Parents of transgender teenager Jason Pulman to sue Sussex Police
Emily and Mark Pulman are now suing the force over an alleged breach of human rights, with around 10 hours passing between Jason being reported missing and an officer first attending their family home.The couple claim police "failed properly or at all to protect Jason against the risk of suicide" after he was graded a medium risk, adding that there was a "real prospect of a different outcome" if there had been a "reasonable response" to Jason's disappearance.
Jason began identifying as a male at about 14 but never received specialist gender dysphoria treatment due to assessment delays, his parents said.In documents filed at the High Court, Mr and Mrs Pulman said Jason also received insufficient mental health support.When he went missing, his mother said she told a police call handler he was transgender, had previously self-harmed and attempted to take his own life, and may have taken public transport.The call handler graded Jason as medium risk but an officer did not look at the case for more than three hours after the first call, despite Mrs Pulman ringing police twice more and stating Jason had informed a friend he was travelling to London, most likely by train, she said.Jason remained graded as medium risk, the British Transport Police were not notified and an officer did not attend the family's home for almost 10 hours after the first call.Jason's body was found by a member of the public about an hour after that visit.
'Long-term damage'
Mrs Pulman said: "If the police can actually take accountability for what has happened and what went wrong, that is the only way they can start making changes."Jason's stepfather Mr Pulman added: "No amount of money, no apology, is going to make up for three years of what they've done because that's long-term damage."A Sussex Police spokesperson said: "Our sincere condolences remain with Jason's family following their tragic loss, however, we are unable to comment further whilst legal proceedings are ongoing."
If you have been affected by this story the BBC Action Line web page features a list of organisations which are ready to provide support and advice.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
27 minutes ago
- The Independent
Murder victim named as Ayowale Aledejana
A man stabbed to death in south-east London has been named as 26-year-old Ayowale Aledejana. Police were called to Monson Road, New Cross, at around 7.26pm on Saturday after a man was found with stab wounds. Officers attended alongside paramedics and London Air Ambulance medics but Mr Aledjana, from South Norwood, Croydon, died at the scene. His family are being supported by specially trained officers. A 23-year-old man and a 23-year-old woman have been arrested on suspicion of murder and remain in custody. Detective Chief Inspector Lucie Card, who is leading the investigation, said: 'Our thoughts are with Ayowale's family and friends at this difficult time. 'I understand this incident will be concerning and we are carrying out a fast-paced and thorough investigation to establish the circumstances. 'I would encourage anyone who has not yet spoken to us to do so.' Anyone with information is asked to call police on 101 quoting reference 6271/02AUG.
The Independent
27 minutes ago
- The Independent
British farmer's year-long wheat crop destroyed by vandals days before harvest
A British farmer's year-long wheat crop was destroyed by vandals who appear to have driven a vehicle through a field just days before harvest. Footage shared by Heady's Farm in Buckinghamshire on Sunday (3 August) shows hundreds of crops knocked over due to the suspected car ploughing. Bending down to inspect the damage, the farmer said that he won't be able to harvest any of the wheat that's been knocked over, labelling the incident as 'so disappointing". He added: 'You wonder why farmers are angry at people and say 'get off our land'. It's not the normal people, it's the bloody idiots who decide to drive their cars about in fields.'
The Independent
27 minutes ago
- The Independent
Ministers must summon the courage to right an ‘obvious injustice'
The very judges who handed out 'unfair' indefinite prison sentences have joined The Independent 's campaign to resentence thousands of offenders who are still trapped by a law that was abolished in 2012. Sir John Saunders, a former High Court judge, tells us that he would apologise to offenders he sentenced to imprisonment for public protection (IPP) terms. 'I should say I'm really sorry this has happened; it's extremely unfair,' he said. 'I didn't want to be party to unfairness. I would feel very bad about it, I would apologise to them.' The sentences, described as an 'obvious injustice' by one former senior judge, were introduced by David Blunkett as home secretary in 2005 in an attempt to deal with a small number of offenders who might continue to be a danger to the public. Such prisoners were given no release date, were subject to stringent assessment before being let out, and were then liable indefinitely for recall to prison if they broke the conditions of their release. However, the sentences were used more often than Lord Blunkett intended, and the psychological effects of indefinite detention caused more problems than it solved. Lord Blunkett now describes the policy as his 'biggest regret'. The law was repealed by the coalition government in 2012, but it continued to apply to the thousands of prisoners still serving IPP sentences. Victims of the scandal, whose tragic cases have been taken up by The Independent, include Leroy Douglas, who has served 19 years for stealing a mobile phone; Thomas White, who set himself alight in his cell and has served 13 years for stealing a phone; and Abdullahi Suleman, who is still inside 19 years after he was jailed for a laptop robbery. The Independent supports a plan put forward by an expert panel convened by the Howard League for Penal Reform, which calls for IPP prisoners to be given a release date within a two-year window at their next parole hearing. They should, in effect, be resentenced and treated henceforth on the same basis as all other offenders. James Timpson, the prisons minister, says: 'We have significantly improved support for these offenders, with greater access to rehabilitation and mental health support. There is more work to do as we reduce the number of IPP offenders in custody, but we will only do so in a way that protects the public.' We understand why ministers in successive governments have been reluctant to go further. They are fearful of the consequences if someone released from an IPP sentence goes on to commit a serious offence. And they are right to make the protection of the public the highest priority. But that will not be achieved by the continued indefinite detention of 2,500 prisoners who were unlucky enough to be sentenced at the wrong time. Especially when a greater risk to the public is probably posed by the early release of prisoners to free up space in our overcrowded prisons. Simon Tonking, the former recorder of Stafford, told The Independent that the Labour government should use its majority to end the injustice by taking up the Howard League's proposals: 'Virtually everybody who has had any professional dealings with IPP knows that it is unjust and now is the time to act.' It is no use for former ministers such as Lord Blunkett and Alex Chalk, the former justice secretary, calling for justice to be done after they have left office. It is up to Lord Timpson, his boss Shabana Mahmood and ultimately Sir Keir Starmer to do the right thing while they can.
