Delhi govt welcomes CAQM relief on overage vehicle fuel ban, calls it a commendable decision
The Delhi government has welcomed the decision to defer the implementation of the fuel ban on overage vehicles until November 1 by the Centre for Air Quality Management (CAQM). Delhi Chief Minister Rekha Gupta has called it a commendable decision taken in the public interest. Also, she said the Delhi government will use the time given by CAQM to provide further relief to residents and work collaboratively toward a long-term and practical solution.
As per the directive from the CAQM, the Delhi government implemented a fuel ban on the overage petrol and diesel vehicles in the national capital on July 1. This rule mandated that petrol vehicles older than 15 years and diesel vehicles older than 10 years will not be given fuel in any of the over 500 fuel stations in Delhi. During the enforcement of the rule, several vehicles were impounded by the government officials. This sparked quite an outrage among the citizens, as many vehicles that were banned from getting fuel or being impounded due to being overage were in good condition. Responding to the criticism, the CAQM withdrew the rule and deferred the implementation until November 1 this year, which is a deadline in sync with a ban on overage vehicles in other cities in NCR.
Meanwhile, Delhi Environment Minister Manjinder Singh Sirsa lauded the CAQM's decision, calling it a major relief for the people of the city. "After our request, CAQM has shown sensitivity towards the concerns of the people. This is a big relief for Delhiites," PTI has quoted him as saying.
The Centre's panel on air quality in Delhi-NCR on Tuesday decided to put on hold the implementation of the fuel ban on end-of-life (EOL) or overage vehicles in the national capital until November 1, 2025. The EOL vehicles are diesel vehicles older than 10 years and petrol vehicles older than 15 years.
Reiterating the government's commitment to improving air quality in the capital, the minister said the fight against pollution will continue, but vehicle bans must be guided by science and data rather than arbitrary age limits. "Polluting vehicles must be banned, but not just because they are old. We will conduct proper studies to assess actual pollution levels and will approach the Supreme Court and the National Green Tribunal (NGT) with our findings. Any policy must be based on emission data, not age," he said.
Get insights into Upcoming Cars In India, Electric Vehicles, Upcoming Bikes in India and cutting-edge technology transforming the automotive landscape.
First Published Date: 10 Jul 2025, 10:23 am IST
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
27 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Chhattisgarh: 66 Maoists surrender across five Bastar districts
As many as 66 Maoists, including 49 carrying a cumulative reward of ₹2.27 crore, surrendered in five districts of Chhattisgarh's Bastar division on Thursday, police officials said. Inspector General of Police (Bastar Range) Sundarraj P hands over a cheque to Maoists after their surrender, in Bijapur district, on Thursday. (PTI) Officials said 25 surrendered in Bijapur, 15 in Dantewada, 13 in Kanker, eight in Narayanpur, and five in Sukma; 27 of them were women. According to the police, the surrendered cadres cited growing disillusion with the Maoist ideology, atrocities committed by the group on innocent tribals, and deepening internal rifts within the banned outfit. Many also said they were inspired by the state government's 'Niyad Nellanar' (Your Good Village) scheme, aimed at development in remote tribal areas, along with the new surrender and rehabilitation policy, and the Bastar police's 'Poona Margham' initiative for social reintegration. In Bijapur, 23 of the 25 surrendered Maoists were carrying a collective bounty of ₹1.15 crore. Among them were Ramanna Irpa (37), a member of the Odisha State Committee and the Maoists' Special Zonal Committee, who carried a reward of ₹25 lakh, and his wife Rame Kalmu (30), a Platoon Party Committee Member (PPCM) with a bounty of ₹8 lakh. Others included Sukku Kalmu (38), Bablu Madvi (30), Kosi Madkam (28), and Reena Vanjam (28), each carrying rewards of ₹8 lakh. In Dantewada, five of the 15 who surrendered had a total bounty of ₹17 lakh. Among them were Budhram alias Lalu Kuhram, a divisional committee member with a bounty of ₹8 lakh, and his wife Kamli alias Moti Potawi, who carried a reward of ₹5 lakh. With this latest surrender, a total of 1,020 Maoists — 254 of them carrying rewards — have given up arms under the 'Lon Varratu' (Return to Your Home) campaign launched in June 2020. In Kanker, the 13 surrendered Maoists carried a combined reward of ₹62 lakh, according to superintendent of police Indira Kalyan Elesela. In Narayanpur, the eight who laid down arms had a total bounty of ₹33 lakh. One of them, Vatti Ganga alias Mukesh (44), who served as the Maoists' north bureau technical team in charge, carried a reward of ₹8 lakh. Each surrendered Maoist was given immediate assistance of ₹50,000 and will be rehabilitated under the provisions of the state government's surrender and reintegration policy.
Hindustan Times
42 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
‘Can't open floodgates': SC junks plea for delimitation in AP, Telangana
The Supreme Court on Friday dismissed a plea seeking a fresh delimitation exercise in Andhra Pradesh and Telangana, ruling that there exists a constitutional bar against taking up such a demand before the first census conducted after 2026, while also cautioning that entertaining such public interest petitions could 'open the floodgates' for similar pleas from other states. Supreme Court of India. (PTI) A bench of Justices Surya Kant and N Kotiswar Singh delivered the judgment, firmly rejecting allegations of discrimination vis-à-vis the separate delimitation conducted for the Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir, which was reconstituted in 2019 following the abrogation of Article 370. 'On a plain and harmonious reading... Section 26 of the AP Reorganisation Act (on increase in assembly seats) is subject to Article 170 of the Constitution,' said Justice Surya Kant while reading the operative portion of the verdict. 'We have held that this (granting the plea) will open floodgates for all states to approach seeking parity. We hold that the constitutional mandate under Article 170(3) serves as a bar. Demand for the delimitation is contrary to the same and thus fails,' he added. Article 170(3), inserted by the 84th Constitutional Amendment Act, 2001, freezes the allocation of seats in state assemblies until data from the census conducted after 2026 is available. Dismissing the writ petition filed under Article 32, the court held that the exclusion of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana from the 2020 delimitation notification issued for Jammu & Kashmir was not arbitrary or violative of Article 14. It clarified that delimitation provisions applicable to J&K, a Union Territory, were distinct from those governing states under Chapter III of Part VI of the Constitution, dealing with the structure, composition, functioning, and powers of state legislatures. 'J&K having been reconstituted is not governed by Chapter III of Part VI of the Constitution,' Justice Kant observed. He further noted that while 'legitimate expectation' is a well-settled principle of law, it 'does not lead to any legal right' and cannot override the express provisions of the Constitution. 'The expectation under the AP Reorganisation Act cannot be seen in isolation, as it is subject to Article 170,' he said. The writ petition, filed by K Purushottam Reddy in 2022, had sought directions to the Union of India to initiate the process of increasing the number of assembly seats in Andhra Pradesh and Telangana under Section 26 of the Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2014. The petitioner argued that since the government had carried out a similar exercise in Jammu and Kashmir, post its reorganisation into a Union Territory, the exclusion of AP and Telangana amounted to 'unreasonable classification' and was therefore unconstitutional. It was contended that delimiting constituencies exclusively for J&K, while declining to operationalise Section 26 for AP and Telangana, violated the equality clause under Article 14 of the Constitution. However, the Supreme Court dismissed this argument, holding that the two exercises were constitutionally distinct and based on separate legal frameworks. It underscored that while Section 26 of the AP Reorganisation Act contemplated an increase in the number of assembly seats in both Andhra Pradesh and Telangana, Article 170(3) of the Constitution clearly bars any delimitation exercise until after the first census post-2026. 'Thus, any expectation for an earlier delimitation, even if indicated in the Reorganisation Act, cannot override the Constitution itself,' the court held. The bench justified the separate delimitation in Jammu and Kashmir on the ground that it had undergone a fundamental constitutional reorganisation in 2019. Following the abrogation of Article 370, the former state was restructured into a Union Territory under the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019, which empowered the Centre to initiate a fresh delimitation exercise through a Delimitation Commission. The petition before the court had attempted to argue that the same yardstick should apply to AP and Telangana. However, the bench held that Union territories are not subject to Article 170, which deals with the composition of state legislative assemblies. Therefore, the delimitation exercise in J&K could not be compared with that in states. This line of reasoning was consistent with the Supreme Court's February 2023 judgment, which upheld the validity of the delimitation exercise in Jammu and Kashmir, rejecting the challenge filed by two residents of Srinagar. In that verdict, a bench of Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul and AS Oka dismissed the plea questioning the legal basis of setting up the Delimitation Commission for J&K and increasing its assembly seats from 83 to 90. The court had made it clear that the Delimitation Act, 2002, and the 2019 Reorganisation Act provided sufficient legal grounds for the commission's formation, and the Election Commission's role did not preclude the constitution of a separate delimitation body for the UT. The final delimitation order for J&K was notified in May 2022. It increased the number of assembly seats from 83 to 90, allocating 43 seats to Jammu and 47 to Kashmir. This marked a shift in the region's political balance, with Jammu's share rising to 47.8%, up from 44.6%, and Kashmir's falling to 52.2%, down from 55.4%. The exercise was carried out based on the 2011 Census, and despite opposition from regional parties, the Centre maintained that delimitation was a necessary step before holding fresh elections. The Union government had also argued in court that the Delimitation Commission's orders, once published in the Gazette, are final and not open to judicial review.
News18
44 minutes ago
- News18
India flexible on Chinese investments in electronics: Govt source
New Delhi, Jul 25 (PTI) India is flexible for collaboration of domestic companies with Chinese, especially electronics, a government source said on Friday. Around 60 per cent of electronics manufacturing happens in China, and hence, it is not easy to ignore it, the source added. 'Things are easing (between India and China). There are signals. Tourist visas have been opened. In electronics, 60 per cent of manufacturing takes place in China. So, there has to be some sort of collaboration," the sources said. He was replying to a question on government approval for the Dixon joint venture with Chinese companies. Dixon Technologies has received approval from the Indian government to form a joint venture (JV) with Chinese peer Longcheer. Dixon has been reaching out to several Chinese companies for joint ventures. It has signed separate agreements with Chinese electronic component firms — Chongqing Yuhai Precision Manufacturing Co Ltd and the Indian arm of Kunshan Q Technology — for manufacturing and sales of electronic components used in electronic devices like mobile phones and laptops, among others. First Published: July 25, 2025, 13:30 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
