logo
Wall Street, Main Street push for foreign tax rethink in U.S. Budget bill

Wall Street, Main Street push for foreign tax rethink in U.S. Budget bill

The Hindu09-06-2025
Industry groups representing sectors including real estate, finance and multinational companies are pushing for the reduction or exclusion of a retaliatory tax targeting foreign investors in the U.S. in the Republican tax bill, as they see it as a threat to their businesses and to the broader markets and economy. The proposed tax, known as Section 899, applies a progressive tax burden of up to 20% on foreign investors' U.S. income as pushback against countries that impose taxes the U.S. considers unfair, such as digital service taxes. It could raise $116 billion in taxes over 10 years.
Some individual companies are also pushing for action, according to two lawyers familiar with their clients' plans, who did not name specific companies due to client confidentiality.
'Lobbying surrounding Section 899 is at peak levels,' said Jeff Paravano, a former Treasury Department official who is now chair of law firm BakerHostetler's tax group. The move comes as Senate Finance Committee Chairman Mike Crapo, the Republican in charge of the chamber's tax writing provisions, and other Republicans are in close coordination with President Donald Trump on the tax bill, having met on Wednesday.
The White House declined to comment. Mr. Crapo said he would not comment on ongoing discussions about the bill.
Global investors hold almost $40 trillion in U.S. assets, such as securities, loans and deposits, according to the U.S. Treasury International Capital Reporting System. This raises concerns about the ripple impact of the bill.
"It has the potential to be a very negative impact on the free flow of capital from the U.S. and through businesses that are multinational," said Gabriel Grossman, a U.S. tax partner at Linklaters, adding he has seen some clients put planned investments in the U.S. on pause until they have more clarity on the new levies. The broader bill itself is also creating much debate as it is forecast to add about $2.4 trillion to the U.S. debt and has sparked an explosive feud between Trump and his erstwhile key ally Elon Musk, the billionaire CEO of Tesla.
Collateral damage
Industries across different sectors are on high alert.
The new levy could increase taxes from rents and real estate investment trusts, gains from property sales and securitized products.
"There is a legitimate fear among investors that, if this goes through, it could impact investments, and that it would create higher costs for real estate in terms of getting financing," said David McCarthy, managing director at the CRE Finance Council, a nonpartisan trade group. "It could depress the value of real estate if you don't have as much money to finance property purchases."
The asset management industry is concerned about outflows.
"We encourage the Senate to make this provision more targeted to respond to unfair foreign taxes and other concerning measures rather than disincentivizing beneficial foreign investment in the U.S.," a spokesperson for the Investment Company Institute said.
The investment community is also working to clarify whether Treasuries and corporate bonds will remain exempt as they are currently subject to a portfolio interest exception that applies no taxation, lawyers and industry sources said.
"There's reason to believe that fixed-income assets wouldn't be in scope, but there's still considerable uncertainty about this point," Morgan Stanley strategist Michael Zezas said in a note to clients.
A footnote part of the Budget Committee report, which provides direction to taxpayers, courts and the Treasury in interpreting the statute, says that Section 899 "does not apply to portfolio interest."
Foreigners' equity investments, however, do not count with the portfolio interest protection and could be taxed, lawyers and banks said.
Multinational companies could face a new tax burden on dividends and inter-company loans, potentially reducing profit, according to Section 899.
Jonathan Samford, president of the Global Business Alliance, a lobbying group for international companies in the U.S., said many multinationals could decide to shut down operations in the U.S., risking 8.4 million jobs in the country.
"Those companies will not be paying U.S. tax whatsoever because they will not be able to operate in that punitive, high-tax environment," he said.
Morgan Stanley said in a note to clients a repatriation of profits out of the U.S. and pressure on the U.S. dollar.
Corporate loans could also become more expensive, as loans extended by foreign banks might be subject to the new tax burden if section 899 overrides current treaties, lawyers said, adding that companies could end up paying more for the debt to make up for the tax increase.
Senate passage
Investors are hoping for some changes in the Senate.
Senator Steve Daines, a Montana Republican on the Finance Committee, said it may be necessary to clarify the language in Section 899.
'We want to make sure we don't have tax policies that in some way would diminish the fact that we are the gold standard in the world,' Daines said.
Morgan Stanley said in a note that it expects "sufficient Senate Republicans to take notice and clarify the policy to mitigate this risk" of increasing the cost of capital for the U.S.
"It actually is pretty much of a nuclear bomb," said Pascal Saint-Amans, partner at Brunswick Group, who is also the former tax chief of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, who led the 2021 global tax treaty. "The coverage (of Section 899) seems extremely broad and the terms are not extremely well-defined."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Is Trump considering pardon for Ghislaine Maxwell? Here's what President said ahead of Epstein's ex-girlfriend grilling
Is Trump considering pardon for Ghislaine Maxwell? Here's what President said ahead of Epstein's ex-girlfriend grilling

Hindustan Times

timean hour ago

  • Hindustan Times

Is Trump considering pardon for Ghislaine Maxwell? Here's what President said ahead of Epstein's ex-girlfriend grilling

President Donald Trump spoke with the media before departing for afive0day trip to Scotland on Friday and revealed whether he was considering a pardon for late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein's girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell. As per WSJ, the letter from Donald Trump to Jeffrey Epstein has several lines of typewritten text. (X) When Trump was addressing the media outside the White House, he was asked about Maxwell and Epstein's case. 'People should really focus on how well the country is doing,' the President stated. Democrats are furious that Trump's former personal attorney, Todd Blanche, who is currently the Deputy Attorney General, is scheduled to meet with Maxwell for a second day today. She is serving a 20-year sentence for her involvement in Epstein's child sex trafficking scheme. On being asked if Trump has decided a pardon for Maxwell, he said, 'I haven't thought about it,' claiming that he has 'nothing to do with the guy,' the UK Independent reported. His statement came amid the uproar over the Epstein list. Trump and Epstein were close friends and were often seen together in photos during the 1990s and early 2000s. Epstein was present at Trump's second wedding in 1993, and reports have claimed that Trump wrote a bawdy birthday message in a book for Epstein's 50th birthday. Ex-Trump lawyer to grill Ghislaine Maxwell for second day Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche is scheduled to examine Maxwell for a second day on Friday to determine if she has any new information regarding the closely watched case. She will be interrogated at a federal courthouse located in Tallahassee, Florida. Maxwell will be taken to the court from the nearby federal jail. Blanche's interview will consist of the same questions that were asked on Thursday. Also Read: Trump's approval rating suffers fresh blow amidst declining support from Independents House Republican revolt in the House over Epstein files Speaker Mike Johnson reportedly ordered the house to go into early summer vacation in order to prevent lawmakers from dealing with the situation after House Republicans rebelled against GOP leadership over the Trump administration's management of the Epstein documents. According to Politico, Johnson was facing a "growing crisis" among his key Republican supporters as leadership declined to take any action on Epstein to the House floor, adding to the uproar over the administration's failure to release all government documents pertaining to the sex offender.

Judge's vaccine exemption ruling sparks education crisis in West Virginia schools
Judge's vaccine exemption ruling sparks education crisis in West Virginia schools

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Judge's vaccine exemption ruling sparks education crisis in West Virginia schools

A West Virginia judge's ruling on Thursday permitting three unvaccinated children to attend public school this fall has sparked intense debate over the intersection of religious freedom, student safety, and access to education. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Issued just weeks before the new school year begins, the injunction marks a significant moment in a growing national struggle over vaccine mandates in classrooms. The legal victory, though limited in scope, comes amid a high-stakes confrontation between Republican Governor Patrick Morrisey and the West Virginia Board of Education, potentially setting the tone for how vaccine-related disputes will influence education policy and student welfare. Religious exemptions vs. State Education law Raleigh County Circuit Judge Michael Froble granted a preliminary injunction in favour of three families who filed suit on June 24, asserting that their children should be allowed to attend school without required vaccinations on religious grounds. The order currently applies only to those three children, but its symbolic weight is far greater. Governor Morrisey, who took office in January, had issued an executive order allowing religious exemptions to long-standing school vaccine mandates. However, the West Virginia Board of Education voted to ignore the order, asserting that it violates existing state law, which prohibits religious exemptions for school-entry vaccinations. Calling the court decision a major step forward, Morrisey said as reported by the Associated Press: 'Today's ruling is another legal victory in the fight for religious freedom. No family should be forced to choose between their faith and their children's education, which is exactly what the unelected bureaucrats on the State Board of Education are attempting to force West Virginians to do. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Education infrastructure under pressure School administrators across the state now face growing uncertainty over how to prepare for a safe reopening. Public school vaccine mandates, long credited with shielding students from preventable illnesses, are deeply embedded in the state's education infrastructure. West Virginia requires immunizations against diseases such as measles, hepatitis B, polio, and chickenpox for school enrollment. Medical professionals warn that relaxing these rules may undermine classroom safety and disrupt student learning. Vaccination mandates for public schools are seen as a way to prevent the spread of once-common childhood diseases, according to national public health guidelines. Already, the United States is experiencing its worst year for measles in more than 30 years. Educators worry that rising vaccine hesitancy may not only spark outbreaks, but also cause spikes in absenteeism, learning loss, and increased pressure on teachers already coping with post-pandemic academic gaps. Colleges and careers could see Ripple effects High school students granted religious exemptions may also face hurdles in their higher education journey. Many colleges and universities require proof of immunisation for enrollment, on-campus housing, and participation in exchange programmes. A legal shift at the K-12 level could therefore introduce friction in the college application process, particularly for students eyeing out-of-state or international opportunities. Moreover, for students pursuing careers in healthcare, teaching, or early childhood education, fields where vaccinations are often non-negotiable, the decision could alter their eligibility and employability. Faith vs. medical consensus The plaintiffs in the lawsuit include Miranda Guzman, a parent who identifies as Christian. According to the complaint, Guzman believes that altering her child's immune system via vaccines would 'demonstrate a lack of faith in God' and 'disobey the Holy Spirit's leading.' Two additional parents joined the suit after it was filed. Notably, the lawsuit does not specify any religious denomination, and the American Bar Association states that most religious denominations and groups support medical vaccinations. While the ruling supports the plaintiffs' right to an education aligned with their faith, critics argue that it sets a dangerous precedent by elevating personal belief above scientific consensus and community health. Board pushback and legal uncertainty The state Board of Education has expressed dissatisfaction with the outcome. In a statement, it said it was 'disappointed by the ruling' and that its members 'will decide next steps in the near future.' Education officials remain firm that only the Legislature, not the Governor, can rewrite public health policy tied to school attendance. Meanwhile, a separate lawsuit against Governor Morrisey's executive order was dismissed this week on procedural grounds due to a lack of a 30-day notice. However, the court has permitted it to be refiled, ensuring that the legal tug-of-war is far from over. Lawmakers in West Virginia also failed to pass a bill during their last session that would have legalized religious exemptions for school vaccine mandates, another sign of legislative gridlock. A fragile balance between belief and learning As classrooms prepare to welcome students back, the state must now grapple with a pivotal question: Can West Virginia safeguard both religious freedom and the public right to a safe education? Though this injunction currently affects only a few students, it opens the door to wider challenges—ones that could disrupt the very structure of school entry, student health policies, and post-secondary planning.

'Cut all visa programs': Steve Bannon says 'Einsteins' should remain in their countries amid major tech layoffs
'Cut all visa programs': Steve Bannon says 'Einsteins' should remain in their countries amid major tech layoffs

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

'Cut all visa programs': Steve Bannon says 'Einsteins' should remain in their countries amid major tech layoffs

Steve Bannon says US should scrap all visas first and clean up the system while 'Einsteins' can remain in their countries and make those countries great. Amid major tech layoffs in teh US, the focus has again shifted to the H-1B visa programs which the Donald Trump administration is planning to change. But before any change comes into effect, US tech workers, Republican lawmakers are up in arms against big tech companies laying off American workers and then petitioning for foreign labors. After Microsoft which announced job cuts in several phases this year, now Intel has said they are planning to cut more than 25,000 jobs in a major reset. Vice president JD Vance has attacked Microsoft for laying off 9.000 workers and said he doesn't believe in the 'bulls**t story that the company can't find workers in America. Now, Trump's former aide and a staunch critic of H-1B, Steve Bannon, said all visa programs should be cut. He said 'Einsteins' can stay in their countries and contribute to making their countries great, instead of coming to the US. Or, the US can explore a program to bring 'Einsteins'. — gc22gc (@gc22gc) The situation in the Silicon Valley is a festering sore, Bannon said on his podcast, adding that the projection is that 12 million trained IT graduates can't get jobs because US is bringing foreign workers. Bannon said no one can prove that foreign workers are better educated, but tech companies want indentured servants, "people who will work 24 hours a day at half the cost because they are afraid of being sent home". by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Many Are Watching Tariffs - Few Are Watching What Nvidia Just Launched Seeking Alpha Read More Undo "We need to cut all the visa programs. If we are going to do it, let's do it hard-core and clean it up," Bannon said. There is always a way to get 'Einsteins', Bannon said, adding that he personally believes for world peace and prosperity, 'Einsteins' should remain in their countries and make their countries great again like they are doing in Japan. JD Vance says displacement of American workers worries him Speaking at a bipartisan event co-hosted by the Hill and Valley Forum, Vance questioned the layoffs of big tech companies and said it does not make any sense to him that they fire Americans to hire foreigners. "That displacement and that math worries me a bit. And what the president has said, he said very clearly: We want the very best and the brightest to make America their home. We want them to build great companies and so forth. But I don't want companies to fire 9,000 American workers and then to go and say, 'We can't find workers here in America.' That's a bulls**t story."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store