Liverpool will make Newcastle PAY for Hugo Ekitike transfer deal
And while Eddie Howe's side were reeling from the knock-back, Liverpool swooped in. Ekitike now appears Anfield-bound - and his arrival will take the Reds' spending to well over £250m this summer.
LFC x Nike Air Max
Buy Now
LFC Retro Shirts
Buy Now
LFC Kits
Buy Now
LFC Nike Training
Buy Now
Newcastle have no choice but to move on to other targets and according to one report in Germany, they have got a Liverpool player in their sights.
The Merseysiders have managed to claw back plenty of money in sales so far this window - with Jarell Quansah, Caoimhin Kelleher, Trent Alexander-Arnold and Nat Phillips all departing.
Nunez stuck in transfer limbo
But more outgoings will be required in order to finance a blockbuster deal for Ekitike - and this is where Newcastle's interest in Darwin Nunez could come in very handy indeed.
Having seen a move to Napoli fall apart - due to the Italian champions' reluctance to meet Liverpool's asking price - 26-year-old Darwin was stuck in transfer limbo.
Teams in Saudi Arabia are willing to meet his valuation - said to be around £70m - but the player's first choice had been initially to remain in Europe.
And now BILD is reporting that Newcastle are ready to move on to Darwin to supplement their striking options.
Newcastle have got Darwin Nunez on their radar
Of course Alexander Isak remains the Magpies' first choice, but the reason behind a move for Ekitike was reportedly to give cover and competition to the Swede - as well as field the duo up top together.
'Newcastle have dropped out of the poker game and already have two other attackers on their radar: Victor Osimhen and Darwin Nunez,' the report reads.
'It became increasingly clear that the Frenchman was not convinced about a move to Newcastle.
'Experts were all the more surprised that Newcastle had already submitted an initial official offer (€80 million) to Frankfurt.
'It's clear that the Magpies wanted to put significant pressure on Ekitiké, hoping for a breakthrough.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Is BP p.l.c. (BP) a Good Option for Passive Income Investment?
BP p.l.c. (NYSE:BP) is included among the 12 Best Oil and Gas Dividend Stocks to Buy Now. An oil rig surrounded by the expanse of sea, the pumping operations in progress. BP p.l.c. (NYSE:BP) expects the total of its dividends and share buybacks over time to be around 30% to 40% of operating cash flow. The company is targeting an increase of at least 4% per year in its ordinary dividend and announced a dividend of $0.08 per share in April. As of the writing of this piece, BP boasts an impressive annual dividend yield of 6.13%. BP p.l.c. (NYSE:BP) also announced $750 million of share repurchases at the end of the first quarter of 2025, and the $1.75 billion share buyback program it announced with the fourth quarter results was completed on April 25, 2025. To help improve its profitability, BP p.l.c. (NYSE:BP) has revealed that it is working on a $4 billion – $5 billion cost reduction program. The company delivered $800 million of structural cost reductions and $300 million of absolute reductions last year. Moreover, it was already $500 million lower in terms of absolute cost base in Q1 2025, compared to the same period in 2024. BP p.l.c. (NYSE:BP) is a British multinational company recognized worldwide for quality gasoline, transport fuels, chemicals, and alternative sources of energy such as wind and biofuels. While we acknowledge the potential of BP as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 10 Best Nuclear Energy Stocks to Buy Right Now and The 5 Energy Stocks Billionaires are Quietly Piling Into. Disclosure: None.
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Soccer has changed, but the drama and dynamics of penalties remain
England's victory over Sweden at the women's Euros came after one of the worst penalty shootouts in history (or at least, worst in terms of how many penalties were missed; in terms of drama, it was arguably one of the greatest ever). Of the 14 penalties taken, only five were scored. That led, predictably, to the usual tedious criticism of the women's game and suggestions that the penalty spot should be moved closer to the goal. Which is, of course, nonsense. Four of the five penalties that were scored were excellent, hit firmly into the corners, and the other, the kick that turned out to be the winner, was smashed sensibly and without fuss, straight down the middle by Lucy Bronze as the goalkeeper Jennifer Falk dived out of the way. Two nights later, as Germany beat France in a shootout, 12 of the 14 penalties were scored. In the Women's Super League last season, 90.32% of penalties were converted. Nobody has used those examples to suggest moving the penalty spot further away to give goalkeepers more of a chance. Related: Ann-Katrin Berger follows up biblical miracle with penalty heroics for Germany | Jonathan Liew It is one of the great fascinations of soccer that, since penalties were introduced in 1891, the spot has remained 12 yards from goal as the size and shape of the penalty area has changed. It turns out that being one-and-a-half times further from the goal than the distance between the posts creates a scenario that feels fair and has a remarkable balance. That may in part be the result of familiarity, but at almost every level of the game in the 135 years since, roughly three-quarters of penalties have been scored. That is to say, the contest between striker and goalkeeper remained constant – a relative lack of power in the striker at junior level, for instance, matched by a lack of size in the goalkeeper. Before the Germany v France shootout on Saturday, only 12 of 29 penalties had been scored at the Euros – 41.38%. After the shootout, that percentage had risen to 57.14%. With small datasets there's always a danger of interpreting random variations as patterns, but it did seem that panic had set in. Even before the high tension of England against Sweden, Norway's former Ballon d'Or winner Ada Hegerberg had missed two penalties in the tournament, including, critically, in her country's quarter-final defeat to Italy. That, perhaps, was enough to plant a seed of doubt, which blossomed in England and Sweden's shootout, when both sides suffered a collective loss of nerve. Anxiety is contagious and far from unknown in penalty shootouts: it happened, for instance, to Barcelona as they missed four out of four in a shootout against Steaua Bucharest in the 1986 European Cup final, and to Manchester United as they missed four out of five against Sunderland in the 2014 League Cup semi-final. The England-Sweden contagion then seemed to escape the confines of its own shootout, as Spain missed two penalties in beating Switzerland on Friday and Germany missed a penalty against France in the 90 minutes. Related: England's Hannah Hampton hits the headlines in latest act of unlikely career The shootout is perhaps the area of soccer in which psychology matters most. In the 2006 World Cup, Germany's goalkeeper Jens Lehmann made great play of consulting notes he had scribbled on hotel notepaper and hidden in his sock before each Argentina penalty in the quarter-final. It turned out that, of the seven players he had jotted down, only two actually took penalties, but the belief he had specific knowledge was enough to unnerve Argentina, who lost the shootout 4–2. Goalkeepers increasingly have data to help inform their decisions. Germany's keeper on Sunday, Ann-Katrin Berger, had notes taped to her water bottle. On TV, the names of only two French players were clearly visible: Amel Majri and Alice Sombath. In both cases, Berger was advised to dive left. She did and on each occasion saved the kick. Given Berger's notes were shown clearly several minutes before the end of normal time, could somebody have informed the French staff who could then have passed on the message for at least some of their takers to change plan? Or would asking a player to vary from their preferred method of conversion itself make them more likely to miss? That's part of the glorious game theory of penalties. At the moment, it feels like an arms race. VAR set goalkeepers back for a time, denying them the skip forward they habitually took as the penalty was taken. But goalkeepers have now worked out how to advance with one foot, the other remaining in contact with the goalline. As strikers have learned how to stagger their run to wait for the keeper to move first, so keepers have more data and can predict such subterfuge. In the Premier League last season, 83.13% of penalties were converted, which is on the high side historically, but actually a drop of just over 6% from the previous season. The season before that, only 74.75% were scored. In fact, what is striking when looking at penalty conversion rates over the past three decades is how little pattern there is – from a low of 65.75% in 2001–02 to the high of the season before last, and all points in between. Penalties are missed, penalties are scored, the taker's cause is developed, and then the keeper's, and sometimes panic sets in, yet somehow the proportion of penalties scored largely remains at 75-80%. Balance remains. This is an extract from Soccer with Jonathan Wilson, a weekly look from the Guardian US at the game in Europe and beyond. Subscribe for free here. Have a question for Jonathan? Email soccerwithjw@ and he'll answer the best in a future edition.
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
BASF enters long-term natural gas supply agreement with Equinor
Chemical company BASF has entered into a strategic ten-year agreement with Equinor, securing an annual supply of up to 23 terawatt-hours of natural gas, equivalent to two billion cubic metres. This deal will provide a significant portion of BASF's natural gas requirements in Europe. Deliveries are scheduled to commence on 1 October 2025. Equinor president and CEO Anders Opedal said: 'This agreement further strengthens our partnership with BASF. Natural gas not only provides energy security to Europe but also critical feedstock to European industries. 'I am very happy that our gas also supports BASF's efforts to reduce their carbon footprint. Gas from Norway comes with the lowest emissions from production and transportation.' Natural gas serves a dual purpose for BASF, acting as both an energy source and a raw material for producing essential chemicals. The deal aligns with BASF's objective of diversifying its energy and raw materials portfolio, ensuring competitive terms and supporting the company's sustainability goals. BASF chief financial officer and chief digital officer Dirk Elvermann said: 'We are very happy to enter into this long-term partnership with Equinor for the reliable supply of natural gas for BASF's operations in Europe. 'Equinor is a trusted and valued partner. The supply agreement not only comes with competitive terms but also supports our sustainability targets.' BASF's diverse portfolio includes solutions for consumer goods including sportswear, car interiors, personal care items and agricultural products. The new contract follows Equinor's recent deal with Centrica to supply natural gas to the UK over the next ten years in a contract valued at around £20bn ($27.11bn). "BASF enters long-term natural gas supply agreement with Equinor" was originally created and published by Offshore Technology, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
