Divided US appeals court allows Biden-era biofuel rule to stand
June 20 (Reuters) - A federal appeals court declined to throw out the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's renewable fuel standards for 2023 to 2025 on Friday, even as it concluded regulators failed to adequately assess the potential effect the rule would have on climate change and endangered species.
A 2-1 panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit largely rejected, opens new tab challenges by environmental groups, refiners and a renewable fuel producer to fuel volume requirements that the EPA set in 2023 for corn ethanol and other biofuels during former Democratic President Joe Biden's tenure.
The requirements increased the amount of biofuels that oil refiners must blend into the nation's fuel mix and set finalized biofuel blending volumes at 20.94 billion gallons in 2023, 21.54 billion gallons in 2024 and 22.33 billion gallons in 2025.
The panel's majority found merit only in challenges filed by two environmental groups, including the Center for Biological Diversity.
They argued the EPA failed to adequately explain why it relied on an outdated study when addressing greenhouse gas emissions associated with crop-based biofuels and contended the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service did not adequately explain its conclusion that the rules would have no effect on endangered species.
The panel's majority agreed, finding that the EPA's analysis of the effects of the rule on climate change under the Clean Air Act was arbitrary and that the Fish and Wildlife Service failed to explain why it concluded there would be "no effect" on habitats if land is converted to grow corn and soybeans.
U.S. Circuit Judges Cornelia Pillard and Michelle Childs, both appointees of Democratic presidents, nonetheless declined to vacate the rule and instead sent it back to the EPA for further consideration, saying tossing it could be "highly disruptive."
Maggie Coulter, a lawyer at the Center for Biological Diversity, in a statement called the ruling a "big win," saying the agencies would now need to fully assess the renewable fuels program's harms to protected species and habitat.
The EPA did not respond to requests for comment.
U.S. Circuit Judge Gregory Katsas, who Republican President Donald Trump appointed in his first term, dissented and said he would have set the rule aside, saying "the requirements are more deeply flawed than my colleagues recognize."
He said the EPA considered only how much renewable fuel the industry could produce, without considering the costs and benefits of possible alternatives.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Trump's aid cut risks causing 14 million deaths, report finds
Donald Trump's move to cut most of the US funding towards foreign humanitarian aid could cause more than 14 million additional deaths by 2030, according to research published in The Lancet medical journal on Monday.A third of those at risk of premature deaths are children, the research Secretary of State Marco Rubio said in March that President Trump's administration had cancelled over 80% of all programmes at the US Agency for International Development, or USAID."For many low- and middle-income countries, the resulting shock would be comparable in scale to a global pandemic or a major armed conflict," Davide Rasella, who co-authored the Lancet report, said in a statement. The funding cuts "risk abruptly halting - and even reversing - two decades of progress in health among vulnerable populations," added Rasella, a researcher at the Barcelona Institute for Global report comes as dozens of world leaders are meeting in the Spanish city of Seville this week for a United Nations-led aid conference, the biggest one in a back over data from 133 nations, the team of researchers estimated that USAID funding had prevented 91 million deaths in developing countries between 2001 and also used modelling to project how funding being slashed by 83% – the figure announced by the US government earlier this year – could affect death cuts could lead to more than 14 million avoidable deaths by 2030, the projections found. That number included over 4.5 million children under the age of five – or around 700,000 child deaths a to Rubio, there were still approximately 1,000 remaining programmes that would be administered "more effectively" under the US State Department and in consultation with the situation on the ground has not been improving, according to UN month, a UN official told the BBC that hundreds of thousands of people were "slowly starving" in Kenyan refugee camps after US funding cuts reduced food rations to their lowest ever a hospital in Kakuma, in northwestern Kenya, the BBC witnessed a baby who could barely move and was showing signs of malnutrition, including having parts of her skin wrinkled and peeling.
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Trump news at a glance: Republicans scramble to pass ‘one big, beautiful bill' as deadline looms
Senate Republicans are racing to meet Donald Trump's self-imposed 4 July deadline to pass the president's massive tax-and-spending 'one big, beautiful bill'. In a marathon session, senators convened at the Capitol to propose amendments to the legislation over many hours. Democrats, who universally oppose the bill, are expected to use the process to force their opponents into politically tricky votes that they will seek to wield against them in elections to come. Even if it passes the Senate, the bill will still need to go back through the House, which is being called back to session for votes as soon as Wednesday. Here's the latest: As the marathon session kicked off on Monday morning, Senate majority leader John Thune sounded optimistic that the measure would soon clear his chamber. 'Let's vote. This is good for America, this is good for the American people, it is good for working families,' he said. Chuck Schumer the Senate minority leader said the bill 'steals people's healthcare, jacks up their electricity bill, take away their jobs – all to pay for tax breaks for billionaires'. He said Democrats would offer amendments to 'see once and for all if Republicans really meant all those nice things they've been saying about 'strengthening Medicaid' and 'protecting middle-class families', or if they were just lying'. Republican Senator Thom Tillis said 'this bill will betray the promise Donald Trump made,' a few hours after announcing he would not seek re-election in politically competitive North Carolina. Read the full story The Trump administration has codified its efforts to strip some Americans of their US citizenship in a recently published justice department memo that directs attorneys to prioritize denaturalization for naturalized citizens who commit certain crimes. The memo, published on 11 June, calls on attorneys in the department to institute civil proceedings to revoke a person's United States citizenship if an individual either 'illegally procured' naturalization or procured naturalization by 'concealment of a material fact or by willful misrepresentation'. Read the full story The United States has said that Canada's prime minister Mark Carney 'caved' to demands from the White House after his government abruptly scrapped their digital services tax on US technology companies, which was set to go into effect on Monday. 'It's very simple. Prime minister Carney and Canada caved to president [Donald] Trump and the United States of America,' press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a daily briefing. Read the full story The Trump administration has concluded that Harvard University violated federal civil rights law in its handling of Jewish and Israeli students, and it threatened the school with a potential 'loss of all federal financial resources' as a result, according to the Wall Street Journal. In a Monday letter addressed to the Harvard president, Alan Garber, administration attorneys stated that the university was aware Jewish and Israeli students felt unsafe on campus but failed to take meaningful action. The letter, obtained by the Journal, accused Harvard of 'deliberate indifference' toward those concerns. Read the full story Donald Trump has signed an executive order to lift some financial sanctions on Syria in a move that the White House says will help stabilise the country after the ousting of Bashar al-Assad. Read the full story The US dollar has had its worst first half-year in more than 50 years, as the financial markets over the last six months were dominated by geopolitical crises and Donald Trump's trade war. The dollar has fallen by 10.8% against a basket of currencies since the start of 2025. That is its worst performance over the first six months of any year since 1973, and the worst half-year since the second half of 1991. Read the full story The US Department of Homeland Security has for the first time built a national citizenship database that combines information from immigration agencies and the social security administration. The Trump administration is on track to oversee one of the deadliest years for immigrants in detention after the recent deaths of two men – one from Cuba and another from Canada – while in federal custody. The US supreme court agreed on Monday to hear a case that could further erode restrictions on money in politics, in a challenge that comes in part from vice-president JD Vance. Catching up? Here's what happened 29 June.
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Musk vows to unseat lawmakers who support Trump's one big beautiful bill
Elon Musk has vowed to unseat lawmakers who support Donald Trump's sweeping budget bill, which he has criticized because it would increase the country's deficit by $3.3tn. 'Every member of Congress who campaigned on reducing government spending and then immediately voted for the biggest debt increase in history should hang their head in shame! And they will lose their primary next year if it is the last thing I do on this Earth,' he wrote on his social media platform, X. A few hours later he added that if 'insane spending bill passes, the America Party will be formed the next day'. With these threats, lobbed at lawmakers over social media, the tech billionaire has launched himself back into a rift with the US president he helped prop up. Since taking leave from his so-called 'department of government efficiency', or Doge, Musk has sharply criticized Trump's budget bill, which he has said will undermine his work at Doge by increasing spending. Musk had been relatively quiet about the bill after his dramatic fallout with Trump, but reentered the debate this weekend. On Monday, he said lawmakers who had campaigned on cutting spending but backed the bill 'should hang their heads in shame! And they will lose their primary next year if it is the last thing I do on this Earth,' Musk said. The Tesla and SpaceX CEO called again for a new political party, saying the bill's massive spending indicated 'that we live in a one-party country – the PORKY PIG PARTY!!' 'Time for a new political party that actually cares about the people,' he wrote. After contributing $277m to Trump's political campaign, Musk became a vital part of the US president's orbit and his administration. Doge, which oversaw abrupt and chaotic cuts to various government programs, claimed it saved $190bn. But the effort may also have cost taxpayers $135bn, according to an analysis by the Partnership for Public Service (PSP), a nonpartisan non-profit that focuses on the federal workforce. Both Musk and Trump were aligned in cutting social safety net programs, environmental and health initiatives and global aid programs. But Musk has railed against the president's signature proposal, which he is calling his 'big, beautiful bill'. The Senate's version of the bill would add nearly $3.3tn to the deficit over the next decade, according to a congressional budget office estimate, whereas the House-approved bill would add $2.4tn to the deficit over the next decade. Musk has expressed disdain for both versions. In addition to criticizing the bill's spending provisions, he has bemoaned its slashing of subsidies for electric vehicles, saying that the bill 'gives handouts to industries of the past while severely damaging industries of the future'.
