&w=3840&q=100)
Has Pakistan violated US rules by using F-16s against India?
Has Pakistan used its F-16 fighter jets in the current standoff with India? Why this may be an issue with the US? File image/AFP
It's been four days of tensions running high between India and Pakistan. Islamabad continues to provoke and escalate the situation by using fighter jets, drones, long-range weapons, loitering munitions to attack India's military sites.
On Saturday in a press briefing, Col Sofiya Qureshi confirmed that the Pakistani Army is continuously attacking the western borders. 'It has used drones, long-range weapons, loitering munitions, and fighter jets to attack India's military sites.' She added that India neutralised many dangers, but Islamabad tried to infiltrate via air at more than 26 places, and they damaged equipment and personnel at air force bases in Udhampur, Bhuj, Pathankot, and Bathinda.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
This remark shines a light on Pakistan's aerial power, namely its fighter jets that they have been using for the past few days, namely the US-supplied F-16. In fact, highly-placed government sources have been reported as saying that New Delhi struck down an F-16 supersonic fighter jet of the Pakistan Air Force on Friday.
If this is confirmed, it's a violation of the US rules laid down for the use of these fighter jets. Let's see how.
Pak's use of F-16 against India in current standoff
On the intervening night of May 7-8, Pakistan deployed a F-16 towards India. However, the fighter jet was shot down by New Delhi, sources were reported as telling NDTV. According to the sources, the F-16 took off from the Sargodha air base in Pakistan, a key air force station of the Pakistani Air Force. However, an Indian SAM (Surface-to-air missile) shot it down near the Sargodha air base.
Following this incident, Prakash Ambedkar, a veteran Indian politician and grandson of Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar, questioned the use of the F-16 by Pakistan, urging India's prime minister and external affairs minister to take up the matter with Washington, as it violates the stipulations laid down. He wrote on X, 'Pakistan and its evil designs should be exposed to the whole world!'
But are there any rules and stipulations to Pakistan's use of the F-16?
America's rules for Pakistan's use of F-16s
The F-16 is the mainstay of Pakistan's air force with one news portal, titled 'War on the Rocks', stating that the aircraft is an object of national pride and military strength — it appears on painted billboards across Pakistan and adorned on decorated commercial trucks that trudge along Pakistan's highways.
The US first mooted the supply F-16s to Pakistan in the early 1980s in order incentivise Pakistan's assistance to the United States in Afghanistan. However, with the Soviet Union's defeat in Afghanistan in 1989, US reliance on Pakistan quickly waned. In 1990, the US slapped sanctions on Pakistan on account of the country's undeclared nuclear weapons programme and cancelled the supply of approximately 30 F-16s that Pakistan had already purchased.
The F-16 is the mainstay of Pakistan's air force. The US first mooted the supply F-16s to Pakistan in the early 1980s. File image/AFP
However, as The Diplomat notes in one report, the 9/11 attacks refocused Washington's interest in the region and established Pakistan as a central cog in the US war against al-Qaeda and the Taliban. The then George W Bush administration agreed to release the previously blocked F-16s to Pakistan, refurbish the country's existing F-16 aircraft, and sell Pakistan new F-16 Block-50/52 aircraft worth approximately $3 billion.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Then in 2016, the US State Department approved the sale of eight F-16s and other equipment to Pakistan worth $699 million. At the time, a US official said, 'We support the proposed sale of eight F-16s to Pakistan, which we view as the right platform in support of Pakistan's counterterrorism and counterinsurgency operations.
'These operations reduce the ability of militants to use Pakistani territory as a safe haven for terrorism and a base of support for the insurgency in Afghanistan, which is in the national interests of both Pakistan and the United States, and in the interest of the region more broadly.'
US has laid down strict rules for the use of F-16s by Pakistan. Its sole intention is to strengthen Pakistan's capacity for counter-insurgency and counterterrorism operations. File image/AP
However, documents reveal that the US placed a number of restrictions on the use of these fighter jets. Every F-16 sale comes with an End-Use Monitoring (EUM) agreement, which means Pakistan cannot freely use the jets.
The sole intention of selling these planes is to 'strengthen Pakistan's capacity for counter-insurgency and counterterrorism operations'.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Moreover, any use of the F-16s by Pakistan outside of the country needs prior approval from the US. There's also a Technical Security Team ( TST), a contingent of contractors in Pakistan to monitor F-16. The TST includes US Air Force personnel stationed in Pakistan who conduct real-time monitoring of F-16 activities
It's important to note that between 2018 and 2022, the US had paused the sale of F-16s with the Trump administration accusing Pakistan of giving only 'lies and deceit' for the billions of dollars that the US had 'foolishly' given it. However, in September 2022, the US President Joe Biden reversed the decision with with a $450 million package for a lifetime upgrade of Pakistan's F-16 fleet.
Pak's prior use of F-16s and India's concerns
Pakistan's use of the F-16 in the current standoff is reminiscent of 2019. On February 29, 2019, India MiG-21 Bison got into a dogfight with a PAF F-16 during the Balakot airstrike. Group Captain Abhinandan Varthaman shot down a Pakistani F-16 fighter, but in the process was captured by the enemy in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK). He was later repatriated on March 1, 2019.
Pakistanis look at a F-16 jet fighter at the Nur Khan military airbase in Islamabad. File image/AFP
Months after that incident, the US State Department had written to the Pakistan air force chief pointing out that the F-16s had been moved to 'unauthorised' forward operating bases in defiance of its agreement with the US. The letter, quoted by a US media organisation, said that such actions by Pakistan risked allowing these weapons to fall in the hands of 'malign actors' and 'could undermine our shared security platforms and infrastructures'.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
In the past, India has expressed concern over US' supply of the fighter jet to Pakistan. Following the Biden administration's decision in 2022, External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar questioned the American rationale. Moreover, when asked about the US justification that the fighter planes were meant to assist Pakistan in its counter-terrorism efforts, Jaishankar retorted: 'You're not fooling anybody by saying these things'.
With inputs from agencies
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India Today
30 minutes ago
- India Today
Trump threatens 100% tariffs on Russia, US conducts military drills at Panama Canal, more
24:09 The case of Nimisha Priya, a Kerala nurse facing execution in Yemen on July 16th for murdering a Yemeni national in 2017, has reached a critical juncture. The Indian government informed the Supreme Court that despite diplomatic efforts, including recent talks with Yemeni authorities, no reprieve has been granted.


Hindustan Times
32 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Trump supporters angry over Jeffrey Epstein case. Here's what to know
A broken promise to release more information about the Jeffrey Epstein case has sparked outrage among some of President Donald Trump's loyal supporters. Conservatives, led by key figures in the MAGA movement, have pressed unsubstantiated claims that Epstein was murdered.(AFP) The Justice Department last week said Epstein, who was facing charges of sex trafficking, did not leave behind a 'client list.' Attorney General Pam Bondi suggested in February it was on her desk, though she later said she was referring to the overall case file. Bondi also said officials were poring over a 'truckload' of previously withheld evidence. The Justice Department concluded, however, that public disclosure would not be appropriate and that much of the material was placed under seal by a judge. That has angered right-wing influencers who were once bolstered by Trump's own claims on this case, but are now feeling their demands are being squelched by his administration. Figures like commentator Tucker Carlson, right-wing activist Laura Loomer, and former Trump adviser Steve Bannon claim the government's handling of the case shows a lack of transparency. Anger over the case threatens to divide the MAGA faithful. Here's a look at the Epstein sex trafficking case, how the Trump administration has handled it and how his supporters have reacted to recent developments. What is the Epstein case? Epstein was a wealthy financier arrested in 2019 on federal sex trafficking charges. His former girlfriend, Ghislaine Maxwell, was charged with helping him abuse teenage girls. Epstein was found dead in his cell at a federal jail in New York City about a month after he was arrested. Investigators concluded he killed himself. Maxwell later was convicted at trial and sentenced to 20 years in prison. The case attracted attention because of Epstein and Maxwell's links to famous people, including royals, presidents and billionaires. It also led to some of the biggest conspiracy theories animating Trump's base. Conservatives, led by key figures in the MAGA movement, have pressed unsubstantiated claims that Epstein was murdered and that 'deep state' actors in the government are hiding lists of his clients, videos of crimes being committed and other evidence. Trump himself suggested there was a cover-up. What are the 'Epstein Files'? Trump lately has tried to change the subject, but the Epstein matter commands attention because of the words and actions from his administration. In February, far-right influencers were invited to the White House and provided with binders marked 'The Epstein Files: Phase 1' and 'Declassified.' The binders contained documents that had largely already been in the public domain. Bondi said in May there were 'tens of thousands of videos of Epstein with children or child porn.' That fueled a belief that details about powerful figures had been suppressed. 'It's a new administration and everything is going to come out to the public,' Bondi said at one point. Multiple people who participated in the criminal cases of Epstein and Maxwell told The Associated Press that they had not seen and did not know of a trove of recordings along the lines of what Bondi had referenced. What happened last week? The Justice Department on July 7 acknowledged that Epstein did not have a list of clients and said no more files related to Epstein's case would be made public. A two-page memo that bore the logos of the FBI and Justice Department, but that was not signed by any individual, said the DOJ determined that no 'further disclosure would be appropriate or warranted.' It said much of the material was placed under seal by a court to protect victims and 'only a fraction' of it 'would have been aired publicly had Epstein gone to trial.' It was a huge retreat from what Bondi and others had previously claimed. And it prompted anger — and more suspicion and conspiracy theories — from the MAGA faithful. Some MAGA world influencers, including Loomer and Glenn Beck, have explicitly called on Bondi to resign. Former Fox News personality Megyn Kelly, who is now a podcaster, called Bondi 'either lazy or incompetent.' What had Trump said about Epstein before his second term? As far back as 2019, Trump suggested that Epstein's death was a cover-up and called for a full investigation. In retweeting a post by conservative pundit and comedian Terrance K. Williams, who suggested that former President Bill Clinton may have been involved, Trump wrote that Epstein 'had information on Bill Clinton & now he's dead.' When asked about his retweet, Trump said he was merely 'demanding' a full investigation, a day after then-Attorney General Bill Barr said there had been 'serious irregularities' at the prison where Epstein was being held. In a 2023 interview, Trump told Carlson he believed that Epstein had committed suicide. But he couched his response, saying it was also 'possible' that he had been murdered, a theory he said 'many people.' believed. Last year, Trump was asked on Fox News whether he would declassify documents regarding the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks and the 1963 assassination of President John F. Kennedy, and he answered 'yeah.' He was then asked about the 'Epstein files,' and he said 'yeah, yeah, I would,' but then added 'I think that less so because you don't want to affect people's lives if it's phony stuff in there, because it's a lot of phony stuff with that whole world. But I think I would.' What has Trump said recently? In a Cabinet meeting last week, Trump called it 'unbelievable' and a 'desecration' that people were still talking about 'this creep,' given other pressing matters, including the catastrophic flooding in Texas. In a social media post on Saturday, he expressed support for Bondi. 'What's going on with my 'boys' and, in some cases, 'gals?'' Trump wrote. 'They're all going after Attorney General Pam Bondi, who is doing a FANTASTIC JOB! We're on one Team, MAGA, and I don't like what's happening.'


Time of India
35 minutes ago
- Time of India
14-Samdani-CM-FIber-Net-Revival
Vijayawada: Chief minister Chandrababu Naidu directed officials to take swift action to restore and revitalize the AP Fiber Net project. He charged that the previous government had completely derailed the AP Fiber Net project, a visionary initiative launched between 2014 and 2019. Reviewing the progress of AP Fibernet activities here on Monday, the chief minister asked the officials to assess the challenges, financial constraints, necessary corrective steps, and new policy directions. He said that the system, designed to benefit the public, students, and government departments, was exploited for political purposes by the previous govt. He pointed out that while there were 8.70 lakh connections before 2019, was dropped to 4.50 lakh during the YSRCP regime. "We managed the organization effectively with just 130 employees and provided over 8 lakh connections. But the YSRCP government created unauthorized posts to accommodate its party workers, expanding the workforce from 130 to 1,350 and misusing public funds. This was a new form of corruption where party affiliates were placed in government roles and used for political work. The fiber network was no exception. Those responsible must be held accountable. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Providers are furious: Internet access without a subscription! Techno Mag Learn More Undo A thorough investigation should be conducted into those appointments, and full transparency must be ensured," directed chief minister. He, however, said that steps must be taken to rectify past mistakes and ensure a better future. He instructed that the current 4,53,525 connections be increased to at least 8–10 lakh. The chief minister approved the integration of AP Fiber Net with the BharatNet (Amended BharatNet Programme – ABP). Under this scheme, the Centre will allocate Rs. 1,900 crore to AP Fiber Net from 2025 to 2035. He also approved the transition of fiber networks in 1692 gram panchayats across Chittoor and Visakhapatnam districts from linear to ring architecture. Additionally, 480 new gram panchayats will be connected using the ring model. The Centre will provide Rs. 430 crore for this phase. GFX *A Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV), jointly managed by the Central and State Governments, to oversee these projects should be created: CM *The selection process for set-top box suppliers be completed immediately and that a revenue-sharing model be developed with Local Cable Operators (LCOs) using new set-top boxes: CM *Reintroduce services like virtual classrooms *Andhra Pradesh currently leads the nation in village panchayat connectivity. *Fiber net services have been extended to 12,946 panchayats so far. *The government aims to expand the network to a total of two lakh km. *Andhra Pradesh leads all Indian states in fiber optic network coverage with 78355km, followed by Maharashtra (50,481 km), Tamil Nadu (49,616 km), Gujarat (35,246 km), and Telangana (29,143 km).