Ferrari contests reasons why #50 car was disqualified from Le Mans 24h
Ferrari has expressed its surprise with the disqualification of its #50 499P Hypercar from fourth position in the 2025 Le Mans 24 Hours.
A press release from the Scuderia on Tuesday put into perspective the arguments of the stewards, who argued that not only was the car not compliant with technical regulations but it was unsafe – due to the rear wing lacking four bolts – and had a potential performance advantage.
Advertisement
'Given the design of the element, the absence of one or more of these components did not compromise the car's safety in any way,' Ferrari insisted.
Performance-wise, stewards pointed out a 'a rear wing deflection of 52mm', which is about three and a half times higher than the regulatory maximal deflection of 15mm, as well as the fact that the #50 machine achieved its highest top speed on lap 380 out of 387 – implying the overly flexible rear wing enjoyed reduced drag and therefore generated more performance.
Ferrari has disagreed in clearer terms: 'The subsequent loss of the remaining bolts during the final 37 minutes of the race provided no advantage in terms of performance or the final standings.
'The top speed of the #50 499P reported by the Stewards in their decision was recorded during the car's final seven laps while it was running in the slipstream of its sister car, the #51 499P.'
Advertisement
In the same release, the Scuderia reiterated its view that 'the incident in question offered no competitive advantage to the crew, nor did it compromise the safety of our drivers or that of other competitors', but steered clear of actually criticising stewardship and stated its 'full confidence' in the World Endurance Championship's regulations.
Read Also:
#50 Ferrari disqualified from Le Mans 24h over extreme wing deflection
To read more Motorsport.com articles visit our website.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Times
16 minutes ago
- New York Times
The Advantages of Attacking the Net in Tennis
Tennis is dominated by rallies from the baselines as players with supercharged groundstrokes try to overwhelm their opponents by blasting shots that are fast, deep and heavy with topspin, occasionally throwing in a drop shot to throw them off balance. As a result, players attack the net less frequently than they did in the past. 'The ball is being struck so hard with so much topspin it gets below the net really quickly, which makes it hard to volley,' the ESPN analyst Patrick McEnroe said. But players who take advantage of short balls from their opponents to fight their way forward can seize control, winning points more quickly than those who stay at the baseline. Ask top tennis analysts to name the elite volleyers in the sport and there's little debate on who's best: Carlos Alcaraz — the recent winner of the French Open and defending two-time Wimbledon champion — is the unanimous choice. McEnroe said that Alcaraz 'has the best combination of speed, explosiveness and soft hands.' Alcaraz's footwork and agility also enable him to get back quickly and annihilate lobs, Pam Shriver, also an ESPN analyst, said. 'His movement going backwards is incredible.' That ability to go backward well means he can move closer to the net, Martina Navratilova, a Tennis Channel analyst, said, which makes volleying easier, especially because he reads his opponents so well and can quickly cut off the lanes for passing shots. 'He can push off to go back or explode forward.' Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'Didn't get a chance': Major blow after Oscar Piastri dudded by rival driver
Lando Norris soared to a stunning pole for the Austrian Grand Prix on Saturday after Oscar Piastri and Max Verstappen were robbed of their final qualifying lap by a mishap from Pierre Gasly. Norris delivered the perfect response to his Montreal horror show, which saw him collide with McLaren teammate Piastri and cost himself vital points in the championship race. The Brit's world championship bid was dealt a major setback a fortnight ago when he ran into the back of Piastri and failed to finish. But he produced a sublime drive on Saturday at the Red Bull Ring, landing his 12th career pole after topping all of the practice sessions. Norris' margin over second-fastest qualifier Charles Leclerc was a huge 0.521 seconds - the biggest of the year so far at the shortest track on the calendar. Piastri, who leads Norris by 22 points in the championship heading into Sunday's main race, qualified third - 0.583 seconds behind his teammate. Piastri and Verstappen (seventh fastest) were denied one final chance to improve their times when Alpine driver Gasly spun ahead of them, resulting in a yellow flag that meant drivers behind had to slow down. Piastri was furious at having his final lap runed, saying 'f*** me, man, Jesus Christ' on team radio. He later said: 'I had (Pierre) Gasly spin at the first corner so I didn't even open my second lap. Lando's been very quick all weekend so it would have been a tough challenge, but we had the pace to be on the front row. 'We can still have a good race from there and we are not here to come home third. I'm not planning on finishing third, that's for sure. Always a shame when you don't even get the chance. Sometimes it's just not your day." Gasly said of his mishap, which saw him spin into the gravel before ending up back on the track: 'I think I was pushing a lot, and I did a mistake. I felt like I had a bit of time to get in that last corner after my lap in Q2 and, yeah, I went for it. 'Unfortunately, when I turned in, I didn't manage to rotate the car the way I wanted. So I didn't get the apex the way I wanted and went on power, tried to turn the car, and eventually it didn't go the way I wanted. Not happy about it.' RELATED: F1 legend accuses Oscar Piastri 'nasty' act in teammate collision Daniel Ricciardo floated for shock F1 return as race ban looms Norris' first lap in Q3 put him two tenths faster than anyone else in the field, and he then pulled out more than half-a-second with his next lap. "It was a good lap, that's for sure," he said. "I feel like my first lap in Q3 was good but I knew I could get more time and I did exactly that. I did what I planned to do and when I do that and it goes right it is usually very good." Verstappen (43 points behind Piastri) complained that his Red Bull was "undriveable", and faces the prospect of losing further ground in the championship. "The car is completely undriveable," he said over the radio after finishing nearly a second behind Norris. "It is even worse than before. I don't even know what to say." He later added: 'The whole of qualifying didn't go well at all. There was no corner where the car felt good, so that is a huge problem in qualifying. It wasn't nice to drive at all. I don't think we're strong enough to challenge the McLarens... They're at another level, but hopefully tomorrow we can at least be competitive with Ferrari or Mercedes.' with agencies
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Aston Martin sues Italian supplier for freezing deliveries
Aston Martin has sued a key supplier that halted deliveries fearing that the carmaker would not pay its bills. Warwickshire-based Aston Martin has been forced to take legal action against IMR Industries after the Italian manufacturer stopped deliveries of vital components. IMR, which also supplies the likes of Ferrari and Maserati, is understood to have ceased shipments because of concerns that Aston Martin's financial troubles would leave it unable to pay for the parts delivered. A source close to Aston Martin insisted the company always paid its suppliers on time. It comes as Aston Martin, which is overseen by billionaire Lawrence Stroll, battles to stem years of losses and get debts under control. Like other carmakers, the luxury marque has also been buffeted by Donald Trump's tariffs on vehicle imports, which prompted the company to temporarily suspend deliveries to the US this year. IMR is understood to have stopped delivering parts to Aston Martin around a fortnight ago. Production has so far been unaffected by the disruption thanks to sufficient stockpiles. However, Aston Martin has now taken legal action against IMR, filing a lawsuit for breach of contract in the UK's High Court on June 19. An initial hearing was held last Thursday, where the case was adjourned while IMR builds its defence. But a High Court judge issued a temporary injunction ordering IMR Industries to restart deliveries. Aston Martin has received supplies in the days since. The carmaker is now seeking a permanent injunction to force IMR Industries to continue making deliveries for the remaining period of the contract. Aston Martin has enlisted lawyers from City firm Gowling WLG to make its case. A spokesman for Aston Martin said: 'In keeping with Aston Martin policy, we do not comment on ongoing litigation.' IMR Industries and Gowling WLG were contacted for comment. IMR was founded 60 years ago and has two sites based near Milan and Pescara in southern Italy. The manufacturer, which employs around 1,300 staff across six plants, makes exterior parts used on luxury cars as well as interior leather trims. Clients include Bentley, Ferrari, Maserati, BMW and Porsche. Aston Martin has a multi-year contract with IMR to supply components, including both body and interior parts. The clash comes as Aston Martin struggles to find a firm footing for its business. Shares have lost more than 90pc of their value since the company first listed on the London Stock Exchange in 2018 and Aston Martin has been through a succession of chief executives, each of whom has struggled to find a path to profitability. Aston Martin issued back-to-back profits last year, blamed on issues with its supply chains and an economic slowdown in China. The company lost £289m last year and saw its debts jump by 43pc to £1.1bn. It has also been severely affected by Mr Trump's 25pc tariffs on all cars and car parts imported into the US. The levies caused Aston Martin to temporarily pause all shipments to America, a key market, for a month. In February, Aston Martin outlined plans to cut 170 jobs in a bid to reduce its costs by £25m a year. It has also outlined plans to sell its stake in the Aston Martin Aramco Formula One Team for £125m to help reduce its debts. The British carmaker, which was founded in 1913 and is known for its association with James Bond, is aiming to turn around its performance by ironing out issues with production that have dogged the business. Adrian Hallmark, the chief executive who formerly ran Bentley, said this year his focus was on 'operational execution and delivering financial sustainability'. Mr Hallmark was appointed last year by Mr Stroll, the Canadian tycoon who seized control of Aston Martin in 2020 through a bailout. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data