Donald Trump's T1 Mobile Phones Will Be Made in US 'Eventually'—Eric Trump
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
The Trump family's latest venture, an "America first" mobile network and self-branded phone will "eventually" be built in the U.S., leaving questions about where the new "T1" phone will be manufactured ahead of its launch later this year.
In an interview on Monday, Eric Trump, vice president of the Trump Organization, said that it was possible for the phones to be built in the U.S., and that "eventually all the phones will be built in the United States."
Newsweek has reached out to Trump Mobile, the newly formed company selling both the phones and the mobile service, via email for comment.
Why It Matters
On the backdrop of the White House's "America First" agenda, the feasibility of a purely American-made smartphone by The Trump Organization, the real estate-focused company now operated by the president's two eldest sons, has been questioned by experts, given the country's higher labor costs, outmoded manufacturing capabilities and the reliance of even domestically made phones on imported components.
What To Know
On Monday, the Trump Organization announced the launch of Trump Mobile and its flagship cellular service—"The 47 Plan"—which offers users 5G data service, unlimited calls and texts and 24/7 roadside assistance for the price of $47.45 per month, a reference to Trump's election as the 45th and 47th president.
In addition, the new gold-colored "T1" smartphone is currently available for pre-order on the Trump Mobile website for $499, and is set to be released in September. In its press release on Monday, the Trump Organization said that it would be releasing the T1 Phone in August.
In this photo illustration, an iPhone displays the website for The Trump Organization's mobile phone service and a Trump-branded smartphone on June 16, 2025 in Miami, Florida.
In this photo illustration, an iPhone displays the website for The Trump Organization's mobile phone service and a Trump-branded smartphone on June 16, 2025 in Miami, Florida.In the announcement, the Trump Organization described the T1 phone as "proudly designed and built in the United States."
However, this claim has already been met with scrutiny from tech and supply chain experts, who doubt whether a phone could be domestically manufactured in this timeframe or at the advertised price point.
Nilay Patel, co-founder of technology news website The Verge, told CNBC: "I don't think they're going to sell a phone that has anything to do with the United States on any kind of timeline that makes sense." He added that the only phone which could be sold for $499 by September would be "undoubtedly a rebranded Chinese Android phone."
"Barring miracles, building a smartphone entirely in the U.S. by September is all but impossible," Tinglong Dai, professor at the Johns Hopkins Carey Business School, told Newsweek.
"The U.S. doesn't currently have the supply chain to support that. We don't make key components like screens, memory chips, or camera modules here at scale," he added. "Even final assembly would be a stretch without significant lead time and preparation."
The Trump Organization has seen a surge in business since the president's inauguration in January. The ventures announced, as well as the expansion into new sectors like cryptocurrency and telecommunications, have drawn scrutiny from ethics watchdogs who have raised concerns over potential conflicts of interest arising from the use of the president's brand and office for financial gain. However, the White House has maintained that President Trump has sufficiently distanced himself from his business dealings.
What People Are Saying
Eric Trump, vice president of the Trump Organization, said in a statement: "I'm incredibly excited to step into this new digital space, hard-working Americans deserve a wireless service that's affordable, reflects their values, and delivers reliable quality they can count on. We're especially proud to offer free long-distance calling to our military members and their families — because those serving overseas should always be able to stay connected to the people they love back home."
In an interview with Right Side Broadcasting Network, Eric Trump said: "In hopefully in the next six months we're going to be manufacturing the phones in the United States. And so it's kind of, you know, we'll all be done here in our shores, employing American people. At $47 a month, we're going to do it cheaper, faster, better, safer than any of the other providers."
He added that customer service for Trump Mobile would be provided from offices in St. Louis, Missouri "and not Bangladesh, not India, not one of these places."
Leo Gebbie, analyst at tech research and advisory firm CCS Insight, told the BBC that the U.S. does not currently possess the "high-tech supply chain" needed for domestic smartphone manufacturing.
Meghan Faulkner, communications director for Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), told the outlet: "It's unbelievable that the Trump family has created yet another way for President Trump to personally profit while in office."
Tinglong Dai, professor at the Johns Hopkins Carey Business School, told Newsweek: "If the claim is 'Made in USA,' the [Federal Trade Commission] has a very strict standard: all or virtually all parts and processing must be domestic."
"That rules out any meaningful reliance on foreign suppliers, which makes the claim unrealistic under current conditions," he added. "The Trump Organization's 'built in America' language isn't an official designation, so that may be the direction they're taking."
What Happens Next?
The Trump Organization and Trump Mobile have yet to confirm where the phone will be manufactured in the U.S, and whether these will be domestically made in time for the launch later this year.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Where Will Lucid Group Stock Be in 5 Years?
U.S. EV sales growth has decelerated dramatically, dropping from 40% growth in 2023-2024 to just 10% in 2024-2025. Lucid Motors is losing approximately $222,000 per vehicle sold despite recent growth, with operational costs of $927 million against just $235 million in revenue last quarter. The company's new Gravity SUV could be a make or break product rollout. 10 stocks we like better than Lucid Group › The electric vehicle (EV) revolution was supposed to be unstoppable, but the road has gotten bumpier than many investors expected. Many once-promising players have been forced to bow out, but Lucid Group (NASDAQ: LCID), a favorite of many investors, has managed to stick around despite significant headwinds. So, what might the future hold for the luxury EV maker? The macro picture for EVs has changed quite a bit over the past few years. U.S. sales are still growing, but the pace of that growth has slowed significantly. From 2023 to 2024, EV sales grew 40%, but from 2024 to 2025, that was just 10%. Consumer sentiment has degraded as well. Consumers are increasingly wary of large initial price tags, high repair costs, and a lack of charging infrastructure in many areas. A survey from AAA showed that American attitudes toward EVs are the worst they've been since 2019. Only 16% of respondents said they were likely or very likely to pick an EV as their next car. That's down from 25% just three years ago. Over the same period, the share of respondents who said they were unlikely or very unlikely to do so grew from 51% to 63%. Things could soon get worse. Right now, President Trump's "Big Beautiful Bill" is working its way through Congress. The Senate is still deliberating on its version, but the House's version, which passed in May, eliminates the EV tax credit that provided up to $7,500 to families purchasing qualified EVs. This, along with rising prices due to automotive tariffs, is likely to further slow domestic EV sales. Things look different outside the U.S., especially in China. Roughly half of all new car sales last year were EVs, and by now, about one in 10 cars on the road in China are electric, more than twice the share in the U.S. But while the Chinese market is still very strong, Lucid doesn't sell in China at the moment. Despite the lack of strength in the overall U.S. market, it's an exciting time for Lucid in many ways. After sales growth flatlined from 2022 to 2023, the company has delivered steady growth for the last year and a half. This growth is likely to accelerate as the company ramps up the launch of its Gravity SUV, which is already proving to be very successful. Lucid expects to deliver 20,000 total vehicles in 2025, more than twice that of 2024. The majority of these new deliveries will come from its Gravity SUV, while its sedan deliveries are expected to remain flat. As encouraging as the Gravity launch is, Lucid is still plagued with issues. Aside from the fact that sales of its sedan aren't growing, Lucid loses money on each car it sells -- a lot of money. Last quarter, the company reported $235 million in revenue it earned from delivering 3,109 vehicles. It also reported operational costs of $927 million. That means each car lost the company $222,000, well over the average price of a new Lucid. Even if you exclude sales, marketing, administrative, and R&D expenses, the company is still losing $73,000 on every vehicle it sells. Needless to say, the company has a lot of work to do. Still, these figures are better than they were, and the launch of a new vehicle is always going to be an especially costly time. Though the company needs to work to reduce costs and boost efficiency, which company leadership has assured investors is a top priority, scaling production will help significantly. There are high fixed costs in manufacturing that become less of an issue when more cars are rolling off the line. Though he's since stepped down, former CEO and CTO Peter Rawlinson said in an interview with an industry publication that he would "love it to be 20-80: Twenty percent doing cars, 80% licensing. Because the vision I have for Lucid is: Just as there's an Intel inside your laptop, there's a Lucid inside a Honda or a Toyota." Interim CEO Marc Winterhof clarified in the company's latest earnings call that this doesn't mean the company's focus is not on its vehicles first and foremost, but rather that it's a reflection of the size of the licensing opportunity. Lucid has some of the best technology in the business. Its powertrain technology, many of the internal components, and its software are top-of-the-line. Lucid can license this technology to other EV designers and drive revenue growth outside of delivering more cars. If Lucid executes flawlessly, scales production efficiently, and successfully grows a significant licensing segment, it could emerge as a profitable niche player. However, there are too many hurdles in the way for my taste. The company is burning incredible amounts of cash in a hyper-competitive field, and I think the most likely outcome is that Lucid continues to struggle over the next five years. Before you buy stock in Lucid Group, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Lucid Group wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $713,547!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $966,931!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,062% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 177% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 30, 2025 Johnny Rice has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Where Will Lucid Group Stock Be in 5 Years? was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
White House Pushes B.S. About ‘Big Beautiful Bill' as Popularity Craters
President Donald Trump has insisted that Republicans get his so-called 'Big Beautiful Bill' to his desk by the Fourth of July. With only days left before the self-imposed deadline, the White House is now scrambling to do damage control around the deeply unpopular legislation produced by Congress. A series of recent polls shows that the bill — which will force millions off of Medicaid, restrict access to food assistance programs, and cost the poorest Americans billions over the next 10 — is underwater with the public. A Washington Post survey recently produced a net favorability rating of -19. Fox News clocked in at -21, a Quinnipiac poll produced a -26 rating, and KFF — formerly the Kaiser Family Foundation — found net favorability to be at -29 points. In the face of this widespread public disapproval and the GOP's inter-party squabbling over the bill, the White House is pushing 'fact checks' insisting that the legislation would not hurt low-income families or the economy at large, and that it is not just a dressed-up tax break for billionaires at the expense of everyone and everything else. In a 'fact check' sheet issued Sunday night by the White House Communication Office, the administration claimed that the legislation would 'put more than $10,000 a year back in the pockets of typical hardworking families,' that the 'OBBB protects and strengthens Medicaid for those who rely on it,' and that the suggestion that people will 'literally die' if denied access to health care is 'one of the most egregious deranged attacks from the Left peddling fear over the facts.' The document repeatedly emphasized that American households would be taking home an extra $10,000 in income a year. Huge, right? Unfortunately — but not unexpectedly — the figure is a gross misrepresentation. The figure, which was circulated in several communications released by the White House and touted by Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt during a briefing earlier this month, is the high end of a projection produced by the Council of Economic Advisers – an internal White House agency. According to a Politifact review, the Council's range of a $7,600-$10,900 increase in annual take-home pay for a family of four was based on uniquely optimistic projections about how much total economic stimulus the 'Big Beautiful Bill' would produce. Where other independent agencies have predicted a maximum GDP increase of around 0.5-2 percent over the next 10 years, the counsel assumed an almost five percent increase over five years and a weighted 2.9-3.5 percent increase over 10 years. The $10,000 figure isn't a tangible change in income based on rewrites to the tax code, but rather a fantastical number carved out of an imaginary GDP boom. According to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), Trump's enshrinement of his 2017 tax cuts, along with the exclusionary reforms being made to programs like Medicaid and SNAP, will cost the lowest-earning tenth of American households about $1,600 a year. 'Federal and state in-kind benefits would decrease household resources by $1.0 trillion,' the CBO wrote. 'Primarily because federal spending on benefits provided through Medicaid and SNAP would be lower. Changes to program benefits that states made in response to changes in federal policy would also reduce household resources.' Meanwhile, the richest Americans would see 'resources would increase, on average, over the projection period by about $12,000,' or even more given to the favorable pro-corporate policies packed into the bill. During Monday's press briefing, Leavitt insisted that 'this bill strengthens Medicaid,' and that rural hospitals were exaggerating the potential fallout of spending cuts to the program. According to the CBO, 11 million Americans could be squeezed out of their health care coverage over changes to Medicaid, bureaucratic red tape, more stringent work requirements, and changes to public insurance marketplaces. According to KFF, 'an estimated 1.5 million fewer people could be covered by Medicaid in rural areas under the reconciliation bill in 2034,' and the resulting drop in Medicaid enrollment could force rural hospitals and clinics — often the only nodes connecting rural Americans to the health care system — to close down. The bill 'protects' Medicaid only in the sense that the program will continue to exist, but it in no way protects the Americans who rely on it for their health. Millions of them will be forced to find care elsewhere if Republicans pass the 'Big Beautiful Bill.' More from Rolling Stone Senate Republicans Pass Trump's Bill to Strip Health Care From Millions J.D. Vance Dismisses Kicking Millions Off Medicaid: 'Minutiae' Trump Teases Deporting Elon: 'We'll Have to Take a Look' Best of Rolling Stone The Useful Idiots New Guide to the Most Stoned Moments of the 2020 Presidential Campaign Anatomy of a Fake News Scandal The Radical Crusade of Mike Pence
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
J.D. Vance Dismisses Kicking Millions Off Medicaid: ‘Minutiae'
President Donald Trump and the GOP's so-called 'Big Beautiful Bill' is far from beautiful and deeply unpopular with the public. Battling concerns from voters about increased barriers to accessing programs like Medicaid and food assistance; massive transfers of wealth from less fortunate Americans to corporations and the rich; and the mass deregulation of industries like crypto and AI, Vice President J.D. Vance is attempting a new tactic to persuade the hesitant: ignore all of that and focus on how much money the bill is giving to ICE. 'The thing that will bankrupt this country more than any other policy is flooding the country with illegal immigration and then giving those migrants generous benefits. The [One Big Beautiful Bill] fixes this problem. And therefore it must pass,' Vance wrote Tuesday on X. 'Everything else — the CBO score, the proper baseline, the minutiae of the Medicaid policy — is immaterial compared to the ICE money and immigration enforcement provisions,' he added. The millions of people who are expected to lose access to their health insurance as a result of the legislation would likely beg to differ. The version of the legislation passed by the House would give Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) over $100 billion for the construction of new immigration detention centers, increasing arrest and deportation efforts, militarization of the border and the hiring of new agents. Such a massive windfall for immigration enforcement comes as ICE has blown through its annual budget months before the end of the fiscal year. In May, during a hearing of the U.S. Senate Appropriations Committee, Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) laid into the reckless spending of the Department of Homeland Security under Secretary Kristi Noem. 'You are spending like you don't have a budget. You are on the verge of running out of money for the fiscal year […] You are ignoring the immigration laws of this nation, implementing a brand-new immigration system that you have invented that has little relation to the statutes that you are required — that you are commanded — to follow as spelled out in your oath of office,' Murphy said. 'Your agency acts as if laws don't matter, as if the election gave you some mandate to violate the Constitution and the laws passed by this Congress. It did not give you that mandate.' Through the reconciliation bill and presidential policy, Republicans in Congress and the Trump administration are looking to give DHS and ICE that mandate. White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller has demanded that ICE detain at least 3,000 migrants a day. As the reconciliation bill continues to move through the Senate, Trump and Noem traveled to Florida on Tuesday to tour the so-called 'Alligator Alcatraz,' a migrant detention center built in the hostile backwaters of the Florida Everglades. 'We're going to teach them how to run away from an alligator,' Trump said ahead of his visit to the center. 'Don't run in a straight line,' Trump said, waving his hand in a zig-zag to demonstrate how a detainee might potentially need to move to escape a half-ton reptile. This kind of callous cruelty is what the administration is focused on, whether it be its treatment of migrants, or dismissing kicking millions off of their health care as insignificant 'minutiae.' More from Rolling Stone White House Pushes B.S. About 'Big Beautiful Bill' as Popularity Craters Dem Senator Whines Amid GOP Push to Gut Medicaid: 'I Just Want to Go Home' Rick Scott Demands More Cuts to Medicaid, Which His Company Allegedly Scammed Best of Rolling Stone The Useful Idiots New Guide to the Most Stoned Moments of the 2020 Presidential Campaign Anatomy of a Fake News Scandal The Radical Crusade of Mike Pence
