Union Power Minister Khattar urges states to fast-track smart meter rollout, ensure power sector reforms
Addressing the Regional Conference for the Northern Region States and UTs here, the minister underlined the importance of a future-ready, modern, and financially viable power sector to fuel the country's growth.
The Union Power minister also underlined the importance of a future-ready, modern, and financially viable power sector to fuel the country's growth on its journey towards becoming a developed nation.
Khattar said that smart meters have the potential to change how consumers interact with electricity providers by using data analytics powered by AI and machine learning tools. These features, built into smart meter applications, can help users make better energy choices and benefit from more efficient energy use.
"India has successfully met a peak demand of 250 GW in May 2024 and has transformed from power-deficit to a power-sufficient nation, and as of today, peak demand shortage is zero," he said adding that the growth of the power sector is important for achieving the goal of 'Viksit Bharat' by 2047.
The minister said the states should, while meeting their resource adequacy plan, should also work on having adequate power generation mix including addition of nuclear generation capacity. India's peak electricity demand is projected to reach 446 GW by 2034–35, and this sustainably requires proactive planning and continued coordination between the Centre, States, and stakeholders.
On the issue of power reliability, Khattar highlighted the importance of cybersecurity and "islanding schemes" to help prevent outages due to cyber threats and to make the power grid more resilient.
Calling the distribution sector the most critical link in the power value chain, Khattar said it continues to face major challenges due to poor tariff structures, inefficient billing and collections, and delays in payments by government departments. He said it is important to reduce AT&C (Aggregate Technical and Commercial) losses and the gap between the cost of supply and the revenue collected. He urged states to work with Electricity Regulatory Commissions for cost-reflective tariffs and timely tariff revisions. 'Losses of utilities today add to cost of power for consumers and also deteriorate the delivery of services to consumers, and further, continued losses have a cascading effect,' he said.
Khattar also called on distribution companies to speed up work under the Revamped Distribution Sector Scheme to improve efficiency and smart infrastructure. He said the delay in payment of government dues and subsidies continues to affect the financial health of utilities, with some states still behind on dues from the 2023–24 financial year and wider gaps seen in the current year.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
37 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Nuke law recast expected to cap supplier liability
Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads A More Viable Framework Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Draft in Making India is considering a total recast of laws governing atomic energy , including the Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage (CLND) Act, said people familiar with the matter. In particular, the revamp will seek to address the open-ended liability of suppliers under the current law as the Centre seeks to rope in private aims to expand its nuclear energy capacity to 35-40 GW by 2035 and 100 GW by 2047. Policymakers are of the view that the laws require changes if the target is to be met. India currently has 22 operating reactors, with an installed capacity of 6,780 MW. 'Instead of multiple piecemeal changes, there is a thinking that the laws be rewritten completely,' said one of the persons Atomic Energy and CLND Acts were introduced in the context of a state-owned nuclear thrust. Now, however, 'The idea is to encourage private sector participation and not discourage it,' the person liability law, envisaged as a safeguard against fallout after any accident, has been a long-standing concern of potential Section 6(1) of the CLND Act caps the total liability for each nuclear incident at 300 million special drawing rights, a reserve asset defined by the International Monetary Fund and equivalent currently to Rs 3,700 6(2) sets the operator's maximum liability at Rs 1,500 suppliers' worries stem from Section 17, which allows for a potentially large liability. This states that the operator will have recourse to liability claims where 'the nuclear incident has resulted as a consequence of an act of supplier or his employee, which includes supply of equipment or material with latent defects of substandard services.'This imposes unlimited liability on a supplier, said one of the persons cited.'A supplier may be sourcing or subcontracting various inputs from other suppliers,' the person said. 'Besides, a plant has several components and so liability cannot be that of a single supplier.'According to ongoing deliberations, the liability of a supplier to a nuclear operator would be capped at a certain defined value. Some liability beyond that amount would likely be assumed by the government, said a third person.A nuclear fund could be created as proposed in the current CLND, but with a more defined contribution from the operator that could be based on each unit of power generated.'Hectic drafting exercise is on, along with discussions,' the person said. 'These would also be discussed with stakeholders before being put up for the Cabinet nod.' The government is keen to get the legislation through the Parliament in the current calendar year, he added. An inter-ministerial committee is firming up changes to the proposed recast would also take into account global best practices and conventions to which India is a signatory. While India has signed the Convention of Supplementary Compensation (CSC), it's yet to ratify the accord.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Nuke law recast expected to cap supplier liability
India is considering a total recast of laws governing atomic energy , including the Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage (CLND) Act, said people familiar with the matter. In particular, the revamp will seek to address the open-ended liability of suppliers under the current law as the Centre seeks to rope in private investment. India aims to expand its nuclear energy capacity to 35-40 GW by 2035 and 100 GW by 2047. Policymakers are of the view that the laws require changes if the target is to be met. India currently has 22 operating reactors, with an installed capacity of 6,780 MW. 'Instead of multiple piecemeal changes, there is a thinking that the laws be rewritten completely,' said one of the persons cited. The Atomic Energy and CLND Acts were introduced in the context of a state-owned nuclear thrust. Now, however, 'The idea is to encourage private sector participation and not discourage it,' the person added. The liability law, envisaged as a safeguard against fallout after any accident, has been a long-standing concern of potential investors. A More Viable Framework Currently, Section 6(1) of the CLND Act caps the total liability for each nuclear incident at 300 million special drawing rights, a reserve asset defined by the International Monetary Fund and equivalent currently to Rs 3,700 crore. Section 6(2) sets the operator's maximum liability at Rs 1,500 crore. But suppliers' worries stem from Section 17, which allows for a potentially large liability. This states that the operator will have recourse to liability claims where 'the nuclear incident has resulted as a consequence of an act of supplier or his employee, which includes supply of equipment or material with latent defects of substandard services.' This imposes unlimited liability on a supplier, said one of the persons cited. 'A supplier may be sourcing or subcontracting various inputs from other suppliers,' the person said. 'Besides, a plant has several components and so liability cannot be that of a single supplier.' According to ongoing deliberations, the liability of a supplier to a nuclear operator would be capped at a certain defined value. Some liability beyond that amount would likely be assumed by the government, said a third person. Draft in Making A nuclear fund could be created as proposed in the current CLND, but with a more defined contribution from the operator that could be based on each unit of power generated. 'Hectic drafting exercise is on, along with discussions,' the person said. 'These would also be discussed with stakeholders before being put up for the Cabinet nod.' The government is keen to get the legislation through the Parliament in the current calendar year, he added. An inter-ministerial committee is firming up changes to the framework. The proposed recast would also take into account global best practices and conventions to which India is a signatory. While India has signed the Convention of Supplementary Compensation (CSC), it's yet to ratify the accord.
Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
GST reforms: Home Minister Amit Shah set to open talks for consensus on rate rationalisation
TO IMPART urgency to the process of overhauling the Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime, Union Home Minister Amit Shah is set to initiate discussions with all stakeholders — states as well as Central ministries — to build consensus and resolve contentious outstanding issues. Amongst the many proposals on the table, the one to do away with the 12 per cent slab has been hanging fire for long. This involves shifting some items to the lower 5 per cent slab, and some others to the higher 18 per cent slab. Though this would simplify the multiple rate structure, it is estimated to result in significant revenue losses of Rs 70,000-80,000 crore for the Centre and states combined, top sources said. 'Any tweaks in GST structure right now, especially when it has stabilised after eight years of rollout, are not going to be easy. A lot of factors will be in consideration, and revenue loss is a big factor. No state, whether Opposition or BJP, will accept the proposals easily. Therefore, the Home Minister plans to hold discussions with states beforehand,' the source told The Indian Express. The sources said that the Home Minister has already held discussions with Finance Ministry officials last week. 'There are certain important and sensitive decisions coming up and the states have to be convinced. So it's important the Home Minister is in the loop. Whenever there's a third-party evaluation beyond the Finance Minister, the Home Minister is roped in,' said a source. GST, the biggest indirect tax reform in recent years, was introduced in July 2017. But it is riddled with a multiplicity of rates — zero, 5 per cent, 12 per cent, 18 per cent and 28 per cent, in addition to the cess rates for luxury and sin goods, and special carve outs for precious metals. This rate rationalisation has not been palatable to many states, both BJP-ruled and Opposition. Several attempts to simplify or reduce rates on consumer-focused items were stalled earlier in the GST Council, the overarching federal body with members from both the Centre as well as states. Two Opposition-ruled states also demanded the GST rate on life and health insurance premiums to be cut to 5 per cent from 18 per cent now; several others wanted no tax on premiums. Sources said Shah's intervention was required to resolve 'politically sensitive issues' and 'those that need support from states'. A major overhaul in GST will not go through in a single meeting of the GST Council; it will require a broad consensus as the decisions may go for a vote within the Council, the sources said. Describing the presence of the Home Minister as 'normal', the source said there have been instances in the past when he was part of the meetings. For instance, he was involved in discussions on disinvestment. He has also chaired meetings on price rise of staple food items in the past. 'He has been involved especially in politically sensitive decisions,' the source said. The GST rate rationalisation has been talked about for over four years now. In its 45th meeting held in September 2021 in Lucknow, the GST Council discussed the need to undertake rate rationalisation including correction of inverted duty structure, to reduce classification related disputes, and enhance GST revenues. The Council then approved changes in GST rates to correct inverted duty structure in many sectors, including textiles and footwear that were brought into effect from January 2022. Earlier this year in February, The Indian Express had reported the ministerial panel on rate rationalisation had held threadbare discussions on the items in each of the key slabs. But even after the detailed exercise, the 12 per cent GST slab was proposed to be retained by the panel, along with three key slabs. This was flagged in internal discussions as being inconsistent with the objective of reducing the number of slabs. The panel had then decided to revisit the matter, and hold more deliberations. A three-slab proposal by doing away the 12 per cent slab would involve a careful consideration while shifting items in that tax slab. As of now, the 12 per cent slab includes packaged food items such as condensed milk, nuts, dates, sausages, fruit juices; household goods such as cotton, jute handbags, furniture, sewing machines, some textile products, stationery; and medical items such as medical grade oxygen, gauze, bandages, diagnostic kits. As per government data for 2023-24 shared in Parliament last year, around 70-75 per cent of the GST revenue came from 18 per cent tax slab, while the 12 per cent slab contributed 5-6 per cent of the GST collections. The lower 5 per cent slab accounted for 6-8 per cent of the GST, while the higher 28 per cent slab's share was 13-15 per cent. In its 55th meeting held in Jaisalmer in December 2024, the GST Council held discussions on lowering rates on several items. However, it decided to defer a key decision to lower the tax rate on health and life insurance premiums. The GoM on rate rationalisation had sought more time to discuss the proposal to tweak rates on as many as 148 items, which is expected to come up for discussion in the next meeting of the GST Council.
