Fuel thefts: MTA want police to do more
Photo:
RNZ / Dan Cook
There is a lack of faith between many service station owners and the police, the Motor Trade Association (MTA) says.
RNZ last week reported on two service stations in Northland and Hamilton who had fallen victim to thieves
targeting their underground fuel storage tanks
.
Both owners raised concerns over how police had handled their case.
MTA head of communications Simon Bradwell told RNZ many owners felt police would not do anything and would not report thefts as a result.
"For a number of years, members have told us that it's really hard to get police interested, let alone investigating fuel theft from their premises," he said.
"There's just a very strong feeling out there in service station land that police just don't want to know."
Bradwell said they had not heard so much of thieves targeting underground fuel tanks.
"The level of know-how to do it, the level of outright cheek to do it is pretty limited to be honest," Bradwell said.
"That's a fairly major operation, and you've got to have pretty big balls to do something like that, especially when the owner of the business is on site."
There needed to be a change to police's mindset when investigating fuel theft, he said.
"There's a real mindset amongst police that it's the service station's problem,"
Bradwell said they wanted police to accept they had a major role to play in keeping service stations safe, and to work more closely with the MTA and with stations to make them feel better about reporting crime.
He said night-time patrols to reassure service stations would mean a lot.
"Just that visible presence would put off a lot of offenders from trying their luck at committing theft or more violent crime at that particular site," Bradwell said.
"We think that's one easy measure the police could start doing, which is not going to be a drain on resources, and it would mean a lot to service stations just to have that reassurance of police presence on their site."
He also wanted to see more attention from the government on the causes of crime.
"There's a lot of work going into things like three strikes and sentencing, but hey, where's all the attention that's going on stopping crime at the outset," said Bradwell.
"We're just not seeing enough of that, and surely that's got to be a better focus for the government than just more police cars at the bottom of the cliff."
Police were contacted for a response but failed to respond by deadline.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
‘Scary stuff': Locals on crash corner fear it will take a death to get it fixed
A car crashed into the retaining wall of Mike's Courtney Rd home Photo: LDR / supplied Locals on a busy Tauranga street fear someone will die before anything substantial is done to improve safety on a bend notorious for crashes. Three times in the past year, a car has ploughed into the retaining wall of Mike's home on Courtney Rd in Gate Pā. Courtney Rd runs between two shopping centres on Cameron Rd and Fraser St, with Mike's house on a hill between two corners. The street has a long history of crashes. Mike, who didn't want his surname published, said he lived there for 16 years. In that time, he said, four crashes had done damage and there'd been countless smaller accidents, including cars mounting the kerb. Last year, before Mike moved out, he had just got out of his ute when a car came through the retaining wall. A few seconds earlier, and it would have crushed his leg. Mike said his tenant and her child were narrowly missed by a car in one recent crash, and he is worried someone will be killed. It was "pretty scary stuff", and Mike said his tenants lived in fear of being hit. In an accident years ago, a car hit the wall with so much force that blocks went flying and broke house windows, he said. "We can't get insurance on that wall, because these pricks keep going through it." His insurance had gone up and he had to cover the cost of repairs if the driver or their insurance company didn't pay, he said. Mike wants Tauranga City Council to extend a metal safety barrier from the corner toward his property to improve safety but has been told it's too expensive. "Is it going to take somebody to die to do something?" Another crash that damaged a streetlight and trees of a home in Courtney Rd in Gate Pā. Photo: LDR / supplied Mike's property manager, Toni Cranston, wrote to the council after the tenants threatened to leave because of the crashes. Cranston contacted the council several times, asking it to extend the safety barrier or put speed bumps on the street, but she too was told there wasn't a budget for the safety measures. The last three major crashes happened between 3pm and 4pm when children were walking home from school, she said. There were five schools in the area. "There's a lot of traffic going through there, and it's a really sharp, ugly bend that can change very quickly, especially when you're not paying attention. "The concern for the tenants, the owners, the people in that community, and obviously the schools around, is that if one of these cars does hit a child, you're calling death. "They're always speeding, so you're almost guaranteeing a death." Cranston also contacted the police, asking them to have more of a presence on the street to discourage speeding and dangerous driving. Mike's neighbour Steve Kelly said he was lucky his house had never been hit. "It's just been pure luck that nobody's actually been taken out or seriously injured." He agreed extending the barrier would protect pedestrians and the homes. "For the small cost that it would cost the council to stick in 10m of fence and posts - a bit of a barrier - it could be lifesaving." Kelly said traffic had increased on Courtney Rd since 2020 as people used it as a shortcut between Cameron Rd and Fraser St, with the problem expected to worsen with a new housing development nearby. The council's acting safety and sustainability manager, Karen Hay, said that because of the high cost of physical safety measures, the council evaluated requests based on vehicle speeds, traffic volumes, accessibility, and crash data. This was to ensure all safety concerns were addressed fairly and equitably, she said. "Areas where deaths or serious injuries have occurred are given higher priority." Two non-injury crashes and one minor-injury crash had been reported on the Courtney Rd bend in the past five years, said Hay. But the council relied on crash data from police, and they did not attend all incidents, she said. After an investigation, lower-cost safety improvements were planned for installation in August or September, Hay said. These were a centre line, "slow down" road markings, reflective chevron boards and a speed advisory sign of 25km/h on the downhill approach to the corner, where the issues were most prevalent. "We are confident these will help the current situation, and the situation will be monitored." The median barrier could be extended, but it would need to be prioritised for future consideration, she said. Traffic volumes on Courtney Rd had steadily increased over time, Hay said. The average daily traffic count increased from 6080 vehicles in 2008 to 7870 in 2023, with an average speed of 43.9km/h in 2023. In 2024, it was 7272 vehicles with an average speed of 43.5km/h. These speeds were well within a "reasonable range" of the 50km/h limit, Hay said. Police said the local road policing team were not aware of any requests for more regular patrolling in the area. With two of the recent crashes, police said, the drivers were not over the speed limit, but they were going too fast around a sharp corner. LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Citizen's arrest changes unlikely to materially improve public safety
The changes were announced by Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith in February. Photo: RNZ / Mark Papalii The government's proposed citizen's arrest changes are unlikely to have much impact on public safety, according to the justice ministry's analysis. It says there are also risks people would be more likely to use unreasonable force, particularly on children who - being physically smaller - are easier to catch and restrain. In February, the justice minister unveiled proposals for changing up the citizen's arrest regime, after a Ministerial Advisory Group (MAG) led by Sunny Kaushal came up with the recommendations. The changes would remove an old limitation on making citizens arrests at certain hours of the day, and clarify other aspects of the law including that restraints and reasonable force could be used, and requiring people to call police and follow their instructions as soon as practicable. They are set to be combined with a raft of changes to Crimes Act announced this week, including instant fines for shoplifters , higher penalties for assaulting first responders , and making a "coward punch" a specific offence . The ministry's Regulatory Impact Statement showed the approach taken by the government was more conservative than what the MAG initially proposed, but more ambitious than what the ministry would have wanted. It found the changes likely to improve how people understood the law, but unlikely to materially improve public safety. "The changes are coherent, and somewhat minimise the scope for unintended consequences. In of themselves, these proposals are not expected to reduce offending levels but will provide more clarity around how intervention can occur, what should be done following an arrest, and remove confusion as to what degree of force can be used to defend one's property," it said. It found clarifying the rules - that people making citizen's arrests can use restraints and should contact police as soon as practicable - was likely to "codify (but not change) the status quo". However, people could also be encouraged by the changes to use force and restraints to make such arrests, which "may lead to unreasonable use of force and unlawful detention". The ministry said this could be seen as inconsistent with the Bill of Rights, and the use of restraints "is inconsistent with laws regulating the use of force on children and young people". "Agencies believe that specifying the use of restraints (although already allowed under the law) may lead to unreasonable use of restraints, which is especially concerning in relation to alleged youth offenders (who may be more likely to be arrested given they are typically physically easier to restrain that alleged adult offenders). "Further, Māori are more likely to be disproportionately impacted by these changes (if more arrests occur)." Removing restrictions on hitting or doing bodily harm when making an arrest would also mean less confusion about the law and make it more workable and consistent - but again, with no material change to public safety. "No impact on public safety expected as the proposal does not allow for more than reasonable force and there is a minimal risk that retailers or the public will interpret this as allowing excessive force in applicable defence of property scenarios." A cost-benefit analysis suggested the changes would make retailers and security guards' rights and obligations clearer, but this could also come with "minimal" one-off costs and the changes would overall have a "low" level of impact. It also said police had raised concern about several aspects of the changes: The document said limited time, a narrow scope, few options to consider and a lack of broader consultation all limited the depth of the analysis, and said it would be difficult to assess how effective it was. "This data may be difficult to gather, even with an excess of time, as police are unlikely to record the occurrence of 'citizens' arrests', for example." While police would continue monitoring things like rates of shoplifting, "it will not be possible to determine whether any changes in offending rates are attributed to the changes proposed here, due to the many factors that give rise to offending behaviours". The government is also looking at making sentences for a "coward punch" - a single-strike surprise attack on the head or neck - more strict, with An Auckland law professor has previously warned it would be easy for people making citizen's arrests to stray into using unreasonable force - including, for example, a deadly punch. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
2 hours ago
- RNZ News
Khandallah murder trial: Victim was bludgeoned, forensic pathologist tells jury
Helen Gregory died at her Khandallah home in January last year. Photo: RNZ / Soumya Bhamidipati The elderly woman found dead in her home in Wellington's suburb of Khandallah last year was bludgeoned, a forensic pathologist has told a jury. Helen Gregory, 79, was killed in January 2024 - her daughter Julia DeLuney is on trial for murder in the High Court at Wellington. She has pleaded not guilty. The Crown says DeLuney attacked her mother, possibly with a vase that has never been found, before staging it to look like she had fallen from the attic. But the defence says someone else caused those injuries in the 90 minutes in which DeLuney went to get help. Julia DeLuney in the High Court. Photo: RNZ / Mark Papalii On Wednesday, the court heard from forensic pathologist Dr Judy Melinek, who peer-reviewed Gregory's post-mortem. Melinek said she agreed with the post-mortem, which found the 79-year-old had died from complications of blunt force trauma - primarily to the head. She said death would not have been instantaneous, as the swelling of the brain that results from such trauma typically takes several hours. Melinek took pains to describe to the jury the different types of injuries that can result from blunt force trauma - abrasions, contusions, and lacerations - before using the bust of a mannequin to point out the type and location of Gregory's wounds. She said Gregory had a total of "11 planes of injury on the head alone," meaning she had sustained at least 11 separate impacts. She said the impacts were caused by "significant force". "You know, someone taking a heavy object, like a cricket bat or something, or a large hefty object and hitting it with a good amount of force over the head." In response to questions from the prosecution, Melinek said the injuries could have been caused by a vase. "An object like that vase would be a blunt force object and it's hefty and heavy, so it could easily cause the lacerations such as we see on Ms Gregory." Under cross-examination, Melinek said a fall could also cause blunt force injuries, but the pattern tended to be different from being struck by an object. She said a fall from a height of a metre or two could cause one of the smaller head wounds, but a fall couldn't explain a large injury on the back of her head. "I've never seen an injury of that magnitude caused by a fall in someone's residence, even if we're talking from stairs. It's too big and there are too many planes of impact. "You need a bludgeoning to get this many planes of injury." Melinek said it was plausible that multiple and repeated strikes against an entertainment unit could have caused the head wounds, but maintained it was unlikely they were the result of being kicked. She said in total, Gregory had about 75 discrete injuries, including lacerations, contusions, abrasions and fractures. She also said bruising on the soft tissue of her arms was consistent with "grab marks" and defensive injuries on her wrists. She said injuries from a fall tended to be located on boney parts of the body. The defence suggested that the injuries could have been sustained at a different point in time. The trial continues. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
