BEA: personal income and inflation both rose in June
July 31 (UPI) -- The Federal Reserve's preferred inflation gauge rose more than expected in June, according to a report by the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis released Thursday.
The personal consumption expenditures index, or PCE, rose 0.3% in June from the previous month and 2.6% from June 2024. Core PCE, which excludes volatile food and energy prices rose 2.8% on an annual basis.
The annual increases were higher than analysts' expectations of a 2.5% increase for PCE and 2.7% rise for core PCE.
Additionally, when measured at a monthly rate, Americans saw their income increase by 0.3%, or $71.4 billion. However, after taxes that increase in dollars dips to around $61 billion, and the value of the goods and services bought by or for American citizens, or personal consumption expenditures, also rose 0.3% to $69.9 billion.
As for savings, residents held on to $1.01 trillion in personal savings in June, and when measured as a percentage of disposable income, those personal savings came in at 4.5%.
Inflation was also evident via the consumer price index, or CPI, as that rose 0.3% for urban consumers increased 0.3% since June when seasonally adjusted, and 2.7% over the last 12 months not seasonally adjusted, despite dipping as low as 2.3% in April.
The Fed continues to hold short-term interest rates steady at a range of 4.25% to 4.5% following its meeting earlier this week, with Fed Chair Jerome Powell citing earlier this month that the impact of President Donald Trump's reciprocal tariff strategy is the reason the Fed hasn't gotten back to cutting rates.
Trump, who has been pushing for the Fed to lower rates, posted to Truth Social Thursday in regard to the Fed's hold, saying Powell "is costing our Country TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS," and called him a TOTAL LOSER."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC News
22 minutes ago
- NBC News
Modi was ready to 'make India great again,' then Trump put America first
The U.S. and India 's blossoming friendship is at risk of falling to pieces, observers have warned, as President Donald Trump threatens to substantially increase tariffs on Indian goods over its purchases of Russian oil. At the start of the year, India seemed to be one of the countries most likely to win Trump's favor, given its growing role as an Asian counterweight to China and Trump's close relationship with its leader, Prime Minister Narendra Modi. But U.S. relations with India have instead come under strain over trade and other issues. Trump has threatened Apple and other companies that manufacture in India, moved closer to its biggest rival, Pakistan, and mocked India's 'dead' economy. 'He's threatening to undo, or at least hit pause on, what has been two decades of steadily improving relations between India and the U.S.,' said Dhruva Jaishankar, executive director of the Observer Research Foundation America, a nonprofit group in Washington. On Monday, citing India's 'massive' purchases of Russian oil, Trump said he would 'substantially' increase the U.S. tariff on Indian imports, which is already one of the highest among Asian countries at 25%. Along with China, India is a top purchaser of Russian crude oil sanctioned by Western governments after Moscow's 2022 invasion of Ukraine. In a sharp response, India, a major U.S. security partner, said such criticism was 'unjustified and unreasonable' and that it bought Russian oil with U.S. support. 'India began importing from Russia because traditional supplies were diverted to Europe after the outbreak of the conflict,' the Ministry of External Affairs said in a statement Monday. 'The United States at that time actively encouraged such imports by India for strengthening global energy markets stability.' The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment. U.S.-India tensions are mounting domestic political pressure on Modi, with opponents accusing him of failing to stand up to his 'dear friend' Trump. 'The country is now bearing the cost of Narendra Modi's 'friendship,'' the opposition Congress party said last week. 'I don't want you building in India' It was a different picture in February, when Modi was among the first world leaders to visit the White House after Trump returned to office. Mirroring Trump, he said he too would 'make India great again.' The bonhomie did not last long. Since then, Trump has needled India over a number of issues, including billions in investment by American companies as they shift manufacturing from China. Last quarter, India produced 44% of U.S. smartphone imports, more than any other country including China, according to data from the research firm Canalys. That includes iPhones sold in the U.S., the majority of which Apple chief executive Tim Cook says will have India as their country of origin starting this quarter. 'I don't want you building in India,' Trump said he told Cook in May, urging him to produce phones in the U.S. instead, despite the difficulties. Cozying up to India's foe A terrorist attack in Indian-controlled Kashmir that killed 26 people in April is another source of friction in U.S.-India relations. India responded by bombing neighboring Pakistan, which it has long accused of harboring terrorists, resulting in a four-day conflict that threatened to explode into a broader war fueled by decades of tensions between the two nuclear-armed countries. Trump irked India by repeatedly claiming that he had personally brokered a ceasefire. While Islamabad thanked Trump for mediating, India rejected claims of U.S. involvement, including in a call between Modi and Trump. 'India has not endorsed Trump's claim,' said Amitendu Palit, a former Indian finance ministry official and a senior research fellow at the Institute of South Asian Studies at the National University of Singapore. 'That has not gone down very well with Trump,' he said. Within weeks, Trump hosted Pakistan's powerful army chief at the White House in an unprecedented meeting. He has also imposed a lower tariff rate on Pakistan of 19% and said the U.S. had reached a deal with Pakistan on exploring its oil reserves. Squeezed over Russia As Trump has expressed growing frustration with Russian President Vladimir Putin, he has turned his attention to India's relationship with Moscow. For years, New Delhi has benefited from its 'non-aligned' foreign policy, which allowed India to strengthen U.S. ties while continuing its longstanding relationship with Russia, one of its main suppliers of energy and military equipment. When Russian oil was hit with Western-led sanctions over Ukraine, India — the third-largest energy consumer in the world after China and the U.S. — seized the opportunity to buy it at a discount, which even U.S. officials said helped stabilize global oil prices. 'They bought Russian oil because we wanted somebody to buy Russian oil,' Eric Garcetti, the U.S. ambassador to India under former President Joe Biden, said at a conference last year. 'It was actually the design of the policy, because as a commodity we didn't want oil prices going up.' The U.S. position on India's oil purchases appears to have reversed under Trump, who said in a social media post last week that India and Russia 'can take their dead economies down together.' 'We are now at a stage where the American ability to control Russia and its allies is beginning to impact India,' Palit said. Jaishankar said that while Trump's actions won't push India out of America's orbit, they could drive India to strengthen ties with other countries such as China. During a meeting of their foreign ministers in Beijing last month, India and China agreed to resume direct flights between their countries for the first time in five years. Despite the recent setbacks in their relationship, India will continue to engage with the U.S. as a key strategic and technological partner, said Chietigj Bajpaee, a senior research fellow for South Asia at Chatham House, a London-based think tank. 'But I think it's a wake-up call of sorts,' he said.
Newsweek
22 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Why China is Becoming Donald Trump's Biggest U-Turn
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. When President Donald Trump launched the trade war with China in his first term, he did so amid a growing consensus in Washington that Beijing posed a long-term challenge to U.S. security, political and economic interests globally. Now, China watchers on both sides of the aisle are concerned at signs that Trump is pivoting away from years of efforts to compete with America's top geopolitical rival, which is likely to seize the moment and solidify its foothold in strategic industries that Trump wants to win back. The White House did not immediately comment when reached after hours. Setting Expectations While Democrats have criticized Trump's yearslong economic war with Beijing and his government's perceived lack of coordination with key allies, they were largely supportive of a tougher approach to China, citing accusations such as unfair trade practices, currency manipulation and unequal access to the Chinese market. The shift in Trump's first presidency had such far-reaching effects on Sino-American sentiment in both capitals that former President Joe Biden found the chill of the new Cold War hard to reverse. Biden not only extended, but later expanded Trump-era tariffs and further tightened controls on U.S. tech exports over fears they were accelerating China's military modernization. Trump campaigned on a promise to be even tougher. Matthew Pottinger, his deputy national security adviser from 2019-2021, predicted Trump would "pick up the baton and run with it" in pursuing Section 301 investigations into Chinese trade practices considered harmful to international and U.S. economic interests. In April, when the White House launched sweeping tariffs against friend and foe alike to bring Beijing to the negotiating table for a new trade deal, it appeared to signal the start of a new phase of the tech war, designed not only to address the trade deficit and revive U.S. manufacturing, but to ensure America stayed one step ahead of China in technological and military supremacy in an increasingly unstable world. The Biggest U-Turn of Donald Trump's Presidency The Biggest U-Turn of Donald Trump's Presidency Newsweek Illustration/Canva/Getty Reaction and Compromise The reaction from President Xi Jinping's China was swift and targeted. It played the tit-for-tat tariff game for a while but reached quickly for the nuclear option of cutting American firms out of its rare earths supply chain, weaponizing its dominance in the same way the U.S. had sought to curb Chinese access to advanced computer chips. Observers of the ongoing trade talks have sensed a shift in tone and approach, marked by a number of notable concessions in July—both symbolic and substantive—that they argued were overly conciliatory toward Beijing for the sake of securing an agreement. At the top of the list are emerging technologies and the Trump administration's decision to permit the export of U.S. tech—specifically Nvidia's H20 artificial intelligence chip—to China, following an intense lobbying campaign by company CEO Jensen Huang, who had argued that further curbs would only accelerate Chinese domestic breakthroughs in the race to dominate the global AI market. The decision has alarmed some of Trump's current and former allies in the GOP. "The H20 is a potent accelerator of China's frontier AI capabilities, not an outdated AI chip," said a July 28 letter to U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, signed by Pottinger and former Trump adviser Steve Bannon, among others. Last week, it emerged that Trump had broken precedent by refusing a request by Taiwan President Lai Ching-te to transit the United States as part of his wider visit to Taipei's remaining allies in Latin American—a diplomatic coup for China, which claims Taiwan as its own. In this file photo taken on June 28, 2019, China's President Xi Jinping, right, shakes hands with U.S. President Donald Trump before a bilateral meeting on the sidelines of the G20 summit in Osaka. In this file photo taken on June 28, 2019, China's President Xi Jinping, right, shakes hands with U.S. President Donald Trump before a bilateral meeting on the sidelines of the G20 summit in Osaka. Brendan Smialowski/AFP via Getty Images Michael Sobolik, a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute who signed the letter, told Newsweek: "Several factors are contributing to the shifting climate on China policy. The Trump administration wants to open up China's market for American businesses, which is elevating the cooperative agenda for the moment." "The [Chinese Communist Party's] willingness to leverage U.S. dependency on critical minerals is also curtailing the willingness of some officials to anger Beijing," he said. Sobolik said: "Jensen Huang is putting Nvidia's profit margin ahead of U.S. national security. It's the job of leaders in Washington to put national security ahead of one company's economic interests. Selling advanced AI chips to China does the opposite: it equips China's military with powerful tools to target Americans. We need to win the AI race, not unilaterally surrender to the Chinese Communist Party." China's embassy in Washington, D.C., did not immediately respond to a request for comment after hours. A Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson said last week that Beijing was opposed to "politicizing, instrumentalizing and weaponizing tech and trade issues and malicious attempts to blockade and keep down China" The Debate If Trump stays the course, it would be among the biggest pivots in what was to be a generational U.S.-China rivalry. But not all are convinced Trump is showing his true hand. George Magnus, an associate at the University of Oxford China Center, told Newsweek that Trump wants to demonstrate to the world that only he can strike trade deals with Beijing while his predecessor could not. "I don't think Trump and the administration are necessarily not thinking about China as a strategic adversary, but I think he wants to boast 'a win' in his first year in office and show to the world that America and China can do business together regardless," Magnus said. "We should also remember the U.S. has an America First investment policy memo which is unashamedly anti-China, and it's not unlikely that the U.S. will withdraw [most favored nation] status from Chinese goods. So there is a lot of nuance and ambiguity in Trump's poses and postures, all of which can be real," he said.
Business Insider
22 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Why some top Wall Street forecasters say don't bet on rate cuts this year
After a dismal July jobs report, investors began to bet that the Federal Reserve would finally be willing to lower interest rates at its September meeting. But top economists at Morgan Stanley and Bank of America say not so fast. Markets are pricing in an 87.8% chance of a 25-basis-point cut in September, according to the CME FedWatch Tool. At the end of July, those odds were 37.6%. The shift has come after weak labor market data caught investors off guard; according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the US economy added 73,000 in July, well below consensus expectations. But June and May job additions were jointly revised down by 258,000, creating a three-month average of 35,000, consistent with recessionary levels, said Jose Torres, a senior economist at Interactive Brokers. The report prompted President Trump to fire BLS director Erika McEntarfer. Stocks plunged on the lackluster numbers last Friday, as investors worried the US economy was headed toward a recession. "Powell is going to regret holding rates steady this week," said Jamie Cox, managing partner for Harris Financial Group, in an August 1 email. "September is a lock for a rate cut and it might even be a 50-basis-point move to make up the lost time." But Michael Gapen, the chief US economist at Morgan Stanley, and Aditya Bhave, a senior economist at Bank of America, aren't convinced. In an August 1 note, Gapen said that rate cuts are still unlikely until 2026 because the labor market remains in good shape. While that sounds counterintuitive given the meager payroll additions, he said to look at the unemployment rate, which remained steady at a historically low 4.2%. It showed that even though job gains were slowing, so was labor force participation. "When asked about how he would interpret a slowdown in payrolls, Powell said, 'the demand for workers is slowing, but so is the it [the labor market] is in enough.' Today's nonfarm payrolls will put that simplification to the test," Gapen wrote. "Payrolls were weaker than we and the market expected and backward revisions point to a softer labor market than we had known. And yet, the unemployment rate is essentially where it has been for the past year." Inflation is still above the Fed's target of 2%, he said, and Powell reiterated his relatively hawkish approach at his July 30 FOMC meeting press conference. On Monday, Bhave wrote that BofA is also staying with its call for no cuts the rest of this year. That's partly due to tariffs and their potential inflationary impact. "The Fed is still missing by a lot more on inflation than its labor mandate," Bhave said. "If it were to cut in September, it would be putting a lot of faith in a forecast of labor market deterioration, with no evidence that inflation has peaked." Spending data from BofA clients, which portrayed a robust consumer in July, back up Bhave's worries about inflation. "The danger of premature cuts is underscored by evidence that the economy rebounded in July. Aggregated BAC debit and credit card spending accelerated last month, we saw record Prime Day spending and auto sales and air travel surged," he wrote. "A July rebound would be in line with the idea that trade policy uncertainty is receding after having peaked in 2Q."
