
Tom Cruise ‘had to be carried off the plane' after an exhausting ‘Mission: Impossible' stunt
In the blockbuster franchise's eighth and seemingly final instalment, Tom Cruise filmed a scene walking on the wing of a small biplane mid-air.
'It beat the hell out of him. The wind hitting him, and the blast of the propeller, particles hitting him. It was the hardest workout you could ever do, it was very dangerous and very exhausting for him. Many times, we were carrying him off the wing because he was so tired. And he was flying all day,' said Wade Eastwood, the film's longtime stunt coordinator and second-unit director to The Times of London newspaper.
Eastwood and Cruise have worked together since 2013, after meeting during the filming of Edge of Tomorrow. He was a stunt coordinator on the last four Mission: Impossible films and reminisced about his most-liked moment, which came in the seventh film, Dead Reckoning Part One, where Cruise rode off a cliff-edge on a motorbike.
On the actor's risk tolerance and performing his own stunts, Eastwood said, "Tom doesn't show fear, Tom shows competence. He had fun during all his stunts, even when it was exhausting. He's always positive, he'll always put on a smile, and he genuinely enjoys it.'
The actor spent over a year training in motocross and skydiving to prepare for the stunt, completing more than 500 skydives and 13,000 motocross jumps, he disclosed. 'No, no chance. He's a machine. He acts like a 20-year-old. And there's no magic there, it's just hard work and discipline with his food, nutrition and training," Eastwood said when he was asked whether Cruise might soon step back from such physically demanding roles.
Mission: Impossible – The Final Reckoning, which was released on May 17, stars Hayley Atwell, Pom Klementieff, Mariela Garriga, and Esai Morales, besides Tom Cruise. Directed by Christopher McQuarrie, it shows Cruise's character Ethan Hunt and the IMF team rush to stop the Entity, a rogue AI that can annihilate mankind.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Netizens laud Priyanka Chopra as she takes Akshay Kumar's name on a global platform with Tom Cruise and appreciates him: 'PC will never not be iconic'
Priyanka Chopra has been promoting her film 'Heads Of State' where she's seen in a powerful avatar, doing hardcore action alongside John Cena and Idris elba. The film began streaming from June 2 onwards but at the premiere of 'Heads Of State' in London, PC was asked about doing big action movies. The actress made sure she spoke about her roots with the global media at the red carpet as well. When asked about doing her own stunts just like Tom Cruise , Priyanka said, "I love what Tom Cruise and Akshay Kumar do. They're really good at that. But, I don't think I have the courage to hang off a plane that's taking off or doing that kind of stuff." She further added, "But, I do love being a part of big mega movies. We do stand on the shoulders of so many people – there's a massive stunt team that made me do all the things that I did." A user on Reddit, shared this video and wrote, "It was nice to have Akshay's name taken here, like to have people from your country being appreciated in a big place like Hollywood, which is great." Netizens further lauded Priyanka as they commented on her post, thus pointing out the fact that Priyanka never fails to take names from Bollywood globally, thus always remembering that she's the ambassador of Hindi cinema in the west. A user said, "I mean, he is Khiladi for a reason! Before khatron ke khiladi, he would host a show called Seven deadly arts with Akshay kumar. And I was super fascinated by that!! And pC has always given credit where it's due!! Love her presence of mind and general appreciation!" Another person said, "Taking akkis name without caring about contemporary 'so called' standards ...Akki Kudos" A person commented, "Always did and still love this about PC! She has a sharp awareness that she is not only breaking the ceiling with her exposure in Hollywood but she knows that she is sort-of the representative of Bollywood out west. And she makes sure to share credit and no shy away from her own native references. That way, she gets to hype up her colleagues, stay true to herself, and in her own way continue being the bridge between cultures. And the best thing? Its never out-of-the-blue. It makes sense in context!" The same comment further pointed out, "When she was promoting Citadel, she was mentioning SLB as a director who has a gran vision for his films and achieves scale that looks massive even though his budgets are smaller than Hollywood's. When she is promoting Heads of State now, and just off the back of Tom Cruise doing M:I, it makes total contextual sense for her to not only use the Tom Cruise name/hype in her own action experience, but also tie in Akshay Kumar along the way. " Another person said, "Just one thing. PC will never not be iconic. PERIOD."


Indian Express
6 hours ago
- Indian Express
Hollywood's biggest star of the era, whose last film earned Rs 4810 crore, almost became a Catholic priest; was kicked out for stealing alcohol
Hollywood without Mission: Impossible is hard to even imagine. But what if we told you that it might've never happened if Tom Cruise had taken a completely different path? Most people know he used to wrestle in school and even considered going professional. But what many don't know is that before Scientology, Cruise was a devout Roman Catholic, just like his ex-wife Katie Holmes once was. In fact, he was so committed, he even joined a seminary to train as a priest. At the time, he was living with his mom and sisters, his father had walked out when he was just 13. Also read: Mission Impossible – The Final Reckoning movie review: Tom Cruise's last rodeo as Ethan Hunt makes a feeble appeal for a united world A priest named Father Ric Schneider noticed young Cruise's growing interest in religion and brought him into St. Francis Seminary in Cincinnati. Cruise stuck around for a year—he liked the prayers, daily Mass, the whole routine, but deep down, he knew this wasn't it. In an interview with the New York Daily News, Cruise's old schoolmate Shane Dempler recalled, 'We went to Mass, spent time in the chapel, and enjoyed hearing stories from the priests. We thought the priests had a great lifestyle, and we were really into the idea of priesthood.' 'Tom was instantly hooked,' Father Ric added. 'I think he wanted a solid education. With his parents splitting up, things were rough. Maybe that's why he came here.' This was back in the '70s. Cruise, then still Tom Mapother, was just a teenager living in Louisville. After the divorce, his mom packed up and moved the kids to Kentucky. One day at school, Cruise came across Father Ric, who was with the Order of Friars Minor. At the end of his talk, the priest asked if any boys were interested in joining the seminary. Cruise raised his hand. Also read: F1: Brad Pitt, Joseph Kosinski remind what going to the movies is all about Father Ric later visited the house, a simple setup, nothing fancy, and gave Cruise an IQ test to see if he could handle the academics. He barely passed. But by fall 1976, Cruise was in, one of 68 freshmen at St. Francis Seminary. No one thought he'd last. Father Ric remembers him as a smiling kid, the type who'd pull a prank or trip someone for a laugh. Crooked teeth, one chipped. Not the smartest or strongest in the room, but the personality stood out. Shane Dempler, speaking to the New York Daily News, shared how Cruise and a few others got into trouble for sneaking booze. 'I tossed about six, most broke, but we managed to get a couple and stash them in the woods,' he said, adding that the priests had no clue. But later, some boys found the hiding spot, snuck in, got drunk, and ended up getting caught. 'The school sent letters to our parents saying they liked us both, but would prefer if we didn't return. So we weren't exactly kicked out, just preferred not to go back,' Dempler said. What really flipped the switch for Cruise was Father Aubert Grieser, the drama and speech teacher. He'd throw the quietest kids on stage just to shake the fear out of them. For Cruise, that moment made him realise, what he wanted. Less than a year later, he walked out of seminary life, and later summed it up with: 'I realised I love women too much to give all that up.' A few years later, Cruise popped up on screen in Risky Business, sliding around in his underwear, and his school friend was stunned to see him. 'Oh my God, that's Mapother!' one of them said in an interview with the New York Daily News. What shocked many of them even more than the acting was Cruise turning to Scientology. His old classmates just couldn't believe it, this wasn't the kid they prayed with every day. Years later, just before Cruise's 50th birthday, around the time of his marriage to actor Katie Holmes, Father Ric found one of his old photos from the seminary days and sent it to him by post. It was Cruise at 14, smiling, holding a remote-controlled boat he'd built in school. Interestingly, the photo likely arrived right around the time Cruise was dealing with Holmes walking away with their daughter. Katie Holmes, who was also raised Catholic, reportedly left because she didn't want their daughter growing up in Scientology.


Indian Express
9 hours ago
- Indian Express
F1: Brad Pitt takes a page out of Shah Rukh Khan's Pathaan playbook, and tears it to shreds
Nearly four decades ago, the late director Tony Scott, star Tom Cruise, and producer Jerry Bruckheimer attempted to re-conjure the magic that made Top Gun such a cultural touchstone with Days of Thunder, a racing movie that followed the same basic structure, but replaced the fighter jets with fast cars. Now, Bruckheimer and director Joseph Kosinski are essentially following the same playbook with Top Gun: Maverick and the recently released F1. The only difference, this time around, is that Cruise didn't return for the sports drama, perhaps because he has been occupied for the last half-decade by the Mission: Impossible franchise. But this was all for the best, because nobody other than Brad Pitt could've played the role of the seasoned drifter Sonny Hayes. It's an odd observation to make, because Cruise literally played the most famous drifter of them all, Jack Reacher. Twice. But he was famously miscast in those movies. Not because he didn't fit writer Lee Child's physical description of the towering Reacher, but because, as an actor, Cruise doesn't exactly project the going-with-the-flow energy that is required for such a character. He is simply too intense, his persona is too curated, too meticulous to play someone that lives like hobo. There's a reason why people joke that he's actually an alien scientologist sent to spy on earthlings. Pitt, on the other hand, has the exact opposite screen presence. He's a relaxed, relatable, somewhat rudderless. Also read – 28 Years Later: Danny Boyle has probably made Shashi Tharoor's favourite film; a thriller that punishes the British for all their plundering and pillaging For instance, you could never imagine Cruise taking a sip more than he has prescribed for himself at the Vanity Fair Oscars afterparty, but you can imagine Pitt 'drinking a Russian under the table with his own vodka'. This messiness is key to his character in F1, a man who is described as not a has-been, but a never-was. Back in the day, the prodigious Sonny used to race with the likes of Ayrton Senna, Michael Schumacher, and Alain Prost. Now, presumably in his 50s — Pitt is 61 — he works as a racer-for-hire, scooping up loose change in pursuit of a rush that has eluded him for decades. There are multiple failed relationships in his rearview mirror; he's overcome several addictions. But he isn't in it for the money. Sonny's busy living in his van and drowning out his thoughts with Apple AirPods Max™ when his old buddy Ruben, played by Javier Bardem, plucks him out of obscurity and pleads with him to save his cratering Formula One team, APXGP. Half the season's over, and the board is threatening to sell the team if they don't show signs of life. Sonny is the only man who can save them. Desperate times call for desperate measures, after all. Plus, Ruben has immense faith in his old friend. In several of their scenes together, it seems as if Bardem is only one step away from declaring him to be the 'Lisan al-Gaib'. As played by Pitt, Sonny has a purity of soul that makes him instantly likeable. But in a movie as well-oiled as F1, even shades of grey have to be coloured with artisanal paint. For someone who is prone to throwing a wrench in his team's plans, disobeying orders, and relying increasingly on 'chaos' and 'combat' as viable strategies, Sonny certainly steers F1 towards a predictable path. Much of the film's central conflict stems from his tense relationship with his partner, the rookie Joshua Pearce, played by Damson Idris. Perhaps because the film doesn't have a conventional villain, much like Maverick, it relies on personal drama as a source of tension. Joshua is a brash, arrogant, and eager to level up. But despite being a lone ranger — he is, in many ways, is an archetypal Western hero — Sonny instils in him a team spirit. There's a huge generational divide separating the two of them, but it's obvious that Joshua cannot evolve without Sonny's help. Heck, his career might have crashed and burned had Sonny not arrived and nudged it back on track. And if Maverick was a metaphor for the movie industry, so is F1. Both films believe, very strongly, that the era of stardom is over. It's almost like the scene at the end of Pathaan, where Shah Rukh Khan and Salman Khan declare that they must bear the burden of saving the film business, because the self-centred younger stars are in it just for themselves. But there's a difference. While Pathaan took a 'bachcho pe nahi chhod sakte' stance, F1 understands that true progress can only be achieved when the older generation makes way for the new. Maverick presented Cruise as Cinema Manifest. F1 feels like the sort of movie you'd make if you were preempting a public cancellation. Cruise has survived a few of those himself, and always seems at the verge of doing something kooky enough for people to turn people against him. He's been excused for his absenteeism and strange beliefs only because the audience has weighed the pros against the cons, and decided that life is simply too short to deny yourself the pleasure of watching him dangle from a biplane. Pitt, on the other hand, has lived a messy life. There is little to hide there. It's telling that, in both movies, their characters don't have kids. Unlike Cruise, who has delivered a seminal blockbuster in every decade of his career, Pitt has never been a commercial crowd-puller. He has, however, always been a movie star. Just as Bollywood is struggling to anoint successors to the three Khans, Hollywood is having its own crisis. The always outspoken Quentin Tarantino (correctly) pointed out that the guys who work in Marvel movies aren't real stars; this includes the likes of Chris Hemsworth, Chris Evans, Chris Pratt, and all the rest of them. Even Robert Downey Jr's first post-Marvel tent pole, Dolittle, flopped despite his presence. Read more – Mission Impossible The Final Reckoning: Tom Cruise deserved better than a goofy Abbas-Mustan movie that chooses spoon-feeding over spectacle Tarantino went so far as to deny George Clooney a spot on his list, suggesting quite plainly that Clooney has never delivered a blockbuster on the strength of his name. The actor told GQ that he was 'irritated' at Tarantino for essentially writing off his entire career, but he admitted that the industry wasn't producing stars like it used to. 'We were at the very end of that, where you could work at a studio and do three or four films, and there was some plan to it. And I don't think that's necessarily the case anymore. So it's harder for you to sell somebody something on the back of a star,' he said. One could argue that F1 sort of markets itself; the 'sport' is incredibly popular across the globe, and has produced numerous icons of its own. But there's no denying that the movie wouldn't be what it is without Pitt's weathered performance to anchor the spectacle. Similarly, Inception wouldn't be what it is without Leonardo DiCaprio's haunted performance; Armageddon would be a worse film without the youthful exuberance of Ben Affleck to counterbalance Bruce Willis' weariness. Only Denzel Washington could take a dour gangster drama to $200 million worldwide. At the same time, it's important to point out that Cruise took Glen Powell under his wing; DiCaprio has a famous posse of his own; Affleck and his buddy Matt Damon are empowering a whole new batch of filmmakers; and Washington, bless him, was the first person to put his money on Chadwick Boseman. An isolationist attitude rarely works. You have to pay it forward instead of pulling away; you must give back instead of gloating about your own success. If you truly believe that 'bachcho pe nahi chhod sakte', then teach them. Post Credits Scene is a column in which we dissect new releases every week, with particular focus on context, craft, and characters. Because there's always something to fixate about once the dust has settled.