'My support plan was my lifeline - Keir Starmer must not scrap them'
A disabled student has travelled to 10 Downing Street in her wheelchair to deliver a heartfelt open letter - signed by more than 10,000 people - to Keir Starmer asking him not to scrap EHCPs.
Nineteen-year-old Hannah Steadman, who has several chronic conditions - including epilepsy and autism - tells the Prime Minister how school became so challenging she felt she 'couldn't go in any more' until her 'life changed' after getting an educational health and care plan (EHCP) two years ago.
She is writing amidst fears that the government white paper, to be published in the autumn detailing reforms to the special educational needs and disabilities (SEND) system, could see EHCPs being scrapped.
She adds: 'Thanks to my EHC plan, I'm now looking to the future and planning to start a Level 3 Acting and Performance qualification at college in September.
'It is no exaggeration to say this plan completely transformed my experience of school.'
Before getting her EHCP, aged 16, south Londoner Hannah tells Sir Keir: 'By this point I was at home because my school had deemed me attending a health risk and a safeguarding issue.'
Describing how her plan meant she had transport, so she could get to school, how she had someone to push her wheelchair and her lessons were moved to the ground floor, making them accessible, she then tells the Prime Minister: 'I'd like to invite you to meet with me, and a group of other disabled young people, to talk about the difference an EHC plan has made to us.'
Speaking exclusively to The Mirror, Hannah, who is supported by the charity Ambitious About Autism, says: 'I was really excited to go to Downing Street. Knowing that 10,000 people have signed my letter feels incredible.
'When I was experiencing the worst of my issues in school it felt like no-one cared, so to know that many people are behind me is really great.
'I wanted to write this letter and to share my story, because I truly feel that having an EHCP was the thing that salvaged what was left of my education, and I want other young people to have that legal right to support too.
READ MORE: British traitor fighting for Russia brags he's won a medal for 'wiping out' Ukrainians
'Without an EHCP I would never have finished school as I was too exhausted to keep pushing back and fighting to get my needs met.
'Education opens up so many doors, and every young person should have the same right to an education, and the same standard of education. For me an ECHP was the thing that helped me to achieve that.
'I don't think the government really understands the impact of what would happen if they do scrap EHCPs, and how many lives that would disrupt.'
Stephen Kingdom, campaign manager for The DIsabled Children's Partnership - which represents 1.7 million children - says ECHPs are essential to ensure children with additional needs have the same opportunity as their friends to have an education.
He says: 'The SEND community is not asking for anything special - we are simply fighting for an ordinary education, an ordinary commute to school and a seat in a classroom where a child can learn.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
10 hours ago
- BBC News
Lib Dem leader Ed Davey comments on SEND services in Oxfordshire
The leader of the Liberal Democrats has been defending his party's record on services for children with special educational needs (SEND) in Ed Davey said families "should not worry" after the county council scrapped the dedicated cabinet member role for Ed, who is the parent of a child with disabilities, is now urging the government to protect SEND children and their familiesA Department for Education spokesperson previously said the government "inherited a SEND system left on its knees". The Liberal Democrats run Oxfordshire County Council, which had a damning Ofsted report two years authority has come under fire recently from SEND parents, after the dedicated cabinet role for SEND was merged with the cabinet role for children and young people in asked about this, Sir Ed said: "I'm not familiar with the details, but I think what it was probably about was saving money and making sure we could take an integrated approach."I don't think SEND parents should necessarily worry about that."Speaking as a SEND parent myself, I have a lovely boy called John who has quite a profound disability, I'm not worried about names, I'm worried about [the local authority] actually doing the best they can and working with MPs to get the national government to do what it should have been doing years ago." Both Sir Ed and Lib Dem education spokesperson Munira Wilson have written to Sir Keir Starmer setting out five fundamental principles for SEND Ed said if the reforms were adopted they could make "a massive difference" in of the proposal suggests spending less on special educational needs year the county council spent more than £25m on home-to-school transport fees and private Department for Education spokesperson said the government was providing £740m "to encourage councils to create more specialist places in mainstream schools". You can follow BBC Oxfordshire on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.
BBC News
16 hours ago
- BBC News
Leeds parents urge government to close SEND transport 'loophole'
Parents in Leeds have called on the government to change the law around transport for young people with special educational needs and disabilities (SEND) to include older say legally a disabled young person is expected to be in school or training until they turn 18, but the local authority does not have a legal duty to cover travel costs once they turn year, Leeds City Council said SEND students aged over 16 would no longer be provided with a free school bus which would save the authority around £800, Department for Education said local authorities had a legal duty to set out a transport policy, although there was "flexibility in deciding these arrangements". Campaign group Save Our School Transport said it was "morally wrong" to axe transport for Goldstone's daughter Poppy will turn 16 next year and would not be entitled to free transport to college as a result of the change of policy by Leeds City Goldstone said Poppy currently "loves" the school bus and it gave her independence, but she would not be able to cope on public does not believe those who have made the decision at the council have "ever met our kids or spent a day with these children".She added that they were "all functioning much lower than their cognitive age, so age is irrelevant". Although legally young people have to remain in education or training until they are 18, there is no legal requirement for local authorities to continue to cover the transport costs for those with Goldstone believes that local authorities have "exploited" a "loophole", which was "not illegal, just morally wrong".Along with other members of the Save Our School Transport group, she would like to see the government change the law so local authorities had to continue providing transport for those in education with also pointed to government guidance which says through the adult transport duty, local authorities are required to provide free transport for certain adult learners, once they turn 19 (young people over sixth form age). Steph Ward is a parent carer support worker at Carers Leeds and her son Lisle ,16, would also be affected by this pointed to the "loophole" in the law which she thinks "cash-strapped councils are exploiting".She fears what has not been taken into account is the effect cuts to post-16 transport for young people with SEND would have on parent Ward said: "For many parents the only break they have is when a child goes to school."If you take away the transport to get that child to school, then many children won't go." Parents from the campaign group gathered outside a council meeting earlier this week to protest against the changes. They said more than 1,000 children would be affected by the policy changes.A Leeds City Council spokesperson said it remained committed to supporting young people in accessing Helen Hayden, Leeds City Council's Executive Member for Children and Families, said that Leeds continued to offer discretionary support that went "beyond legal requirements".She pointed to zero-fare travel passes, independent travel training and personal transport allowances, and said applications and appeals were reviewed with care to ensure exceptional circumstances were fully considered. A Department for Education spokesperson said: "This government inherited a SEND system left on its knees."Through our Plan for Change, we're already making progress, investing £740m to create more places for children with SEND in mainstream schools, while increasing early access to speech, language and neurodiversity support to prevent needs from escalating."Local authorities have a legal duty to set out the travel arrangements to support young people to attend post-16 education including specific arrangements for those with SEND; there is local flexibility in deciding these arrangements." Listen to highlights from West Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North or tell us a story you think we should be covering here.
Daily Mail
18 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Council spends almost £160,000 a year on ferrying ONE child with special needs to school - as transport costs spiral to more than £1.5bn
A council spent almost £160,000 last year on travel for just a single child with special education needs and disabilities to and from school, new figures have revealed. East Sussex forked out the astonishing sum in 2024 amid a huge spike in the cost of transport to specialist Send schools, which hit £1.5billion for the country last year. Data obtained by the Liberal Democrats using the freedom of information act showed that Milton Keynes Council also spent a six-figure sum - £113,000 - on transport - for one child. It comes as Labour faces demands to get a grip on the spiralling bill - but also pressure from already militant backbenchers who have vowed to fight any cuts. Data released last month showed the number of children with education, health and care (EHC) plans - which allow them to access funding for transport - surged by 10 per cent in the year to January. Just over £1.5billion was earmarked for transporting S pupils aged up to 16 in 2024-25. That was up from £1.2billion the previous year - and around three times the level from 2017-18. Lib Dem leader Sir Ed Davey called for more Send schools to be built as part of a general increase in capacity to cut overall costs, rather than reducing EHCs. 'Parents of children with special educational needs are fighting a broken system that doesn't provide the support they need. If the Government thinks the answer to the crisis is to roll back children's rights, they're totally missing the point,' he said. 'After years of Conservative underfunding and neglect, too many children aren't getting the support they need at school and councils are having to shell out for expensive private provision.' East Sussex Council has been approached to comment. A report by the Local Government Association (LGA) earlier this month predicted the transport cost will rise to £1.97 billion in 2025/26. There has also been a rise in children being placed in schools far from their homes due to local ones being full, the report said. And some children may also have more 'complex' needs, requiring 'individualised' transport. According to separate Government figures, the number of pupils with EHCPs is now 482,640 – the highest figure on record – and double the number in 2016. Many of these children are disabled, or need a specific special needs school, necessitating the state paying for transport. In addition, some children without Send are eligible if they live far away from their nearest school or are on a low income. Ministers have failed to rule out slashing education plans for children and young people with special educational needs, after campaigners warned against the move. Education minister Stephen Morgan insisted parents should have 'absolutely' no fear that support for children with special needs or disabilities will be scaled back. But he could not guarantee that the current system of education, health and care plans (EHCPs), which are issued to give children specialist classroom support, would remain in place. In a letter shared with the Guardian newspaper, campaigners have said that without the documents in mainstream schools, 'many thousands of children risk being denied vital provision, or losing access to education altogether'. On Monday, Mr Morgan told broadcaster LBC the current system of support is 'failing children, it's failing parents'. Asked if concerned campaigners could have no fear that Send support will be scaled back, Mr Morgan replied: 'Absolutely. What we want to do is make sure we've got a better system in place as a result of the reform that we're doing that improves outcomes for children with additional needs.' But pressed whether the reforms could include scrapping ECHPs, Mr Morgan replied: 'We're looking at all things in the round.
