Closely Watched US Jobs Report Likely to Show Hiring Slowed in June
When the Labor Department on Thursday releases job numbers for last month, they're expected to show that businesses, government agencies, and nonprofits added 115,000 jobs in June, down from 139,000 in May, according to a survey of forecasters by the data firm FactSet. The unemployment rate is expected to have ticked up to 4.3 percent, which would be the highest since October 2021 but still low enough to suggest that most American workers continue to enjoy job security.
The US job market has cooled considerably from red-hot days of 2021–2023 when the economy bounced back with unexpected strength from COVID-19 lockdowns and companies were desperate for workers. So far this year, employers have added an average 124,000 jobs a month, down from 168,000 in 2024 and an average 400,000 from 2021 through 2023. Hiring decelerated after the Federal Reserve raised its benchmark interest rate 11 times in 2022 and 2023. But the economy did not collapse, defying widespread predictions that the higher borrowing costs would cause a recession. Companies kept hiring, just at a more modest pace.
But the job market increasingly looks under strain. A survey released Wednesday by the payroll processor ADP found that private companies cut 33,000 jobs last month. 'Though layoffs continue to be rare, a hesitancy to hire and a reluctance to replace departing workers led to job losses last month,' said ADP chief economist Nela Richardson. (The ADP numbers frequently differ from the Labor Department's official job count.)
Employers are now contending with fallout from Trump's policies, especially his aggressive use of import taxes–tariffs. Mainstream economists say that tariffs raise prices for businesses and consumers alike and make the economy less efficient by reducing competition. They also invite retaliatory tariffs from other countries, hurting US exporters. The erratic way that Trump has rolled out his tariffs–announcing and then suspending them, then coming up with new ones–has left businesses bewildered. Manufacturers responding to a survey released this week by the Institute for Supply Management complained that they and their customers were reluctant to make decisions until they understood where Trump's tariffs would end up. 'That whiplash has to stop, and it has to stay stopped,' said Susan Spence, chair of the ISM's manufacturing survey committee.
Trump's assault on the federal bureaucracy could also show up in June's job report. Nancy Vanden Houten, lead US economist at Oxford Economics, expects federal jobs dropped by 20,000 last month, reflecting a hiring freeze, voluntary quits, and retirements. 'For now,' she wrote in a commentary Wednesday, 'court rulings have put massive federal layoffs on hold.'
The president's deportations–and the threat of them–also are likely to start having an impact on the job market by driving immigrants out of the job market. In May, the US labor force–those working and looking for work–fell by 625,000, the biggest drop in a year and a half.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Asharq Al-Awsat
2 hours ago
- Asharq Al-Awsat
Nvidia Set to Become the World's Most Valuable Company in History
Nvidia was on track to become the most valuable company in history on Thursday, with the chipmaker's market capitalization reaching $3.92 trillion as Wall Street doubled down on optimism about AI. Shares of the leading designer of high-end AI chips were up 2.2% at $160.6 in morning trading, giving the company a higher market capitalization than Apple's record closing value of $3.915 trillion on December 26, 2024. Nvidia's newest chips have made gains in training the largest artificial-intelligence models, fueling demand for products by the Santa Clara, California, tech company, Reuters reported. Microsoft is currently the second-most valuable company on Wall Street, with a market capitalization of $3.7 trillion as its shares rose 1.4% on $498. Apple rose 0.5%, giving it a stock market value of $3.19 trillion, in third place. A race among Microsoft, Meta Platforms , Alphabet and Tesla to build AI data centers and dominate the emerging technology has fueled insatiable demand for Nvidia's high-end processors. The stock market value of Nvidia, whose core technology was developed to power video games, has nearly octupled over the past four years from $500 billion in 2021. Nvidia is now worth more than the combined value of the Canadian and Mexican stock markets, according to LSEG data. The tech company also exceeds the total value of all publicly listed companies in the United Kingdom. Nvidia recently traded at about 32 times analysts' expected earnings for the next 12 months, below its average of about 41 over the past five years, according to LSEG data. That relatively modest price-to-earnings valuation reflects steadily increasing earnings estimates that have outpaced Nvidia's sizable stock gains. The company's stock has now rebounded more than 68% from its recent closing low on April 4, when Wall Street was reeling from President Donald Trump's global tariff announcements. US stocks, including Nvidia, have recovered on expectations that the White House will cement trade deals to soften Trump's tariffs.
Asharq Al-Awsat
2 hours ago
- Asharq Al-Awsat
Chip Design Software Firms Climb as US Lifts Curbs on China Exports
Shares of Synopsys and Cadence Design Systems jumped on Thursday after the US lifted export curbs on chip design software to China, easing uncertainty around access to the crucial market. The restrictions, announced in late May, had essentially cut off the market that brings over 10% of revenue for the industry's major players, hitting forecasts and knocking down shares. The export resumption means both the companies will only lose one month of revenue in the current quarter, Mizuho analysts said. The easing trade tensions may also clear the path for long-awaited Chinese approval of Synopsys's $35 billion buyout of engineering software firm Ansys, the analysts added, Reuters reported. Synopsys, which had pulled its forecast in May due to the curbs, rose 5.5%. The company said on Wednesday it is still assessing the impact of export restrictions on China on its financials. Cadence and Ansys gained 6.1% and 3.5%, respectively, while Germany's Siemens, the third major player in the electronic design automation tools sector, was up 1.5% in Frankfurt. "This marks a distinct warming of relations and a small ceasefire in the chips war," said Susannah Streeter, head of money and markets at Hargreaves Lansdown. Still, she cautioned that the move did not signal a broader shift on high-end chip exports from companies such as Nvidia. "The US will remain concerned about the technological prowess China has developed, and its use of US intellectual property." Successive US administrations have sought to restrict China's access to advanced American chip technology, citing concerns that it could be used to strengthen Beijing's military. But the export curbs have also fueled a surge in domestic chip design activity in China, aided by generous state subsidies. They have also stoked fears of retaliation, with analysts warning that Beijing could delay or block approval of the Synopsys-Ansys deal in response. The deal, which has received merger clearance in every jurisdiction other than China according to the companies, carries a deadline of July 15 for its closure with an option to extend until January next year.
Arab News
2 hours ago
- Arab News
Climate agenda makes West increasingly reliant on China
China and the US last week reached an agreement to alleviate some restrictions on rare earth element exports. Under the plan, China will issue six-month export licenses for key rare earth minerals and magnets, which had been heavily restricted since April. This ban, during a period of trade turbulence, caused global shortages and disrupted many sectors, particularly renewable energy, including electric vehicles, as well as defense at a time of resurging geopolitical and military threats. This agreement will help stabilize supply chains, but it is not a 'happily ever after' ending. The trade tensions are still present. To regain access to rare earth elements, the US agreed to ease certain tech-related export controls and visa restrictions on Chinese researchers. It comes as no surprise that, during the last round of trade tensions, semiconductors and rare earth elements were at the core, as they are both — in different ways — essential to the development of the economy of the future. For now, this deal excludes military-grade materials, which shows China's leverage capacity. China accounts for 70 percent of the world's rare-earth mining and more than 90 percent of the processing, so despite efforts to replace it or find alternative sources, this pressure will continue to weigh on Western economies. The situation regarding rare earth elements could be blamed on tariff tensions, yet — just like semiconductors — they are becoming a key asset that any country would look to secure for itself. These tensions have highlighted the vital role rare earth elements play in the renewable sector, raising questions about the sustainability of supply in a time of intensifying geopolitical competition. In short, if Western economies fully transition to a climate-friendly structure, they will become dependent on China. Any supply disruption could severely damage these economies or even halt key sectors — especially in areas like EVs. Despite efforts to replace China or find alternative sources, this pressure will continue to weigh on Western economies Khaled Abou Zahr There are plans to replace China's supply with sources from allied countries such as Australia. But these still need to be executed, which will take at least a decade, according to several experts in media reports. One might also want to add another decade to account for the likely real-world and geopolitical delays. Moreover, it is not just about mining, as processing facilities must also be built. It is now clear that constructing alternative infrastructure will require even more time, investment and, as with anything in the Western hemisphere, environmental approvals. Basically, rare earth element processing has significant environmental impacts, including toxic and radioactive waste, water and air pollution, high energy use and land degradation. And so, to power the climate-friendly economy, more pollution seems to be the path forward. Innovation offers another potential route to building an independent supply chain, but it is still in its early stages. The same applies to recycling. We can already imagine the debates around this endeavor and, realistically, it may not be achieved by 2040, perhaps not even by 2050. This state of affairs brings to mind a statement made in 2023 by Greg Hayes, then-CEO of Raytheon, who said the company had 'several thousand suppliers in China and decoupling … is impossible.' This comment, coming from a leader in the defense industry, reveals the depth of Western dependency on China and should be taken seriously. It has also been stated that the entire renewable energy sector is completely dependent on China. Thus, between the climate economy and defense, China has effectively cornered the whole Western hemisphere. Logically, China has argued that export controls on rare earth elements are necessary to prevent Chinese-made goods from being used for military purposes that threaten its interests. And evidently, Beijing would prefer these elements to be used in the climate economy rather than in weapons systems. Yet, setting aside rising geopolitical threats, how can Europe and the US fully transition to a climate-friendly economy if that means total dependence? What if China's growing economy pushes Beijing to decide it needs to reserve this supply for its own growth? What would Europe and the US do then? The unique properties of the rare earth elements make them indispensable for scaling up the clean energy transition Khaled Abou Zahr In this potential scenario, how would the West ensure high-efficiency performance in wind turbines, EVs, solar panels and energy storage systems without China? A quick search reveals that elements like neodymium, praseodymium and dysprosium are essential for powerful magnets used in EV motors and wind turbines, while lanthanum and cerium support battery and fuel cell technologies. It does not stop there but rather extends to the entire climate-friendly infrastructure. Indeed, rare earth elements also improve energy-efficient lighting, smart grid electronics and hydrogen systems. Their unique properties make them indispensable for scaling up the clean energy transition. To be corny, there is a silver lining to this entanglement. It is that, in all logic, each party should seek continued collaboration and avoid escalating tensions. For now, there is no doubt that, in these segments, China has the upper hand, but the West has other sectors it can use as a bargaining chip. Nevertheless, while the West rebalances its supply chain — or at least begins to debate it — it may feel reverse pressure that forces diplomatic concessions in unrelated areas. It is interesting that, in pursuit of climate ideology, the West has tied its future to China, while in pursuit of financial performance, the defense industry has done the same. Without much questioning, the West has allowed China to become the kingmaker in both sectors, perhaps forgetting their true original missions.
