UK set to strike new deal with Iraq to return migrants faster
Ministers are under pressure to get a grip of the migrant crisis with 2025 on course to be a record year for small-boat crossings. More than 21,000 people have already made the perilous journey across the Channel, and Iraqi Kurds now dominate the people smuggling networks. Ms Cooper struck a deal with Iraq at the end of last year to tackle the gangs, including greater intelligence sharing and more law enforcement operations.
Since then, the National Crime Agency has been working with the Kurdish authorities and says it has succeeded in targeting criminals operating in places where they thought they were 'untouchable'. But Ms Cooper hopes to strike an enhanced deal by the end of the summer to speed up cooperation between the UK and Iraq, enabling migrants to be detained and deported more quickly, The Sunday Times reported. Meanwhile, it emerged that the Government is looking at digital ID cards for migrants, so they can show if they have the right to live and work in the UK.
Sir Keir Starmer will this week discuss border security with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. Writing in the Sunday Express, Sir Keir said Mr Merz's visit to the UK will include talks on 'what more we can do together to prosecute criminal networks and prevent people smuggling to the UK'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Tax raid not enough to fix debt crisis, OBR chief warns
The chairman of the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) has warned that further tax rises will hit growth and fail to tackle the country's growing debt burden. Speaking to the Commons Treasury Select Committee, Richard Hughes said there were 'reasons to be concerned about the level of UK government debt' and suggested taxes alone would not be enough to address the issue. 'Higher and higher levels of taxes are also not good for growth,' he said, suggesting a fresh raid in the autumn could prove self-defeating. 'We have also already raised taxes quite a bit in this country. The tax burden is getting close to an all-time high,' Mr Hughes told the committee. The difference between the interest rate on government debt and economic growth makes it 'harder to stabilise the debt to GDP ratio', the OBR chairman added. 'Increasingly vulnerable' His testimony followed the publication of the OBR's Fiscal Risks and Sustainability Report last week which warned that Britain's economy was 'increasingly vulnerable'. The report from the fiscal watchdog painted a grim picture for the UK's finances and warned that without action, debt as a share of GDP would rocket from almost 100pc today to over 270pc over the next 50 years. Mr Hughes raised concerns that the British economy was particularly vulnerable to future shocks. 'We are a country which is very exposed to shocks [and] has been particularly hard hit by the last three shocks which the world has faced – the financial crisis, Covid and the energy crisis. In each case we took quite a hard hit economically and fiscally from those shocks,' Mr Hughes told the Commons committee. 'There are reasons to be concerned about the level of UK government debt.' The UK's government debt is the fourth-highest amongst advanced European economies and the country faces the third-highest borrowing costs of any advanced economy after New Zealand and Iceland. Concerns about the sustainability of the UK's debt comes after the OBR's Fiscal Risks report warned that the 'scale and array of risks to the UK fiscal outlook remains daunting.' The fiscal watchdog said successive Tory and Labour governments had failed to make any progress on tackling public debt. UK government debt currently stands at around £2.7 trillion, with the Government's interest bill this year expected to be around £100bn. David Miles, a member of the OBR's budget responsibility committee, warned that the decline in full-salary pensions schemes, which were traditionally big buyers of UK government debt, could push up long-term borrowing costs by as much as £20bn. Costly U-turns The warning comes as the country braces for a fresh tax raid in the autumn. It is almost certain that the Chancellor will have to push taxes higher in order to make up a shortfall in the Government's finances and ensure she doesn't break her 'iron-clad' fiscal rules. A series of costly U-turns by the Government on disability benefits and winter fuel payments have left the Chancellor scrambling to find billions of pounds. Economists have warned that the Chancellor is facing a black hole of between £10bn to £20bn in the autumn Budget. No 10 has refused to rule out a wealth tax after Lord Kinnock, the former Labour leader, said the party was 'willing to explore' the idea. He added that the Government could raise an extra £10bn a year by imposing a 2pc tax on assets worth more than £10m.
BreakingNews.ie
an hour ago
- BreakingNews.ie
John Torode's contract on MasterChef not renewed, BBC and Banijay UK confirm
John Torode's contract on MasterChef will not be renewed, the BBC and production company Banijay UK have confirmed. Australian-born Torode, 59, started presenting MasterChef alongside Gregg Wallace in 2005. Advertisement On Monday night, Torode confirmed he was the subject of an allegation of using racist language that was upheld as part of a review carried out by law firm Lewis Silkin into the alleged behaviour of his co-presenter Wallace. John Torode after being made an MBE during an investiture ceremony at Buckingham Palace. Photo: Kirsty O'Connor/PA. A statement from Banijay UK said: 'In response to John Torode's statement, it is important to stress that Banijay UK takes this matter incredibly seriously. 'The legal team at Lewis Silkin that investigated the allegations relating to Gregg Wallace also substantiated an accusation of highly offensive racist language against John Torode which occurred in 2018. 'This matter has been formally discussed with John Torode by Banijay UK, and whilst we note that John says he does not recall the incident, Lewis Silkin have upheld the very serious complaint. Advertisement 'Banijay UK and the BBC are agreed that we will not renew his contract on MasterChef.' The Lewis Silkin report, commissioned by Banijay UK, found 45 out of 83 allegations against Wallace were substantiated, alongside two standalone allegations made against other people, including one for using racist language. Torode confirmed on Monday night he was the person alleged to have used racist language but said he had 'no recollection of the incident' and was 'shocked and saddened' by the allegation. A BBC spokesperson said: 'John Torode has identified himself as having an upheld allegation of using racist language against him. Advertisement 'This allegation – which involves an extremely offensive racist term being used in the workplace- was investigated and substantiated by the independent investigation led by the law firm, Lewis Silkin. John Torode denies the allegation. 'He has stated he has no recollection of the alleged incident and does not believe that it happened. He also says that any racial language is wholly unacceptable in any environment. 'The BBC takes this upheld finding extremely seriously. We will not tolerate racist language of any kind and, as we have already said, we told Banijay UK, the makers of MasterChef, that action must be taken. 'John Torode's contract on MasterChef will not be renewed.' Advertisement It comes after BBC director-general Tim Davie said MasterChef had a future with the broadcaster beyond 2028, when its current deal runs out, while presenting the corporation's 2024/2025 annual report. Asked about the show's future, Davie said: 'I absolutely think it does (have a future), I think a great programme that's loved by audiences is much bigger than individuals. 'It absolutely can survive and prosper, but we've got to make sure we're in the right place in terms of the culture of the show.' BBC director-general Tim Davie. Photo: Andrew Milligan/PA. He was also asked about Torode's future on Tuesday, to which he said the BBC would 'absolutely expect action to be taken'. Advertisement Downing Street has said it 'utterly condemns' any instance of racist language after the allegation made against Torode was upheld. 'When it comes to racism (it) clearly has no place at the BBC or anywhere in society, and we utterly condemn any instances of racist language or abuse in the strongest possible terms,' Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer's official spokesman said. 'And it's obviously up to the BBC, who are operationally independent from Government, to take forward any necessary next steps.' It comes after the BBC addressed the future of a series of MasterChef filmed last year, which has not yet been aired, on Monday, saying they had not made a final decision on broadcasting it. A spokesperson for the corporation said: 'We know this is disappointing for fans of the show and those who took part, and at the appropriate time Banijay UK will consult further with the amateur contestants.' Entertainment What were the main findings of the Gregg Wallace i... Read More The MasterChef upheaval comes as the BBC faces scrutiny over the Gaza: How To Survive A Warzone documentary which after a review was found to have breached the corporation's editorial guidelines on accuracy. The corporation has also been criticised over its coverage of Glastonbury, particularly the livestream of punk duo Bob Vylan's set, during which singer Bobby Vylan, whose real name is reportedly Pascal Robinson-Foster, led crowds in chants of 'death, death to the IDF (Israel Defence Forces)'. In 2022, Torode was made an MBE in the Queen's Birthday Honours, for services to food and charity. He became a familiar face to TV audiences in 1996 as the resident chef on ITV's This Morning, before joining MasterChef alongside Wallace when it was known as MasterChef Goes Large.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
John Healey and MPs bask in nauseating non-mea culpas over secret Afghan relocation scheme
I suppose we might have guessed something like this. In August 2021, the then foreign secretary, Dominic Raab, had moaned about the 'sea being closed' while on holiday in Crete. The fate of thousands of Afghans who had helped the UK and whose lives were in danger as the Taliban homed in on Kabul came a distant second. For Psycho Dom, it was a simple matter of priorities. So no wonder a government official and/or a soldier had been less than diligent with the names of Afghans at risk. Following by example. Which one of us hasn't accidentally emailed an entire spreadsheet of more than 18,000 endangered people to someone who might pass on their names to the Taliban? Such an easy mistake to make. Why bother to check a confidential file when you can just press send and go and grab yourself a coffee? Shortly after 12.30 and the lifting of the superinjunction, the defence secretary, John Healey, came to the Commons to give a statement on the data leak, the subsequent cover-up, and the news that a secret relocation scheme costing at least £800m, the Afghan Recovery Route (ARR), was being wound up. He might as well have been talking about the, by now familiar, Arse Covering Scheme (ACS). Time and again, Healey would commend MPs from both sides of the house for the tone they were taking. The sombre, measured sentences. No surprise there. The fuck ups all originated and were set in motion under the Tories. So they were hardly going to complain. But the self-congratulatory non-mea culpas all became nauseatingly cloying. This was not a time to not rock the boat. This was a time for righteous anger. How dare our government – not the government – be so cavalier with data? Put allies at risk. And then try to cover up the entire shambles. And get us to pay for it. Thanks for that. At the very moment Rishi Sunak was shouting 'Stop the Boats', he was running his own private relocation and immigration scheme to mop after his government's own failings. Someone should hang their head in shame at the hypocrisy. Time and again Healey would insist that it caused governments great pain to keep things secret from the public. That would have come as news to most of us. More frequently, it feels like getting blood from a stone. A desperate attempt either to conceal or, when that's no longer an option, to spin the truth to their best advantage. Tuesday's statement felt like no exception. There was no avoiding this one for Healey once the superinjunction was lifted. If he hadn't given a statement he would soon have been playing catchup, as the journalists who had known about the story for years but had been prevented from writing about it would have got to work. Best to get the government version out first. Time for the ACS. Healey began by apologising for having kept parliament in the dark about the data leak and the ARR. This broke his heart, he said. He sounded almost sincere. But what could he have done? He too was bound by the superinjunction. What we had to remember was that it was all in a good cause. So top secret, that even those whose data had been breached were not allowed to be informed. That way, if the Taliban had wanted to send in a death squad then at least it would come as a surprise. So much better than spending months worrying about it. Or trying to flee the country. Anyway, Healey concluded, everything was fine now. The Taliban had promised to be a lot nicer. So it was OK for the superinjunction to be lifted and it was just fine to end the ARR. Everyone who needed to be in the UK was now accounted for. Or thereabouts. And anyone who wasn't could just take their chances. The UK had done its bit. Paid all its debts. You couldn't go around feeling sorry for Afghans you'd let down indefinitely. Part of the healing process was the moving on. In reply, the shadow defence secretary, James Cartlidge, was keen to absolve both the Tories and Labour. And especially himself. He had been a very – ever so humble – junior minister in August 2023 and his involvement had been minimal. So minimal that he might as well not have been there. So let's just say he wasn't there. Or anywhere. It was all down to Ben Wallace or Grant Shapps. One of the two. But they too had been doing their best. So it was probably right for all concerned to just reflect quietly and look to the future. This pretty set the tone for the next hour and a quarter. Everyone was very sorry but none of them had done anything wrong. And it was important to remember that. They were the real victims in this, not the Afghans. The Lib Dem's Helen Maguire went on to wonder just how many other superinjunctions the government might have in place. Er … That's the whole point. We'll never get to find out unless they are lifted. For all his rhetoric about the value of transparency in the cradle of democracy – yuk – Healey was relatively opaque with his answers. He ignored requests to identify the leaker as either a government official, a civil servant or a soldier and refused to say if the person had been sacked or forced to resign. Above all of our pay grades. He also threw his hands in the air. Much of the detail was in the papers of the former government. And luckily he didn't have access to them. Long may it stay that way. Some of the dimmer MPs from both parties sought assurance that this could never happen again. A question that always gets asked at such moments. As if you could stop idiots from being idiots. You can't foolproof the system. Especially when Psycho and the Shappster are setting the mood. The most interesting contributions came from Tories Edward Leigh and Mark Pritchard. Leigh suggested that one useful takeaway was we should think twice before committing to any more liberal imperialist urges to send British troops into unstable countries. Pritchard reckoned it was time to rock the boat. Shake the Commons out of its complacency and for people to feel a genuine sense of outrage. Healey shook his head. This was the wrong tone. That would never do.
