Leaving Cert: French exam used 'challenging vocabulary', teacher says
Geraldine Dwyer from St Mary's Secondary School in Macroom, Co Cork, said the Higher Level paper included some predictable topics, such as the diary and some opinion questions.
Advertisement
"The diary was based on the cancellation of a party due to a red weather alert which would have been prepared due to recent weather events," she said.
"In the opinion questions, the topic of addictions in the form of drugs appeared, which would be a manageable question. Similarly, gender equality would be a topic which candidates would have prepared, as it is a core topic.
"The question on engagement in political life would be more challenging and would incorporate a range of issues. The message was a pleasant question as it was based on mobile phones and the questions would make it accessible to all candidates. The obligatory question 1 had good choices between the benefits of membership in club/ organisation and elderly people.
"The reading comprehensions were based on scouts and an author looking for a character for a novel. The questions were manageable and the candidates could access the answers quite easily. The literary comprehension would require familiarity with challenging vocabulary, and it would be the most difficult question of the paper."
Advertisement
The Ordinary Level paper reflected the content of previous exam papers, Ms Dwyer said.
"The comprehensions, which are to be answered through English, were based on Fashion and YouTube. The vocabulary would be mostly familiar and accessible. Q3 Comprehension was based on an actor and this theme has occurred regularly in past papers . Thus, the candidates would have sufficient practice.
"The written section was predictable. The candidates would be satisfied with the postcard option, as it included the typical points. The message asked for use of Past and Future Tenses, the Diary was based on a concert in the past and the Formal letter asked for a reservation.
"In all, the paper was manageable. Comprehension 4 was the most difficult."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
7 hours ago
- The Independent
Pupils punished for incorrect uniform due to cost pressures, charity warns
More than two in five parents say their children have faced negative consequences for incorrect uniform as it is unaffordable, a survey has found. A poll of 3,000 parents of school-aged children in the UK found some pupils have received detention, been placed in isolation or been excluded for not having the correct uniform. Nearly two in five (38%) parents said they struggle to pay for the school uniform their child needs, according to the poll for The Children's Society. The survey, carried out by Censuswide in June, found 42% of parents said school uniform was not more affordable this year (2024/25) compared to the previous academic year (2023/24). It comes as the Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill, which is currently being considered in the House of Lords, includes a proposal to cap the number of branded uniform items schools in England can require. The survey found 44% of parents said their children have faced negative outcomes for wearing the incorrect uniform, or for not having a required item, as the uniform is unaffordable. Around one in eight (12%) said their child had received a detention for uniform breaches, while 9% had been placed in isolation, and 8% had been excluded. The poll found 15% of parents said their child had not been able to participate in lessons and 12% were not able to participate in extracurricular activities due to incorrect uniform. Mark Russell, chief executive at The Children's Society, said: 'Punishing children for circumstances outside their control is deeply unjust. 'Every child should be able to attend school without fear of detention, isolation, or exclusion because of uniform costs their families cannot afford.' Nearly four in five (78%) parents believe there should be a specific limit on the number of branded uniform items that schools can require, the survey found. The charity is calling on the Government to implement proposals set out in the Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill to introduce a limit of three branded items of school uniform to help families. Mr Russell added: 'At a time when many families are already struggling to afford the basics, we can't let the cost of school uniforms make life even harder for children.' Pepe Di'Iasio, general secretary of the Association of School and College Leaders, said: 'The experiences reflected in this survey are worrying, and demonstrate just how tough the financial position is for some families who face having to make impossible decisions. 'Most schools – in our experience – are acutely conscious of cost pressures on families and work hard to support the many children in our country who live in difficult financial circumstances. 'We support the Government's intention of limiting the cost of uniforms – though we think this would be better achieved with a monetary cap rather than specifying the number of branded items that are allowed.' Ahead of the committee stage debate on the Bill in the House of Lords on Thursday, schoolwear retailers have repeated warnings that the proposed cap of three branded school uniform items could increase costs for families. Matthew Easter, chairman of the Schoolwear Association, said: 'We have repeatedly tried to engage with ministers in a constructive way to warn of the risks of this policy backfiring – harming the very families it's meant to help, and putting small community businesses and local jobs at risk. 'A blunt, one-size-fits-all cap will only drive-up costs and reduce access to essential support.' Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson said: 'School uniforms can create a sense of community and belonging for children but they shouldn't cost the earth. 'Through our Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill we are capping the number of costly branded uniform items – putting money back into the pockets of working families as part of our Plan for Change. 'Whilst it might upset those who profit from branded items, it's clear from the Children's Society research that we have the backing of parents. It means schools can continue to benefit from a cohesive uniform, while parents can shop where suits their budget.'
The Independent
9 hours ago
- The Independent
School children put in detention because parents can't afford uniform
More than two in five parents report their children have faced negative consequences at school, including detention and exclusion, because they cannot afford the required uniform, a new survey has found. The poll of 3,000 parents across the UK, commissioned by The Children's Society and conducted by Censuswide in June., highlights the significant financial burden school uniforms place on families, leading to punitive measures for pupils. Specifically, 44 per cent of parents said their children had faced negative outcomes for wearing incorrect uniform or lacking a required item due to affordability issues. Among those affected, one in eight (12 per cent) children received a detention for uniform breaches, while nine per cent were placed in isolation, and eight per cent were excluded from school. The findings underscore a widespread struggle, with nearly two in five (38 per cent) parents admitting they find it difficult to pay for their child's school uniform. The financial strain appears to be worsening or stagnating for many, as 42 per cent of parents reported that uniform costs were no more affordable this academic year (2024/25) compared to the previous one. The survey's findings come as the Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill, currently under consideration in the House of Lords, includes a proposal to cap the number of branded uniform items schools in England can require. This legislation aims to alleviate the financial pressure on households and ensure that no child is penalised for their family's inability to meet costly uniform demands. The poll found 15 per cent of parents said their child had not been able to participate in lessons and 12 per cent were not able to participate in extracurricular activities due to incorrect uniform. Mark Russell, chief executive at The Children's Society, said: 'Punishing children for circumstances outside their control is deeply unjust. 'Every child should be able to attend school without fear of detention, isolation, or exclusion because of uniform costs their families cannot afford.' Nearly four in five (78 per cent) parents believe there should be a specific limit on the number of branded uniform items that schools can require, the survey found. The charity is calling on the Government to implement proposals set out in the Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill to introduce a limit of three branded items of school uniform to help families. Mr Russell added: 'At a time when many families are already struggling to afford the basics, we can't let the cost of school uniforms make life even harder for children.' Pepe Di'Iasio, general secretary of the Association of School and College Leaders, said: 'The experiences reflected in this survey are worrying, and demonstrate just how tough the financial position is for some families who face having to make impossible decisions. 'Most schools – in our experience – are acutely conscious of cost pressures on families and work hard to support the many children in our country who live in difficult financial circumstances. 'We support the Government's intention of limiting the cost of uniforms – though we think this would be better achieved with a monetary cap rather than specifying the number of branded items that are allowed.' Ahead of the committee stage debate on the Bill in the House of Lords on Thursday, schoolwear retailers have repeated warnings that the proposed cap of three branded school uniform items could increase costs for families. Matthew Easter, chairman of the Schoolwear Association, said: 'We have repeatedly tried to engage with ministers in a constructive way to warn of the risks of this policy backfiring – harming the very families it's meant to help, and putting small community businesses and local jobs at risk. 'A blunt, one-size-fits-all cap will only drive-up costs and reduce access to essential support.' Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson said: 'School uniforms can create a sense of community and belonging for children but they shouldn't cost the earth. 'Through our Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill we are capping the number of costly branded uniform items – putting money back into the pockets of working families as part of our Plan for Change. 'Whilst it might upset those who profit from branded items, it's clear from the Children's Society research that we have the backing of parents. It means schools can continue to benefit from a cohesive uniform, while parents can shop where suits their budget.'
Edinburgh Reporter
12 hours ago
- Edinburgh Reporter
Edinburgh holiday hubs changes ‘not enough'
Changes to Edinburgh's holiday hub scheme are a 'step in the right direction', but more needs to happen, according to a parent using the service and a city councillor. And they expressed concern over two pupils who were unable to access holiday hub services this summer because service providers could not accommodate their care needs. At the last meeting of the city's Education, Children and Families Committee, councillors approved changes to the services which saw 192 new places added for the summer. In addition, going forward, families will be able to access four weeks at the service, instead of three, bringing provision back to the levels experienced last year. But it will come at a cost for some pupils, with space being prioritised for students with the most advanced levels of need, and then for those from families facing poverty and other stresses. Labour councillor James Dalgleish, who convenes the committee, said he was glad more funding had been made available for the service at the council's budget meeting in February. But he also said that the demand on the service had become 'unsustainable' in recent years, and called for more support for the service going forward. The changes to the scheme have come after consultations between council officers and parents of additional support needs (ASN) pupils. Denise McGee-Dewar, a member of the REPAIR group which advocates for ASN pupils and their families, said the changes were a 'good compromise' between parents and city officials. However, she said families and pupils have faced issues this summer, including two children who had their holiday hub time cancelled due to the council being unable to handle their needs. She said: 'Two families have had the allocations they were given cancelled. It was kind of a miscommunication [for one family] between the council and the provider. '[The parent] is now sitting with nothing for the holidays, you can imagine how devastating that is. 'And then one family went along Monday of this week, it was due to his needs, and nobody had told her that there was no place for him. 'They were both refunded, but it's not about the refund, it's the child's routine getting changed. The plans that [families made] will have to change. It's been really difficult for them.' Cllr Dalgleish said that in 'isolated incidents', due to safety concerns, the council has had to 'make the difficult decision' to amend or revoke the holiday hub offering to a family. The scheme offers respite care to ASN pupils in Edinburgh, given them care, support and a social space over school term holidays. Ms McGee-Dewar also said that parents had faced difficulties in signing up for the holiday hubs service for the next academic year, which starts in August. The changes to the scheme means that space in the holiday hubs is being rationed in part based on the level of needs families have. Families receiving benefits, facing poverty or with a single parent are all given priority. However, in the questionnaire to sign up for holiday hubs for next year, parents were presented with a question asking if they met any of these criteria. The only option was 'yes', and it was mandatory, meaning parents had to check off the question if they wanted to submit the questionnaire. According to Ms McGee-Dewar, council officials said they would fix the form. SNP councillor Euan Hyslop called the changes a 'great next step', but said that more needed to be done for the service, calling on other parties to back more funding for it at the budget meeting next February. He said: 'This is a great next step, but there's no doubt that this is going to lead to a lot of young people losing out. I still don't think that's acceptable. 'I'm angry about this situation. So I'm putting a call out to colleagues to engage in the runup to the budget next year, because we'll always have doors open. 'There are a group of families with very complex additional needs, with life-limiting conditions. Medical conditions that mean this is their only opportunity, really, to play with their friends, their peers. 'It's not nice that we're in the situation where we're having to decide who gets and who doesn't get.' He continued to say that ASN parents he had spoken to were 'broadly' supportive of the council's engagement over the past few months – but said that it came off the back of a year of officers 'almost ignoring parents'. And, he said that some of the children who would be excluded from the holiday hubs based on the newly introduced criteria had been using the service for years. Cllr Dalgleish said: 'If councillors are giving the impression that Holiday Hubs can simply be expanded through a large increase in funds at budget time, then they are not being totally clear with the public. Much more work is needed on this issue, and I am committed to doing that. 'This is fundamentally an issue around locating skilled people who can provide this service, potential cuts to our council budget in the near future will also make our task more difficult. 'I will, alongside many other councillors, be making the case for increasing support for Holiday Hubs, as I know how valuable this service is. 'I want to thank all the parents and carers who have given up their time to share invaluable thoughts and views on holiday hub support which has got us to this positive point.' By Joseph Sullivan Local Democracy Reporter Like this: Like Related
