
How SANParks turned conservation into a success story
South African National Parks (SANParks) stands as one of the world's leading conservation agencies.
In recent years, SANParks has demonstrated remarkable financial resilience, generating nearly 80% of its own revenue. For the first time, the organisation's annual revenue has exceeded R4 billion in the past financial year.
Since 1994, SANParks has undergone a transformative journey, underpinned by a commitment to inclusivity and equity. This shift has been guided by the Vision 2040, which envisions a future where people and nature thrive in sustainable mega living landscapes.
SANParks' success story is not only one to be celebrated but also serves as a model for how conservation can be funded effectively.
At its core, SANParks remains committed to its primary mandate, protecting and managing South Africa's natural and cultural heritage for current and future generations.
Its achievements – and the model it employs to fund conservation – are worthy of recognition through tourism.
ALSO READ: Vultures lead rangers to one of SANParks' largest poisoning events
Take the story of the bontebok, for instance, a classic case of conservation success.
Once on the brink of extinction due to hunting and expanding human settlement, the bontebok population had dwindled to just 17 animals by the late 1930s.
In response, a dedicated conservation area was established to protect the species, preventing it from suffering the same fate as the quagga, which went extinct in the late 1800s.
Today, bontebok National Park, which was founded in 1931 in Swellendam, is home to over 100 bontebok, with about 3 000 living in private reserves.
Despite its limited commercial viability, Bontebok National Park continues to operate because SANParks' model allows for cross-subsidisation.
More profitable parks support those that are less financially viable but ecologically essential, ensuring that conservation is not driven solely by profit, but also to ensure biodiversity in perpetuity.
ALSO READ: WATCH: Elephant chases away police at Kruger Park
The bontebok's original habitat, the renosterveld, is now among the most threatened vegetation types in South Africa, with 70% of it under threat.
As a result, the bontebok has become a flagship species for renosterveld conservation.
SANParks has developed specific management plans to protect both the species and its critically endangered ecosystem.
This approach is not limited to bontebok conservation. In 2023, SANParks launched the Richtersveld Desert Botanical Garden, the country's first botanical garden in a desert biome.
Located within the Ai-Ais Richtersveld Transfrontier Park, it safeguards over 400 succulent species facing extinction due to poaching, mining, climate change and overgrazing.
Other success stories abound: after a 170-year absence, lions have been reintroduced to the Karoo National Park, where the population is now thriving to the point of abundance.
ALSO READ: Rachel Kolisi finds strength amid Tokai inferno and personal struggles
The mountain zebra, once facing extinction with just 80 individuals remaining, has rebounded dramatically, with over 3 200 now recorded. These zebras play a vital ecological role, helping maintain biodiversity and supporting predator populations.
In collaboration with archaeologists from the University of Pretoria, SANParks launched a project to rescue and preserve two significant archaeological sites along the Letaba River in the Kruger National Park.
These sites, which were inhabited between 1 500 and 1 000 years ago, offer some of the earliest evidence of trade between South Africa and Asia, predating ancient civilisations like Mapungubwe and Great Zimbabwe.
Sadly, the Letaba sites are currently being threatened by severe soil erosion, risking the irreversible loss of a valuable record of Africa's past.
Through archaeological research and conservation efforts, the aim is to recover as much material as possible before it is lost, providing greater insight into the lives of the ancient people who once lived in the Kruger National Park.
What underpins these efforts and successes is a conservation funding model that works. Most revenue is generated by some of the well-visited parks and those funds are strategically redistributed to support the entire national parks network.
ALSO READ: The fight to save the penguins
This approach ensures that not only well-known sites like Table Mountain National Park flourish, but also that less-visited parks continue to safeguard South Africa's rich natural heritage.
Conservation is not a luxury; it is a necessity. It is an investment in our future generation.
SANParks' funding model is a success due to the combination of funding sources, tourism revenue, government grants, volunteers such as honorary rangers and private donors.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

IOL News
4 days ago
- IOL News
SANParks defends its management against #SaveTableMountain petition
SANParks Head of Communications and Spokesperson, JP Louw, has spoken out against these stakeholder claims of Table Mountain National Park mismanagement. Image: Armand Hough/Independent Newspapers South African National Parks (SANParks) has hit back at a recent petition issued by a group of stakeholders opposed to the current management of Table Mountain National Park (TMNP). The petition is demanding accountability, calling for comprehensive action to restore and protect Table Mountain, and has crossed 5,800 signatures, with them urging more concerned residents to join them. This campaign, driven by Friends of Table Mountain and supported by Take Back Our Mountains, Love Our Trails, Table Mountain Watch, Table Mountain Bikers and Hikers Network, said that they believe it's their right and responsibility to demand accountability and action. They claim that TMNP suffers from critical issues directly linked to SANParks' poor management and underfunding. They are also concerned by the persistently high crime rates, failure of their conservation mandate, decaying infrastructure, insufficient signage, runaway fires, and the decay of tourism infrastructure. SANParks head of communications and spokesperson, JP Louw, has spoken out against these claims, stating that an independent assessment of the implementation of TMNP's management plan scored the entity an overall high of 75%. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad Loading Louw said this assessment was done by Conservation Outcome, a biodiversity non-governmental organisation that supports the development and management of land for biodiversity conservation. They are also a member of the International Union for Conservation of Nature - IUCN. 'The scores of specific areas of focus is 43% for bioregional management, 90% for responsible tourism, 66% for biodiversity management, 57% for constituency building, 43% for cultural heritage, 90% for responsible tourism and 89% for effective park management. 'This report provides us with factual and objective information which allows for SANParks to continue with its management of Table Mountain National Park based on science and evidence-based detail,' Louw said. 'This overall positive assessment comes amid the unfortunate circulation of a misleading petition issued by a small group of stakeholders opposed to the current management of TMNP.' Commenting on some of the stakeholders' specific complaints, Louw said they had a crime incident spike in January to March this year, but the figures have since dropped back to single-digit incidents. 'In the past year, the figures were primarily in the region of single digits.' He added that the safety alerts issued by foreign consulates relate to South Africa as a whole and not Table Mountain alone. While fires are started by religious groups, they account for about 10% of fires in the past 3 years. 'Fact is that the majority of fires are caused by arsonists and vagrants. 'We have had a few fires this year, and the infrastructure that burnt down was toilet blocks at Silvermine. No infrastructure was damaged during the Newlands Ravine fire, the Tokai and Muizenberg fires,' Louw said. 'We have a management plan to control alien vegetation. We also have an Extended Public Works programme to clear alien vegetation with the support of collaborative NGOs.' He also addressed the claim that '76% of the R430 million was sent to other parks' and said last year they clarified to Take Back Our Mountain (TBOM) that the R107 million referenced in their claim represents only direct, park-level expenditure. 'It does not account for essential corporate-level costs.' And with regards to the tourism infrastructure left to decay and losing potential revenue, 'we have tenders issued to refurbish and renew infrastructure such as Rhodes Memorial, Hoerikwaggo trail, and Orange Kloof tented camp'. Louw stated that SANParks actively seeks collaborative relationships across all its national parks. 'The organisations concerned are encouraged to rather continue with a relationship that is constructive and collaborative in nature as opposed to acrimony and misleading information.'


The Citizen
6 days ago
- The Citizen
How SANParks turned conservation into a success story
SANParks' self-funded conservation model proves that tourism and ecology can thrive together for future generations. South African National Parks (SANParks) stands as one of the world's leading conservation agencies. In recent years, SANParks has demonstrated remarkable financial resilience, generating nearly 80% of its own revenue. For the first time, the organisation's annual revenue has exceeded R4 billion in the past financial year. Since 1994, SANParks has undergone a transformative journey, underpinned by a commitment to inclusivity and equity. This shift has been guided by the Vision 2040, which envisions a future where people and nature thrive in sustainable mega living landscapes. SANParks' success story is not only one to be celebrated but also serves as a model for how conservation can be funded effectively. At its core, SANParks remains committed to its primary mandate, protecting and managing South Africa's natural and cultural heritage for current and future generations. Its achievements – and the model it employs to fund conservation – are worthy of recognition through tourism. ALSO READ: Vultures lead rangers to one of SANParks' largest poisoning events Take the story of the bontebok, for instance, a classic case of conservation success. Once on the brink of extinction due to hunting and expanding human settlement, the bontebok population had dwindled to just 17 animals by the late 1930s. In response, a dedicated conservation area was established to protect the species, preventing it from suffering the same fate as the quagga, which went extinct in the late 1800s. Today, bontebok National Park, which was founded in 1931 in Swellendam, is home to over 100 bontebok, with about 3 000 living in private reserves. Despite its limited commercial viability, Bontebok National Park continues to operate because SANParks' model allows for cross-subsidisation. More profitable parks support those that are less financially viable but ecologically essential, ensuring that conservation is not driven solely by profit, but also to ensure biodiversity in perpetuity. ALSO READ: WATCH: Elephant chases away police at Kruger Park The bontebok's original habitat, the renosterveld, is now among the most threatened vegetation types in South Africa, with 70% of it under threat. As a result, the bontebok has become a flagship species for renosterveld conservation. SANParks has developed specific management plans to protect both the species and its critically endangered ecosystem. This approach is not limited to bontebok conservation. In 2023, SANParks launched the Richtersveld Desert Botanical Garden, the country's first botanical garden in a desert biome. Located within the Ai-Ais Richtersveld Transfrontier Park, it safeguards over 400 succulent species facing extinction due to poaching, mining, climate change and overgrazing. Other success stories abound: after a 170-year absence, lions have been reintroduced to the Karoo National Park, where the population is now thriving to the point of abundance. ALSO READ: Rachel Kolisi finds strength amid Tokai inferno and personal struggles The mountain zebra, once facing extinction with just 80 individuals remaining, has rebounded dramatically, with over 3 200 now recorded. These zebras play a vital ecological role, helping maintain biodiversity and supporting predator populations. In collaboration with archaeologists from the University of Pretoria, SANParks launched a project to rescue and preserve two significant archaeological sites along the Letaba River in the Kruger National Park. These sites, which were inhabited between 1 500 and 1 000 years ago, offer some of the earliest evidence of trade between South Africa and Asia, predating ancient civilisations like Mapungubwe and Great Zimbabwe. Sadly, the Letaba sites are currently being threatened by severe soil erosion, risking the irreversible loss of a valuable record of Africa's past. Through archaeological research and conservation efforts, the aim is to recover as much material as possible before it is lost, providing greater insight into the lives of the ancient people who once lived in the Kruger National Park. What underpins these efforts and successes is a conservation funding model that works. Most revenue is generated by some of the well-visited parks and those funds are strategically redistributed to support the entire national parks network. ALSO READ: The fight to save the penguins This approach ensures that not only well-known sites like Table Mountain National Park flourish, but also that less-visited parks continue to safeguard South Africa's rich natural heritage. Conservation is not a luxury; it is a necessity. It is an investment in our future generation. SANParks' funding model is a success due to the combination of funding sources, tourism revenue, government grants, volunteers such as honorary rangers and private donors.

IOL News
6 days ago
- IOL News
Don't let hackers crash your vacation: cyber safety tips for travellers
Before you connect to the airport Wi-Fi, make sure that you have protected yourself from online hackers looking to swipe your information. A recent study by cybersecurity experts NordVPN and Saily has uncovered just how vulnerable travellers are. From stolen passport scans to hacked frequent flyer accounts, criminals are cashing in on a booming black market of personal travel data, and the cost of your identity on the dark web might be far lower than you'd expect. As international travel surges, so too does cybercrime aimed at unsuspecting travellers. Stolen travel documents are being bought and sold online for as little as $10 (R177), while verified EU passports can command prices of over $5,000 (R88 513). Fake visa stickers, forged bank statements, and loyalty accounts loaded with travel miles are also being traded for hundreds of dollars. Even confirmed reservations are being resold for upwards of $250 (R4 426). 'The staggering prices we're seeing on the dark web show just how valuable and vulnerable travellers' personal information has become,' says Marijus Briedis, chief technology officer at NordVPN. How cybercriminals steal travel data The methods used to steal travel information are wide-ranging and alarmingly simple. Cybercriminals often deploy malware that scans your devices and cloud storage for sensitive files. Phishing sites, which closely mimic real airline, hotel, or visa application websites, trick users into uploading personal documents and ID scans. Travellers are also at risk due to data breaches at airlines, travel agencies, and online booking platforms, which can leak entire passenger profiles. Even publicly accessible cloud folders with weak permissions can be easily discovered and exploited. In more advanced cases, criminals are turning to AI-generated scams to mimic legitimate requests. These include fake Wi-Fi login pages at airports, phoney lounge access portals, or even requests for selfies alongside ID documents, made to look like they come from official sources. 'With AI tools now easily accessible to criminals, these phishing attempts have become simple to create, remarkably convincing, and difficult to detect,' warns Vykintas Maknickas, CEO of Saily. Why travel documents are so valuable According to these experts, travel documents are a goldmine for hackers. Many digital services and identity checks only require a passport scan and a selfie, which criminals can fake using deepfake technology. With the right data, including full name, date of birth, passport number, email address, phone number, and emergency contacts, hackers can: Commit identity theft Open fraudulent bank accounts or credit lines Apply for loans Launch highly targeted phishing or social engineering attacks 'Travel documents offer direct access to your identity with minimal barriers, making stolen travel data incredibly dangerous,' Briedis explains.