Flexport Debuts Tariff Simulator as Customers ‘Need Clarity on Costs'
Flexport wants to help businesses better estimate how much extra they're paying in tariffs when they're importing goods into the U.S.
The digital freight forwarder launched the Flexport Tariff Simulator Monday as importers continue to navigate the stop-and-start environment. The simulator is accessible to the general public.
More from Sourcing Journal
US Pushes Global Partners for Trade Deals by Wednesday
Trade Truce Crumbles as China Says US Violated Terms
Trans-Pacific Ocean Freight Rates Continue Their Ascent on More Front-Loading
With the Flexport Tariff Simulator, importers shipping to the U.S. can now estimate tariff and landed cost scenarios based on key shipment details, including: the Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS) code; shipment value; entry date; country of origin; and product-specific details such as material composition.
For example, a business importing a men's T-shirt from China can either search their specific product category or enter the relevant HTS code and select an entry date to receive an estimated, detailed duty calculation with landed cost. The calculation also breaks out how much is owed for each individual duty that applies to the product's country of origin.
Additionally, the tool also allows shippers to include potential exclusion codes to determine how much they would save if applied.
Within the simulator, there is an interactive map that allows users to see trade data around the world including the total value of imports from a given country, the current average duty rate and the percentage of total U.S. imports coming from that country. The map also can break down total imports by individual HTS codes, and enables users to see the top trade partners for each individual product category.
The simulator is built to enable dynamic scenario planning and cost forecasting as importers explore alternative trade lanes, manufacturing options and import timelines. According to Flexport, the user interface is updated in real time as tariff policies change.
'Our customers have been telling us loud and clear: they need clarity on costs,' said Ryan Petersen, founder and CEO of Flexport, in a statement. 'Our engineering team built The Flexport Tariff Simulator in response to meet that need in the face of all the uncertainty caused by rapid policy changes. We want to help merchants avoid expensive surprises.'
Petersen has been vocal about the tariffs in recent months and how they could impact the Flexport business and its many customers. He told Fortune in a recent interview that the duties push back profitability projections for Flexport by six months to a year. And in a separate interview with The Wall Street Journal, he called the tariffs 'an extinction-level, asteroid-wiping-out-the-dinosaurs kind of event' for small businesses.
In a LinkedIn post on Monday, Petersen called the tariff simulator 'the number one thing customers have asked for.'
Retailers and brands alike of all sizes have had to endure a flurry of on-the-fly changes to U.S. tariff policy since April 2, when President Donald Trump's 'Liberation Day' announcements unveiled a slew of country-specific 'reciprocal' tariffs on dozens of American trade partners.
A week later, on the day those duties initially went into effect, Trump put a 90-day pause on the country-specific tariffs, paring them back to a 10-percent baseline.
Much of the attention is now on China, where plenty of Flexport customers still manufacture and source many of their products. China has seen the most tariff fluctuations of any U.S. trade partner as the White House continues its trade war against the country, likely creating confusion among those business leaders needing to stay abreast of the immediate impacts.
On top of already existing Section 301 tariffs, China's 'Liberation Day' duties, including the 20-percent fentanyl-related tax, totaled 54 percent. These tariffs were then escalated to 145 percent as the remaining country-specific tariffs were scaled back, before being put largely on pause in May for 90 days. Chinese imports into the U.S. now have a duty rate of 30 percent.
President Trump and China's President Xi Jinping could hold direct talks on the tariffs as soon as this week, according to the White House.
Flexport's launch came the same day a Reuters report indicated that the White House wants its 'best offers' from U.S. trade partners by a Wednesday deadline.
The official deadline for most countries to negotiate new deals with the Trump administration is July 9, before the 90-day pause expires and the original April 2 duties would go into effect. For China, the target date is Aug. 14.
Alongside the tariff simulator launch, the freight tech company also is debuting a new, searchable catalog of HTS code content. Each entry is designed to provide detailed, easy-to-understand information to help businesses better navigate classification requirements, special duty rates and implications for their customs clearance process.
Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten
Melden Sie sich an, um Ihr Portfolio aufzurufen.
Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten
Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten
Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten
Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
32 minutes ago
- CNBC
CNBC Daily Open: The S&P 500's high is a gift from Trump that can be taken away
Something I rarely, if ever, say: What a wonderful Monday morning! On Friday stateside, the S&P 500 broke its previous record. Celebrations were shared with the Nasdaq Composite, which also hit a new high. The tech-heavy index enjoyed a liftoff from Nvidia and Microsoft, both of which reached all-time highs (and probably made some insiders at Nvidia multi-millionaires over the past month). Tariff relief buoyed sentiment in markets. China announced it had finalized details of its deal with the United States. And even though U.S. President Donald Trump's "reciprocal" tariffs are due to kick in (again) one week later, he suggested that his administration "can do whatever we want" regarding the 90-day pause. Postponing the return of those tariffs would give investors further cheer and put another feather, perhaps of the chicken variety, in their caps. That said, as Trump giveth, so does he taketh away. The S&P 500 was up as much as 0.76% at one point during Friday's trading session, but stumbled after the U.S. president slammed the door shut on trade talks with Canada over its digital services tax. The index dipped only slightly, but that nonetheless shaved off some gains from what could have been a higher high. Even though Canada has since rescinded the tax, this episode shows how Trump is still steering markets. U.S. markets open just as Europe trading begins winding down. May it be in Trump's nature to be a giver, to borrow Chappell Roan's words — so Monday can end as well as it began. New record for S&P 500. The broad-based index rose 0.52% to close at 6,173.07 Friday, surpassing its previous high of 6,147.43. U.S. futures climbed Sunday evening stateside. On Monday, Asia-Pacific markets mostly rose. China manufacturing activity contracted in June. Even though the official purchasing managers' index improved from May's reading, it's still below the 50-point mark, making it the third consecutive month of contraction. Canada walks back on its digital services tax. The country's decision, released Sunday night local time, follows Trump's announcement that the U.S. is ending trade discussions because of said tax. 'Very wealthy people' ready to buy TikTok. Speaking at a Fox News interview on Sunday, Trump said he can reveal the identities of those individuals in about two weeks, but the deal depends on Beijing's approval. [PRO] Eyes on U.S. jobs numbers. June's nonfarm payrolls report comes out Thursday and could determine if the rally in U.S. markets continues. Investors will only have half a day to react: U.S. markets close early Thursday and are dark Friday. How BP became a potential takeover target For weeks, market tongues have been wagging about a potential merger between Britain's oil giants — until, ending weeks of speculation, Shell on Thursday denied reports that it's in talks to acquire BP. But how did we get to the point that BP, a U.K. oil exploration company that was founded in 1909 under the name Anglo-Persian Oil Company, is now seen as a possible takeover target for its long-time rival?
CNBC
7 hours ago
- CNBC
Asia markets set to open higher as investors await a slew of data releases
Aerial view of Seoul downtown city skyline with vehicle on expressway and bridge cross over Han river in Seoul city, South Korea. Mongkol Chuewong | Moment | Getty Images Asia-Pacific markets are set to mostly climb Monday, with investors watching a slew of data points, including South Korea's and Japan's industrial output figures for May and China's purchasing managers' index readings for June. Japan's benchmark Nikkei 225 was set to open higher, with the futures contract in Chicago at 40,725 while its counterpart in Osaka last traded at 40,580, against the index's Friday close of 40,150.79. Australia's S&P/ASX 200 is slated to start the day higher, with futures tied to the benchmark at 8,521, compared to its last close of 8,514.20. Futures for Hong Kong's Hang Seng index stood at 24,182, pointing to a weaker open compared to the HSI's last close of 24,284.15. U.S. equity futures rose in early Asia hours before the year stretches into the second half. All three key benchmarks on Wall Street rose sharply in last Friday's session. The broad-based S&P 500 hit a new record in more than four months after ending the session about 0.5% higher at 6,173.07 — overtaking its previous record of 6,147.43. The Nasdaq Composite also reached an all-time high, closing at a record after adding about 0.5%, while the Dow Jones Industrial Average rose nearly 1%. The three benchmarks have staged a sharp recovery this month from the lows seen in April during the height of trade policy tensions. The whipsaw of global trade negotiations can quickly sway market sentiment and pose an ongoing threat to the strength of this rally. — CNBC's Pia Singh contributed to this report.
Fast Company
20 hours ago
- Fast Company
The housing market is shifting—here's where it's happening most rapidly
Want more housing market stories from Lance Lambert's ResiClub in your inbox? Subscribe to the ResiClub newsletter. A few days after I launched ResiClub in October 2023, I wrote an article titled 'The key housing market metric heading into 2024.' In it, I reaffirmed a point I had also made at Fortune in 2022: that some traditional rules of thumb—i.e., months-of-supply thresholds for what constitutes a buyers' market versus a sellers' market—could struggle in this post–Pandemic Housing Boom environment, where there's downward pressure on prices. For the time being, I suggested that an easy-to-create and useful metric for housing stakeholders to follow—one that helps gauge short-term pricing momentum and whether downside risk might manifest—is a local market's level of active inventory compared to that same market's inventory level in the same month of pre-pandemic 2019. The thinking was that markets where active inventory remains well below 2019 levels would still exhibit some tightness, while those where inventory has surged back to or above pre-pandemic 2019 levels would experience a shift in the supply-demand equilibrium more in favor of homebuyers. Heading into 2025, I recreated that analysis showing the dynamic was still holding true. Fast-forward to today, and this particular data cut still proves useful (overtime ResiClub believes its usefulness will diminish—just not right now). Generally speaking, housing markets where active housing inventory for sale has surged above pre-pandemic 2019 levels have experienced weaker or softer home price growth (or even outright home price declines) over the past 36 months. Conversely, housing markets where active housing inventory for sale remains far below pre-pandemic 2019 levels have, generally speaking, experienced more resilient home price growth over the past 36 months. Indeed, just look at the scatter plot below showing 'Shift in home prices since their local 2022 peak' Vs. 'active inventory for sale now compared to the same month in 2019' for the nation's 250 largest metro area housing markets. Below is the same scatter plot as the one above, only its color scheme is adjusted to show which markets have LESS active inventory now than in 2019 (BROWN) and which markets have MORE active inventory right now than in 2019 (GREEN). Click here for an interactive version of the scatter plot below. To see if this data cut still proves useful, let's swap out 'home price since their local 2022 peak' for 'year-over-year home price shift.' The answer is yes—the trend still holds. (Recently, both the Wall Street Journal and John Burns Research and Consulting created their own versions of this longtime ResiClub scatter plot.) Below is the same scatter plot as the one above, only its color scheme is adjusted to show which markets have LESS active inventory now than in 2019 (BROWN) and which markets have MORE active inventory right now than in 2019 (GREEN). The current regional bifurcation—greater weakness in Sun Belt and Mountain West boomtowns and greater resiliency in the Northeast and Midwest—shouldn't be surprising to ResiClub readers. Given that we cover that regional bifurcation frequently, we're not going to spend time in this piece discussing what's driving that bifurcation. Instead, let's discuss why this particular data cut is useful right now, and why overtime it could become less useful. This data cut's usefulness—right now—explained During the Pandemic Housing Boom, housing demand surged rapidly amid ultralow interest rates, stimulus, and the remote work boom—which increased demand for space and unlocked 'WFH arbitrage' as high earners were able to keep their income from a job in, say, NYC or L.A., and buy in, say, Austin or Tampa. Federal Reserve researchers estimate 'new construction would have had to increase by roughly 300% to absorb the pandemic-era surge in demand.' Unlike housing demand, housing stock supply isn't as elastic and can't ramp up as quickly. As a result, the heightened pandemic era demand drained the market of active inventory and overheated home prices, with U.S. home prices rising a staggering +43.2% between March 2020 and June 2022. At the height of the Pandemic Housing Boom in spring 2022, most of the country had 60% to 75% less active inventory than in 2019. Once mortgage rates spiked, national housing demand cooled off. While many commentators view active inventory and months of supply simply as measures of 'supply,' ResiClub sees them more as proxies for the supply-demand equilibrium. Large swings in active inventory or months of supply are usually driven by shifts in housing demand. For example, during the Pandemic Housing Boom, surging demand caused homes to sell faster—pushing active inventory down, even as new listings remained steady. Conversely, in recent years, weakening demand has led to slower sales, causing active inventory to rise in many markets—even as new listings fell below trend. For a market like Austin or Punta Gorda to surge from historically low active inventory levels in spring 2022 to now well above pre-pandemic 2019 levels, it has taken a significant shift in the balance of power—from sellers to buyers. That shift has also coincided with those markets experiencing outright home price corrections. Conversely, despite the affordability shock, markets like Syracuse and Milwaukee still have active inventory levels well below 2019 levels and continue to see slightly positive year-over-year home price growth. Inventory wasn't historically 'high' back in 2019—so why does climbing back to 2019 levels matter? During the Pandemic Housing Boom, housing demand overwhelmed the Denver metro housing market—pushing active housing inventory for sale down to just 2,288 homes by May 2021, down 69% from the 7,490 listings in May 2019. Since the Pandemic Housing Boom fizzled out, and mortgage rates spiked, active inventory for sale in Denver has spiked up to 12,354 active listings as of May 2025—65% above pre-pandemic May 2019 levels. While active inventory for sale in Denver today isn't necessarily that high by historical comparison, the sharp jump from 2022 inventory levels to 2025 levels in such a short window reflects a pretty big shift in the supply-demand equilibrium. On the ground that shift should feel jarring. That greater active inventory bounce up in Denver has coincided with a greater house price softening/weakening. Indeed, Denver metro area home prices as measured by ResiClub analysis of the Zillow Home Value Index are down 1.7% year-over-year, and down 7.3% since their 2022 peak. Why, over time, this data cut could prove less useful One of the common pushbacks I hear when comparing today's active inventory for sale to 2019 levels is that some markets—like Austin and Punta Gorda—have larger populations now than they did back in 2019. It's true that some of the markets with higher inventory today compared to 2019 are also the ones that have experienced notable population growth in recent years. However, that actual population growth—i.e., a larger population base—isn't the sole reason inventory has jumped so quickly in places like Austin and Punta Gorda. Rather, it's because those markets have experienced a sharper weakening in their for-sale market since the Pandemic Housing Boom fizzled out. And that has helped push up unsold inventory in those markets. That said, over time, changes in market size—specifically population and total households—will naturally affect what constitutes a 'normal' level of active inventory. By 2035, for example, comparing active inventory to 2019 levels will be far less meaningful than it has been in 2021-2025. Some traditional rules of thumb have fallen short this cycle A rule of thumb in real estate is that anything below a six-month supply of inventory is considered a 'seller's market,' while anything above a six-month supply is a 'buyer's market.' However, that hasn't always held true this cycle, and ResiClub's view is that this rule of thumb is a bit outdated. In many housing markets, including Austin's metro area, where house prices began to decline in June 2022 with only 2.1 months of inventory, that rule hasn't applied effectively. In fact, even though Austin's inventory only peaked at 5.2 months as of April 2025, according to Texas A&M University's Texas Real Estate Research Center, home prices in the Austin metro have already fallen 22.8% from their 2022 peak, based on our analysis of the Zillow Home Value Index. A better measure of this incoming pricing weakness was the abrupt active inventory jump that occurred in Austin in spring/summer 2022 (going from 0.4 months of inventory in February 2022 to 2.1 in June 2022), which quickly pushed active listings near/above pre-pandemic 2019 levels. Big picture: In today's post-Pandemic Housing Boom landscape, comparing a market's current level of active inventory to its same-month 2019 baseline remains a useful gauge for the shift in the supply-demand balance. While imperfect, this simple metric captures the degree of tightness or softening better than some traditional measures. Markets where inventory has surged well above 2019 levels—like Austin or Punta Gorda—are typically the ones that have seen demand weaken most, restoring buyer leverage and, in some cases, producing home price corrections. Meanwhile, markets where inventory remains far below 2019 levels continue to exhibit greater pricing resiliency.
