Sprinklr's (NYSE:CXM) Q1 Sales Top Estimates, Quarterly Revenue Guidance Slightly Exceeds Expectations
Is now the time to buy Sprinklr? Find out in our full research report.
Revenue: $205.5 million vs analyst estimates of $201.8 million (4.9% year-on-year growth, 1.8% beat)
Adjusted EPS: $0.12 vs analyst estimates of $0.10 (21.6% beat)
Adjusted Operating Income: $36.74 million vs analyst estimates of $31.9 million (17.9% margin, 15.2% beat)
The company slightly lifted its revenue guidance for the full year to $826 million at the midpoint from $822.5 million
Management raised its full-year Adjusted EPS guidance to $0.40 at the midpoint, a 2.6% increase
Operating Margin: -0.9%, down from 2.9% in the same quarter last year
Free Cash Flow Margin: 39.3%, up from 0.8% in the previous quarter
Market Capitalization: $2.20 billion
'Our Q1 results reflect solid progress in our transformation to better serve our customers and partners. We are deeply focused on improving our execution and delivering business value to the brands we serve with our AI-native CXM platform. We also generated record free cash flow in the quarter,' said Rory Read, Sprinklr President and CEO.
Initially focused only on social media management, Sprinklr (NYSE: CXM) is a leading provider of unified customer experience management software.
Reviewing a company's long-term sales performance reveals insights into its quality. Any business can have short-term success, but a top-tier one grows for years. Over the last three years, Sprinklr grew its sales at a 15.3% compounded annual growth rate. Although this growth is acceptable on an absolute basis, it fell slightly short of our standards for the software sector, which enjoys a number of secular tailwinds.
This quarter, Sprinklr reported modest year-on-year revenue growth of 4.9% but beat Wall Street's estimates by 1.8%. Company management is currently guiding for a 4.2% year-on-year increase in sales next quarter.
Looking further ahead, sell-side analysts expect revenue to grow 2.8% over the next 12 months, a deceleration versus the last three years. This projection doesn't excite us and implies its products and services will see some demand headwinds.
Here at StockStory, we certainly understand the potential of thematic investing. Diverse winners from Microsoft (MSFT) to Alphabet (GOOG), Coca-Cola (KO) to Monster Beverage (MNST) could all have been identified as promising growth stories with a megatrend driving the growth. So, in that spirit, we've identified a relatively under-the-radar profitable growth stock benefiting from the rise of AI, available to you FREE via this link.
The customer acquisition cost (CAC) payback period measures the months a company needs to recoup the money spent on acquiring a new customer. This metric helps assess how quickly a business can break even on its sales and marketing investments.
It's relatively expensive for Sprinklr to acquire new customers as its CAC payback period checked in at 168.9 months this quarter. The company's slow recovery of its sales and marketing expenses indicates it operates in a highly competitive market and must invest to stand out, even if the return on that investment is low.
We were impressed by how Sprinklr raised its full-year revenue and EPS guidance, which blew past analysts' expectations. We were also glad its revenue, EPS, and adjusted operating income exceeded Wall Street's estimates. Overall, we think this was a solid "beat-and-raise" quarter. The stock traded up 3.9% to $8.89 immediately following the results.
Sprinklr had an encouraging quarter, but one earnings result doesn't necessarily make the stock a buy. Let's see if this is a good investment. The latest quarter does matter, but not nearly as much as longer-term fundamentals and valuation, when deciding if the stock is a buy. We cover that in our actionable full research report which you can read here, it's free.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
OpenAI's Wallet Just Got Heavier -- Because Meta's Been Poaching
OpenAI isn't just building cutting-edge AI anymore; it's now fighting a full-blown talent war and it's using stock options as its shield. The company known worldwide for ChatGPT has seen its stock-based compensation jump more than five times over the past year; that's not a typo. In total, OpenAI handed out $4.4 billion in equity; that figure was 119% of its entire revenue for the same period. Yes it's now literally paying out more in stock than it's earning. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 6 Warning Sign with META. And the trigger? Meta (META, Financials) which has reportedly lured away at least nine researchers from OpenAI's AI team including some working on foundational models. These exits weren't minor; they cut deep. OpenAI had hoped this stock-based spending spree would cool off by 2025 projecting equity payouts to drop to 45% of revenue, and then under 10% by the end of the decade. But that was before Meta started raiding its brain trust. Now, those assumptions are out the window. According to internal chatter, Chief Research Officer Mark Chen believes the company might have to sweeten its equity offers even more; because when your biggest assets walk out the door, the only thing left to do is open it wider with better incentives. This isn't just about keeping salaries competitive; it's about survival. The AI space is getting fiercer by the week; and even with Microsoft in its corner, OpenAI can't afford to lose talent to rivals. Equity compensation isn't a perk anymore; it's a weapon. And OpenAI is loading up. This article first appeared on GuruFocus.

Miami Herald
3 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Which Workers Will AI Hurt Most: The Young or the Experienced?
When Amazon CEO Andy Jassy wrote last month that he expected the company's use of artificial intelligence to 'reduce our total workforce' over the next few years, it confirmed the fear among many workers that AI would replace them. The fear was reinforced two weeks later when Microsoft said it was laying off about 9,000 people, roughly 4% of its workforce. That AI is poised to displace white-collar workers is indisputable. But what kind of workers, exactly? Jassy's announcement landed in the middle of a debate over just this question. Some experts argue that AI is most likely to affect novice workers, whose tasks are generally simplest and therefore easiest to automate. Dario Amodei, CEO of the AI company Anthropic, recently told Axios that the technology could cannibalize half of all entry-level white-collar roles within five years. An uptick in the unemployment rate for recent college graduates has aggravated this concern, even if it doesn't prove that AI is the cause of their job-market struggles. But other captains of the AI industry have taken the opposite view, arguing that younger workers are likely to benefit from AI and that experienced workers will ultimately be more vulnerable. In an interview at a New York Times event in late June, Brad Lightcap, the chief operating officer of OpenAI, suggested that the technology could pose problems for 'a class of worker that I think is more tenured, is more oriented toward a routine in a certain way of doing things.' The ultimate answer to this question will have vast implications. If entry-level jobs are most at risk, it could require a rethinking of how we educate college students, or even the value of college itself. And if older workers are most at risk, it could lead to economic and even political instability as large-scale layoffs become a persistent feature of the labor market. David Furlonger, a vice president at the research firm Gartner who helps oversee its survey of CEOs, has considered the implications if AI displaces more experienced workers. 'What are those people going to do? How will they be funded? What is the impact on tax revenue?' he said. 'I imagine governments are thinking about that.' Is AI Making Better Managers? Economists and other experts who study AI often draw different conclusions about whom it's more likely to displace. Zooming in on the fields that have deployed AI most widely thus far tends to paint a dire picture for entry-level workers. Data from ADP, the payroll processing firm, shows that in computer-related fields, employment for workers with less than two years of tenure peaked in 2023 and is down about 20% to 25% since then. There is a similar pattern among customer service representatives, who are increasingly reliant on AI as well. Over the same period, employment in these industries has increased for workers with two or more years of job tenure, according to Ruyu Chen, a Stanford University researcher who analyzed the data. Other studies point in a similar direction, if in a roundabout way. In early 2023, Italy temporarily banned ChatGPT, which software developers there relied on to help them code. A team of researchers at the University of California, Irvine, and Chapman University compared the change in the productivity of Italian coders with the productivity of coders in France and Portugal, which did not ban the software, to isolate the impact of ChatGPT. While the study did not look at job loss, it did find that the AI tool had transformed the jobs of midlevel workers in more favorable ways than the jobs of entry-level workers. According to the researchers, the junior coders used AI to complete their tasks somewhat faster; the experienced coders often used it to benefit their teams more broadly. For example, the AI helped midlevel coders review the work of other coders and suggest improvements, and to contribute to projects in languages they didn't know. 'When people are really good at things, what they end up doing is helping other people as opposed to working on their own projects,' said Sarah Bana, one of the paper's authors, adding that the AI essentially reinforced this tendency. Bana said the paper's result suggested that AI would prompt companies to hire fewer junior coders (because fewer would be needed to complete entry-level tasks) but more midlevel coders (because AI amplified their value to their whole team). On the other hand, Danielle Li, an economist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology who studies the use of AI in the workplace, said there were scenarios in which AI could undermine higher-skilled workers more than entry-level workers. The reason is that it can, in effect, untether valuable skills from the humans who have traditionally possessed them. For instance, you may no longer have to be an engineer to code, or a lawyer to write a legal brief. 'That state of the world is not good for experienced workers,' she said. 'You're being paid for the rarity of your skill, and what happens is that AI allows the skill to live outside of people.' Li said AI would not necessarily be good for less experienced workers, either. But she speculated that the uptick in unemployment for new college graduates resulted from employers' expectations that they will need fewer workers overall in the age of AI, not just fewer novice workers. An overall hiring slowdown can have a bigger impact on workers right out of college, since they don't have a job to begin with. Robert Plotkin, a partner in a small law firm specializing in intellectual property, said AI had not affected his firm's need for lower-skilled workers like paralegals, who format the documents that his firm submits to the patent office. But his firm now uses roughly half as many contract lawyers, including some with several years of experience, as it used a few years ago, before the availability of generative AI, he added. These more senior lawyers draft patent applications for clients, which Plotkin then reviews and asks them to revise. But he can often draft applications more efficiently with the help of an AI assistant, except when the patent involves a field of science or technology that he is unfamiliar with. 'I've become very efficient at using AI as a tool to help me draft applications in a way that's reduced our need for contract lawyers,' Plotkin said. Some of the companies at the cutting edge of AI adoption appear to have made similar calculations, laying off experienced employees rather than simply hiring fewer entry-level workers. Google, Meta and Amazon have all done layoffs since 2022. Two months before its most recent layoff announcement, Microsoft laid off 6,000 employees, many of them software developers, while the July layoffs included many middle managers. 'Anything that is administrative, spreadsheet-related, where there's an email trail, a document-management type activity, AI should be able to perform fairly easily, freeing up time for managers to do more mentoring,' said Furlonger, the analyst at Gartner, whose survey recently included questions about AI. 'CEOs are implying in the data that we don't need as many of them as we did previously.' The Value of Inexperience Gil Luria, an equity analyst who covers Microsoft for the investment bank D.A. Davidson, said one reason for layoffs was that companies like Microsoft and Google were cutting costs to prop up their profit margins as they invested billions in chips and data centers to develop AI. But another reason is that software engineers are susceptible to replacement by AI at all skill levels -- including experienced engineers who make a large salary but are reluctant to embrace the technology. Microsoft 'can do math quickly -- see who's adding value, who's overpaid, who's not overpaid, who's adapting well,' Luria said. 'There are senior people who have figured out how to get leverage out of AI and senior people who are insistent that AI can't write code.' Harper Reed, CEO of 2389 Research, which is building autonomous AI agents to help companies perform a variety of tasks, said the combination of higher salaries and a reluctance to embrace AI was likely to put the jobs of experienced coders at risk. 'How you decrease cost is not by firing the cheapest employees you have,' Reed said. 'You take the cheapest employee and make them worth the expensive employee.' A number of studies have suggested that this is possible. In a recent study by researchers at Microsoft and three universities, an AI coding assistant appeared to increase the productivity of junior developers substantially more than it increased the productivity of their more experienced colleagues. Reed said that from a purely financial perspective, it would increasingly make sense for companies to hire junior employees who used AI to do what was once midlevel work, a handful of senior employees to oversee them and almost no middle-tier employees. That, he said, is essentially how his company is structured. This article originally appeared in The New York Times. Copyright 2025


Business Wire
3 hours ago
- Business Wire
SunLink Health Systems Announces That It Received a NYSE American LLC Notice Indicating That SunLink Has Fallen Below Certain NYSE American Continued Listing Standards
ATLANTA--(BUSINESS WIRE)--SunLink Health Systems, Inc. ('SunLink') (NYSE American: SSY) today announced that on Thursday, July 3, 2025, it received a deficiency letter (the 'Notice') from the NYSE American LLC ('NYSE American') stating that SunLink failed to hold an annual meeting of stockholders during SunLink's fiscal year ended June 30, 2025, as required by Section 704 of the NYSE American Company Guide (the 'Company Guide'). The Notice has no immediate impact on the listing of SunLink's common stock, which will continue to be listed and traded on the NYSE American during the applicable cure period, but will be assigned a '.BC' indicator by the NYSE to indicate that SunLink is below compliance. The '.BC' indicator will be removed at such time as SunLink is deemed compliant with the NYSE's continued listing standards. Likewise, the Notice has no expected impact on SunLink's planned merger with Regional Health Properties, Inc., a Georgia corporation ('Regional') which is being submitted to the shareholders of SunLink for approval at a special meeting of shareholders of SunLink, to be held in person at Hyatt House Hotel, 3595 Cumberland Blvd., Atlanta, Georgia 30339, at 10:00 a.m., Eastern time, on July 29, 2025 (the 'SunLink special meeting'). In the event the merger agreement is terminated for any reason, including any failure to obtain required shareholder approvals from the shareholders of SunLink and Regional, SunLink intends to hold its annual meeting no later than June 30, 2026, in order to regain compliance under the Company Guide. As amended, the merger agreement may be terminated by each of Regional and SunLink under certain circumstances, including if the merger is not consummated by 5:00 p.m., Eastern time, on August 11, 2025. NO OFFER OR SOLICITATION Communications in this press release shall not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any securities or a solicitation of any proxy vote or approval, nor shall there be any sale of securities in any jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful prior to registration or qualification under the securities laws of any such jurisdiction. No offer of securities shall be made except by means of a prospectus meeting the requirements of Section 10 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the 'Securities Act'). ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The proposed merger will be submitted to both the SunLink and Regional shareholders for their consideration. In connection with the proposed merger, Regional has filed a Registration Statement on Form S-4 (the 'Registration Statement') with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the 'SEC') that includes a joint proxy statement/prospectus for SunLink and Regional and other relevant documents concerning the proposed merger. INVESTORS ARE URGED TO READ THE REGISTRATION STATEMENT AND THE CORRESPONDING JOINT PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS REGARDING THE PROPOSED MERGER, AS WELL AS ANY OTHER RELEVANT DOCUMENTS FILED WITH THE SEC, TOGETHER WITH ALL AMENDMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTS TO THOSE DOCUMENTS, AS THEY CONTAIN OR WILL CONTAIN IMPORTANT INFORMATION. You are able to obtain a copy of the joint proxy statement/prospectus, as well as other filings containing information about SunLink and Regional, without charge, at the SEC's website ( or by accessing SunLink's website ( under the tab 'Investors' or by accessing Regional's website ( under the tab 'Investor Relations.' Copies of the joint proxy statement/prospectus have been mailed to the shareholders of SunLink and Regional who are, as of the respective record dates, entitled to vote on the merger, copies can also be obtained, without charge, by directing a request to Investor Relations, SunLink Health Systems, Inc., 900 Circle 75 Parkway, Suite 690, Atlanta, Georgia, 30339, telephone 770-933-7004 or to Investor Relations, Regional Health Properties, Inc., 1050 Crown Pointe Parkway, Suite 720, Atlanta, Georgia, 30338, telephone 678-869-5116. SunLink and Regional and certain of their directors and executive officers may be deemed to be participants in the solicitation of proxies from the shareholders of SunLink and Regional in connection with the proposed merger. Information about the directors and executive officers of SunLink is set forth in Part III of SunLink's Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024, which information may be updated by SunLink from time to time in subsequent filings with the SEC. Information about the directors and executive officers of Regional is set forth in Part III of Regional's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024, which information may be updated by Regional from time to time in subsequent filings with the SEC. Additional information about the interests of those participants and other persons who may be deemed participants in the transaction may also be obtained by reading the joint proxy statement/prospectus relating to the proposed merger. Free copies of this document may be obtained as described above. Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements This press release contains forward-looking statements made pursuant to the safe-harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Such forward-looking statements can often, but not always, be identified by the use of words like 'believe', 'continue', 'pattern', 'estimate', 'project', 'intend', 'anticipate', 'expect' and similar expressions or future or conditional verbs such as 'will', 'would', 'should', 'could', 'might', 'can', 'may', or similar expressions. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements relating to the expected timing and benefits of the proposed merger between Regional and SunLink, including statements of Regional's goals, intentions and expectations; statements regarding Regional's business plan and growth strategies; and the ability of SunLink to meet the continued listing requirements of the NYSE American and to maintain the listing of securities thereon. These forward-looking statements are subject to significant risks, assumptions and uncertainties that may cause results to differ materially from those set forth in forward-looking statements, including, among other things: Litigation that may be filed against Regional, SunLink, the members of the Regional Board, the members of the SunLink Board or the officers of Regional or SunLink could result in substantial costs, and the possible unexpected or adverse outcomes of such litigation, any of which could adversely affect Regional's and SunLink's ability to complete the merger on a timely basis or at all; the ability to obtain the approvals of SunLink's or Regional's shareholders, and the ability to complete the merger on the expected timeframe; the ability of SunLink to meet the continued listing requirements or rules of the NYSE American LLC, the ability of Regional to meet the requirements of the OTCQB, and the ability of Regional to meet the initial listing requirements of the NYSE American after the merger, and, as applicable, the ability to maintain the listing or trading, as applicable, of securities thereon; the risk that the businesses of Regional and SunLink will not be integrated successfully, or such integration may be more difficult, time-consuming, or costly than expected; expected revenue synergies and cost savings from the merger may not be fully realized or realized within the expected time frame; revenues following the merger may be lower than expected; customer, vendor and employee relationships and business operations may be disrupted by the merger; possible changes in economic and business conditions; the impacts of epidemics, pandemics, or other infectious disease outbreaks; the existence or exacerbation of general geopolitical instability and uncertainty; possible changes in monetary and fiscal policies, and laws and regulations; competitive factors in the healthcare industry; Regional's dependence on the operating success of its operators; the amount of, and Regional's ability to service, its indebtedness; covenants in Regional's debt agreements that may restrict its ability to make investments, incur additional indebtedness, and refinance indebtedness on favorable terms; the effect of increasing healthcare regulation and enforcement on Regional's operators and the dependence of Regional's operators on reimbursement from governmental and other third-party payors; the relatively illiquid nature of real estate investments; the impact of litigation and rising insurance costs on the business of Regional's operators; the effect of Regional's operators declaring bankruptcy, becoming insolvent, or failing to pay rent as due; the ability of any of Regional's operators in bankruptcy to reject unexpired lease obligations and to impede its ability to collect unpaid rent or interest during the pendency of a bankruptcy proceeding and retain security deposits for the debtor's obligations; Regional's ability to find replacement operators and the impact of unforeseen costs in acquiring new properties; and other risks and factors identified in (i) SunLink's cautionary language included under the headings 'Forward-Looking Statements' and 'Risk Factors' in SunLink's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2024, and other documents subsequently filed by SunLink with the SEC and (ii) Regional's cautionary language included under the headings 'Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements' and 'Risk Factors' in Regional's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024, and other documents subsequently filed by Regional with the SEC. Neither SunLink nor Regional undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statement, whether written or oral, relating to the matters discussed in this press release. In addition, SunLink's and Regional's past results of operations do not necessarily indicate either of their anticipated future results, whether the merger is effectuated or not. SunLink Health Systems, Inc. is the parent company of subsidiaries that own and operate a pharmacy business and an information technology business in the Southeast. For additional information on SunLink Health Systems, Inc., please visit the Company's website. This press release contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 including, without limitation, statements regarding the company's business strategy. These forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks, uncertainties, and other factors, which could cause actual results, performance, and achievements to differ materially from those anticipated. Certain of those risks, uncertainties and other factors are disclosed in more detail in the company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2024 and other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission which can be located at