 1-800-526-8630 For GMT Office Hours Call +353-1-416-8900Sign in to access your portfolio

Which Giants will make the cut? Here's our 53-man roster projection after Week 1 of camp
Which Giants will make the cut? Here's our 53-man roster projection after Week 1 of camp

Yahoo

time27 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Which Giants will make the cut? Here's our 53-man roster projection after Week 1 of camp

EAST RUTHERFORD − The New York Giants are jockeying for position at the many levels of the depth chart and training camp has only begun. Full pads are set to go on Monday morning in the Giants' fifth practice of the summer, and this represents an opportunity for many to drastically change perspective in the battle for jobs [and playing time]. Here is a position-by-position analysis of where the Giants stand with the chase for spots on the 53-man roster just heating up through a week of camp: OFFENSE (26) Quarterback (3) Russell Wilson Jameis Winston Jaxson Dart Breakdown: Nothing has changed here with Wilson the clear QB1. Dart has gotten most of the second-team reps, while Winston has made the most of his with solid play as well as demanding the standard be just as high for players who might be fighting for spots not on the active roster, but the practice squad. His presence as noticeable. Tommy DeVito has had limited chances, but he has looked good with those reps. He's likely still staring at a practice squad offer or heading elsewhere unless there is a significant injury. Running back (3) Tyrone Tracy Devin Singletary Cam Skattebo Breakdown: Tracy is the lead back and looks good. Will be interesting to see him when the run game starts getting work. Skattebo has been fantastic as a receiver, catching every pass thrown his way while working with the second and third teams. Singletary is solid and his reliability in pass protection is a plus. Turbo Miller has had a strong start to camp and will be fighting to force the Giants to keep four backs. His burst jumps out. Can he carve out a role on special teams and lock down a roster spot? Wide receiver (6) Malik Nabers Darius Slayton Wan'Dale Robinson Jalin Hyatt Ihmir Smith-Marsette Beaux Collins Breakdown: Special teams ace Bryce Ford-Wheaton had an inside track to a spot from this position until he tore his Achilles in Sunday's practice. It's a crushing blow for a third-year player who has shown flashes, but has been hit by bad injury luck in each of his three seasons. That potentially opens the door for another receiver. Undrafted rookie Beaux Collins has stood out with chances on the first and second teams with Russell Wilson, Jaxson Dart and Jameis Winston, so he gets the early nod. Dalen Cambre is another UDFA rookie who could have a path to replace Ford-Wheaton because of his special teams prowess in college at Louisiana. Another option: free agent Gabe Davis did visit the team in May and has strong bonds with Brian Daboll and Joe Schoen. Smith-Marsette has done well with his opportunities on offense and he is the kick returner. Tight end (4) Theo Johnson Chris Manhertz Daniel Bellinger Thomas Fidone Breakdown: I kept four tight ends here, but as expected, this could be a position that gives up a spot depending on a numbers' crunch elsewhere. A fifth in Greg Dulcich has had a strong start to camp. Bellinger and Manhertz have been relatively quiet, so it'll be interesting to see the physicality they can bring with the pads going on. Offensive line (10) LT Andrew Thomas LG Jon Runyan Jr. C John Michael Schmitz RG Greg Van Roten RT Jermaine Eluemunor T James Hudson T/G Marcus Mbow G Evan Neal G Jake Kubas G/T Joshua Ezeudu Breakdown: Thomas has started camp on the PUP list and he can be activated at any time, but don't expect the Giants to rush him. He's working with the training staff to make sure he's ready on road back from Lisfranc surgery. Rookie fifth rounder Marcus Mbow has emerged at left and right tackle with the second and third teams, and while James Hudson has been at left tackle with the 1s, if for some reason Thomas' return is slower than anticipated, it's possible Mbow gets even more of a look. John Michael Schmitz had a tough first week and needs to step up when the physicality increases. It's going to be interesting to watch Evan Neal at guard when the pads go on. DEFENSE (24) Defensive line (5) Dexter Lawrence Rakeem Nunez-Roches Roy Robertson-Harris Darius Alexander Elijah Chatman Breakdown: Nunez-Roches is going to get pushed by younger players such as Elijah Garcia, who has had a strong start to camp. Chatman gets the fifth spot for now, but the Giants have depth here and it'll be a roller coaster for all those competing for a spot here. All depends on the combinations, and don't forget Abdul Carter and Chauncey Golston can also play inside in rush packages. Edge (4) Brian Burns Kayvon Thibodeaux Abdul Carter Chauncey Golston Breakdown: Carter has been as advertised - maybe even better so early. Burns is so underrated and such a presence on this team. His production should catch up to that perception. Thibodeaux is off to a strong start as well. Golston rounds out this quartet and he's had his moments, too. Free agent signee Victor Dimukeje was injured while training away from the team, tearing his pectoral and landing on the PUP list to start camp. Inside linebacker (5) Bobby Okereke Micah McFadden Chris Board Darius Muasau Demetrius Flannigan-Fowles Breakdown: Okereke and McFadden are mainstays in the middle. Board and Muasau are core special teams players. Flanningan-Fowles is an addition from our initial projection; he's also a contributor on special teams. Cornerback (6) Paulson Adebo Tae Banks Dru Phillips Cor'Dale Flott Tre Hawkins III Korie Black Breakdown: Banks and Flott are battling for the starting job opposite Adebo, and so far, Flott appears to have the upper hand. It's early, however. Phillips is a potential game-changer at nickel. Nic Jones had a Pick 6 of Jaxson Dart on Day 1 and he's been pushing for bigger chances as Phillips' backup. He could threaten for a role, which could put Hawkins or Black in jeopardy if that continues. Safety (4) Jevon Holland Tyler Nubin Dane Belton K'Von Wallace Breakdown: The top of this position is set with Holland and Nubin. Both have made plays and gives the Giants their best safety tandem since Super Bowl XLVI with Antrel Rolle and Kenny Phillips. Belton has had a quiet start to camp after such a loud spring as a takeaway machine. Wallace was signed on the eve of camp, so he's working his way up the depth chart. Specialists (3) K Graham Gano P Jamie Gillan LS Casey Kreiter Breakdown: No reason to think anything has changed here. Jude McAtamney is still on track to be a second kicker on the practice squad as part of the International Pathway Program. This article originally appeared on NY Giants roster projection: Our prediction after Week 1 of camp

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store