Woman shares retired parents keep footing her grocery bill — now she feels 'awkward' as they keep bringing it up
While they've repeatedly said they aren't expecting repayment, the comments have left her feeling awkward and unsure how to respond.
In a post on r/askSingapore, she explained that money was always a major topic growing up. Her dad was extremely careful with spending. Every cent was tracked, and every expense was accounted for.
She and her siblings did well in school, so most of their education was funded through scholarships. Still, when one of them needed to borrow money from their dad, he made sure the amount was fully repaid once that sibling started working.
The woman also mentioned that her parents often reminded them how much it had cost to raise them.
'There was a lot of talk about how much it cost for our parents to bring us up, their sacrifice, etc.; typical Chinese filial piety brainwashing stuff, I suppose,' she said. 'If my parents spent money on a bigger ticket item for us, they would talk about it a lot to 'make us appreciate it.' Especially my dad, maybe because he was very poor growing up and was not accustomed to spending.'
Fast forward to the present, and the financial dynamic has shifted. She is now a high-income earner, married with children. Her parents, although retired, are financially independent and no longer have to worry about money. They aren't flashy spenders, but they live comfortably.
As part of helping out, her parents have been buying groceries for her and her husband around two to three times a month. While the amount spent isn't small, she said that from her perspective, it didn't seem like a huge deal, so she never felt the need to offer to pay them back.
However, recently, she noticed that her parents kept bringing this up. Not in a direct or confrontational way, and not as a request for money, but just as a passing comment about how much they had spent at the supermarket or how groceries are getting expensive.
While they were quick to say they weren't expecting anything in return, the fact that it kept coming up made her feel slightly uncomfortable.
'I can't help but feel rather awkward about this,' she wrote. 'By the way, I treat them to meals often. I just don't track how much I spend on them and, likewise, how much they spend on me. I have children now, and my parenting philosophy towards money is quite different from how I was brought up. I'm having very complex feelings about this situation.'
She ended her post by asking others how they would interpret this kind of situation.
'Can anyone help me unpack these feelings? Is there anyone who can explain my parents' POV?' she wrote. 'Things are getting expensive outside, so you could start by offering to pay or getting your own groceries?'
The post quickly gained traction on the platform, and many users were not impressed with the woman's attitude. Some felt it was pretty entitled of her to let her retired parents keep buying groceries without offering to pay, despite knowing how frugal they had been all their lives.
Others said it was strange that she understood her parents' values so well, having grown up under their strict money management, yet didn't think twice about letting them cover household expenses.
One user said, 'Hmm… High-income earner, but comes here to complain about parents asking for money to buy groceries. Just get your own next time lah. NTUC (National Trades Union Congress) does delivery.'
Another told her, 'Why do your parents buy groceries for you? LOL like they should be enjoying retirement, not be some part-time aminah, and if you ask them for help and they are willing, you can't even pay for your own groceries for a family of 4 or more using your parents' savings?
Treating meals is your own accord. It shouldn't be a trade-off kind of thing, a.k.a. Because I treat them meals, they should buy groceries for me and use their own money.'
A third commented, 'It's not a big sum to you, but for how they've lived like 90% of their life, it is a big sum to them. Things are getting expensive outside, so you could start by offering to pay or getting your own groceries?'
In other news, a 20-year-old woman has alleged that her parents threatened to report her to the police for 'theft' after she moved out with a phone and a laptop that they had previously purchased for her.
In a Reddit post published on Wednesday (July 2), the woman stated that she had recently left her family home and did not intend to return. She brought with her a phone and a laptop, which had either been gifted to her or bought for her by her parents when she was still residing with them. According to her, these items had long been treated as her personal belongings.
Read more: 20 yo woman says parents accused her of 'theft' after she moved out with gifted phone and laptop
Featured image by Depositphotos (for illustration purposes only)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Independent Singapore
10 hours ago
- Independent Singapore
Maid says, ‘My employer calls me lazy and always yells at me even though I've done all the work without rest from 6:30 morning to 12:30 night'
SINGAPORE: In a heartfelt Facebook post that quickly caught the attention of fellow helpers and employers alike, a foreign domestic worker sounded the alarm on her harsh working conditions, shedding light yet again on the difficult balance between duty, dignity, and domestic life in Singapore. 'I've only been here in Singapore for three months now,' she wrote in a public group for direct hire transfers. 'But my boss treats me badly. He always yells at me, always gets angry with me. Even though I've done everything (all the work), everyone (my employers) still says I'm lazy. I don't get enough rest working from 6:30 in the morning until 12:30 at night.' Photo: FB/Direct Hire Transfer Singapore Maid / Domestic helper That's 18 hours a day! With no rest! And if all her account is true, it's not just exhausting — it's exploitative! Despite this, the helper ended her post with grace and grit: 'I hope I can find a good boss. I'm a fast learner and know how to get along with others. Know how to take care of the elderly, children, and dogs. I can do cleaning, ironing, washing, and cooking.' In short: She's not giving up. 'Same with my employer. You're not alone.' — a chorus of quiet suffering Her post resonated with many other helpers in the group based on previous feedback on other posts. One chimed in with their own story in this one, commenting simply but poignantly: 'Same with my employer. You're not alone.😥 I miss my last employer. She's very calm and very understanding — one of the best employers.' The pain, nostalgia, and longing for respect wrapped into that one sentence were enough to speak volumes. For many domestic workers, good employers are always remembered for their kindness and basic human decency. 'Don't believe their drama' — some employers bite back However, not everyone was sympathetic. In the comments section, a few employers fired back — clearly fed up with what they viewed as a tired trope: the 'lazy maid' playing victim. 'Yeah, as usual,' one employer wrote. 'Create some story about your current employer. If you can't take the workload, next time during the interview, be honest. Don't say yes, ma'am, yes, sir, and end up wanting to change employers. Employer already paid so much to bring you in, and now you want to change. Don't be lazy.' Another added bluntly: 'Even if you ask for a transfer, it depends on your employer if they want to release you. Worst scenario, you'll be sent home.' To many onlookers, the tone may feel more like courtroom prosecution than constructive criticism, but it raises a fair question: Who's telling the truth? Unfortunately, in most cases, it's a one-sided story until the Ministry of Manpower (MOM) steps in — or something serious happens. Behind closed doors: What the MOM says… Singapore's MOM outlines clear expectations on its official website regarding the well-being of Foreign/Migrant Domestic Workers (FDWs/MDWs). According to MOM: 'As an employer, you are responsible for the health and well-being of your MDW.' And common sense tells us that this includes allowing them to have adequate rest with: Sufficient sleep (uninterrupted sleep at night) At least one rest day per week Breaks during the day, especially during long working hours In this case, if the helper's account of a daily 6:30 a.m. to 12:30 a.m. grind is true, it clearly violates basic guidelines. Sleep-deprived, verbally abused, and dismissed as lazy — that's not a job. That's survival — almost slavery, even. Moreover, fatigue due to insufficient rest can also affect your helper's performance and safety. It is detrimental to her well-being. No amount of cooking, cleaning, dog-walking, or diaper-changing should ever come at the cost of someone's physical and mental health. So whose drama is it anyway? The accusations from employers — that some helpers 'make up stories' or 'just want to find an easy household' — reflect a broader mistrust that often shadows the domestic helper scene in Singapore. Yes, it's true: Not every maid is a saint. Some might over-promise during interviews. Others might genuinely struggle with homesickness, communication, or unrealistic expectations, but in a power-imbalanced relationship where the employer holds the purse strings, the bed, the food, and the legal visa — how often do helpers have a fair chance to speak up? The high cost of a bad hire Many employers cite the hefty cost of hiring a helper — often between S$3,000 and S$5,000, including agency fees, insurance, and travel — as the reason they feel 'cheated' when a helper requests a transfer just weeks or months after being hired. Understandably, this causes frustration. However, it also reveals a deeper truth: We treat people better when we see them as individuals, not investments. Perhaps that's the crux of the issue. Employers see helpers as sunk costs. Helpers just want to be treated as humans. The 'lazy' label: a convenient catch-all? When everything else fails, name-calling begins. The word 'lazy' gets thrown around far too often in domestic work, but let's be real — can someone really be lazy after working 18 hours a day? Can someone be 'lazy' and still cook, clean, iron, wash, take care of the kids, the elderly, and the dog? What are we missing here? And what's next for the helper? The maid who posted the original complaint is now seeking a transfer to another employer, but according to the rules, she will need her current employer's written consent for that. If her employer refuses, her only other option may be to return to her home country. It's a difficult spot to be in — stuck between abuse and bureaucracy. Still, her resilience shines through. She didn't insult. She didn't threaten. She simply told her story and said: I hope I can find a good boss. And perhaps there's one out there reading this who's thinking: 'I'll give her that chance.' What to do if you're a helper facing abuse in Singapore Helpers who feel mistreated should first attempt to resolve the matter calmly with their employer. If this fails, we encourage you to: In a nation built on discipline, order, and hard work, it's easy to overlook the silent engines keeping our households running. But behind the mop and the rice cooker is a person, not a thing. One who wakes up before us. Sleeps after us. And — sometimes — cries in silence. So maybe it's about time we listened. In other news, a Facebook post that quickly stirred emotions in Singapore's online domestic helper community, one foreign domestic worker shared a jaw-dropping tale of life inside a household that has five helpers, and still, according to her, nothing is ever right. 'My lady employer has five helpers. For many months, everything we do, she sees as wrong. Always demanding — do this, do that,' the helper wrote in the Direct Hire Transfer Singapore Maid / Domestic Helper Facebook group. 'She is only thinking of the salary she's giving us and not our service to her family. Should I leave?' she asked for advice from other helpers and employers alike. You can read her full story here: Maid says her employer has '5 helpers, but still complains that all the work done is wrong and that she's feeding us too much'
Independent Singapore
10 hours ago
- Independent Singapore
Over 87,000 senior citizens lived alone last year, more than twice as many as a decade ago
Depositphotos/sweet_tomato SINGAPORE: An increasing number of elderly Singaporeans are living alone, according to the Ministry of Social and Family Development's (MSF) latest report on family trends that was released on Monday (7 July). The report found that about 11.4 per cent of residents aged 65 and above were living alone last year, which is more than double the proportion a decade ago. This translates to more than 87,200 seniors living by themselves in 2024, up from approximately 43,000 ten years earlier. While the number of elderly people living alone has shot up, most seniors continue to reside with family. The report found that 80% of those aged 65 and above lived with a spouse or children. In the same period, the population of seniors living in family settings expanded sharply from 466,300 in 2014 to 767,900 in 2024. About 60% of elderly respondents expressed satisfaction with family support and relationships. Around 90% agreed that maintaining close ties between grandparents and grandchildren was very important. See also Stories you might've missed, Dec 26 At the same time, caregiving can take a toll on those looking after older relatives. The National Council of Social Service's Quality of Life Survey found that caregivers reported lower overall quality of life and less satisfaction with family support compared with non-caregivers. The proportion of caregivers and non-caregivers who said they were satisfied with their family relationships, however, was broadly similar. This suggests that while caregivers often wish for more practical help, they still value and appreciate their family connections. This is the second consecutive year that the MSF has released its family trends report, which tracks developments in marriage patterns, family relationships, resilience, early childhood education, and other key social issues. () => { const trigger = if ('IntersectionObserver' in window && trigger) { const observer = new IntersectionObserver((entries, observer) => { => { if ( { lazyLoader(); // You should define lazyLoader() elsewhere or inline here // Run once } }); }, { rootMargin: '800px', threshold: 0.1 }); } else { // Fallback setTimeout(lazyLoader, 3000); } });
CNA
20 hours ago
- CNA
Air India jet's fuel switches in focus, as crash preliminary report nears
A preliminary report into the deadly crash of an Air India jetliner in June is expected to be released by Friday (Jul 11), three sources with knowledge of the matter said, with one adding the probe had narrowed its focus to the movement of the plane's fuel control switches. The London-bound Boeing 787 Dreamliner, which started losing height after reaching an altitude of 650 feet, crashed moments after takeoff from Ahmedabad, India, killing 241 of the 242 people on board and the rest on the ground. The investigation into the Air India crash is focusing on the movement of the engine fuel control switches following an analysis of the 787's flight and voice data recorders, along with a simulation by Boeing of the aircraft's final moments, one of the sources said. The investigation has not raised any immediate concerns over mechanical failure, the source said, and there has been no bulletin to airlines recommending changes to 787 operations. Aviation industry publication The Air Current first reported the focus on the fuel switches that help power the plane's two engines. It was unclear what specific actions involving the fuel switches are being looked into by investigators. Sources told The Air Current that the available information on the black boxes could not rule in or out improper, inadvertent or intentional actions that preceded or followed the apparent loss of thrust before the aircraft crashed. United States aviation safety expert John Cox said a pilot would not be able to accidentally move the fuel switches that feed the engines. "You can't bump them and they move," he said. Cox added that if a switch was shut off, the effect would be almost immediate, cutting off engine power. Most air crashes are caused by multiple factors. The investigation is focusing at least partly on engine thrust, Reuters reported last month. While the report from Indian investigators could be made public on Friday, the three sources cautioned Reuters that plans could change and there was no clarity on how much information would be available in the document, which comes about 30 days after the Jun 12 tragedy. The sources spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorised to speak to the media. India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau, which is leading the probe under international rules, did not respond immediately to a request for comment outside normal business hours. INFORMATION RELEASE The probe has been dogged by questions over a lack of information, after investigators took about two weeks to download flight recorder data after the crash. The Indian government held only one press conference on the incident, and no questions were taken. However, India reversed course on an earlier decision reported by Reuters to prevent a United Nations aviation investigator from joining the probe, two senior sources said. A specialist from the UN's International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) was granted observer status, following an unusual request by the agency to offer its support. ICAO declined to comment, adding in a statement that any public discussion of "cooperative arrangements", would require authorisation by the state. The crash is challenging the Tata Group's ambitious campaign to restore Air India's reputation and revamp its fleet, after taking the carrier over from the government in 2022. India is banking on a boom in aviation to support wider development goals, with New Delhi saying it wants India to be a job-creating global aviation hub along the lines of Dubai, which currently handles much of the country's international traffic. A panel of Indian lawmakers will review safety in the country's civil aviation sector and has invited several industry and government officials to answer questions on Wednesday, with topics set to include the recent plane crash.
