&w=3840&q=100)
Voter roll updates before polls are legal requirement: CEC Gyanesh Kumar
Addressing reporters, Kumar said that the voter list must be updated ahead of every election, as per the law. He explained that such detailed revisions had not been carried out since January 1, 2003.
"As part of the law, before every election, the voter list needs to be updated. A detailed investigation of the voter list and all voter details was not conducted after January 1, 2003. This is supposed to be a general practice," he said.
The CEC also noted that opposition parties themselves had previously raised concerns about inaccuracies in the voter rolls.
"Nearly every political party complained about issues in the authenticity of the voter list, and demanded updates. More than 100,000 booth-level officers are working on it with the support of all political parties. No ineligible person will be able to make it into this list," Kumar added.
Bihar polls: Special Intensive Revision
The SIR is a targeted effort by the Election Commission of India to verify and clean the voter list before elections, aiming to ensure its accuracy and legitimacy.
However, opposition parties have raised questions over the exercise. Congress leader Sachin Pilot, speaking in Rajasthan's Dausa, voiced doubts about the SIR process and accused the Election Commission of acting in haste.
"The haste with which the Election Commission has taken this step raises significant doubts, and a group of opposition parties met them and asked questions, but no satisfactory answers were received," Pilot said.
Fears of voter disenfranchisement
Several opposition parties, including the Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD), fear that the revision process may be used to exclude legitimate voters, particularly those from underprivileged and marginalised communities.
In response, the Election Commission maintained that the revision exercise is being conducted in full accordance with Article 326 of the Constitution and the Representation of the People Act, 1950. The Commission added that the goal is to remove ineligible entries without leaving out any genuine voter.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
an hour ago
- New Indian Express
Odisha's infrastructure plans in eco-zones to be reviewed by CEC
BHUBANESWAR: Odisha government's plans for tourism and infrastructure projects in sensitive zones of critical protected areas (PAs) of the state have drawn the notice of the Supreme Court-appointed Central Empowered Committee (CEC). The panel has now called for a meeting and asked chief secretary Manoj Ahuja to discuss crucial tourism and bridge infrastructure projects as well as the matter pertaining to eco sensitive zone (ESZ) finalisation. The meeting is scheduled on July 17 at New Delhi. Sources said issues of governance and execution model for tourism infrastructure which have a bearing on sanctuaries, national parks, tiger reserve areas and Ramsar sites will be taken up by the CEC. Similarly, tourism projects requiring forest and ESZ clearances and stake of the Tourism department in ESZ finalisation will also be discussed. The SC-constituted panel has also asked the principal chief conservator of forests (general), PCCF (wildlife) and Secretary, Tourism department to be take part in the meeting which will specifically discuss two critical infrastructure projects in the state. One of the contentious projects is the proposed construction of a two-lane national highway over Chilika lagoon by the National Highways Authority of India. The 7.740 km project, estimated at a cost of around Rs 526.08 crore, had prompted the expert appraisal committee (EAC) of the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEFCC) to seek a cost-benefit analysis from the state government.
United News of India
an hour ago
- United News of India
Mahua Moitra moves SC against ECI's special electoral roll revision in Bihar
New Delhi/Kolkata , July 6 (UNI) Trinamool Congress MP Mahua Moitra has filed a petition in the Supreme Court challenging the Election Commission of India's (ECI) June 24 order, which mandates a Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of the electoral rolls in Bihar. The Krishnanagar MP has sought the quashing of the order, terming it "unconstitutional" and in "violation" of fundamental rights guaranteed under Articles 14, 19(1)(a), 21, 325, and 326 of the Constitution of India, as well as provisions of the Representation of People Act, 1950 and the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960. 'Just filed writ petition in Supreme Court challenging ECI notification to conduct SIR in Bihar & seeking a stay on conducting the same in other states including Bengal,' Moitra posted on her X handle. The petition argues that the ECI's directive introduces "extraneous and legally unsanctioned" requirements for retaining or including names in the electoral rolls, including the production of documents proving citizenship — such as proof of citizenship of one or both parents. In the petition filed through Advocate Neha Rathi, the Trinamool Congress MP argued that these requirements are not envisaged by Article 326 of the Constitution or by any provision of the RP Act, and they create arbitrary hurdles for eligible voters. On June 24, the EC announced a Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar ahead of the Assembly elections scheduled later this year. As part of the process, voters are required to submit one of 11 approved documents, such as a birth certificate or passport, to verify their date and place of birth. Those born before July 1, 1987, need only provide their own documents. However, those born between July 1, 1987, and December 2, 2004, must also submit one parent's documents, while individuals born after December 2, 2004, must provide documents for both parents. According to the plea, the ECI order excludes commonly accepted identity proofs like Aadhaar and ration cards, disproportionately burdening voters — especially those in rural and marginalised communities. Current field reports from Bihar, the petition notes, suggest that lakhs of voters face imminent risk of disenfranchisement due to these stringent document requirements. 'This is the first time the Election Commission has initiated such an exercise, where voters already listed on the rolls and having voted in past elections are now being asked to revalidate their eligibility. She warns that the move may result in widespread disenfranchisement, undermining democratic principles and the conduct of free and fair elections,' Moitra argued in her petition. The petition also raises concerns about procedural inadequacies. It highlights that the order mandates the exclusion of names from the draft rolls if fresh enumeration forms are not submitted by July 25, 2025 — a deadline the petitioner calls arbitrary and unreasonable, especially for voters needing time to procure documents. The MP has additionally sought a direction to prevent the ECI from extending similar revision drives to other states. She claims the ECI has already issued instructions for the rollout of a similar exercise in West Bengal starting August 2025. Drawing parallels with the controversial National Register of Citizens (NRC), the plea underscores that the revision exercise appears to follow a similar structure and could disproportionately affect the economically and socially vulnerable populations. Interestingly enough, West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee on Thursday strongly criticised the new guidelines under the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) process, alleging they are intended to target West Bengal ahead of its 2026 Assembly elections, and indirectly accused the Election Commission of acting as an agent of the BJP. Criticising the Election Commission for taking the decision unilaterally, the chief minister had said, 'This is alarming for democracy. 'India became independent in 1947. Why are people born between 1987 and 2004 being targeted? I don't understand.' The West Bengal chief minister had claimed that the Election Commission could not take such steps without consulting political parties, underscoring that India is a democratic nation with a federal structure, and that no political party or elected government should be treated as subservient. 'Is this being done so that the younger generation cannot vote? How will the poor obtain their parents' documents? Is this NRC in disguise? Are they trying to implement NRC through this? Let them clearly state their intention. Is this what's happening in our country?' Mamata had questioned. UNI XC SSP
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
TMC MP Mahua Moitra moves Supreme Court against EC's revision of electoral rolls in Bihar
Trinamool Congress leader and Member of Parliament Mahua Moitra has moved the Supreme Court challenging an order of the Election Commission of India for special intensive revision of electoral rolls in Bihar. In her plea, Ms. Moitra said she seeks setting aside of the order dated June 24 under which Special Intensive Revision (SIR) is being conducted in alleged violation of various provisions of the Constitution. "The present writ petition has been filed in public interest under Article 32 of the Constitution seeking setting aside of order dated 24.06.2025 issued by Election Commission of India under which SIR of electoral rolls in Bihar is being conducted in violation of Articles 14, 19(1)(a), 21, 325, 328 of the Constitution and provisions of Representation of People (RP) Act, 1950 and Registration of Electors (RER) Rules, 1960 which, if not set aside, can lead to large-scale disenfranchisement of eligible voters in the country thereby undermining democracy and free and fair elections," it submitted. Ms. Moitra further sought a direction from the apex court to restrain the Election Commission of India from issuing similar orders for SIR of electoral rolls in other states of the country. "It is submitted that it is for the very first time in the country that such an exercise is being conducted by ECI, where electors whose names are already there in electoral rolls and who have already voted multiple times in are being asked to prove their eligibility," the plea filed through advocate Neha Rathi said. The plea said "the impugned SIR order requires the inclusion or retention of a voter's name in the electoral roll upon production of citizenship documents, including proof of citizenship of either or both parents, failing which the voter is at risk of requirement is ultra vires Article 326 and introduces extraneous qualifications not contemplated by the Constitution of the RP Act 1950.' A similar plea has also been filed by NGO Association of Democratic Reforms challenging the poll panel's direction for SIR of electoral rolls in Bihar. The ECI on June 24 issued instructions to carry out an SIR in Bihar, apparently to weed out ineligible names and ensure only eligible citizens are included in the electoral roll. Bihar goes to polls later this year. The NGO has also sought setting aside of the order and communication, arguing that it violates Articles 14, 19, 21, 325, and 326 of the Constitution, as well as provisions of the Representation of People's Act, 1950, and Rule 21A of the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960. The NGO's plea filed through advocate Prashant Bhushan said the EC order "can arbitrarily and without due process" disenfranchise lakhs of voters and disrupt free and fair elections. "That the documentation requirements of the directive, lack of due process as well as the unreasonably short timeline for the said Special Intensive Revision of Electoral Roll in Bihar further make this exercise bound to result in removal of names of lakhs of genuine voters from electoral rolls leading to their disenfranchisement," the plea said. The last such revision in Bihar was conducted in 2003. According to the EC, the exercise was necessitated by rapid urbanisation, frequent migration, young citizens becoming eligible to vote, non-reporting of deaths, and inclusion of the names of foreign illegal immigrants. It said with the exercise, it wants to ensure the integrity and preparation of error-free electoral rolls. The SIR is being conducted by booth officers, who are conducting a house-to-house survey for verification. The EC said it will scrupulously adhere to the constitutional and legal provisions as laid down in Article 326 of the Constitution and Section 16 of the Representation of the People Act, 1950, in carrying out the revision. Several other civil society organisations like PUCL and activists like Yogendra Yadav have approached the top court against the ECI's direction.
