
Live Updates: Israel and Iran Trade New Attacks and Brace for More
Photographs of some of the officials and military leaders killed during Israel's attack on Iran, in Tehran on Friday.
If war is diplomacy by other means, diplomacy is never finished. While Israel and Iran are in the midst of what could be an extended war that could spread, the possibility of renewed talks to deal with Iran's expanding nuclear program should not be discounted.
Negotiations are on hold while the war continues, and the future of diplomacy is far from clear. Iran will feel compelled to respond to Israel, and the Israeli campaign could last for days or weeks. For now Washington does not appear to be doing anything to press both sides to stop the violence and start talking again.
But the Iranians say they still want a deal, as does President Trump. The shape of future talks will inevitably depend on when and how the fighting stops.
'We are prepared for any agreement aimed at ensuring Iran does not pursue nuclear weapons,' the Iranian foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, told foreign diplomats in Tehran on Sunday. But his country would not accept any deal that 'deprives Iran of its nuclear rights,' he added, including the right to enrich uranium, albeit at low levels that can be used for civilian purposes.
Mr. Araghchi said Israel did not attack to pre-empt Iran's race toward a bomb, which Iran denies trying to develop, but to derail negotiations on a deal that Mr. Netanyahu opposes.
The attacks are 'an attempt to undermine diplomacy and derail negotiations,' he continued, a view shared by various Western analysts. 'It is entirely clear that the Israeli regime does not want any agreement on the nuclear issue,' he said. 'It does not want negotiations and does not seek diplomacy.'
Image
Abbas Araghchi, Iran's foreign minister, center, in Lebanon this month. On Sunday, he said that Iran remained open to negotiations on nuclear weapons.
Credit...
Hassan Ammar/Associated Press
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel has argued that the attack on Iran was to stop Tehran from developing a nuclear weapon, even as a sixth round of talks to prevent that very outcome was scheduled between the United States and Iran.
While Israel argues that it had to strike now to prevent an Iranian race to bomb, American and European judgments were that Iran was still many months away from building a bomb and has not yet decided to do so.
Mr. Netanyahu believes that a deal that would allow Iran to enrich uranium would mean a nuclear-armed Iran in the future, and he has been bent on preventing that outcome. He has apparently judged that a U.S.-Iran deal would have kept him from his goal of destroying Iran's nuclear program, and, perhaps, he hopes, bringing about the fall of the Islamic Republic.
But Israel is considered highly unlikely to meet the goal of destroying Iran's nuclear program without active American involvement, which Mr. Trump has so far resisted.
The president continues to say that he wants negotiations to succeed. He seems to believe that the attack will bring Iran back to the table in a weaker and more conciliatory position, ready to accept his latest demand that it halt all enrichment of uranium. But Iran insists that it has the right to enrich for civilian uses under the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty.
Mr. Trump clearly sees the war as a form of diplomacy. On Friday, he wrote: 'Two months ago I gave Iran a 60-day ultimatum to 'make a deal.' They should have done it! Today is day 61. I told them what to do, but they just couldn't get there. Now they have, perhaps, a second chance!'
Early on Sunday, Mr. Trump warned Iran against attacking American forces in a message on Truth Social. 'However, we can easily get a deal done between Iran and Israel, and end this bloody conflict,' he said. Whether Israel would accept such a deal, if Iran is allowed to enrich at all, is an open question.
At the same time, Mr. Trump, who has said he knew about the Israeli attack beforehand, has done nothing in public to restrain the Israelis. When Washington announced last week that the talks would continue on Sunday, it is not clear whether it knew when Israel would attack, but the Iranians are convinced that Washington was complicit in trying to fool them into believing that any Israeli attack would come afterward.
A quick deal now that would give up enrichment would be seen as a surrender, said Vali Nasr, a professor at the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies who served in the State Department during the Obama administration. That could make the Iranian government more vulnerable at home. 'They won't give up enrichment, not this easily,' he said. 'They're not going to surrender.'
Image
People in Rehovot, Israel, on Sunday amid the ruins of buildings destroyed by an Iranian missile attack.
Credit...
Avishag Shaar-Yashuv for The New York Times
For now negotiations with Iran are on hold, said Robert Malley, a former U.S. official who negotiated with Iran on the nuclear issue under President Joseph R. Biden Jr. But their future shape and timing will depend on the length of the Israeli attack and what it achieves.
'When Iran feels comfortable to come back to the table with the United States, which it believes is deeply complicit with the attack, and in what position Iran comes back depends on how significantly Israel has degraded its nuclear program,' he said.
For now, Washington is backing the Israeli operations, but 'at some point, better sooner than later, they will try to exercise some restraint' to limit the conflict, Mr. Malley said. Mr. Trump still seems eager to get a deal and avoid being dragged into the war.
Karin von Hippel, a former State Department official and former director of RUSI, the London-based defense research group, agrees. 'We'll get back to the table eventually but at what cost to Israel and the region?' she said. 'The challenge is going to be that the Iranians want a face-saving way to get back to the table,' while Mr. Trump prefers 'to back people to the edge and get them to capitulate.'
Unless the Iranian government collapses — or Israel tries to kill the political and clerical leadership of Iran, as it did with Hezbollah — any deal is likely to be very similar to the original 2015 nuclear pact negotiated under President Barack Obama, and which Mr. Trump, in his first term, abandoned in 2018.
'It will probably be a very similar deal as the one with Obama, but Trump will want to put his own spin on it,' Ms. von Hippel said. 'Trump can declare victory no matter what. And if the deal has enough safeguards on Iran he can get away with it,' she said, even if some Republicans and Israel criticize it for not ending Iran's enrichment altogether.
Mr. Trump has miscalculated in thinking Israel's attack would force Iran to accept a deal based on zero enrichment, said Rajan Menon, professor emeritus of international relations at the City College of New York, in an email post and an article in The New Statesman. Mr. Trump is unlikely to miscalculate again and join Israel's war, but 'this much is certain: Netanyahu wanted to scuttle the U.S.-Iran negotiation, and he has succeeded,' Mr. Menon said, at least for now.
But Iran clearly wants to come back to negotiations, since a deal is still the best protection it has from continuing or subsequent Israeli attacks on a country that has lost most of its own air defenses and has limited ways of striking Israeli territory.
Image
Smoke billowing from the Shahran fuel and gasoline depot, seen from Tehran on Sunday.
Credit...
Arash Khamooshi for The New York Times
Even if the government is not about to fall, it is weakened and at profound risk, for the first time since Iraq and Saddam Hussein invaded in 1980, said Suzanne Maloney, an Iran expert and director of the foreign policy program at the Brookings Institution.
A pathway to a deal is unclear for now, but the Iranians must still consider diplomacy as 'the best way to extricate themselves from what is an existential crisis,' she said.
There will inevitably be a sharp debate inside the Iranian regime about whether to accept a diplomatic solution out of weakness or to continue to try to strike back and even race for a nuclear weapon, Mr. Malley said.
The alternatives, of course, include widening the war by damaging regional energy assets of Saudi Arabia and the Persian Gulf, closing the Strait of Hormuz to shipping, assaulting institutions and even synagogues abroad or attacking American troops and interests in the region. But there is probably no surer way of bringing the United States into the war, which Mr. Netanyahu deeply desires.
For their part, the Europeans who were instrumental in the 2015 nuclear deal, and who have been sidelined by Mr. Trump, say they are ready to hold talks with Iran on its nuclear program. 'I hope that's still possible,' the German foreign minister, Johann Wadephul, said late Saturday in Oman. 'Germany, together with France and Britain, are ready,' he told the German broadcaster ARD.
Iran must never have a nuclear weapon, he said, but other than wanting the violence to end, he indicated no European move to pressure either side to desist. 'There's a shared expectation that within the next week, a serious attempt must be made on both sides to interrupt the spiral of violence,' he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


USA Today
16 minutes ago
- USA Today
Stephen Colbert fires back at Trump's 'Late Show' diss
Stephen Colbert has some choice words for President Donald Trump. In his first show back on air since announcing that "The Late Show" will be canceled in May 2026, Colbert had a brief comeback ready for the president, who'd expressed in a July 18 Truth Social post that "I absolutely love that Colbert got fired. His talent was even less than his ratings." "How dare you, sir? Would an untalented man be able to compose the following satirical witticism? Go (expletive) yourself," Colbert said in his July 21 "Late Show" monologue, per a clip shared on social media ahead of the episode's airing. The three-word message was captured via an "eloquence cam" that was zoomed into the host's face. As he waved off the crowd's chanting of his name, Colbert read the next sentence in Trump's social media post: "I hear Jimmy Kimmel is next." Colbert replied, "Nope, absolutely not, Kimmel. I am the martyr. There's only room for one on this cross, and I've gotta tell you, the view is fantastic from up here. I can see your house!" The rest of Trump's post had also called out Jimmy Fallon as the president wrote that Fox News' "Greg Gutfeld is better than all of them combined, including the Moron on NBC who ruined the once great Tonight Show." In his previous "Late Night" episode, Colbert dropped the cancellation bombshell on his fans, saying, "It's not just the end of our show; it's the end of the 'Late Show' on CBS." He'd added, "I'm not being replaced. This is all just going away." In an ensuing statement, Paramount Global executives said, "We consider Stephen Colbert irreplaceable and will retire 'The Late Show' franchise at that time." The Paramount statement called the move "purely a financial decision against a challenging backdrop in late night. It is not related in any way to the show's performance, content, or other matters happening at Paramount." Paramount's decision came days after Colbert slammed Paramount for settling President Donald Trump's defamation lawsuit, calling the $16 million donation to Trump's future presidential library "a big fat bribe" to his administration that could help earn FCC approval for the company's $8.4 billion merger with Skydance Media. Contributing: Bryan Alexander, USA TODAY


UPI
17 minutes ago
- UPI
DOJ launches new civil rights probe into George Mason University
The Justice Department under Attorney General Pam Bondi on Monday launched a new civil rights investigation into George Mason University. File Photo by Annabelle Gordon/UPI | License Photo July 21 (UPI) -- The Justice Department on Monday announced it has launched an investigation into George Mason University's admissions process, marking the fourth federal probe the Trump administration has targeted the school with this month. George Mason University was informed of the civil rights investigation in a letter stating that federal prosecutors will look into whether the school has denied equal treatment to students based on race or national origin, a violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. No specific instances of violations or complaints were provided in the letter, but it suggests alleged racial segregation regarding access to programs and facilities, as well as preferential treatment based on race in its admissions process and in awarding student benefits and scholarships. "Public educational institutions are contractually obligated to follow our nation's federal civil rights laws when receiving federal funds," Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon of the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division said in a statement. "No one should be denied access to opportunity or resources because of their race, color or national origin, and the United States is committed to keeping our universities free of such invidious bias." It is the fourth federal investigation launched into the Fairfax, Va., university this month and the second in under a week amid the Trump administration's crackdown on diversity, equity and inclusion policies in both the private and public sectors. Diversity, equity and inclusion, known as DEI, is a conceptual framework that promotes fair treatment and full participation of all people. It has been a target of conservatives who claim it focuses on race and gender at the expense of merit. President Donald Trump has sought to remove DEI from the federal government through executive orders and has threatened to revoke federal funding from several universities, including Harvard, over their alleged DEI programs. Last week, the Justice Department launched an investigation into the school over alleged illegal hiring practices, which followed the Department of Education opening a civil rights investigation into the university on July 10 and another probe over allegations it failed to respond effectively to a "pervasively hostile environment for Jewish students and faculty" earlier this month. George Mason University President Gregory Washington has yet to respond to the announcement of the latest Justice Department investigation but has repeatedly denied the accusations leveled at the school by the previous three. "It is inaccurate to conclude that we created new university policies or procedures that discriminate against or exclude anyone," he said last week in a statement. "To the contrary, our systems were enhanced to improve on our ability to consistently include everyone for consideration of every employment opportunity. That is our ethos and it is core to our identity as a national leader in inclusive excellence in higher education." In a separate statement earlier this month that does not directly accuse the Justice Department of misusing Title VI, Washington said he has seen a "profound shift" in how it is now being applied to attack longstanding efforts to address inequality. "Broad terms like 'illegal DEI' are now used without definition, allowing virtually any initiative that touches on identity or inclusion to be painted as discriminatory," he said. "This shift represents a stark departure from the spirit in which civil rights law was written: not to erase difference, but to protect individuals from exclusion and to enable equal opportunity for all." George Mason University has retained Torridon Law to engage with the federal government regarding the investigations.


New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
House speaker says there will be no votes on releasing Epstein files before August recess
The House of Representatives will not move forward with any legislative efforts aimed at releasing files related to notorious pedophile Jeffrey Epstein before its monthlong August recess, House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) said Monday. 'No,' Johnson responded when asked by CNN reporter Manu Raju if lawmakers would vote on a resolution calling for the public disclosure of documents related to Epstein's case before the lower chamber takes its annual summer break. Johnson indicated that he and Trump are on the same page regarding the Epstein files. Getty Images The House speaker argued that Congress needs to give the Trump administration 'space' to handle the hot-button issue on its own for the time being. 'There is no daylight between the House Republicans, the House and the president on maximum transparency,' Johnson said. '[President Trump] has said that he wants all the credible files relating to Epstein to be released. He's asked the attorney general to request the grand jury files of the court. All of that is in process right now.' 'My belief is we need the administration to have the space to do what it is doing.' Johnson indicated that 'if further congressional action is necessary or appropriate,' the House 'will look at that.' 'I don't think we're at that point right now, because we agree with the president,' he added. Last week, the Republican-controlled House Rules Committee voted to advance a nonbinding resolution calling for the release of some information related to the Epstein case. Some MAGA supporters have expressed outrage with the president's handling of files related to Epstein. REUTERS The resolution, which carries no legal weight, directs Attorney General Pam Bondi to publish 'all credible' documents, communications and metadata related to the federal government's investigation of Epstein and his convicted sex-trafficking accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell. The resolution cleared the rules committee as part of a deal with GOP lawmakers who initially opposed Trump's rescissions bill. On the same day the resolution was approved by the panel, Trump ordered Bondi to request that the grand jury transcripts in the Epstein case be unsealed. Bondi asked the federal court in the Southern District of New York the following day to unseal the grand jury testimony related to the 2019 federal sex trafficking case against Epstein and Maxwell.