Legislature wants to make it impossible for local governments to build back better after hurricanes
Hello, is this the 911 operator? I need to report someone who's a danger to themselves and others. It's the Florida Legislature.
No, operator, this is not a joke! Didn't you hear what they did? After one of Florida's worst hurricane seasons in years, they passed a bill to block local governments from trying to build back better.
And they did it right before the start of another hurricane season, one that's predicted to be above normal, just like last year. No, I can't tell you why it's supposed to be so bad. It involves climate change, and the governor doesn't want us to talk about that.
Even if climate change wasn't heating up the Gulf of Whatchamacallit to a temperature that you're more accustomed to seeing in an oven, this hurricane season seems especially fraught with peril because of the chaos in Washington.
The tumult and the shouting in D.C. are interfering with disaster aid and preparation. Nothing increases everyone's pre-storm jitters like hearing that the Federal Emergency Management Agency is not ready for the season.
I know Gov. Ron DeSantis has been trying to convince everyone that Florida doesn't really need FEMA, even though it stepped up to hand over $1 billion to aid homeowners and renters last year.
But this is the guy who can't even get members of his own party to approve a new state budget. That means we could be facing a state government shutdown on July 1, shortly after the start of hurricane season on June 1.
So, given the unreliability of FEMA, the prediction of another horrible hurricane season, and this ill-considered bill that passed Tallahassee with flying colors, can you see why I'm worried that the Legislature wants to kill us?
I mean, does it sound to you like they're paying attention to anyone's safety, including their own?
Operator, the bill they passed, the one that puts everyone in peril, is Senate Bill 180. That's a pretty good description of it, too, because it's 180 degrees from what would have been much safer for all concerned.
The specific part of the bill that's got me and a lot of other people worried would prevent any local government in Florida from adopting anything for its growth regulations after a hurricane that could be deemed too 'restrictive or burdensome' to developers.
'One part of the bill prevents cities and counties listed in federal disaster declarations for Hurricanes Debby, Helene, and Milton — a majority of the state — from adopting tougher development rules until October 2027. The ban is retroactive to August 2024, also threatening to undo any recent rule changes,' the Miami Herald reported last week.
And there's no real end-date for what it does, either. We could be stuck with this restriction forever.
'Another part of the bill calls for a similar one-year ban anytime a local government is listed in a federal disaster declaration and lies within 100 miles of a hurricane's path,' the Herald said. 'It could renew each time a storm strikes Florida's coast, a regular occurrence for the storm-plagued state.'
'These are decisions that need to be made by local governments locally, not by people in Tallahassee,' Kim Dinkins of the smart growth group 1000 Friends of Florida told me. 'Every time a storm comes through, we learn more about how to deal with them.'
Worse, she pointed out, the bill will interfere with the ability of cities and counties to take advantage of money from the feds and the state for converting septic tanks to sewers and fixing drainage problems. If those fixes require ordinance changes that affect development, such as requiring new homes to connect to the sewer lines, this bill won't allow it.
How did we get here? Bear in mind that we're a state surrounded on three sides by water, so we're especially vulnerable to a rising sea level. Yet our state has seen rampant overdevelopment in flood-prone spots in recent years.
Our blatantly pro-development legal and political structure has turned the state into a hotbed of poorly planned projects that are constantly risking inundation. Developers don't want that to change.
Here's the truly alarming thing, operator: This idiotic bill was sponsored by Sen. Nick DiCeglie, whose own home flooded during Hurricane Helene.
He's a storm victim himself, yet he's OK with blocking cities and counties from putting in place any additional protections for future storm victims. DiCeglie is in the trash-hauling business, so maybe that's why he pushed this particular piece of garbage.
Despite the obvious life-threatening flaws in this bill, our fine Legislature passed it by nearly a unanimous vote in both houses. I swear, it's as if we're being governed by the writers of the TV show 'Seinfeld: 'No hugging and no learning!'
And operator, did I mention that this isn't the first time they've done this kind of thing?
The first time this happened was in early 2023, a few months after Hurricane Ian.
Ian, you may recall, clobbered the Southwest Florida coast and killed 149 people. 'Scores drowned as they fled on foot, while in their cars or after seawater swallowed their homes,' NBC News reported. 'Ian was one of the deadliest hurricanes to hit the U.S. in the past 20 years.'
The high body count showed that the development pattern in that area had flaws. It would have been great if Lee County had done something to adjust its building regulations in response.
But Lee couldn't.
When the Legislature met in special session the following February, one of Lee County's own, Sen. Jonathan Martin of Fort Myers, sponsored a bill that said local officials in the area hit by Ian could not impose any new development rules deemed 'more restrictive or burdensome' than what was already on the books.
Marttin's bill passed the Legislature and was signed into law by DeSantis. It covered a 100 square mile radius affected by Ian. Also, it was set to expire in 2024. That was strike one.
Months later, the Big Bend area was smashed by powerful Hurricane Idalia. The casualty count wasn't as high, but the property damage was really bad.
During a special session in November 2023, a new bill, sponsored by Rep. Jason Shoaf of Port St. Joe, extended the ban on any commonsense regulation changes on development through 2026.
Worse, it expanded the area affected to list 10 specific counties that had to wear the Legislature's handcuffs: Charlotte, Collier, DeSoto, Glades, Hardee, Hendry, Highlands, Lee, Manatee, and Sarasota.
DeSantis signed that one into law as well. Call that strike two.
Then came this year's session and SB 180. The guv hasn't put pen to paper on this one, so we can't call it strike three — yet.
Some groups, such as Volusia and Miami-Dade counties, are urging him to veto it.
The bill will 'not only limit our ability to responsibly manage development, flooding, and ensure public safety … but also could expose local governments to attorney's fees and costly litigation if local government regulations, enacted in good faith, are challenged,' Miami-Dade Mayor Daniella Levine Cava wrote to the governor this week.
'This legislation prevents local governments from enacting changes that may help our citizens in future storm events,' the Volusia County Council wrote to him in its own veto letter.
But I doubt DeSantis will listen to them, because this bill benefits developers. Our governor loves developers even more than he loves eating pudding while wearing his white go-go boots.
Operator, I asked around about who was behind this bill. The word in Tallahassee is that its major proponent is a big-time developer in Manatee County named Pat Neal.
Neal is a former legislator who's built 25,000 homes in Florida, most of them in Manatee and Sarasota counties. He's now a billionaire, according to Forbes magazine, but compares himself a hungry seagull — and not the touchy-feely Jonathan Livingston kind.
'I have the right to swoop down on any chicken bone,' he told the magazine proudly. That's not a motto you'd hear from someone who's much concerned about the fate of his fellow man.
Thus, even though the Florida housing market seems to be headed for another crash with all the rapidity of a competitor in a demolition derby, Neal plans to keep building more and more homes. It's what he's been doing since the '70s, and as the '70s soul duo McFadden & Whitehead would say, 'Ain't no stopping him now.'
However, the Manatee County Commission, alarmed by flooding from last year's hurricanes, has proposed a development moratorium while they figure out how to build subdivisions and other projects that will drain better.
Neal has been one of the more vocal opponents of a development moratorium, and his opinion does carry a lot of weight. He's a guy for whom public officials tend to do favors.
For instance, 10 years ago I watched in open-mouthed wonder as the members of the Southwest Florida Water Management District board did Neal a huge favor. They did so despite the fact that it went against a judge's ruling and they did it over the strong objections of environmental activists.
Now that the Legislature has said no local government can pass any 'burdensome' post-storm regulations, the Manatee moratorium has been murdered in its crib. All you little Floridians must kneel to Neal and his needs! Give him all your chicken bones!
I tried reaching Neal to ask him about this, but he didn't respond. Perhaps he was too busy squelching other good ideas for coping with the increasing intensity of Florida's hurricanes.
If this bill becomes law, all the folks buying Neal-built homes will be just as much at risk of flooding as they were last year and the years before that, too.
But more importantly, Neal will still make money and spend his spare time contemplating his legacy.
'We want to make sure that what we leave behind is authentic and good,' he told Forbes. I hope someone will point out to him that homes he considers 'authentic and good' won't stay that way if they turn soggy with the next big storm surge and fill up with mold.
The larger problem, dear operator, is that Manatee County was far from the only place in hurricane-ravaged Florida where officials were talking about imposing new building regulations.
Just down the road from Manatee, over in Polk County, the county commissioners were considering new stormwater requirements for developments in stressed basins, as well as some other changes.
Not anymore.
Here was the headline in the Lakeland Ledger: 'Polk County delays vote on roosters, chicken coops and development issues over pending state bill.'
The chicken coop line is no yolk (sorry!). Polk commissioners had been considering new restrictions on where homeowners can keep their chickens.
But because DiCeglie's bill passed, it's Polk County that's cooped up with its existing regulations. Polk's commissioners voted to hold off taking any action until they see what DeSantis will do.
But that's not as big an impact as what's happening in New Smyrna Beach.
Back in 2022, after Ian passed through, the town of New Smyrna Beach first proposed a moratorium on growth. In those days, you almost never heard the M-word in Florida. But the folks in New Smyrna Beach were desperate.
During Ian's onslaught, the city experienced 'close to 21 inches of rain and 4 feet of storm surge in some areas,' the Daytona Beach News Journal reported. 'County and city first responders rescued about 215 individuals as a result of the flooding, while over 850 homes suffered catastrophic damage to their properties.'
That was followed in 2023 by two non-hurricane storms that caused serious street flooding in a section of town called Venetian Bay. Major roads were impassable for days on end. Residents demanded the city do something.
That led to a moratorium on building permits pending work on fixing the drainage system. The city also passed new stormwater regulations in February. But all that will go away if DeSantis signs SB 180.
As a result, city officials have written to the governor urging him to veto the bill, and they're encouraging all of New Smyrna's 32,000 residents to do the same. I sure hope they fill up DeSantis' inbox with urgent pleas for him to pay attention to this issue.
So, tell me, operator, can you help us all out? Send over some paramedics or even some cops to handle these self-destructive lawmakers? Help them to recover their sense of who they're supposed to serve?
Because if not, all of us residents are likely to need some really urgent aid around the time the first big storm hits.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fox News
7 hours ago
- Fox News
Texas local official caught mocking DHS secretary as 'Homeland Barbie' after deadly floods
City officials in Kerrville were largely unprepared for the devastating floods that struck the Hill Country on July 4, according to newly released city communications, including emails and text messages obtained by KSAT through public records requests. The documents include a text exchange involving Kerrville City Manager Dalton Rice, in which he jokingly referred to U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem as "basically homeland Barbie." Hours before participating in a July 5 press conference alongside federal, state, and local officials to update the public on rescue efforts, Rice received a message from a city employee that read, "Just saw you met Homeland Barbie. How is she?" Rice responded, "Basically homeland Barbie," followed by a string of laughter. The nickname, as well as similar terms like "ICE Barbie," has been used online to satirize Noem since she assumed her role as DHS secretary earlier this year. Her handling of the flood crisis has drawn sharp criticism, particularly after it was revealed that changes to federal contract approval procedures delayed FEMA's deployment by approximately three days. Concerns have also emerged at the state and local levels. Texas officials have long resisted implementing a warning siren system for the Guadalupe River, where the flooding proved most fatal. Additionally, a controversial reorganization by the Trump administration's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) resulted in the dismissal of a key National Weather Service emergency coordination officer just months before the disaster. The tragedy has left Kerrville and surrounding communities demanding answers and reforms before the next storm strikes. In response to mounting scrutiny, Secretary Noem defended the federal government's actions. "This was the fastest in history that FEMA has ever responded to a disaster," she said in a previous interview with Fox News. "Unlike FEMA's poor track record under the Biden administration, this time FEMA operated how President Trump wanted it to operate." She added, "I'm very proud of the fact that we didn't go there and manage it. We went there and allowed the local officials to manage it, to run it. The state did a fantastic job. We're there to support and give them what resources they need." The catastrophic flooding claimed at least 137 lives across Texas, with 108 fatalities reported in Kerr County alone. Among the dead were 27 campers and staff members at Camp Mystic, a century-old Christian summer camp for girls in the town of Hunt. Authorities are now investigating whether Camp Mystic officials received and appropriately responded to flash flood warnings prior to the tragedy. The incident has sparked broader questions about how youth camps and other vulnerable institutions assess and act on rapidly evolving weather threats. Fox News Digital reached out to Kerrville City Manager Dalton Rice and the Kerrville city officials, but did not receive a response. Stepheny Price is a writer for Fox News Digital and Fox Business. She covers topics including missing persons, homicides, national crime cases, illegal immigration, and more. Story tips and ideas can be sent to


Miami Herald
8 hours ago
- Miami Herald
FEMA to distribute $680 million to states to build migrant detention facilities
Over the past month, as the Trump administration has intensified its immigration crackdown, it has called on states to take a more active role in assisting Immigration and Customs Enforcement by building temporary facilities to hold detained migrants. The Federal Emergency Management Agency will now distribute $680 million to states and local governments through a new 'Detention Support Grant Program' for the construction of new migrant detention facilities. 'This will relieve overcrowding in the U.S. Customs and Border Protection's short-term holding facilities, further the U.S. Department of Homeland Security's immigration enforcement plans,' the description of the program states. The detention grant program is launching almost a month after the opening of Alligator Alcatraz, the state-run migrant detention facility in the Florida Everglades. Gov. Ron DeSantis said Florida is the leading example of a state cooperating with the federal government to detain undocumented immigrants The Everglades facility is estimated to cost Florida taxpayers $450 million and is capable of holding up to 3,000 to 5,000 detainees, according to FEMA. Contracts and purchase orders in the Florida Accountability Contract Tracking System show the state has already committed to spending more than $200 million with private contractors. FEMA has said the state can request reimbursement from the agency's $650 million Shelter and Service program fund. The program was established under the Biden administration to award grants to state, local and non-profit organizations that provide services to immigrants released from ICE custody. DeSantis said Friday the state will begin requesting reimbursement from the federal government. Despite complaints from detainees and their lawyers about unsanitary conditions such as clogged toilets, limited showers, and high temperatures, DeSantis has called Alligator Alcatraz a blueprint for temporary detention that other states can follow. The Florida Division of Emergency Management, which oversees the facility, did not respond to requests for comments on whether the state has filed for reimbursement from the federal government and if the state plans to apply for grants from the new program. The new detention grant program requires recipients not to use the funds to construct new permanent facilities, nor can they be used for the transportation of detained migrants between detention centers. It can only be used for 'the costs of sheltering aliens in a detained environment.' An environmental impact assessment is also required. Environmentalists and critics of Alligator Alcatraz have voiced concerns about the bright lights and new constructions, such as the roadway, disturbing the Everglades ecosystem. In June, environmental groups filed a lawsuit accusing the state and federal governments of failing to adhere to environmental regulations under the National Environmental Policy Act. The DeSantis administration has said it plans to build several detention sites similar to Alligator Alcatraz to hold undocumented immigrants. DeSantis has suggested a Clay County training site known as 'Camp Blanding' could be the next location for an immigration detention center. FEMA did not respond to a request for comments on whether the new program funds differed from those of the shelter program. It is also unclear whether there will be a limit on the amount each state is awarded. States and local governments have until early August to apply for the program.


CBS News
10 hours ago
- CBS News
Lawyers argue in Miami federal court that Alligator Alcatraz violates detainees constitutional rights
Civil rights lawyers seeking a temporary restraining order against an immigration detention center in the Everglades say that Alligator Alcatraz detainees have been barred from meeting attorneys, are being held without any charges and that a federal immigration court has canceled bond hearings. The immigration attorneys argued Monday during a virtual hearing that the detainees' constitutional rights were being violated and that 100 detainees already had been deported from Alligator Alcatraz. Lawyers who have shown up for bond hearings for Alligator Alcatraz detainees have been told that the immigration court doesn't have jurisdiction over their clients, and the civil rights attorneys demanded that federal and state officials identify an immigration court that has jurisdiction over the detainees so it can start accepting petitions for bond. "This is an emergency situation," Eunice Cho, an attorney for the American Civil Liberties Union Foundation, said during the hearing in federal court in Miami. "Officers at Alligator Alcatraz are going around trying to force people to sign deportation orders without the ability to speak to counsel." But Nicholas Meros, an attorney representing Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, said the situation had evolved since the civil rights groups' lawsuit was filed July 16. Video-conference rooms had been set up so detainees can talk to attorneys, and in-person meetings between detainees and attorneys had started. "There have been a number of facts that have changed," Meros said during Monday's hearing U.S. District Judge Rodolfo Ruiz, an appointee of President Donald Trump, didn't make an immediate ruling. He asked the civil rights attorneys to refile their complaint to consolidate their pleadings as a request for a preliminary injunction, and he set a briefing schedule that will end with an in-person court hearing on Aug. 18. The judge warned that his role was to provide relief to any proven constitutional violations and said that "attempts to transform the court into the warden of Alligator Alcatraz is not going to happen here." The judge also allowed the civil rights groups to argue for the release of any agreements between the federal and state governments showing who has authority over the detention center, a murky issue since it opened a month ago. "And that's part of the problem — who is doing what in this facility?" Ruiz said. The lawsuit is the second one challenging Alligator Alcatraz. Environmental groups last month sued federal and state officials asking that the project built on an airstrip in the heart of the Florida Everglades be halted because the process didn't follow state and federal environmental laws. Attorneys for the state of Florida have argued in both cases that the federal court's southern district in Florida was the wrong venue since the airstrip is located in neighboring Collier County, which is a part of the middle district, even though the property is owned by Miami-Dade County. A hearing over whether the southern district venue is proper in the environmental case is set for Wednesday. Critics have condemned the facility as a cruel and inhumane threat to detainees, while DeSantis and other Republican state officials have defended it as part of the state's aggressive push to support President Donald Trump's crackdown on illegal immigration. U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem has praised Florida for coming forward with the idea, as the department looks to significantly expand its immigration detention capacity.