logo
Which ‘S.W.A.T.' Stars Are — And Aren't — Returning for Surprise Spinoff After Multiple Cancellations?

Which ‘S.W.A.T.' Stars Are — And Aren't — Returning for Surprise Spinoff After Multiple Cancellations?

Yahoo30-05-2025
The cast of S.W.A.T. has weathered multiple cancellations while continuing to advocate for more seasons of the show — but that doesn't mean everyone is returning for the surprise spinoff.
Based on the 1975 TV show and 2003 film adaptation of the same name, S.W.A.T. centered around the Los Angeles Police Department. The CBS series premiered in 2017 and aired six seasons before it was picked up for a seventh and final season. CBS ultimately reversed that decision and S.W.A.T. returned for season 8. But the celebration didn't last long — the network canceled the show for a second time in March 2025.
S.W.A.T. seemingly came to an end two months later when the series finale aired on CBS. In the final episode, the team survived yet another mission and the last scene showed 20 Squad leaving headquarters to take on their next crisis.
Just two days after the finale aired, Sony Pictures Television picked up a spinoff titled S.W.A.T. Exiles, which will pick up after "a high-profile mission goes sideways, Daniel 'Hondo' Harrelson is pulled out of forced retirement to lead a last-chance experimental SWAT unit made up of untested, unpredictable young recruits." Shemar Moore's character must "bridge a generational divide, navigate clashing personalities, and turn a squad of outsiders into a team capable of protecting the city and saving the program that made him who he is."
Which TV Shows Were Canceled Multiple Times Before the Decision Stuck? From 'S.W.A.T.' to '7th Heaven'
Moore reacted to the 10-episode continuation of S.W.A.T., saying in a statement, "My eight seasons on S.W.A.T. have been epic and memorable. We entertained the world, defied the odds, came back from the dead twice, and continued to woo fans and families worldwide."
He continued: "I am excited for this next generation and iteration of S.W.A.T. with Sony. Katherine Pope, Neal H. Moritz, Jason Ning, and I will keep the franchise, thrill ride action, heartfelt drama, and storytelling of S.W.A.T. alive. WE DON'T LOSE!!!! ROLL SWAT!!!'
While Moore's return was announced, fans couldn't help but notice that the rest of the cast wasn't confirmed. The last season of S.W.A.T also starred Jay Harrington, David Lim, Patrick St. Esprit, Anna Enger Ritch, Annie Ilonzeh and Niko Pepaj.
Keep scrolling for what each cast member has said about whether they would reprise their character — and whether they have officially been offered the chance to return:
'To all my homies, fans and baby girls… to everybody out there around the world who have supported us for eight years, first of all, thank you," the actor, who plays Daniel "Hondo" Harrelson, said in a video shared by Sony Pictures Television. "We couldn't have done this without you,' he said. 'I know the sad news is we got cancelled, but the good news is we don't stop fighting. And guess what happens when you don't stop fighting? We won! S.W.A.T. ain't going nowhere! Hondo ain't going nowhere!"
Before the series finale, Harrington reflected on his character Deacon's conclusion, telling TV Insider in May, "The way the writers crafted this entire 13 episodes was really, really interesting because they didn't want it to be — not just because there's a chance we could come back, but sometimes in shows when they just end and they tie it all into this bow and it's perfect, yeah, you want to do that in some way, but these guys, SWAT officers, they're special."
He continued: "So they really wanted the idea of, the show must go on and it's a job that doesn't go away and we don't lose them. They crafted it very, very smartly, I think."
Despite showing interest in a return, Harrington hasn't publicly reacted yet to the spinoff news and his name wasn't listed in the press release.
When viewers last saw Tan, he accepted a liaison position but remained in the field with the rest of 20 Squad. Lim, meanwhile, has yet to address the surprise spinoff but has expressed interest in remaining in the universe.
'It might not be just over for S.W.A.T. just yet,' he said on KTLA 5 Morning News in April 2025. 'We believe in the show. We believe in what we've built. We're passionate. We want to continue. We're actively trying to find a new home for S.W.A.T., and there's been an outpouring of love and support from our fans.'
Ritch, who plays Zoe Powell, has pitched ideas for what other stories there are still left to tell, sharing with Collider in March 2023, 'I think it would be interesting to see the women go through trying to juggle what it would be like to have a family and also maintain a SWAT tactical officer career. I don't think that's anything I've ever dove into on this show particularly, but hopefully, as we continue, should we continue, that would be an interesting exploration.'
The actress, however, hasn't sounded off on the spinoff — or whether Powell will appear — yet.
Every TV Spinoff to (Hopefully) Look Forward to in 2025: From 'The Testaments' to 'The Madison'
After being promoted to main cast, Pepaj has continued to show support for his character Alfaro's journey. Pepaj documented the days leading up to the series finale but hasn't weighed in on S.W.A.T.'s spinoff.
Before news of S.W.A.T. Exiles broke, Ilonzeh spoke with Us Weekly about attempts to revive the series.
"We are crossing our fingers. So there is a particular discussion being had. I hope I can say [soon] that we really did it. We rallied for a third time," she shared in April 2025 while reflecting on her time playing Gamble. "But we're making noise. They do see it — producers and streamers that are interested — they are like, 'OK, this is something.' So if we can plug and play, we're all geared up to go. We don't want this ride to be over."
Despite fighting for S.W.A.T. to get a new home, it would be the show's last battle to stay on the air.
"I was just talking to [my costar] Shemar [Moore] yesterday and he was like, 'If we do this for a third time — whenever we do get canceled again — I will be OK with it. I'm not fighting for a fourth [time] because we really did it and we end on that,'" she noted. "We will end on the fight and the win and relish in all of this and squeeze the life out of it. We will know that we did it, we did our job and we can walk away happy campers."
Ilonzeh has also not acknowledged the spinoff news yet.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The Onion's Summer Box Office Preview
The Onion's Summer Box Office Preview

The Onion

timean hour ago

  • The Onion

The Onion's Summer Box Office Preview

The Surfer : Nicolas Cage stars in a psychological thriller about the horrors of not knowing whether young people are making fun of you or not. Another Simple Favor : In this sequel to the 2018 hit A Simple Favor , you'll come for the outfits, stay for the outfits, and leave wondering if the outfits were worth it all. Juliet & Romeo : Whoa, they changed the order of the names? Anything could happen in this crazy flick! Thunderbolts* : Stick around for the post-credits scene where Florence Pugh stares blankly down at the eight-figure paycheck in her hands, remembering there was a point in her career when she was in Little Women . Rust : Box offices are betting that fans will show up for this big-budget prequel to The Baldwins . Hurry Up Tomorrow : If we band together, we might be able to white-knuckle it through the Weeknd's acting phase. Transformers: The Interminables : If you thought the last seven Transformers movies were confusing, just wait until you hear all the completely incomprehensible gibberish about Forasic Stones, Shields of Time, and Wind Decoders they're spewing in this one. F1 : Brad Pitt anchors this sports action film that tries its damnedest to convince us race car drivers are athletes. NCIS : If putting a couple episodes of the CBS drama onto the big screen is what it takes to get people to come back to theaters, then so be it. The Fantastic Four: First Steps : This is never going to end, huh? No matter how many of these movies bomb, it's just going to be like this for-fucking-ever, isn't it? Together : Dave Franco and Alison Brie play a codependent couple desperate to avoid public association with their real-life brother and brother-in-law. From The World Of John Wick: Ballerina : A movie so good they have to mention a different movie in the title.

Letters to the Editor: Paramount settlement marks ‘another disgusting surrender' to Trump
Letters to the Editor: Paramount settlement marks ‘another disgusting surrender' to Trump

Los Angeles Times

timean hour ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Letters to the Editor: Paramount settlement marks ‘another disgusting surrender' to Trump

To the editor: This is another disgusting surrender by a corporate entity that did nothing wrong and is simply paying off the lawless demagogue to grease the wheels for their desired merger ('Paramount agrees to pay $16 million to settle Trump's CBS '60 Minutes' lawsuit,' July 1). It's also a betrayal of the company's duty to act responsibly in supporting the country's institutions and values, protecting our democracy. President Trump had no legal basis. The suit was meritless and should have been fought in court, where Paramount likely would have prevailed. Instead, it caved before his extortion and further emboldened him to continue attacking anyone he perceives as having wronged him. This is what happens when rank fascism is fed by those who lack the courage and the moral fiber to oppose it. TR Jahns, Hemet .. To the editor: Great reporting by senior entertainment writer Meg James. Paramount was squeezed into agreeing to this settlement. Paramount controlling shareholder Shari Redstone was desperate for the Skydance merger to be completed even though 1st Amendment experts warned that any settlement constituted a bribe of a public official and may be illegal. Further, it sets a dangerous precedent for media outlets interviewing public officials. Scott Marshutz, Vista, Calif.

After settling with Trump, CBS News staffers fear what comes next
After settling with Trump, CBS News staffers fear what comes next

CNN

time2 hours ago

  • CNN

After settling with Trump, CBS News staffers fear what comes next

Paramount Global is being hammered for bowing to presidential pressure and settling a lawsuit that it likely could have beaten in court. But this convoluted episode is really more about the plaintiff, President Trump, than about Paramount. 'It is odd to call this a 'settlement' when the result of it is so unsettling,' veteran journalism professor Al Tompkins remarked. Employees at CBS News, which produces '60 Minutes,' feel the same way. 'There is great fear about what comes next,' a CBS News staffer told CNN on condition of anonymity. Even though Trump's '60 Minutes' lawsuit is now history, his bullying tactics will continue to challenge media companies for the foreseeable future. Get Reliable Sources newsletter Sign up here to receive Reliable Sources with Brian Stelter in your inbox. 'Behavior that gets rewarded gets repeated,' the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression said Wednesday. 'This settlement will only embolden the president to continue his flurry of baseless lawsuits against the press — and against the American people's ability to hear the news free from government intrusion.' For newsrooms and other organizations targeted by Trump, the question becomes, fight or fold? One follow-up question might be: How do audiences react to outlets that fold? When Trump first sued CBS last fall, Rebecca Tushnet, the Frank Stanton professor of First Amendment law at Harvard Law School, told CNN the suit was 'ridiculous junk and should be mocked.' Tushnet – whose professional home is under multifaceted assault by the Trump administration – said in a follow-up exchange on Wednesday that Paramount's decision to settle was disappointing. 'The individual incentive in a budding authoritarian state is always to capitulate; that's the point of imposing costs on speech,' she said. 'It's disappointing that so many of our institutions are folding especially when individual citizens can see very clearly the dangers of this path.' Some CBS staffers have expressed similar views. Former CBS News correspondent Armen Keteyian echoed current staffers when he wrote on X, 'This Paramount settlement is the nadir for the network — a breach of the public trust Murrow, Cronkite, Hewitt and thousands of us worked decades to build.' Democratic lawmakers also heaped criticism on Paramount for settling; Sen. Elizabeth Warren said 'this looks like bribery in plain sight,' and Sen. Ron Wyden condemned the 'corporate execs who sold out our democracy,' promising action 'when Democrats retake power.' The bribery allegation stems from the fact that Paramount is trying to get the Trump administration to approve its pending merger with Skydance Media. Paramount insists that the settlement is not related to the FCC merger review process. Trump, however, recently spoke about the '60 Minutes' lawsuit and the merger hold-up as if they were self-evidently connected. When a reporter asked Trump what was holding up the merger on June 18, Trump answered by praising Skydance CEO David Ellison, then immediately repeated his talking points about the lawsuit. 'They're working on a settlement now,' he said. According to the terms of the settlement, which were announced late Tuesday night, Trump will drop the suit in exchange for $16 million toward his presidential library. The financial terms mirror the deal that Disney's ABC struck with Trump last December. 'Trump's presidential library will be a permanent monument to Paramount's surrender,' remarked Jameel Jaffer, executive director of the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University. Other press freedom advocates called the CBS parent's decision a 'spineless' and 'shameful' capitulation. Veteran media reporter Paul Farhi said on X that it was 'fascinating how Paramount has borne the bulk of the criticism for agreeing to this payoff. As if Trump is a passive bystander who played no role.' The conservative editorial board of the Wall Street Journal, controlled by Rupert Murdoch, focused on Trump's conduct in a sharply critical piece on Wednesday night. 'The President is using government to intimidate news outlets that publish stories he doesn't like,' the Journal wrote. 'It's a low move in a free country with a free press.' Trump, who on Wednesday was focused on his sweeping agenda bill, has yet to personally weigh in on the Paramount settlement. But a spokesman for his legal team cast the deal as an example of him holding 'the Fake News media accountable for their wrongdoing and deceit.' The supposed 'wrongdoing' in this case, however, was just an edit to a '60 Minutes' interview with then-Vice President Kamala Harris last fall. Trump seized on the clunky editing of one particular question and answer, but TV networks edit interviews all the time, and those editorial decisions are protected under the First Amendment. One takeaway for journalists is to be 'transparent about how you do what you do,' Tompkins said. CBS resisted calls to release the full transcript of the Harris interview last fall, but eventually shared the transcript and tapes amid mounting political pressure. The tapes reaffirmed that Trump had a weak legal case. But the lawsuit gave him leverage over Paramount — and potentially Skydance, the CBS-owner-in-waiting, as well. David Ellison, son of the billionaire Oracle co-founder Larry Ellison, was seen schmoozing near Trump at two different UFC matches earlier this year, stoking speculation that he was leaning on personal relationships to help get the merger approved. On Wednesday, Paramount pushed back on a New York Post report about a 'side deal' between Ellison and Trump involving TV airtime for public service announcements promoting Trump-aligned causes. 'Paramount has no knowledge of any promises or commitments made to President Trump other than those set forth in the settlement proposed by the mediator and accepted by the parties,' the company said. A spokesperson for Ellison had no comment on the matter, and there is no evidence of any such deal. But the report only intensified questions inside CBS News about how Ellison might approach owning the news division in the future. While journalists at '60 Minutes' and across CBS News are concerned about the situation, they ultimately want to move on and continue doing their jobs. 'This settlement is not a reflection on the essential and bold work of 60 Minutes of CBS,' Tompkins told CNN. 'It is a reflection of a vindictive president and corporate heads who did not value one of the fundamental principles that underpin the ownership of a news organization.' 'That principle,' he said, 'is stated as the second tenant of the Society of Professional Journalists Code of Ethics: Act Independently.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store