Fired federal workers lobby for help on Capitol Hill – is anyone listening?
The Tuesday Group was feeling something familiar as its members milled around a bank of elevators in the bustling basement of a Senate office building: rejection.
They had often been told no over the past months – when the government moved to fire them with Donald Trump's blessing, when judges rejected challenges to that decision and when the lawmakers who they have taken to tracking down on Capitol Hill once a week when Congress is in session would turn a deaf ear to their pleas.
More than 59,000 federal workers have lost their jobs since Trump took office, according to government data, but those in power have not changed their tune.
This Tuesday morning, it was staffers of Maine's Republican senator Susan Collins who had told them no, even after they staged an impromptu sit-in in her office for the better part of a half hour. So they proceeded five floors down to the basement of the Dirksen Senate Office Building, hoping that some senator – any senator – would give them a moment of their time.
Then the elevator doors opened and who should come out but Collins. 'Senator Collins!' someone in the group yelled. Another tried to introduce themselves: 'I'm a fired federal worker.' But the senator began waving her hands in front of her in an unmistakable sign of: I don't have time for this.
'Thank you,' Collins said, as she made her way down the hall.
'It's somewhat typical,' observed Whitt Masters, a former USAID contractor who has been unemployed since the end of March, when the company employing him decided to file for bankruptcy after its client began to shut down.
'You know, I don't expect every senator to stop and speak with us. I wish she'd been a bit more approachable, especially since we had spent some time in her office earlier today.'
What's been dubbed the Tuesday Group has come around the Capitol since mid-February, as Trump and Elon Musk's campaign to thin out the federal workforce began to bite. Some who show up have been fired, others are on paid leave while a judge considers whether it is legal to fire them, and those who work for USAID expect to officially lose their jobs next Tuesday, when the agency shuts down.
Democrats often welcome them, but when it comes to the Republicans who control Congress – and are weighing legislation to codify some cuts and make deeper ones in the next fiscal year – the reception has been uneven. They've been ignored, blown off and belittled – all things they would experience last Tuesday, their 17th visit to the Hill.
Their encounter with Collins fruitless, the group formed something of a gauntlet at the intersection of a hallway leading between office buildings and to the Senate subway, a place where lawmakers were sure to pass on a scorcher of a day.
They would call out to any face they recognized, but the group of 10 was nothing a determined senator couldn't handle. Montana Republican Tim Sheehy speed-walked by with a reporter and cameraman in pursuit; Washington Democrat Patty Murray pounded past in sneakers; and Arkansas Republican John Boozman ambled through alone, displaying no sign that he knew the group was even there.
'Would you like to hear how we are impacting your constituents?' asked Stephie Duliepre, who was fired from her Science for Development fellowship program at USAID, when Tennessee Republican Marsha Blackburn came around the corner. The senator pushed on, the answer apparently being no.
John Hoeven, a Republican from North Dakota, exited a stairwell that deposited him right in the middle of the group. He appeared to recognize them – on a previous visit, attendees said that Hoeven had discussed his support for folding a major USAID food assistance program into the state department. 'I see you're still working on it,' he quipped, before heading off.
The Democrats they encountered uttered words of encouragement, and a few stopped to talk. 'Don't give up,' Dick Durbin of Illinois said when he encountered the group. 'I'm with you,' Tammy Baldwin of Wisconsin called out.
South Carolina Republican Lindsey Graham attempted the silent treatment as he came past, but Amelia Hertzberg, who was on administrative leave from her job in the Environmental Protection Agency, was not having it. She followed him down the hall, and started prancing around to get his attention.
'You have a bright future,' Hertzberg recalls the senator saying. 'Well, I was going to have a bright future, and then I was fired,' she replied.
The group spotted Josh Hawley, a Missouri Republican and prominent Trump ally. 'Senator Hawley, these are fired federal workers. Do you have a second to talk to them?' asked Melissa Byrne, a community organizer who had put together the group.
'No,' he replied.
The group was aghast, but they'd been treated worse. When Mack Schroeder encountered Indiana Republican Jim Banks one Tuesday and introduced himself as having been fired from the Department of Health and Human Services, the senator replied, 'You probably deserved it,' before calling him 'a clown'.
That was in April. The incident made the news, Banks refused to apologize, and the Tuesday Group kept showing up.
'I've spoken to the media and been on the radio. I've called my senators, my representatives, and it feels a little bit like shouting into a void,' said Hertzberg, who has made about 12 visits to the Capitol now.
'So it feels good to go into senator's offices and be there and take up space for a while and make them see, or their staff see that there is a person behind all this.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
41 minutes ago
- Reuters
US-Canada trade talks stopped until certain taxes dropped, Trump tells Fox News
WASHINGTON, June 29 (Reuters) - U.S. trade talks with Canada will be stopped "until such time as they drop certain taxes," President Donald Trump said in an interview broadcast on Sunday. Trump made the remarks in an interview on Fox News' "Sunday Morning Futures with Maria Bartiromo" program.
Daily Mail
42 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Mom is hit with $372 tariff bill on top of $900 summer wardrobe refresh
A mom just wanted new clothes for her upcoming vacation. Krystal Wahnschaffe, 35, a Texas-based mom, said that she placed a $919 clothing order from a trendy shop, according to Business Insider. But when the package showed up at her Dallas home, it came with something she hadn't expected: a $372 customs bill. 'That was frustrating, obviously,' she told the publication. 'If I'm going to be charged all this extra money — maybe that changes the calculus of what clothes I keep and what I don't keep.' The unexpected fee came down to international trade rules — and a complicated web that has failed to clearly communicate who's responsible for paying the bill. A big part of her confusion stems from the end of the so-called de minimis exemption, which previously allowed shipments under $800 to enter the US tariff-free — regardless of origin. Before the rule change, foreign companies like Shein and Temu could produce goods overseas and ship them directly to US customers without charging import fees. The hyper-efficient business model allowed those brands to undercut domestic retailers. Some US companies even blamed the exemption for driving them out of business. But now, that exemption is gone. Brands that once relied on tariff-free pricing are starting to see some of those hidden costs surface. In some cases, like Wahnschaffe's clothing order, shoppers are now entirely responsible for paying the bill. Because Wahnschaffe's items were made in China and shipped during a period of peak tariffs, her order triggered high import duties — including a 125 percent tariff on a red sweater vest that originally cost around $60. FedEx paid the import tax upfront to release the package, then handed Wahnschaffe the bill. This won't happen for the majority of imported consumer goods. Typically, products stop at a warehouse operated by a retailer, which pays the import fees and folds those costs into the price the customer sees at checkout. But for the direct-to-consumer businesses that skip the US warehouse altogether, the bill is often going unpaid until the products arrive on a customer's doorstep. The Texas mom isn't alone. Dozens of buyers have taken to social media, confused and angry about surprise charges on international orders. Shoppers at standalone stores are less likely to see the massive one-time bills - but prices in stores will likely still increase from the levies 'Why are these companies not telling us that there is going to be an additional bill,' one creator said on TikTok. Even professionals are surprised by the rules. Wirecutter, the product testing site run by The New York Times, recently investigated the issue by buying items from a variety of overseas sellers. In one case, a $56 ukulele turned into a $158 charge after duties were applied. Other items arrived without any additional fees. There was no clear explanation or advance notice about which products would be taxed and which wouldn't. Chain retailers have offered much more consistent price increases since President Donald Trump launched the signature policy. Customers have started to see pricing spike in some retailers — employees at Walmart and Target have been posting pictures online of massive bouts of price changes coming to their stores. But online stores without a domestic footprint — particularly fast-fashion sellers and niche direct-to-consumer brands — often ship directly from overseas, leaving customers on the hook without warning. Experts advise checking where a product is made, reading shipping policies carefully, and preparing for possible customs charges when ordering online. Even trade pros aren't immune. Lawrence Friedman, a longtime trade attorney, told Wirecutter he recently got hit with a surprise duty on a small online order. 'This is my job, and I didn't even notice it was an imported watch band,' he said.
Daily Mail
42 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Latest addition to restaurant bills has diners vowing 'never to eat at restaurant again'
It started with extra charges for takeout. Then pandemic service fees. Then a 3 percent 'kitchen appreciation' tax. They were on top of tips, which used to be 15 percent tip but have quietly ballooned to as much as 25 percent and more. Now some diners say they've had enough — after spotting yet another unexpected add-on at the bottom of their bill. A restaurant customer was left stunned after discovering an unexpected 18 percent 'Living Wage Fee' added to the bottom of their bill. The diner, who ordered a burger meal earlier this month, posted a photo of the receipt on Instagram with the caption: 'WTF is a living wage fee?' The charge — an extra $5.94 — was listed at the bottom of the receipt, with the restaurant noting: 'This fee goes directly to staff payroll and provides a living wage to our team.' But the 18 percent surcharge wasn't a replacement for tips, which are also viewed as a supplemental wage for many hospitality workers in the US. But tipping wasn't replaced. 'If you choose to tip, tips are pooled amongst the entire team,' the receipt clarified. The fee sparked outrage online, with many calling it deceptive. 'I'd never ever eat there again and would challenge that charge if not shown beforehand,' one person wrote. Others said the business must be poorly run if the staff could not be paid a living wage without the added fees. Some were more positive about the fee, suggesting it could be a way for restaurant's to deal with tipping and inflation weariness. 'Y'all been asking for no tipping - this is what it looks like,' one user wrote. 'It could reflect in drink/food prices but then y'all would say the place was too expensive. 'No one is trying to trick you - if they were transparent about the service fee.' Americans are increasingly pushing back against tipping. Last year, we reported how a Michigan man says his new rule is to stop tipping at restaurants where he has to order while standing up. iPad screens have become synonymous with the country's 'tipflation' problem which has seen tipping culture spill out from bars and restaurants and into shops, takeaway chains and even self-service machines Backhaus in San Mateo and Burlingame banned tipping last year Americans have grown weary of 'tipflation' in the years following the pandemic. The issue is particularly clear in the ire directed at the digital pads presented to shoppers requesting tips after seemingly every retail transaction. Under new 'junk fee' legislation living wage surcharges were banned in California last July. Businesses such as Bay Area bakery Backhaus have responded by banning tipping, opting instead to raise prices to cover the costs of higher wages for staff.
