These Three Cities Honored For Their Public Health Achievements
The Summit was co-hosted by Bloomberg Philanthropies, the World Health Organization (WHO), Vital Strategies, and, of course, the City of Paris. It brought together mayors and officials from 61 different cities around the world that are already part of the Partnership for Healthy Cities network.
Kelly Larson, MPH, who directs this Partnership for Bloomberg Philanthropies, indicated that this global network now has all told 74 cities. It was initially launched in 2017 and has steadily grown since. 'The first step in joining this network is to have buy in from the mayor or the equivalent,' she explained. 'It includes high, middle and low income cities.' She added, 'We've identified specific non-communicable disease or injury issues that the cities can choose from to work on: tobacco, food policy, road safety, overdose prevention, pollution surveillance and most recently dealing with heat.'
During the Summit the participants discussed the biggest public health issues facing cities and the world and how to, you know, actually do something about these issues rather than just blame others. This Partnership includes a Policy Accelerator that offers training and support for cities do things like what the three honored cities have done. Those cities won their awards because they made good concrete in preventing either noncommunicable diseases or injuries or both.
In a statement, Michael R. Bloomberg, founder of Bloomberg L.P. and Bloomberg Philanthropies, WHO Global Ambassador for Noncommunicable Diseases and Injuries, and 108th mayor of New York City reminded everyone, 'Noncommunicable diseases, including heart disease, cancer, and diabetes, and injuries are responsible for more than 80% of all deaths globally, but the good news is: They are preventable.'
So without further ado, here are the three winners and what they do and have done:
WHO Director-General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus praised the winners by saying in statement, "Cities are at the forefront of the fight against noncommunicable diseases and injuries. The progress made in Córdoba, Fortaleza, and Greater Manchester is not only improving health today but also setting a model for others to follow.'
These awardees have shown what being committed to improving the health and lives their residents and following scientific evidence can do. That's something that you don't always see at the national government level these days. For example, in the U.S., recent major cuts in public health personnel, funding and resources may make you wonder how much commitment there is to improving the health of the population. There's also been substantial cuts in what the U.S. is providing to major organizations that have been providing health and public health services around the world. All of this means that unless someone else steps up to fill these new gaps, the health of people around the world could suffer.
That means that an increasing proportion of the public health responsibiilties could fall on the shoulders of cities. Larson acknowledged 'This is a challenging time for public health around the world.' But she was optimistic about what cities can do and has been by the commitments that she has seen with cities and their mayors. 'I believe in the power of cities.' She pointed out what happened in New York City when Bloomberg was mayor, 'Life expectancies in NYC increased by 3 years. We can prioritize cities and public health using model of Mike's tenure as mayor.' In other words, a city situation could end up being quite good.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Pilot scheme reveals how much individual DNA impacts the effectiveness of medicine
A pilot scheme has revealed a widespread genetic sensitivity to common medicines which could increase side effects or stop them working as they should. The trial saw 2,200 adults undergo whole genome sequencing to analyse how their individual DNA responds to the likes of antibiotics and over-the-counter painkillers. A staggering 99% showed a genetic variant that affects their sensitivity to certain medicines. This could mean some drugs, including over-the-counter, everyday painkillers, antibiotics and other prescription medications, won't work for some people based on their individual DNA. DNA could stop over-the-counter medicines working for some Brits The blood test, part of Bupa's My Genomic Health scheme, also looked into their genetic risk of developing 36 preventable diseases, including cancers, heart conditions and type 2 diabetes. It found 91% of participants were found to be at risk of developing a disease with genetic and lifestyle risk factors, such as fatty liver disease, breast cancer and certain heart diseases. While 73% had multiple genetic variants that put them at raised risk of developing a condition that could be prevented or detected early, leading to better health outcomes, including the likes of high cholesterol, skin cancer and type 2 diabetes. Of the participants, 49% were found to be carriers of a genetic variant that could lead to a raised risk of a certain condition in future generations. How to get your own Medication Check Following the successful pilot, Medication Check can now be purchased through Bupa and will also be available to more than three million of its customers as part of its workplace health scheme. A saliva test will establish what medications are most likely to be effective, those with increased risk of adverse side effects, or ones that won't work for you at all. When to see your GP about cancer Dr Rebecca Rohrer, clinical innovation and genomics director for Bupa, said: 'We've long known that most medications only work for 30-50% of the population. 'However, this pilot has highlighted just how significantly individual genomes impact the effectiveness of medications in treating conditions. 'With more than half of us regularly taking a prescription medication and an increasing number affected by a chronic condition, it's crucial that people are prescribed the right medicine from the start, tailored to their unique genetic makeup. 'In the longer term, genomics is key to early detection and even preventing some illnesses altogether.' After completing the at-home medication check, patients will be offered a GP consultation with the healthcare provider to review any medication identified in their genetic tests. It comes as Bupa is about to introduce two new products to its My Genomic Health suite later this year that will help to prevent or detect illness earlier. The DNA Health Check will give people early warning of an increased genetic risk of four different conditions - breast cancer, prostate cancer, type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. While the Advanced DNA Health Check will combine insights from medication, disease risk, carrier status and traits, and will look at the genetic risk of developing conditions such as heart disease, metabolic disease and 10 types of cancer. Recommended reading: Full list of the DWP benefits and pensions changes due this month Freddie Flintoff praises NHS staff who cared for him after serious car crash Insurance refuse to pay man 'paralysed for life' after horror accident abroad Carlos Jaureguizar, CEO for Bupa Global, India & UK, said: 'Whole genomic sequencing is fundamentally changing our approach to healthcare, pivoting from treatment to prevention. 'It has the power to become a health passport that people can reference throughout their lives. 'We firmly believe genomics is the path to health innovation and prevention, reducing the nation's health burden and giving people personalised knowledge of their own genomic profile to live well for longer.'
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
🩺 The Athletic: Real Madrid completely overhauls medical department
As reported by Mario Cortegana in The Athletic and Alberto Pereiro on Onda Cero, Real Madrid has begun a complete restructuring of its medical department following a season with a high number of injuries, especially muscular ones, that severely affected key players such as Carvajal and Militao. Dr. Felipe Segura, present at the club since 2021, now assumes full control of the medical area. His leadership is expected to bring cohesion and a renewed focus on injury prevention and treatment, marking a change of course after the criticisms accumulated in previous campaigns. Similarly, Dr. Manuel Arroyo, previously at Granada, has been hired and enjoys a great reputation. With these initiatives, Real Madrid seeks not only to respond to an accumulated physical crisis, in which it suffered more than 50 injuries during the previous season, but to establish a new philosophy of prevention and consistent performance for the upcoming season This article was translated into English by Artificial Intelligence. You can read the original version in 🇪🇸 here. 📸 MARCO BERTORELLO - AFP or licensors
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
These 4 Habits Could Help You Avoid Cognitive Decline, New Study Says
Reviewed by Dietitian Mandy Enright, M.S., RDN, RYTKey Points A new study suggests exercise, diet and regular healthcare check-ups may lower dementia risk. That includes physical exercise—ideally six times per week—and mental exercises to keep you sharp. Following the MIND diet, a combination of the Mediterranean and DASH diets, may also support better brain disease (AD) and related dementias are significant public health challenges for many reasons. More people are being affected by dementia, and the condition can bring heavy emotional, social and financial burdens. And as much as you or a loved one may want to lower your dementia risk, it can be hard to figure out where to start. Memory decline in older adults often has multiple causes, so effective treatments ideally tackle several targets at once. While new medications that target amyloid (a group of proteins linked to Alzheimer's) show promise in slowing the disease in its early stages, they don't address other common problems like blood vessel damage in the brain, which can also contribute to memory loss. This highlights the need for better, more comprehensive treatments. Non-drug approaches, like improving lifestyle factors, offer a safe, affordable, and accessible way to reduce dementia risk. A groundbreaking study in Finland (called the Finnish Geriatric Intervention Study to Prevent Cognitive Impairment and Disability, or FINGER) showed that combining certain healthy lifestyle changes improved memory and thinking in older adults at risk for dementia. To determine if the positive results from the FINGER study in Finland could also apply to a larger and more diverse group of people in the United States who are at risk for dementia, researchers studied this method's impact on brain health and thinking abilities, and the results were published in JAMA. This study was called the U.S. Study to Protect Brain Health Through Lifestyle Intervention to Reduce Risk, or U.S. POINTER. How Was This Study Conducted? Researchers recruited subjects for this study by using electronic health records and by working with local community organizations to reach people directly. The goal was to include older adults (ages 60 to 79) who didn't have memory problems but were at higher risk of developing dementia. To qualify, participants had to meet specific criteria regarding both lifestyle factors and risk factors. Those factors included having low physical activity levels—meaning less than 60 minutes of moderate exercise per week—and not following the MIND diet, which is designed to support brain health. As for risk factors, participants needed to meet at least two of the following conditions: A close family member (like a parent or sibling) had memory problems. They had health risks like high blood pressure, high cholesterol or high blood sugar. They identified as part of a racial or ethnic group that is often underrepresented in research, such as Native American, Black, Middle Eastern, or Hispanic or Latino. They were in the older age range (70 to 79 years old) or were male, as men are often underrepresented in dementia prevention studies. Both groups focused on improving brain health through physical activity, cognitive activity, healthy eating, social engagement and heart health monitoring. The difference between the two groups was in how the program was delivered. The first group was the structured group, and participants in this group received extra support from trained professionals and worked closely with peer teams of 10-15 people for motivation and accountability. Participants attended 38 team meetings over two years, and meetings were led by trained navigators and specialists. They also participated in the following: Physical exercise: 30-35 minutes of moderate-to-intense aerobic activity four times a week, plus strength and flexibility exercises twice a week. Cognitive exercise: Computer-based brain training program three times a week for 30 minutes, plus regular engagement in other intellectually challenging and social activities. Nutrition: Adherence to the MIND diet, which emphasizes dark leafy greens, berries, nuts, whole grains, olive oil and fish, and limits sugar and unhealthy fats. Health monitoring: Regular check-ins (every 6 months) on blood pressure, weight and lab results. The second group was the self-guided group. This group was more independent but still had access to resources and support from peer teams and navigators from the Alzheimer's Association. Participants received publicly available resources about healthy lifestyle changes, such as tips on exercise, diet and brain health. They only attended six peer team meetings over two years, and had their health checked once a year during clinic visits, following standard health guidelines. This study measured brain health and thinking abilities using a global cognitive score, which combined results from three key areas: executive function, which includes skills like planning, problem-solving, and multitasking; episodic memory, which focuses on remembering specific events or experiences; and processing speed, which measures how quickly the brain can handle information. To calculate the global score, participants completed a series of brain tests during clinic visits at the start of the study and every six months for two years. What Did The Study Find? Both groups in the U.S. POINTER study showed improvements in overall brain function over time as measured by their global cognitive scores. After adjusting for certain factors, the structured group improved slightly faster than the self-guided group, and this difference was statistically significant. When focusing on the different cognitive areas the researchers measured, here is what they found: Executive Function: In planning, problem-solving and multitasking, the structured group improved more than the self-guided group, and the difference was statistically significant. Processing Speed: In gauging how long the brain took to process information, the structured group also showed slightly greater improvement—however, this difference was not statistically significant. Episodic Memory: As for remembering specific events, both groups improved at about the same rate, with no meaningful difference between them. The structured program seemed to have the biggest impact on participants who started the study with lower cognitive function. However, the structured program worked similarly well regardless of participants' sex, age or heart health at the start of the study. Additionally, the effects of the structured program were the same for people with or without the APOE ε4 gene, which research has linked to a higher risk of Alzheimer's disease. In summary, the structured program provided the most benefit for executive function and was especially helpful for participants who started with lower cognitive abilities. Other factors like age, sex and genetic risk didn't seem to change how effective the program was. This study has a few limitations to consider. First, the results might not apply to everyone because the study only took place at five sites, included participants specifically at higher risk for cognitive decline and required a significant two-year commitment from participants. Second, the study wasn't designed to measure whether the interventions could prevent cognitive impairment or dementia, so those outcomes remain unknown. It's also worth noting that the self-guided group wasn't a true 'no-intervention' control group, as they still received some resources and support. Plus, participants knew which group they were in, which could have influenced their behavior or results. Additionally, it's unclear how long the benefits of the structured program will last, how easily it could be scaled up for larger populations or how meaningful the improvements are in the long term. How Does This Apply to Real Life? This study highlights the power of lifestyle changes when it comes to supporting brain health and reducing the risk of memory decline. It shows that combining regular exercise, a brain-healthy diet, mental stimulation and social engagement may make a real difference, especially for people at higher risk of dementia. The structured program, which provided extra guidance and support, was particularly effective in improving skills like planning, problem-solving and multitasking. This observation suggests that having a clear plan and access to professional support may help people stick to healthy habits and see better results. But the self-guided group, which had more flexibility, showed improvements, proving that small, consistent changes in daily life can still benefit brain health. This means that adopting healthier habits like staying active, following the MIND diet, engaging in mentally challenging activities, and staying socially connected can be a practical and accessible way to protect brain health. While the study focused on older adults at risk for dementia, the findings are a reminder that it's never too early or too late to start making positive changes. Our Expert Take A study recently published in JAMA provides valuable evidence that lifestyle changes can play a significant role in supporting brain health and reducing the risk of cognitive decline. In particular, these findings highlight the potential of combining regular exercise, a brain-healthy diet, mental stimulation and social engagement to improve cognitive health, especially for those at higher risk of dementia. Both structured and self-guided programs led to improvements in overall brain function, with the structured program showing slightly greater benefits, particularly in areas like planning, problem-solving, and multitasking. Importantly, the study also demonstrated that even small, self-guided changes can make a meaningful difference, making these strategies accessible to a wide range of people. Read the original article on EATINGWELL
