logo
Mother of six-year-old boy who ‘killed a newborn on French maternity ward' had been told twice to keep an eye on her child but he continued to roam unsupervised, victim's family claims

Mother of six-year-old boy who ‘killed a newborn on French maternity ward' had been told twice to keep an eye on her child but he continued to roam unsupervised, victim's family claims

Daily Mail​21-07-2025
The family of the newborn killed after being allegedly dropped by a six-year-old left to roam a French maternity ward alone have claimed that they had spoken to the child's mother twice telling her to keep an eye on him.
Five-day-old Baby Zayneb-Cassandra was found lying unresponsive on the floor beside her crib with a traumatic brain injury at the Jeanne-de-Flandre Children's Hospital in the northern city of Lille, France, on Friday, July 11 and died from her injuries last Tuesday.
A boy, whose mother was in the maternity war, was found standing on a chair beside her and is believed to have plucked the tiny baby from her crib and dropped her on the floor.
Karima, a cousin of Zayneb's grieving father has claimed that hospital staff were 'warned' of the child's 'abnormal behaviour' and that the baby's grandfather had spoken to the boy's mother two times, urging her to keep an eye on her son.
She also alleged that the boy had fixated on Zayneb, calling her 'my doll', and had likely touched her unsupervised a day prior to her fall.
'The day before, Zayneb had already been found without a diaper or electrodes, wet and suffering from hypothermia,' Karima claimed.
When the family notified the hospital of this, they claimed that they were told by staff that the baby must have taken her diapers off herself.
Baby Zayneb's grieving father Mohamed-Hamza told French press that he will 'fight to identify those responsible' for the tragedy
Baby Zayneb, who was born six weeks premature by caesarean to parents Mohamed-Hamza and Sephora, was resuscitated twice before she died last week.
Lille's prosecutor's office on Friday confirmed that the infant died from trauma 'consistent with a fall to the floor'.
'A six-year-old child, a member of another family, was indeed seen near the crib and the child on the floor,' prosecutors also confirmed.
Zayneb's family are also urging other witnesses to come forward, with Karima explaining that what Zayneb's mother doesn't want 'is for people to think that she left her child unattended,' when she 'entrusted her to the hospital staff'.
The boy and the baby were discovered by Delphine, a young woman who had recently given birth herself, who rushed into the room after hearing what she described as a 'loud bang'.
Delphine later told Le Parisien that the boy in question had been disruptive for days and was not being supervised as his mother was also recovering from giving birth.
'He was running around everywhere and had already touched a baby in a stroller,' Delphine said.
Questions are mounting as to how the boy was able to gain access to Zayneb's crib in the neonatal unit alone, despite being reported as a 'disruptive presence' in the hospital.
Karima explained how the boy was running riot in the halls for days after being dropped off at the hospital each morning by his father.
'The father would drop him off in the ward from 7am to 8pm,' she said.
Mohamed-Hamza's cousin Karima alleged that the six-year-old boy had fixated on Zayneb, calling her 'my doll', and had likely touched her unsupervised a day prior to her fall
Zayneb's grandmother, Fatma, told the Voix du Nord newspaper: 'The boy would arrive at 7am and spend all day running up and down the hallways.
'All the mothers were complaining, and a nurse even warned the child's mother that there was a problem. He was entering the other rooms.
'He also entered Zayneb's room for the first time. He said she looked like a doll, and my husband, who was there, took him out.'
'It seems he tried to grab her by her nappy, and she fell on her head,' Fatma concluded.
'My family is destroyed... My daughter is devastated. Coming home without her baby is inconceivable.'
Zayneb's distraught father, Mohamed-Hamza, told Le Parisien he doesn't blame the boy who allegedly caused his daughter's life-ending injuries, but hit out at the hospital for their lack of care.
'Every six-year-old is a little disruptive. I don't blame the mother; she had just given birth... But the child should have been supervised,' the 23-year-old declared.
Fatma added that she had to push medical staff to arrange psychological support for her inconsolable daughter-in-law after she was informed her child had died.
A criminal investigation into the tragedy was opened this week by the juvenile unit of the Lille Judicial Police Service, in conjunction with local prosecutors.
The hospital also announced the opening of 'an internal administrative investigation'.
A spokesperson said: 'This human tragedy has deeply affected the staff and teams of Lille University Children's Hospital, as well as the other families present.'
A separate statement provided to French press acknowledged 'a particularly serious and upsetting exceptional event, unrelated to care'.
'The thoughts of the University Hospital professionals are first and foremost with the young victim, her family, and her loved ones,' it read.
The hospital also added that 'measures to strictly limit visits to the neonatal units of the Lille University Hospital have been taken as a precautionary measure'.
Mohamed-Hamza and Sephora have not yet filed an official complaint, but dismissed the statement.
'It won't bring my daughter back... But we're waiting for answers. There was a breach, and I'm going to fight to identify those responsible.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Labour's taken state spying of social media to whole new level – leaked emails read like their from dictatorship not UK
Labour's taken state spying of social media to whole new level – leaked emails read like their from dictatorship not UK

The Sun

timean hour ago

  • The Sun

Labour's taken state spying of social media to whole new level – leaked emails read like their from dictatorship not UK

THE Chinese-owned social media platform TikTok has often aroused fears that personal data collected on its users could end up in the hands of the Chinese Communist Party. What fewer people imagined was that our own Government would try to use TikTok in order to police speech in Britain. Yet that is exactly what has happened. 7 7 7 Leaked emails show that a shady branch of government known as the National Security Online Information Team has been leaning on TikTok to suppress content that is critical of official migration and criminal justice policy. On several occasions during the riots which followed the Southport murders a year ago, the unit approached TikTok requesting that it 'assess' some posts made by its users — effectively a crude instruction to suppress what they were saying. Legitimate debate Britain, like every other country, operates security services that spy on terrorists who are plotting atrocities as well as organisations involved in propagating serious public disorder. Were a government organisation to prevent a bomb attack which could have killed dozens of people, no one would be too bothered about how it had obtained the vital information. But the emails show activity which goes far beyond the demands of national security. In one case, officials drew TikTok's attention to a post that suggested a large number of migrants were 'undocumented fighting age males'. Another suggested that TikTok take a look at users who spread 'concerning narratives about the police and a two-tier system [of justice] '. I am sure the police and courts will defend themselves robustly against a charge of operating two-tier justice, but whether or not you think they are doing this, it is a perfectly legitimate area for public debate, just as is the question of whether ethnic minorities suffer disadvantage in the workplace, schools, hospitals and so on. Those who made online accusations of a disproportionate response by the police towards protesters, and who dubbed our Prime Minister 'two-tier Keir', had good reason for raising their concerns. Ten days before the Southport murders, the Harehills area of Leeds erupted into rioting after children from a Roma family were taken into care. Protesters descend on Canary Wharf migrant hotel as police surround building amid fears over 'summer of riots' Days later there was a machete fight on Southend seafront. Keir Starmer had little to say about those grim developments, yet went into overdrive when protesters took to the streets following the Southport riots. True, there were plenty of thugs among them, but to insinuate that all protesters were driven by nothing more than 'far-right hatred' was outrageous. I am not going to defend Lucy Connolly, who was jailed for 31 months for remarks she made in the wake of the Southport killings — her words read like a pretty clear incitement to violence even if she did not intend them to. But it is perfectly reasonable to question whether her punishment was consistent with the treatment handed out to extreme Islamist preachers and Irish Republican sympathisers. Take the Prevent programme, which was set up by the Blair government specifically to deal with the threat of Islamist terrorism in the wake of the 2005 Tube bombings. 7 7 7 Over time it seems to have become more concerned with the far right. Nineteen per cent of those reported to the programme in the year ending March 2024 were recorded as supporting a far right ideology, against only 13 per cent with Islamist ideology — in spite of the latter being responsible for far more terror attacks and killings than the former over the past two decades. For Government officials to try to stop us discussing these matters is something you might associate more with a dictatorship than with British democracy. We have a human rights lawyer as PM, but where is he when it comes to defending our long-held right to free expression? Labour, however, has taken state surveillance of social media to a new level To be fair to Starmer, it is not just his government that has been trying to silence its critics. The National Security Online Information Team was derived from a body set up during Covid to try to gag critics of vaccines and lockdown. The Online Safety Act, which places obligations on social media companies to police content — and which the Government has used to put pressure on TikTok and other companies — was the brainchild of the last Conservative government. Deep concerns Labour, however, has taken state surveillance of social media to a new level. Particularly disgraceful was Technology Secretary Peter Kyle's attempt this week to claim that Nigel Farage was on the side of Jimmy Savile for daring to criticise the Online Safety Act. To listen to Kyle you would think the act was about nothing other than age verification for users of online pornography (not that Savile used the internet to abuse his victims). There are many people, myself included, who support the age verification measures but who have deep concerns about the act's other provisions, in particular its demand that technologies companies act against anything that could fall under the vague definition of being 'harmful to children'. Even the day's news could be deemed harmful to children if it upsets their immature sensibilities. The trouble is that the Online Safety Act was pushed through on the back of emotional propaganda, with few people realising the dark and disturbing ways in which it could be used to silence any of us. We are belatedly realising that now. 7

Harvey Willgoose death 'no less tragic' if teen cleared of murder
Harvey Willgoose death 'no less tragic' if teen cleared of murder

BBC News

timean hour ago

  • BBC News

Harvey Willgoose death 'no less tragic' if teen cleared of murder

The death of a 15-year-old schoolboy is not "any less tragic or pointless" if the pupil who stabbed him is cleared of murder, a jury has been told. Harvey Willgoose died after he was attacked during his lunch break at All Saints Catholic High School in Sheffield on 3 February.A fellow student, who is also 15, is on trial at Sheffield Crown Court after admitting manslaughter but denying barrister, Gul Nawaz Hussain KC, told jurors on Friday that if they cleared his client of murder, "it doesn't mean Harvey's death is any less tragic or pointless". Mr Hussain said: "A loved son has lost his life, a family have been deprived of him. A family mourns him."Another boy of a similar age had admitted his fault and, whatever happens, will pay the price for it."The defendant has accepted responsibility for what he has done. He needs to pay a price, but that price must be a just one."He told the jury that a not guilty verdict to murder would be the just decision in this case, according to the evidence. 'Final straw' The barrister told the court the defendant had a "horrific home life" and suffered a "background of bullying".He said "all that was what came together" when he encountered Harvey and this was the "final straw".Mr Hussain added that his client had reason to fear he told the jury he wanted to make it "very, very, clear" that he was not "maligning Harvey or dishonouring his memory".He said: "We are not saying that Harvey was all bad or the defendant was all good. Nothing of the sort."He discussed evidence of Harvey's "association with football hooliganism", with one school record describing him as "extremely aggressive and threatening" and a social care record saying he "threatened aggression".A range of interactions have been described between the defendant and Harvey that morning, and Mr Hussain said: "The defendant wanted to avoid Harvey. He did not want trouble."However he described how, in a lesson just before the incident, Harvey had mocked the defendant and been aggressive towards the CCTV footage of the stabbing, Mr Hussain said it could be seen that Harvey was the "first one to make it physical".The barrister said his client thought it was an aggressive approach from Harvey and the fact that he stabbed him so hard, breaking one of his ribs and piercing his heart, was further evidence that he "lost control".He added his client was "so scared of being hurt, so frightened, so devoid of calm, that that boy had never ever felt this way in his life before".The barrister also pointed to how his client was heard to to say "you know I can't control it" by a teacher seconds after stabbing Hussain told the jury this was the "best piece of evidence that you all have as to why (the defendant) did what he did".He concluded his closing speech to the jury on Friday morning and the judge, Mrs Justice Ellenbogen, began summing up the evidence. Listen to highlights from South Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North

Incredible Bentley TANK uncovered by cops after being abandoned & left to rust in bushes outside garage
Incredible Bentley TANK uncovered by cops after being abandoned & left to rust in bushes outside garage

The Sun

timean hour ago

  • The Sun

Incredible Bentley TANK uncovered by cops after being abandoned & left to rust in bushes outside garage

AN astonishing Bentley tank has been unearthed from a bush by cops after being abandoned outside a garage. The £200,000 GT Coupe was discovered during a raid on a workshop in St Petersburg, Russia. 2 2 Immigration officers found the luxury vehicle on 30 July when they were looking for illegal workers. Police video footage of the operation shows the hybrid motor parked up among weeds and bushes outside the garage. Officers also discovered 67 hybrid and heavily adapted vehicles on the site either with illegal registration documents or unroadworthy bodywork changes. A police spokesperson said: "Given the nature of the site, special attention was paid to vehicles." The Bentley is believed to be modelled on an earlier "Ultratank" built by Russian petrolhead Konstantin Zarutskiy for his YouTube channel AcademeG. His prototype, with higher tracks, could reach 81 mph, slower than the Bentley's original 200mph but still faster than any other tracked vehicle. This isn't the first time a luxury motor has been seized in a police crackdown on crime. In the UK too, police are frequently confiscating supercars to improve safety in the capital. Last year, Scotland Yard confiscated vehicles including a McClaren, Bentley, Rolls-Royce, Ferrari and Lamborghini. I bought £13,000 Bentley only to learn it was once owned by legendary TV host of classic 1980s game show Westminster local residents complained about cars driving poorly or at high-speed. So the force worked with Westminster City Council and the Motor Insurers' Bureau to remove nuisance drivers who drive around the area more frequently in the summer months. The operation launched on the evening of August 2 and ran across that weekend seizing £6million worth of cars. Officers also made five arrests including for insurance fraud, using a mobile phone at the wheel, not using a seatbelt and driving without due care. Metropolitan Police Special Inspector Geoff Tatman said: "The Met is working to put communities first - listening to and tackling their concerns. "This hugely successful operation has proved we are dealing with those crimes, such as anti-social driving, that is causing most distress to residents and tourists. "This brilliant partnership work between the Met's Vehicle Enforcement Team, Motor Insurers' Bureau and Westminster City Council demonstrates to Londoners we are doubling down on crime on the roads. "It's also testament to the hard work and dedication of the Met Special Constables – volunteer police officers - that play a vital role in our mission to make London safer and kindly give up their free time help serve the community."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store