logo
Indirect talks over Gaza ceasefire continue as Netanyahu arrives in Washington

Indirect talks over Gaza ceasefire continue as Netanyahu arrives in Washington

The Guardiana day ago
Indirect talks between Israel and Hamas over a ceasefire and hostage deal in Gaza continued for a second day on Monday, hours before a meeting in Washington between Benjamin Netanyahu and Donald Trump.
Avi Dichter, an Israeli minister and member of Netanyahu's security cabinet, said he expected Trump's meeting with the Israeli prime minister would go beyond Gaza to include the possibility of normalising ties with Lebanon, Syria and Saudi Arabia – an ambitious project that is central to the US president's policy in the Middle East.
'I think it will first of all be focused on a term we have often used but now has real meaning; a new Middle East,' Dichter told Israel's public broadcaster Kan on Monday.
Trump has increased pressure for a deal in Gaza in recent weeks and raised the possibility that a ceasefire could be declared in a matter of hours or days.
Before departing for Washington on Sunday evening, Netanyahu said he was confident a deal could be achieved and that Israeli negotiators had been given clear instructions to achieve a ceasefire – but only with conditions that Israel has already agreed.
Sources in the prime minister's entourage described the talks in Doha as positive, according to Israel's military radio station and an Israeli official quoted by Reuters. Palestinian officials were more downbeat and said initial meetings on Sunday had ended inconclusively.
The current proposal envisages a phased release of about 50 hostages held by Hamas during an initial 60-day ceasefire, as well as the release of hundreds of Palestinian prisoners in Israeli jails, Israeli troop withdrawals from parts of Gaza, a surge of humanitarian aid and discussions on a definitive end to the 21-monthconflict.
In March, a previous ceasefire collapsed when Israel reneged on a promise to engage in negotiations that would have led to a second scheduled phase of the existing truce and possibly a permanent cessation of hostilities.
Hamas officials have now demanded strong guarantees that Israel will not launch a new offensive after the 60 days is over.
The militant Islamist organisation also wants the UN and other international organisations to control deliveries of humanitarian aid in Gaza, and bar the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), a secretive US and Israel-backed private organisation that started distributing aid in Gaza in May and has been mired in controversy.
A further point of dispute is Hamas's demand for Israel's military to pull back much further than proposed in negotiations. The Israeli military now hold about two-thirds of Gaza, including key strategic corridors as well as a swath of the southern part of the territory that has been razed flat and which Israel is reluctant to give up.
'Hamas are eager for a ceasefire, there is no doubt at all … but they have their red lines too. Here in Israel, we have had an experiment with the idea that more and more pressure on Hamas means they will [eventually] give up. Well, how much more pressure can you imagine?,' said Michael Milstein, a Hamas expert and the head of the Palestinian studies forum at Tel Aviv University.
But Hamas, which has ruled Gaza since 2007, is under immense pressure, having suffered significant casualties in the conflict and the loss of much of its authority in the devastated territory. The organisation has also been undermined by the recent military success of Israel against Hezbollah, the Lebanon-based militia and political movement that was a key ally, and against Iran, a major supporter overseas, in a short war in June that was brought to an end when the US bombed Iranian nuclear facilities and then imposed a ceasefire.
'Hamas know they badly need a pause to regroup and take a breath … but they want to survive in the long run. That's the only real goal … so they are not going to give up everything,' said one source close to Hamas familiar with the current negotiations.
This is why Hamas is refusing two key demands of Israel that are not included in the draft ceasefire proposal, giving up its weapons and sending its Gaza-based leadership into exile, the source said.
Hamas's losses are contested. Israel has said it has killed more than 20,000 militants in Gaza, but offered no evidence to support the claim. There is little doubt that most of the senior leaders of the group in the territory at the beginning of the war are now dead.
Gaza's ministry of health has counted more than 57,000 killed by the Israeli offensive there, mostly civilians. The UN and western governments consider the tally to be reliable.
The offensive has plunged Gaza into an acute humanitarian crisis, with much of the 2.3 million population threatened by famine, and reduced much of the territory to rubble.
Gaza's civil defence agency said Israeli forces killed at least 12 people on Monday, including six in a clinic housing displaced Palestinians. 'We were surprised by missiles and explosions inside the building,' Salman Qudum, an eyewitness, told AFP.
In the south of the territory, Mahmoud Bassal, a civil defence spokesperson, said two people were killed and 20 others injured by Israeli forces' gunfire while waiting for aid near a distribution site run by the GHF.
Hundreds have been killed in recent weeks seeking food from the organisation's distribution points, from UN convoys and from looted aid trucks.
The Israeli military did not immediately comment on the reports of casualties. In a separate statement, it said it had struck 'dozens of terrorists, weapons depots, observation posts, military buildings and other terror infrastructures' over the past 24 hours.
The war was triggered by a Hamas-led attack on southern Israel in October 2023 in which militants killed 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and abducted 250. Of the hostages, 50 remain in Gaza, of whom less than half are thought to be alive.
Some of Netanyahu's hardline coalition partners oppose any end to the fighting. But, with Israelis having become increasingly weary of the war and the military supporting a ceasefire so that remaining hostages can be returned, his government is expected to back a ceasefire.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tucker Carlson's jaw-dropping theory on why Trump is burying the Epstein list
Tucker Carlson's jaw-dropping theory on why Trump is burying the Epstein list

Daily Mail​

time12 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Tucker Carlson's jaw-dropping theory on why Trump is burying the Epstein list

Tucker Carlson said he believes the government is 'covering up' the Epstein files to protect US and Israeli intelligence services. Tucker - who has long claimed Jeffrey Epstein was tied to the Israeli Mossad espionage service - is leading a MAGA backlash against the Trump administration's promises to release Epstein's anticipated 'client list.' In a major U-turn, Attorney General Pam Bondi released a memo this week re-affirming the Justice Department's ruling that Epstein's 2019 death was a suicide, and that he had no 'client list.' Tucker said it was 'obvious' that Bondi was 'covering up crimes'. Amid mounting scrutiny over Trump's handling of the controversy, Carlson said he is not convinced that the president was covering his own alleged ties to Epstein, and felt the reason is hinged on espionage. 'I don't think he's that guy, actually,' Carlson said of Trump. 'I don't think he likes creepy sex stuff.' Rather, Carlson floated a more sinister plot to protect the US and Israeli intelligence agencies was driving Trump's response. 'The only other explanation that I can think of... is that intel services are at the very center of this story, U.S. and Israeli, and they're being protected,' he said. 'I think that seems like the most obvious.' Carlson waded into the controversy hours after Elon Musk launched into another attack on MAGA world by claiming that former Trump advisor Steve Bannon is implicated in the Epstein files. Musk also alleged weeks ago that Trump is in the Epstein files, saying that 'is the real reason they have not been made public.' But on Carlson's show, his guest Sagaar Enjeti, the host of Breaking Points, agreed that intelligence services likely had a role in the growing scandal over the release of the files. Enjeti pointed to reports in 2021 that alleged that federal prosecutors had chosen not to prosecute pedophilia cases within the CIA. 'There have been multiple documented cases of pedophilia inside of the CIA perpetrated by CIA officers,' he said. 'This was a BuzzFeed News piece years back where the CIA specifically did not want to prosecute those individuals in federal court for fear that they would reveal sources and methods if they were pulled into open court and they basically just made it go away. 'The only time they actually prosecuted somebody for child pornography was whenever he'd already been prosecuted for mishandling classified information.' Carlson joked in response: 'Well, when they want to crush you, they put kiddie porn on your computer. It's why I don't have a computer!' The issue of Trump's handling of the Epstein files led the president to snap at a reporter on Tuesday when they asked Bondi about the Justice Department's internal review of the documents. Trump brushed off fury from his MAGA base over the abrupt conclusion of the Epstein probe this week, and accused the reporter who quizzed Bondi of 'desecrating' the deadly Texas flood tragedy. 'Are you still talking about Jeffrey Epstein?' Trump lamented to reporters present for his six-month Cabinet meeting. 'This guy's been talked about for years.' He said that the media needs to move on from 'this creep' Epstein and focus more on the tragedy in Texas and ongoing wars in the Middle East and between Russia and Ukraine. In the past, Trump has riled up his base with theories over Epstein's death, and in his 2024 campaign he vowed to release all the government's secrets, along with documents from the much-scrutinized assassinations of John F. Kennedy and Martin Luther King Jr. Trump, however, is now ready to move on from the Epstein files. 'Do you want to waste the time – do you feel like answering?' Trump asked his Attorney General, who was just one seat away from the president with Secretary of State Marco Rubio between them during a Cabinet meeting on Tuesday. Bondi said she didn't mind answering the question, but Trump continued his tirade against the Post reporter. 'I mean, I can't believe you're asking a question on Epstein at a time like this where we're having some of the greatest success and also tragedy with what happened in Texas. 'It just seems like a desecration, but you go ahead,' he said to his embattled attorney general. Bondi then sought to clarify her past remarks about having Epstein's 'client list' on her desk, saying she never admitted there was a 'client list' and that she was actually referencing the complete paperwork related to the investigation into Epstein's child sex trafficking crimes. She then said that the reason more evidence was not released is because it contained child pornography. 'They turned out to be child porn downloaded by that disgusting Jeffrey Epstein,' Bondi said. 'Never going to be released, never going to see the light of day.'

Supreme Court allows Trump to move forward with mass firings at federal agencies
Supreme Court allows Trump to move forward with mass firings at federal agencies

NBC News

time39 minutes ago

  • NBC News

Supreme Court allows Trump to move forward with mass firings at federal agencies

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Tuesday allowed President Donald Trump at least temporarily to move ahead with plans to impose reductions in force and reorganize various government agencies. The court imposed an administrative stay in the case at the request of the Trump administration. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson was the only justice to provide a written dissenting opinion. At issue is a ruling by California-based U.S. District Judge Susan Illston, who ruled in May that while the president can seek to make changes, there are limits when done wholesale. "Agencies may not conduct large-scale reorganizations and reductions in force in blatant disregard of Congress's mandates, and a President may not initiate large-scale executive branch reorganization without partnering with Congress," she wrote. The justices made clear Tuesday that their order is not about the legality of any individual agency reduction in force or reorganization plan, only the legality of Trump's executive order and an administration memo related to workforce plans. In her dissenting opinion, Jackson wrote, "this decision is not only truly unfortunate but also hubristic and senseless.' The decision affects 19 federal agencies as well as the White House-adjacent Office of Management and Budget, Office of Personnel Management and U.S. DOGE Service. Solicitor General D. John Sauer said in court papers that Illston's ruling is based on the "indefensible premise" that the presidents needs permission from Congress to carry out his duties as delineated in Article II of the Constitution. "Controlling the personnel of federal agencies lies at the heartland of this authority," he wrote. "The Constitution does not erect a presumption against presidential control of agency staffing, and the President does not need special permission from Congress to exercise core Article II powers." The legal challenge was brought by various unions and nonprofit groups, including the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, as well as certain local jurisdictions including the cities of Chicago and Baltimore. Their lawyers said that if the court granted Trump's request "statutorily required and authorized programs, offices, and functions across the federal government will be abolished" with some departments "radically downsized." As such, they urged that the court allow the litigation to conclude before deciding whether Trump can implement his plan.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store