logo
Mom is hit with $372 tariff bill on top of $900 summer wardrobe refresh

Mom is hit with $372 tariff bill on top of $900 summer wardrobe refresh

Daily Mail​13 hours ago

A mom just wanted new clothes for her upcoming vacation.
Krystal Wahnschaffe, 35, a Texas-based mom, said that she placed a $919 clothing order from a trendy shop, according to Business Insider.
But when the package showed up at her Dallas home, it came with something she hadn't expected: a $372 customs bill.
'That was frustrating, obviously,' she told the publication. 'If I'm going to be charged all this extra money — maybe that changes the calculus of what clothes I keep and what I don't keep.'
The unexpected fee came down to international trade rules — and a complicated web that has failed to clearly communicate who's responsible for paying the bill.
A big part of her confusion stems from the end of the so-called de minimis exemption, which previously allowed shipments under $800 to enter the US tariff-free — regardless of origin.
Before the rule change, foreign companies like Shein and Temu could produce goods overseas and ship them directly to US customers without charging import fees.
The hyper-efficient business model allowed those brands to undercut domestic retailers. Some US companies even blamed the exemption for driving them out of business.
But now, that exemption is gone. Brands that once relied on tariff-free pricing are starting to see some of those hidden costs surface.
In some cases, like Wahnschaffe's clothing order, shoppers are now entirely responsible for paying the bill.
Because Wahnschaffe's items were made in China and shipped during a period of peak tariffs, her order triggered high import duties — including a 125 percent tariff on a red sweater vest that originally cost around $60.
FedEx paid the import tax upfront to release the package, then handed Wahnschaffe the bill.
This won't happen for the majority of imported consumer goods.
Typically, products stop at a warehouse operated by a retailer, which pays the import fees and folds those costs into the price the customer sees at checkout.
But for the direct-to-consumer businesses that skip the US warehouse altogether, the bill is often going unpaid until the products arrive on a customer's doorstep.
The Texas mom isn't alone. Dozens of buyers have taken to social media, confused and angry about surprise charges on international orders.
Shoppers at standalone stores are less likely to see the massive one-time bills - but prices in stores will likely still increase from the levies
'Why are these companies not telling us that there is going to be an additional bill,' one creator said on TikTok.
Even professionals are surprised by the rules. Wirecutter, the product testing site run by The New York Times, recently investigated the issue by buying items from a variety of overseas sellers.
In one case, a $56 ukulele turned into a $158 charge after duties were applied.
Other items arrived without any additional fees. There was no clear explanation or advance notice about which products would be taxed and which wouldn't.
Chain retailers have offered much more consistent price increases since President Donald Trump launched the signature policy.
Customers have started to see pricing spike in some retailers — employees at Walmart and Target have been posting pictures online of massive bouts of price changes coming to their stores.
But online stores without a domestic footprint — particularly fast-fashion sellers and niche direct-to-consumer brands — often ship directly from overseas, leaving customers on the hook without warning.
Experts advise checking where a product is made, reading shipping policies carefully, and preparing for possible customs charges when ordering online.
Even trade pros aren't immune. Lawrence Friedman, a longtime trade attorney, told Wirecutter he recently got hit with a surprise duty on a small online order.
'This is my job, and I didn't even notice it was an imported watch band,' he said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Fired federal workers lobby for help on Capitol Hill – is anyone listening?
Fired federal workers lobby for help on Capitol Hill – is anyone listening?

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

Fired federal workers lobby for help on Capitol Hill – is anyone listening?

The Tuesday Group was feeling something familiar as its members milled around a bank of elevators in the bustling basement of a Senate office building: rejection. They had often been told no over the past months – when the government moved to fire them with Donald Trump's blessing, when judges rejected challenges to that decision and when the lawmakers who they have taken to tracking down on Capitol Hill once a week when Congress is in session would turn a deaf ear to their pleas. More than 59,000 federal workers have lost their jobs since Trump took office, according to government data, but those in power have not changed their tune. This Tuesday morning, it was staffers of Maine's Republican senator Susan Collins who had told them no, even after they staged an impromptu sit-in in her office for the better part of a half hour. So they proceeded five floors down to the basement of the Dirksen Senate Office Building, hoping that some senator – any senator – would give them a moment of their time. Then the elevator doors opened and who should come out but Collins. 'Senator Collins!' someone in the group yelled. Another tried to introduce themselves: 'I'm a fired federal worker.' But the senator began waving her hands in front of her in an unmistakable sign of: I don't have time for this. 'Thank you,' Collins said, as she made her way down the hall. 'It's somewhat typical,' observed Whitt Masters, a former USAID contractor who has been unemployed since the end of March, when the company employing him decided to file for bankruptcy after its client began to shut down. 'You know, I don't expect every senator to stop and speak with us. I wish she'd been a bit more approachable, especially since we had spent some time in her office earlier today.' What's been dubbed the Tuesday Group has come around the Capitol since mid-February, as Trump and Elon Musk's campaign to thin out the federal workforce began to bite. Some who show up have been fired, others are on paid leave while a judge considers whether it is legal to fire them, and those who work for USAID expect to officially lose their jobs next Tuesday, when the agency shuts down. Democrats often welcome them, but when it comes to the Republicans who control Congress – and are weighing legislation to codify some cuts and make deeper ones in the next fiscal year – the reception has been uneven. They've been ignored, blown off and belittled – all things they would experience last Tuesday, their 17th visit to the Hill. Their encounter with Collins fruitless, the group formed something of a gauntlet at the intersection of a hallway leading between office buildings and to the Senate subway, a place where lawmakers were sure to pass on a scorcher of a day. They would call out to any face they recognized, but the group of 10 was nothing a determined senator couldn't handle. Montana Republican Tim Sheehy speed-walked by with a reporter and cameraman in pursuit; Washington Democrat Patty Murray pounded past in sneakers; and Arkansas Republican John Boozman ambled through alone, displaying no sign that he knew the group was even there. 'Would you like to hear how we are impacting your constituents?' asked Stephie Duliepre, who was fired from her Science for Development fellowship program at USAID, when Tennessee Republican Marsha Blackburn came around the corner. The senator pushed on, the answer apparently being no. John Hoeven, a Republican from North Dakota, exited a stairwell that deposited him right in the middle of the group. He appeared to recognize them – on a previous visit, attendees said that Hoeven had discussed his support for folding a major USAID food assistance program into the state department. 'I see you're still working on it,' he quipped, before heading off. The Democrats they encountered uttered words of encouragement, and a few stopped to talk. 'Don't give up,' Dick Durbin of Illinois said when he encountered the group. 'I'm with you,' Tammy Baldwin of Wisconsin called out. South Carolina Republican Lindsey Graham attempted the silent treatment as he came past, but Amelia Hertzberg, who was on administrative leave from her job in the Environmental Protection Agency, was not having it. She followed him down the hall, and started prancing around to get his attention. 'You have a bright future,' Hertzberg recalls the senator saying. 'Well, I was going to have a bright future, and then I was fired,' she replied. The group spotted Josh Hawley, a Missouri Republican and prominent Trump ally. 'Senator Hawley, these are fired federal workers. Do you have a second to talk to them?' asked Melissa Byrne, a community organizer who had put together the group. 'No,' he replied. The group was aghast, but they'd been treated worse. When Mack Schroeder encountered Indiana Republican Jim Banks one Tuesday and introduced himself as having been fired from the Department of Health and Human Services, the senator replied, 'You probably deserved it,' before calling him 'a clown'. That was in April. The incident made the news, Banks refused to apologize, and the Tuesday Group kept showing up. 'I've spoken to the media and been on the radio. I've called my senators, my representatives, and it feels a little bit like shouting into a void,' said Hertzberg, who has made about 12 visits to the Capitol now. 'So it feels good to go into senator's offices and be there and take up space for a while and make them see, or their staff see that there is a person behind all this.'

Is Your State On The List? The Top 10 States Rideshare Users Are Losing Patience
Is Your State On The List? The Top 10 States Rideshare Users Are Losing Patience

Auto Blog

timean hour ago

  • Auto Blog

Is Your State On The List? The Top 10 States Rideshare Users Are Losing Patience

Uber and Lyft are not impressing everyone Ridesharing is becoming increasingly common, and companies like Waymo and Tesla are advancing the service by integrating autonomous technology. However, a new study reveals that some states are far better than others when it comes to this platform's customer support. Blakely Law Firm analyzed online search trends across all 50 U.S. states for over 10 keywords related to 'Uber Customer Support' and 'Lyft Customer Support.' 0:09 / 0:09 The top 10 best value used cars in 2025 Watch More Using data from Google Keyword Planner, the research identified where rideshare users are most actively seeking help, ranking states based on average monthly support-related searches per 100,000 residents. The top ten states where riders are most desperately seeking support, ranked from worst to best, were Georgia, New York, Maryland, Nevada, Illinois, Florida, New Jersey, Connecticut, Massachusetts, and Texas. Uber headquarters, California — Source: Getty New York is having a rough time with ridesharing Regarding the second-worst ranked state, New York, a spokesperson at Blakeley Law Firm said: 'New York is showing a clear sign of growing frustration among rideshare users who are increasingly turning to the internet in search of customer support. Behind each search is a rider facing an unresolved issue—whether it's a billing error, a safety concern, or a lost item. The high concentration of support-related searches in this state suggests deeper systemic concerns with how quickly and effectively these services respond to user needs. To improve the customer experience and restore rider trust, it's essential for rideshare companies operating in New York to invest in more accessible support channels, streamline issue resolution processes, and provide clearer guidance to users facing challenges.' New York City residents also face expensive rideshare service charges, with a one-way run from Manhattan to JFK costing anywhere from $75 to over $100. However, the state's unfavorable placement at the top of this study's rankings could be partially attributed to how companies like Lyft and Uber treat their drivers. Lyft app — Source: Getty Autoblog Newsletter Autoblog brings you car news; expert reviews and exciting pictures and video. Research and compare vehicles, too. Sign up or sign in with Google Facebook Microsoft Apple By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. A Bloomberg investigation last October found that Uber and Lyft routinely locked drivers out of their apps to erase some of the drivers' working time from records, allowing the companies to boost profits and circumvent New York City's minimum pay rule. The city's minimum pay rule for rideshare drivers is based on the ratio of time spent driving versus waiting. Locking workers out of the apps made it appear as if drivers were busier, reducing the minimum amounts Uber and Lyft had to pay. This week, New York City's Taxi and Limousine Commission voted to raise minimum pay standards for Uber and Lyft drivers by 5% and adopt new regulations curbing app lockouts. Final thoughts While states like New York were surveyed as struggling with rideshare service satisfaction among customers, recent changes to New York City laws aiding drivers could boost the platform's quality of service, reducing the likelihood of problems emerging requiring customer support. Still, according to the survey, companies like Uber and Lyft need to improve response times in several states and provide more precise guidance to those seeking assistance. It's also fair to wonder why these resources weren't available when these two companies posted their strongest financial results ever in 2024. Uber and Lyft's reported customer service struggles in states like Georgia also give emerging autonomous rideshare players, such as Waymo, a chance to enter these markets and gain traction with quality rider support. About the Author Cody Carlson View Profile

Gold rebounds from over one-month low on weaker dollar
Gold rebounds from over one-month low on weaker dollar

Reuters

timean hour ago

  • Reuters

Gold rebounds from over one-month low on weaker dollar

June 30 (Reuters) - Gold reversed course and edged higher on Monday, supported by a weaker dollar, after hitting a more than one-month low earlier as easing U.S.-China trade tensions dampened safe-haven demand and bolstered risk appetite. Spot gold rose 0.3% to $3,281.65 per ounce, as of 0216 GMT, after hitting its lowest since May 29 earlier in the session. U.S. gold futures were up 0.2% at $3,293.30. "There is less of a 'doom and gloom' outlook surrounding both tariff talks and events in the Middle East, which is relegating gold to play second fiddle to risk assets," KCM Trade Chief Market Analyst Tim Waterer said. Asian shares firmed, with Wall Street futures advancing, while U.S. dollar index (.DXY), opens new tab fell 0.2%. A lower dollar makes greenback-priced bullion less expensive. The U.S. and China have resolved issues surrounding shipments of rare earth minerals and magnets to the U.S., Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said on Friday, adding, the Trump administration's various trade deals with other countries could be done by the September 1 Labor Day holiday. Meanwhile, U.S. President Donald Trump abruptly cut off trade talks with Canada on Friday over its tax targeting U.S. technology firms, saying that it was a "blatant attack" and he would set a new tariff rate on Canadian goods within a week. The Iran-Israel ceasefire after a 12-day conflict also appeared to be holding, further reducing safe-haven demand. "The dollar remains pressured which is limiting the extent of the slide for gold. However, the $3,250 level shapes as a key support level for gold. Any breach of this level could see losses accelerate towards the $3,200 level," Waterer said. Stable geopolitical and economic conditions often reduce demand for gold as a safe-haven asset, while non-yielding bullion's appeal further wanes in a high-interest-rate environment. Spot silver was down 0.1% at $36.02 per ounce, platinum firmed 1% to $1,353.13, while palladium was up 0.2% at $1,135.48.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store