
If Labour cuts my PIP, I lose everything I have worked for
The government claims their welfare reforms are to help support disabled people into work, but they're ignoring the fact that many disabled people can only work because of the benefits they receive – and I'm one of them.
I live with a wide range of conditions including lupus, endometriosis, arthritis, migraines and dyspraxia, the toll these have on my body means that my disability mostly manifests through lack of energy and cognitive function. I would never be able to work a full time job or one with a strict schedule, as I can only work for a few hours at a time before I can't look at a screen anymore. I mostly work from bed as that's where I'm most comfortable.
However, I've still managed to build a pretty successful career as a writer. With my limited energy and time, I've also helped shape the Taking the PIP campaign, which has brought together more than 130 well-known disabled people to urge the prime minister to stop the cruel cuts to benefits.
But the harsh reality is that if these cuts are approved next week, with a second reading vote on the welfare reform bill, I will lose everything I have.
I receive £558 a month in PIP. I also receive Universal Credit, the amount of which changes every month because I have to input my earnings, but is roughly around £400 a month. At a time when I only have the energy to work one or two hours a week, it means that I'm not working myself to the bone in order to be able to afford to live and can still afford my bills.
Currently, you have to score 8 points to qualify for the daily living component of PIP. But if the eligibility changes come in, you will also have to score at least 4 points in one activity – these involving your ability to cook and clean, socialise and maintain good hygiene.
On my last assessment, the highest I scored on all activities was 2. Due to my depression and neurodivergent conditions, I've made myself ill in the past with bad hygiene. I have to be reminded or pushed to keep myself clean. When I'm in deep depressive episodes, I will go days, or sometimes even weeks, without changing my clothes or washing myself.
It's unsafe for me to do certain things in the kitchen as I sometimes lack control of my hands. I enjoy cooking, but often cut or burn myself and struggle to use many kitchen utensils. My cognitive and mental health conditions also mean I put housework at the bottom of the list, and prioritise just keeping myself alive. Only this week, I had to deep-clean my house – with the support of friends – after I discovered a fly infestation.
But I make allowances so that I can live a good, independent life. I have apps that remind me to clean and eat, I buy pre-sliced food or mostly rely on ready meals. I live in social housing, in an accessible bungalow, so I can move around it safely without fear that I will put myself in danger. I live five minutes from my parents, who are on hand to help with housework.
But if Labour's cuts to PIP go through, I won't be able to afford to continue living my lovely little life. I will be forced to find a job that will push me mentally and physically to breaking point. If I lose my PIP, I genuinely can't guarantee I'll still be here in five years time.
And I'm far from the only one. Under Labour plans, more than 3.2 million people will see their benefits cut, pushing around 8,000 people into poverty or even absolute poverty, which is defined by the UN as 'a condition characterised by severe deprivation of basic human needs, including food, safe drinking water, sanitation facilities, health, shelter, education and information. It depends not only on income but also on access to services.'
More than 280,000 PIP claimants who are already in work would lose their support – and, as a result, could lose their jobs.
In return, just 1-3 per cent of those affected will be able to move into work. While many working people will be affected, those who can't work will also be hard hit.
Where I agree with the government is that the welfare system does need reform, but only to make it more compassionate and less inhumane. Starmer says the welfare system 'doesn't work for anyone', and that it's 'counterproductive' and 'works against them getting into work'.
It is all well and good the government saying they want to support people into work – but when they're also quietly cutting Access to Work entitlement, their actions don't show it.
I hear every single day from scared disabled people who have no idea how they'll survive if these cuts go through. The government can claim this is a cost-cutting measure all they want, but the reality is that the very real cost will be that of disabled people's lives.
Is that really a debt politicians want on their hands?
* Rachel Charlton-Dailey is a journalist and disability rights campaigner who is part of the 'Taking the PIP' campaign
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
11 minutes ago
- BBC News
Oxfordshire child's 'harrowing' struggle to fit in at school
A mother has described the experience of her autistic child struggling to attend school and fit in as "really harrowing".The number of severely absent pupils in Oxfordshire has risen sharply, with one in every 38 children now missing more than half of number of so-called "ghost children" – those missing more than 50% of school – has increased more than five-fold in the county over the past decade, from 427 in 2015/16 to 2,305 in 2023/ Department for Education said the "government inherited a broken system" but that it was "determined to turn the tide on poor attendance". Lauren, not her real name, said her child's anxiety around school became so severe they once said they "didn't want to live any more".She said her child found it "very difficult to do anything normal... most of the time they spend half an hour in school each day". Sometimes Lauren would wait with her child at school for up to two hours. "You can tell they can't cope with being there," she said."Am I imagining these things? Am I a bad parent? You question all those things when, deep down, you know your child and you know they're unhappy"."The frustration of them not having those opportunities to fit into a normal education system is really harrowing."There can be many reasons for school absence including long term physical illness, or mental health issues, such as stress or rise in the number of children with a diagnosis of special educational needs and disability (SEND) was also creating a problem for schools, which often do not have the resources to support them. The Oxford-based charity Ark-T run therapeutic sessions at Orchard Meadow Primary in Blackbird Leys, where small groups of children work on art-based projects in a quiet, protected teacher Heather Richards said missing school could become a "vicious circle" but that the sessions had led to "real improvement" in attendance figures. "They have a stronger connection with some of the children in their year group," she added. "They also build their confidence."Lauren's child attends an online version of the sessions and said they "literally leap" to go to attend. 'Need a national effort' "Even if they're having a really bad week, they'll go to that session and they'll come out really buoyant and happy," she said. In a statement, the Department for Education said; "The government inherited a broken system, with children and families facing poor outcomes and barriers to opportunity. "The case for tackling the epidemic of school absence could not be clearer: improved grades, higher wages, better life chances."Tackling this issue is everyone's responsibility – government, schools, parents, and children – and we need a national effort to get our kids back in the classroom."As part of our plan for change, we are determined to turn the tide on poor attendance and break down barriers to opportunity - whether it's through attendance mentors, free breakfast clubs, improved mental health support, additional investment in family support, or more focus from Ofsted." You can follow BBC Oxfordshire on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.


ITV News
19 minutes ago
- ITV News
What's in the government's £500m plan to tackle child poverty?
The government has announced a new £500 million fund aimed at improving the life chances of vulnerable children facing poverty. The money will be used to tackle issues faced by children and their families, such as school absence, mental health and criminal behaviour. The government has described it as the "world's largest fund of its kind", but how will it be paid for, and how will it work? What is the Better Futures Fund? The fund announced by the Chancellor Rachel Reeves aims to help up to 200,000 children facing poverty by funding local projects that tackle things like addiction and school absence. ITV News understands the money will be invested in "social impact bonds", a system where private investors are encouraged to put money into certain schemes and recoup their costs from the government when a particular target is met. The announcement has also received cross-party support, with Conservative ministers saying this builds on the "Life Chances Fund" they implemented while in government - a scheme that received £70 million of funding at the time. The scheme also bears some resemblance to the previous Labour government's "Sure Start" support, aimed similarly at early years assistance. Former Labour Prime Minister Gordon Brown had recently called for further investment of this sort, to the tune of £1 billion. While the government is putting in half of this amount, it hopes councils, investors and philanthropists will match this. The fund will run for ten years and be overseen by the Department for Culture, Media and Sport, with more operational details due to be set out in time. What sort of projects are being invested in? The money will be used to fund a wide variety of projects targeting specific issues facing vulnerable children. These fall into categories like: school absence, addiction, mental health, education, and criminal activity. The Skill Mill is one project which received funding under the Conservatives' "Life Chances Fund" - the precursor to Labour's Better Futures Fund. The Skill Mill provides support to more than 243 young ex-offenders across eight local authorities by offering them paid real work experience, recognised qualifications, and advice. The reconviction rate of people they have supported is just 8% compared to 63% for young offenders outside of the scheme with 11+ convictions. The founder of The Skill Mill, David Parks, offered his backing to The Better Futures Fund, saying it represented a "real shift" in the support for to vulnerable children and their families. "By moving the focus from inputs and activities to meaningful person-centred outcomes, we create more impact for individuals and better value for society," he said. "At The Skill Mill, we've seen the transformation in the young people who have offended and how much they value the second chances they have been given. "Partnering for outcomes holds the key to creating support and programmes that really work, solving some of society's biggest challenges. Everyone wins.' How will Rachel Reeves pay for it? The announcement comes against a backdrop of tight finances, a weak global economic picture, and a blackhole in the chancellor's budget after the government's welfare reform climbdown. Furthermore, many MPs, as well as voters, are urging the government to lift the two-child cap on support currently in place. Supporters of lifting this cap claim it would be the single biggest thing the government could do to lift children out of poverty, but it would come with a roughly £3.5 billion price tag. The £500 million being invested in the Better Futures Fund is significantly cheaper, but still only half of that recommended by former Prime Minister Gordon Brown. Speaking on Monday, Reeves claimed previous projects of this nature have drawn in at least as much money in private investment, and they hope to achieve the same in this instance. The chancellor hopes that, as well as this additional investment, the positive effects of this scheme will be felt for "many years to come", ultimately saving the public money in the long term. What has the chancellor said? Trailing the announcement, Reeves said: 'I got into politics to help children facing the toughest challenges. This fund will give hundreds of thousands of children, young people and their families a better chance. For too long, these children have been overlooked.' Speaking on Monday from a school in Wigan, the chancellor said she could already see the impact of programmes operating but that the benefits would be felt "for many years to come" in better jobs, wages and educational attainment. Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy, whose department will oversee this scheme and accompanied the chancellor to make this announcement, said: 'This groundbreaking Better Futures Fund represents a major step in partnering with the impact economy, which has long played an important role in strengthening communities and driving inclusive growth. 'As part of the plan for change, we're bringing together Government, local authorities, charities, social enterprises and philanthropists to create a powerful alliance that will transform the lives of vulnerable children and young people. 'We owe them the best start in life. 'Together we will break down barriers to opportunity, ensuring those who need support most aren't left behind and have the chance to reach their potential.'


Telegraph
30 minutes ago
- Telegraph
I was trying to help Ukraine, claims ‘Russian spy'
A British man accused of offering to sell information to Russia about Sir Grant Shapps claimed he was trying to 'expose Russian agents' to help the Ukrainian war effort, a court was told. Howard Phillips, 65, allegedly tried to help two intelligence officers who he believed were working for Moscow by passing on personal details about the former defence secretary. He was unemployed and had applied for a job at UK Border Force, hoping the security clearance would give him access to more information. It is alleged he believed he was in contact with two Russian Intelligence Service agents called Dima and Sasha, but they were actually undercover British police officers. Giving evidence at Winchester Crown Court on Monday, Mr Phillips said he wrote a letter to the Russian embassy in early 2024 'portraying that I had information and if they were interested, they should contact me'. He said he did not in fact have any information but wrote it 'because of events that were happening in the world'. 'I was intending to track and expose Russian agents,' Mr Phillips said. Asked by his lawyer Jeremy Dein KC what events he was referring to, he said: 'In particular, the war between Israel and Gaza and the Ukrainian-Russian war. 'I was very frustrated with the delay in the US Senate agreeing to finance and provide weapons and material to Ukrainians. 'Watching every day the lines moving further into Ukraine by the Russian army. 'I felt the West wasn't doing enough to stem the flow of Russian advance. 'I was intending to expose and track a Russian agent who may be operating within the UK. It was a small part to play … it was a small part that possibly I could do,' he added. The court heard Mr Phillips's finances were 'decreasing rapidly' at the time but he denied asking for money when he wrote to the Russian embassy, saying he did not believe he would get any money that way. He said he also wrote to the Iranian and Chinese embassies, with the same plan to assist Israel. On April 4 2024 Phillips left the 'agents' a USB stick on the exposed seat shaft of a bicycle parked on Polygon Road, London, near St Pancras and Euston stations.