
Senate hearing on critical minerals reveals U.S. strategy in Africa
WASHINGTON, July 30 (UPI) -- As the 119th Congress wraps up its final sessions before the August recess, senators turned their attention Wednesday to securing U.S. access to critical minerals in Africa, an increasingly urgent priority amid global competition.
"The economy, the energy transition and even the defense supply chains depend on the Chinese Communist Party. The United States relies heavily on China to refine critical minerals, even those that originate in Africa," Chairman Ted Cruz, R-Texas, said during a Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee on Africa and Global Health Policy hearing.
With demand for lithium, cobalt, graphite and rare earth elements expected to soar over the next decade, the United States is seeking strategic alternatives to its current dependence on China-dominated supply chains.
Africa, home to roughly 30% of the world's critical mineral reserves, has emerged as a central focus of this reorientation.
"We are in crisis, and not enough people recognize the crisis that we're in. It demands action. We know the strategic work of these materials," said Sen. Cory Booker, D-N.J. "I believe the United States is trailing behind in this global competition and not exercising strength, power and focus."
The hearing revealed a bipartisan consensus on the need to deepen diplomatic and commercial engagement with African countries to ensure long-term access to these materials. Countries of particular importance are South Africa, Zimbabwe, Democratic Republic of Congo and Tanzania.
"The extraction processing and refining and manufacturing of critical minerals is complex, but it is also an opportunity to shape the U.S. and reshape U.S.-Africa relations from aid-based to investment led engagement," Cruz said.
Senators emphasized that minerals are not merely commodities, but also strategic assets tied to national security, defense readiness and industrial competitiveness. As the United States accelerates its investments in electric vehicles, grid storage and advanced manufacturing, the need for a diversified and reliable supply of critical minerals has taken on new geopolitical weight.
Lawmakers also examined the barriers that currently hamper U.S. efforts to scale mineral partnerships with African nations. These include insufficient financing tools, inconsistent diplomatic presence and a fragmented interagency approach.
China, by contrast, has spent the past two decades building robust, state-backed relationships with African governments, locking up long-term access to key minerals through infrastructure investments, loan diplomacy and mining concessions.
"Africa is central to our strategy to address this challenge. The continent is home to vast preserves of critical minerals, including cobalt, lithium, tantalum and graphite, which are indispensable for technologies such as batteries," said Jonathan Pratt, a State Department senior bureau official in the Bureau of African Affairs.
The United States, as the senators suggested, is now playing catch-up. And Pratt shared the State Department's prioritization of U.S.-Africa relations and critical minerals.
"The United States is committed to making targeted investments in infrastructure to facilitate the export of minerals from Africa to global markets," Pratt said. "A prime example is the Lobito Corridor, which provides an alternative to Chinese-controlled transportation routes."
The Lobito Corridor is a railway system that links mineral-rich areas of Zambia and the Democratic Republic of Congo to Angola's Atlantic coast, providing a Western-aligned route to export critical minerals. Despite the Trump administration's broader "America First," approach, the administration continues to support this project.
Although the senators pointed out challenges, the hearing placed a spotlight on several opportunities in that African nations are increasingly looking for alternatives to Chinese influence and are receptive to transparent, mutually beneficial partnerships.
They were told that American companies and development finance institutions have a chance to support more ethical, environmentally responsible mining practices, while also fostering value-added processing and infrastructure development in African countries.
There was repeated emphasis on creating deals that are not extractive, but instead foster local development and build trust.
"My team has worked side by side with our colleagues in the African Affairs Bureau in pursuit of projects helping our supply chains and support the administration's approach of building up trade with our African partners rather than being in a shocking to dependence on aid," said Scott Woodard, the State Department acting deputy assistant secretary of economic growth, energy and environment.
"Supporting these projects, building up these supply chains and investing our time and effort into these relationships will benefit us all and bring greater security and prosperity to the United States," Woodard said.
The hearing also linked critical minerals to broader themes in U.S. foreign policy, one being that stronger mineral ties could anchor long-term strategic relationships, promote economic resilience and support African countries' development goals.
Still, Democratic senators warned that this effort cannot succeed without consistent diplomatic engagement.
"The Trump administration terminated labor, environmental and peace building programs that supported vulnerable communities in conflict areas where critical minerals become source of corruption and destruction," Booker said.
Several African countries still lack confirmed U.S. ambassadors and the role of assistant Secretary of State of African affairs remains vacant, hampering relationship-building at a time when it is most needed, he said.
Despite bipartisan support, the Trump administration previously proposed a 77% cut to the Millennium Challenge Corp.'s budget, raising questions about the U.S. commitment to sustained economic engagement in the region.
The Millennium Challenge Corp. is a U.S. foreign aid agency created by Congress in 2004 to promote economic growth and reduce poverty in developing countries.
Booker added, "The Trump administration stopped the U.S. Geological Surveys in African countries to help locate and extend critical minerals."
The takeaway from the hearing was clear: if the United States is serious about competing in the global energy economy and countering authoritarian influence, it must reimagine its presence in Africa -- as a trading partner and long term collaborator.
"Africa is not just a source of raw materials. It is a rising global force in the world economy," Booker said.
Securing critical minerals will require not just transactional deals, but a durable, values based strategy that integrates diplomacy, finance and development assistance, he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why Navitas Semiconductor Stock Plummeted Last Week
Key Points Navitas stock sank early in last week's trading in response to U.S.-China trade news. A trade agreement between the U.S. and China could eventually mean that Navitas winds up facing far more competition. Selling into the Chinese market presents big opportunities for Navitas, but competition from Chinese suppliers is a long-term risk factor. 10 stocks we like better than Navitas Semiconductor › Navitas Semiconductor (NASDAQ: NVTS) stock saw big sell-offs in conjunction with news on the trade front last week. The company's share price fell 9.2% from where it stood at the previous week's market close. Meanwhile, the S&P 500 was down 2.4%, and the Nasdaq Composite slipped 2.2%. Navitas' valuation got hit with a steep pullback early in the week due to fresh developments in the trade war between the U.S. and China. On the other hand, the company's share price actually saw substantial recovery later in the week after it was announced that the tech specialist had won a new battery contract with a major Chinese customer. Navitas stock saw wild swings on China-related news The Trump administration announced on July 28 that it had paused restrictions preventing semiconductors for artificial intelligence (AI) and chip manufacturing equipment from being sold to China. The administration lifted the restrictions in order to increase the chances of getting a trade deal done with China, and it's possible that a trade agreement between the two countries could create some headwinds over the long term for Navitas. The tech specialist produces gallium nitride (GaN) power chips and silicon carbide (SiC) technologies, and a trade deal could reduce competitive barriers and mean that the company winds up facing pressures from Chinese suppliers in its core product categories. Navitas' trade situation is complicated While Navitas stock suffered a big pullback early in the week in response to trade news, its share price saw some significant recovery after the company announced it was providing technology for a new device charger from Xiaomi -- one of China's largest tech players. Xiaomi's next-generation 90W GaN charger will make use of Navitas' GaNSense Control integrated circuits. The Chinese market presents potentially massive opportunities for Navitas, but there's also a risk that competition from other GaN and SiC suppliers in the country will lead to commodification trends that hurt its long-term outlook. Should you invest $1,000 in Navitas Semiconductor right now? Before you buy stock in Navitas Semiconductor, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Navitas Semiconductor wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $624,823!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,064,820!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,019% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 178% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 29, 2025 Keith Noonan has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Why Navitas Semiconductor Stock Plummeted Last Week was originally published by The Motley Fool Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
China's Ant Group to exit India's Paytm, CNBC-TV18 reports
(Reuters) -China's Ant Group will exit Indian payments firm Paytm, selling its remaining 5.84% equity stake in block deals that could total 38 billion rupees ($433.72 million), CNBC-TV18 reported on Monday, citing sources. ($1 = 87.6150 Indian rupees)
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why TMC The Metals Company Stock Plummeted Last Week
Key Points The Trump administration lifted export restrictions preventing key technologies from being sold to China last week. The export restrictions were suspended in order to help advance trade negotiations between the U.S. and China. Investors are wondering if gaining access to Chinese minerals through a trade deal will mean less need for TMC's seabed mining capabilities. 10 stocks we like better than TMC The Metals Company › TMC The Metals Company (NASDAQ: TMC) stock suffered a big pullback last week in conjunction with geopolitical developments. The seabed-mining specialist's share price fell 24.8% across the stretch. TMC stock got hit with big sell-offs last week in response to news that the U.S. had lifted technology export restrictions preventing high-performance semiconductors and chip manufacturing equipment from being sold to China. While developments that could help facilitate a trade agreement between the U.S. and China have often been bullish catalysts for the broader market, TMC's outlook could actually be better if relations between the two countries remain more adversarial. TMC stock sank on China export news News hit on July 28 that the Trump administration had lifted license requirements that prevented artificial intelligence (AI) processors and semiconductor manufacturing equipment from being sold to China. The move came as part of an effort to advance negotiations for a trade agreement with China. Notably, the U.S. is making continued access to China's rare earth minerals a key pillar of what it's aiming to receive in a trade deal -- and the dynamic has substantial implications for TMC stock. Despite the big pullback, TMC stock is still up 424% across 2025's trading -- and the importance that the Trump administration has placed on improving the United States' mineral sourcing capabilities has been central to the rally. A trade agreement between the U.S. and China has the potential to weaken the company's growth outlook, but there's still a lot of uncertainty as to how things will play out on that front. What's next for TMC? In April, President Donald Trump signed an executive order to accelerate permitting processes needed to advance seabed mining in the U.S., and TMC submitted several permit applications just a few days later. While a trade agreement with China could take some of the urgency out of paving the way for TMC and other players in the seabed mining space to scale their operations, there's a good chance that improving domestic mineral sourcing capabilities will continue to be a national priority. Should you invest $1,000 in TMC The Metals Company right now? Before you buy stock in TMC The Metals Company, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and TMC The Metals Company wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $624,823!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,064,820!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,019% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 178% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 29, 2025 Keith Noonan has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Why TMC The Metals Company Stock Plummeted Last Week was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data