
DOJ takes down sick $14.6 billion healthcare fraud scheme that saw patients given ‘unecessary' procedures
The operation, which the department called the largest healthcare fraud takedown in its history, collared 324 defendants, including members of transnational criminal groups and American doctors and pharmacists.
The sick scheme sought to bilk the federal government out of $14.6 billion, with the actual loss to the US government totaling about $2.9 billion, officials said.
Advertisement
6 Hundreds were charged Monday in connection with the largest health care fraud in history that involved $14.6 billion in potential schemes, the Department of Justice revealed Monday.
Getty Images
The feds seized as much as $245 million 'in cash, luxury vehicles, cryptocurrency, and other assets' in the sweeping crackdown, the DOJ said, and stopped $4 billion from going out the door to the health care fraudsters.
Another $48.6 million in alleged civil fraud charges and civil settlements related to the schemes were also disclosed.
Advertisement
Of the nearly 200 federal cases and 90 state cases involved, almost $3 billion in funds were actually swindled from US taxpayers.
'Make no mistake — this administration will not tolerate criminals who line their pockets with taxpayer dollars while endangering the health and safety of our communities,' Bondi added.
DOJ Criminal Division head Matthew Galeotti said that some of the ill-gotten gains came at the cost of exacerbating the nation's opioid epidemic and harming those fighting against drug addiction.
One scheme involved the trafficking of more than 15 million prescription opioid pills — including oxycodone, hydrocodone and carisoprodol — from pharmacists to street drug dealers to users.
Advertisement
'Health care fraud isn't just theft — it's trafficking in trust. Today's announcement shows that when doctors become drug dealers and treatment centers become profit-driven fraud rings, DEA will act,' said Acting Administrator Robert Murphy of the DEA.
6 Former federal prosecutor Neama Rahmani told The Post that the crackdown appeared to be politically motivated, as President Trump has asked Republicans to root out 'waste, fraud and abuse' in Medicaid.
Department of Justice)
Another scheme involved US-based defendants conspiring to take $1.1 billion from Medicare recipients by pressuring them to undergo amniotic wound allografts, in some cases when the procedure was 'unnecessary' since the patients were in hospice and just days or weeks away from death.
Former federal prosecutor Neama Rahmani told The Post that the crackdown appeared to be politically motivated, as President Trump has asked Republicans to root out 'waste, fraud and abuse' in Medicaid through his 'big, beautiful bill' working its way through Congress.
Advertisement
The most bogus medical claims — around $10.6 billion — were submitted to Medicare by transnational crime organizations that had foreign straw owners from Estonia, Russia and elsewhere buy up dozens of medical supply firms to needlessly purchase urinary catheters and other medical equipment.
The plot involved the theft of more than 1 million Americans' identities nationwide to submit the claims.
6 The plot involved the theft of more than 1 million Americans' identities nationwide to submit the claims.
AP
Proceeds were then laundered through cryptocurrency exchanges and later into foreign shell companies.
At least 12 culprits were arrested for participating in the scheme, dubbed 'Operation Gold Rush' by the DOJ, four of whom were apprehended in Estonia and seven of whom were taken at US ports of entry.
Additionally, a Pakistan-United Arab Emirates national owned a billing company that tried to charge Medicaid treatment center owners in Arizona roughly $650 million for substance abuse services.
6 'These criminals didn't just steal someone else's money. They stole from you,' Galeotti told reporters Monday.
Getty Images
The treatments were often poor or not provided at all — and the treatment center owners allegedly paid kickbacks for patients 'recruited from the homeless population and Native American reservations,' DOJ officials said.
Advertisement
The foreign owner of the billing company nabbed $25 million before the feds got wind and used the money to buy a $2.9 million home at a golf club in Dubai.
6 Genetic testing and telemedicine fraud also bilked taxpayers contributing to Medicare programs by more than $1.1 billion.
Getty Images
Genetic testing and telemedicine fraud also bilked taxpayers contributing to Medicare programs by more than $1.1 billion.
Scores of other defendants bilked Medicare, Medicaid and private insurers in schemes amounting to $1.84 billion in false claims for medical testing, treatments and visits that involved alleged kickbacks and bribes.
Advertisement
6 A Pakistani-United Arab Emirates national nabbed $25 million through bogus claims before the feds got wind and used the money to buy a $2.9 million home at a golf club in Dubai.
Christopher Sadowski
'These criminals didn't just steal someone else's money. They stole from you,' Galeotti told reporters Monday.
'Every fraudulent claim, every fake billing, every kickback scheme represents money taken directly from the pockets of American taxpayers who fund these essential programs through their hard work and sacrifice.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Kansas City woman wins $7.1M in landmark illegal towing case — what you should know about predatory towing
Predatory towing has long been a thorn in the side of American drivers — whether their car breaks down at home or they're forced to move it after a crash. But a Kansas City woman just won a $7.1 million judgment against a local towing company, sending a message to the U.S. towing industry: illegal practices won't go unpunished. IBISWorld estimates the towing industry is worth $14.4 billion as of 2024. Attorney Brianne Thomas, a partner at Boyd Kenter Thomas & Parish LLC, calls it a righteous fight, one that began in 2022, when her client parked a food truck in an empty lot behind a shuttered restaurant. There were no signs forbidding parking, no fences, and no warnings. And yet, within 30 minutes, the truck — her entire livelihood — was towed away. 'They were successful, they had her truck for 699 days,' Thomas told Fox 4 Kansas City. Now, with a verdict in hand, the case is being seen as a wake-up call for the towing industry. I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 6 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast) Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan 'works every single time' to kill debt, get rich in America — and that 'anyone' can do it The woman's food truck was the only vehicle in the lot at the time of the tow. Under Missouri law, a property owner must be present for a tow to be considered legal, but no one was on-site. 'They towed the truck after 30 minutes; they towed illegally,' Thomas told Fox 4. Instead of paying the thousands of dollars the company demanded to release the truck, the woman filed a complaint with the Attorney General's office. That decision paid off: a jury has now awarded her $6.9 million in punitive damages, plus $200,000 in compensatory damages. 'The people of Kansas City spoke loud. They spoke not just to this community but to the entire towing industry, and they said it's not going to happen here, it's not going to happen anywhere,' Philip Danaher, an attorney at Danaher Law Firm, told Fox 4. As for the tow company, it appears to have shut down. Its office is now up for sale, and calls to the listed number go unanswered. A neighbor near a second location confirmed the business ceased operations within the last month. Read more: You don't have to be a millionaire to gain access to . In fact, you can get started with as little as $10 — here's how Predatory billing affects 29.8% of crash-related tows in the U.S., according to the Department of Transportation, but there are ways to avoid becoming a victim. Know your local laws. Towing rules vary by city and state, and the definition of a 'legal' tow isn't always obvious. Look up your area's rules, especially if you regularly park in commercial or high-traffic zones. Be alert for warning signs. Watch for signage, fencing, painted curbs and fire lanes, even in empty lots. If you're unsure whether it's private property, play it safe and park elsewhere. Document the scene. If your car is towed, take photos of where it was parked, and ask for a copy of the tow authorization. Don't just pay the fee. If something seems off, like missing signage or an unusually high bill, you don't have to accept it. File a formal complaint. That's exactly what the Kansas City woman did when her truck was taken without cause, and it made all the difference. She reported the incident to the Missouri Attorney General's office, and, after a lengthy legal battle, won a $7.1 million verdict. Her story is proof that taking action can lead to real accountability. A tow shouldn't wreck your livelihood, but if it does, legal recourse is an option, and fighting back can work. This tiny hot Costco item has skyrocketed 74% in price in under 2 years — but now the retail giant is restricting purchases. Here's how to buy the coveted asset in bulk Robert Kiyosaki warns of a 'Greater Depression' coming to the US — with millions of Americans going poor. But he says these 2 'easy-money' assets will bring in 'great wealth'. How to get in now Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you? Stay in the know. Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise sent straight to your inbox every week for free. This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.

USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Federal judge blocks Trump from ending temporary Haitian immigration program
The Haitian program is one of several the Department of Homeland Security seeks to end as the Trump administration takes a harder line on immigration. A federal judge blocked the Trump administration from ending a temporary program that provides work permits and protection from deportation for more than 500,000 Haitian immigrants months earlier than it was set to expire. The Department of Homeland Security announced in February it was rescinding the program called 'temporary protected status' for Haitians. Trump's predecessor, Democratic President Joe Biden, had set to run through Feb. 3, 2026. But U.S. District Judge Brian Cogan in Brooklyn ruled July 1 that DHS Secretary Kristi Noem did not follow instructions and a timeline mandated by Congress to reconsider the program. "Plaintiffs are likely to (and, indeed, do) succeed on the merits," Cogan wrote. "Plaintiffs have also shown that they will suffer irreparable injury without postponement." Federal courts blocked Trump from ending most enrollment in temporary work programs for immigrants during his first term. But the Supreme Court in May let the administration end the temporary program for the Venezuelans, signaling that other terminations could be allowed. The Trump administration also halted another program protecting immigrants from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela in June. And Trump imposed a travel ban against people arriving from a dozen countries including Haiti in June. The State Department has a Level 4 'Do Not Travel' warning for Haiti, citing widespread kidnappings, violent crime, and near-total collapse of emergency services. The advocacy group Haitian Bridge Alliance condemned the administration's move to end the temporary work program after the 2021 assassination of President Jovenel Moise and a 7.2 magnitude earthquake a month later. The group said the country where more than 1 million people are displaced faces rampant gang violence, and a lack of food and fuel. 'This is not just cruel − it's state-sanctioned endangerment,' Guerline Jozef, executive director of Haitian Bridge Alliance, said in a statement about ending the program. 'Sending back hundreds of thousands of people to a country overrun by gangs, where hospitals are shuttered and food is scarce, is a direct assault on Black immigrant communities." Noem decided to end the temporay program Aug. 3 and then pushed the date back to Sept. 2. Cogan found that the government didn't argue Noem had the statutory authority to end the temporary program. Instead, the government argued Noem was exercising her authority under the Immigration and Nationality Act. Cogan, who was appointed by George W. Bush, ruled Noem's action was "unlawful" for lack of statutory authority. Cogan also said Haitians' interests in being able to live and work in the United States "far outweigh" potential harm to the U.S. government, which remains free to enforce immigration laws and terminate the program. The case was filed on March 14 by nine Haitians who said Noem did not do a required review of current conditions in Haiti before ending the temporary program early.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Paramount to pay $16 million to settle with Trump in CBS News ‘60 Minutes' lawsuit
After months of legal negotiations and wrangling, the question was less about whether Paramount would settle with Donald Trump, and more about how much the president's lawyers would agree to. As NBC News reported, that question now has an answer. Paramount has agreed to pay $16 million to settle a lawsuit brought by President Donald Trump that had alleged an interview that aired on CBS's '60 Minutes' last year with Kamala Harris, his Democratic opponent for the presidency, was deceptively edited. The agreement in principle, proposed by a mediator, includes plaintiffs' fees and costs and — except for fees and costs — will be allocated to Trump's future presidential library, Paramount Global said in a statement late Tuesday. The company did not apologize as part of the deal or admit any fault. Nevertheless, the plaintiff wasted little time in gloating: In a written statement from a presidential spokesperson, Team Trump boasted that the settlement 'holds the Fake News media accountable for their wrongdoing and deceit.' Except that's not what happened. By now, the basic elements of this story are probably familiar, but to briefly recap, shortly before the 2024 presidential election, it's customary for the major party nominees to sit down for '60 Minutes' interviews. Last fall, Harris agreed, while Trump initially accepted the invitation before backing out soon after. Harris' interview wasn't especially memorable — it was, however, nominated for an Emmy Award — though Trump has whined incessantly about it for several months, claiming that the program deceptively edited the segment. The Republican's claims have already been thoroughly discredited, but his hysterics have only gotten worse: The president recently accused '60 Minutes' of, among other things, 'unlawful and illegal behavior.' Trump added that CBS should lose its broadcast license and 'pay a big price,' while calling on the Federal Communications Commission to 'impose the maximum fines and punishment.' But it was Trump's civil suit against CBS that was of particular interest, in which he asked for $20 billion in damages (that's not a typo), based on his conspiratorial beliefs about the news magazine's election coverage. Given the bizarre nature of Trump's assertions, and the fact that there really wasn't anything meaningfully wrong with the broadcast, it was unclear why anyone would take the civil suit seriously, or why the case would need to be settled at all. Indeed, after Paramount Global entered settlement negotiations, critics expressed fears that the company was prepared to turn over millions of dollars, not because '60 Minutes' did anything untoward, but because Paramount wants the Trump administration to approve an unrelated merger deal. Paramount on Tuesday cited a previous statement regarding the Skydance merger. 'This lawsuit is completely separate from and unrelated to the Skydance transaction and the FCC approval process,' it said. Those assurances are unlikely to quiet concerns that the corporation is writing a $16 million check to Trump's future presidential library because Paramount hopes to influence the Trump administration's decision-making process. In fact, The Wall Street Journal reported last week, 'Over the past few months, Paramount leaders have been wrestling with how to pay to settle the lawsuit without exposing directors and officers to liability in potential future shareholder litigation or to criminal charges for bribing a public official.' This dynamic was not lost on Capitol Hill observers. 'Paramount appears to be trying to settle a lawsuit that it has assessed as 'completely without merit,'' Democratic Sens. Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders and Ron Wyden said in a recent letter to Chairwoman Shari Redstone. 'Under the federal bribery statute, it is illegal to corruptly give anything of value to public officials to influence an official act. If Paramount officials make these concessions in a quid pro quo arrangement to influence President Trump or other Administration officials, they may be breaking the law.' Now that the settlement is official, and Paramount is paying Team Trump to settle a case that appears baseless, it's likely these questions are poised to grow considerably louder. This ongoing debacle has already cost the network — over the last couple of months, the head of CBS News and the executive producer of '60 Minutes' have both stepped down — and those costs now also include a steep price tag. As for the specific figure, The New York Times reported, 'The size of the settlement, $16 million, is the same sum that ABC News agreed to pay in December to settle a defamation case filed by Mr. Trump against the network and one of its anchors, George Stephanopoulos.' This is a developing story. Check back for updates. This article was originally published on