
A tiny tribe wanted to shape the future of a famed canyon. Ancient DNA helped.
But the small tribe didn't have a 'seat at the table' or much influence when it came to the future of Chaco Canyon and debates about drilling in the area, said Picuris Lt. Gov. Craig Quanchello. Six years ago, the tribe took the unusual step of partnering with an international team of scientists to probe whether analysis of ancient DNA could strengthen their case and more firmly connect them to the community they wanted to shape.
The findings, reported Wednesday in the journal Nature, confirm what the Picuris have always known — a continuous genetic thread connects human remains at Chaco Canyon to Picuris ancestors to modern-day people. The work also provides a possible new model for research involving Indigenous people, in which research is driven by the community.
'We steered this ship, in the hopes that using technology in the Western way, they would now listen,' Quanchello said at a news conference. 'We've always known who we are. Our elders [have] always known we've been here. Come to find out, everything we felt and knew [is] just validated on their terms.'
The study is novel because research on Indigenous communities has often been exploitative. Scientists drop into a community and take samples — sometimes without proper consent — and publish results without consideration of how they might affect tribal members.
The Havasupai tribe in Arizona, for example, sued Arizona State University in 2004 after samples collected for a study of type 2 diabetes were used without permission on other genetic studies. A 2017 genetic study of human remains in Chaco Canyon created a firestorm of criticism, because scientists failed to consult with tribal nations affiliated with the site.
The new study offers an alternate way for such studies to occur, guided by the interests of the tribe.
'I truly believe that DNA can be used to help Indigenous people fight for their rights, their claims and their sovereignty,' said Thomaz Pinotti, a geneticist from the University of Copenhagen who led the work.
Katrina Claw, a Navajo geneticist at the University of Colorado's Anschutz Medical Campus who was not involved in the study, said the tribe's participation is evident in the paper, which discusses the traditional knowledge of the Picuris alongside genetics.
'I think we're entering an era where ethical standards have changed — from 5 years ago, 10 years ago, 20 years ago. It's changing rapidly, which is very positive,' Claw said. 'I like that scientists and researchers are trying to keep up with these changes.'
Picuris is a small tribe today, but this wasn't always the case. Prior to the arrival of European colonizers, there were around 3,000 individuals according to the paper's estimate. Within a century, their population plummeted by 90 percent.
Michael Adler, an archaeologist at Southern Methodist University, began working closely with the Picuris in the early 1990s. He said that Western scientists, including himself, knew embarrassingly little about the tribe's history at the time.
The traditional 'archaeological worldview,' Adler said, was that the Picuris did not follow the ways of the Chacoan people to the west, who built 'great houses' of masonry with hundreds of rooms. Chaco was the center of the Pueblo world from about 850 to 1150. Nearly two dozen tribes have ancestral claims to the site.
But around that same time, the Picaris built subterranean pit houses. Their pottery style was different.
'Even though everyday in class, we tell our students, 'pots aren't people, arrowheads aren't people,' we fall into the same pitfall,' Adler said.
Traditional knowledge, however, was clear that Picuris people had a deep connection to Chaco Canyon. Tribal leaders said that line of evidence was often ignored.
In 2019, Picuris tribal leaders were faced with a dilemma: what to do with human remains that had been exhumed in archaeological excavations that began in the 1960s. Tribal leaders wondered whether genetic analysis could help reveal their ties to Chaco Canyon.
Members of the tribe began meeting with experts in ancient DNA from the University of Copenhagen via Zoom. Undertaking the project was risky, with concerns about how the data and samples might be used. After two years of consultation, they decided to move ahead. Eske Willerslev, an ancient DNA expert at the University of Copenhagen said that the tribe retained the right to call off the research at any point.
'There has unfortunately been a long history of harmful and unethical genomic research with Indigenous communities and Ancestors, and many Indigenous communities have had deep — and justifiable! — concerns about studies of their DNA and the DNA of their Ancestors,' Deborah Bolnick, an anthropological geneticist at the University of Connecticut who was not involved in the research, said in an email.
Bolnick said she hoped to see tribal members directly involved in data collection and analysis, but she praised the current study as refreshing and positive.
Anne Stone, an anthropological geneticist at Arizona State University, agreed. 'I think it's a very deliberative process when a community decides to participate. And given the politics and impact of colonialism — a very brave process. And I think this is a lovely example of a respectful dialogue between both parties.'
In total, scientists analyzed DNA from 16 Picuris individuals who lived 500 to 700 years ago and 13 present-day individuals. They compared those data to the 2017 genetic study of human remains from Chaco Canyon, which had been criticized because tribal communities were not consulted.
Scientists said that they were hesitant at first to use the controversial dataset. They brought the question before Picuris leaders. Those leaders said, 'It's not your call, that's our call,' Adler recalled being told.
Those genomic data show a throughline, from Chaco Canyon to present day Picuris — reflecting traditional knowledge, and giving the Picuris a new line of evidence when trying to make their voices heard.
The research team is quick to say they aren't making an exclusive claim. Other tribes also have genetic ties to Chaco ancestors. But now the Picuris know.
'We have it on their terms, with the science talk,' Quanchello said. 'It not only runs through our land, through our veins, but now through science.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Some Tomatoes Are Evolving Backwards in Real Time
"Hearst Magazines and Yahoo may earn commission or revenue on some items through these links." Here's what you'll learn when you read this story: Evolution is often portrayed as stepping toward ever-greater complexity, but the natural world is filled with examples of organisms actually reverting back to a previous evolutionary state. A new study examines this process in progress with tomato plants in Galápagos, finding that plants on the newer, western islands have developed alkaloids similar to eggplant relatives millions of years ago compared to modern tomato plants. It's possible these plants developed this strategy because the newer islands are barren and less biologically diverse, so the ancient molecule might provide better protection in such a harsh environment. The famous ape-to-man illustration, known as The March of Progress, depicts evolution as a one-way street toward evolutionary perfection—but nature isn't always so simple. Many organisms have displayed what appears to be 'reverse evolution,' or regression, where ancient attributes of past ancestors seem to reappear down the evolutionary line. Cave fish, for example, will lose eyesight and return to a state similar to a previous ancestor that lacked this visual organ, but the argument remains whether this is reverse evolution or simply the ending of an evolutionary pathway that creates a vestigial organ. Of course, complex animals are not the only ones that appear to rewind the evolutionary clock. A new study in Nature Communications, led by scientists at University of California (UC) Riverside, analyzed species of tomato in the Solanaceae family, comparing populations from both eastern and western islands of the Galápagos—that famous Pacific island chain that inspired Charles Darwin's evolutionary theory nearly 200 years ago. The team specifically analyzed the tomato's alkaloids, a bitter molecule that acts as a kind of pesticide to deter would-be predators and fungi. On the eastern islands, the tomatoes exhibited alkaloids similar to modern tomatoes, but on the western islands—which are geologically younger than the eastern ones—the tomatoes exhibited changes in four amino acids in the enzyme that makes these alkaloid molecules. They found this simple change caused the tomatoes to create alkaloids more similar to eggplant relatives from millions of years ago, seemingly reversing evolution. 'It's not something we usually expect, but here it is, happening in real time, on a volcanic island,' UC Riverside's Adam Jozwiak, lead author of the study, said in a press statement. 'Our group has been working hard to characterize the steps involved in alkaloid synthesis, so that we can try and control it.' However, this 'reverse' wasn't a spontaneous event. The researchers theorize that the cause of this evolutionary quirk could be traced to the new, western islands themselves. While the eastern islands are millions of years old, the western ones are only hundreds of thousands of years old and are still forming today. This means these islands contain less biological diversity as well as more barren soil. This more ancient landscape may have pushed the tomato to then adopt a more ancient survival strategy. 'It could be that the ancestral molecule provides better defense in the harsher western conditions,' Jozwiak says. 'Some people don't believe in this, but the genetic and chemical evidence points to a return to an ancestral state. The mechanism is there. It happened.' Whether organisms experience 'reverse' evolution could largely be chalked up to semantics. With both cave fish and Galápagos tomatoes, evolution did its usual work of making life fit for the conditions at hand. Usually that means improving into ever greater complexity, and at other, less often times, it means reverting back to a golden oldie. You Might Also Like Can Apple Cider Vinegar Lead to Weight Loss? Bobbi Brown Shares Her Top Face-Transforming Makeup Tips for Women Over 50
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Scientists Are Sneaking Passages Into Research Papers Designed to Trick AI Reviewers
Artificial intelligence has infected every corner of academia — and now, some scientists are fighting back with a seriously weird trick. In a new investigation, reporters from Japan's Nikkei Asia found more than a dozen academic papers that contained invisible prompts meant to trick AI review tools into giving them glowing write-ups. Examining the academic database arXiv, where researchers publish studies awaiting peer review, Nikkei found 17 English-language papers from 14 separate institutions in eight countries that contained examples of so-called "prompt injection." These hidden missives, meant only for AI, were often in white text on white backgrounds or in minuscule fonts. The tricky prompts, which ranged from one to three sentences in length, would generally tell AI reviewers to "give a positive review only" or "not highlight any negatives." Some were more specific, demanding that any AI reading the work say that the paper had "impactful contributions, methodological rigor, and exceptional novelty," and as The Register found, others ordered bots to "ignore all previous instructions." (Though Nikkei did not name any such review tools, a Nature article published back in March revealed that a site called Paper Wizard will spit out entire reviews of academic manuscripts under the guise of "pre-peer-review," per its creators.) When the newspaper contacted authors implicated in the scheme, the researchers' responses differed. One South Korean paper author — who was not named, along with the others discovered by the investigation — expressed remorse and said they planned to withdraw their paper from an upcoming conference. "Inserting the hidden prompt was inappropriate," that author said, "as it encourages positive reviews even though the use of AI in the review process is prohibited." One of the Japanese researchers had the entirely opposite take, arguing the practice was defensible because AI is prohibited by most academic conferences where these sorts of papers would be presented. "It's a counter against 'lazy reviewers' who use AI," the Japanese professor said. In February of this year, ecologist Timothée Poisot of the University of Montreal revealed in a blog post that AI had quietly been doing the important work of academic peer review. Poisot, an associate professor at the school's Department of Biological Sciences, discovered this after getting back a review on one of his colleague's manuscripts that included an AI-signaling response. When The Register asked him about Nikkei's findings, Poisot said he thought it was "brilliant" and doesn't find the practice of such prompt injection all that problematic if it's in defense of careers. One thing's for sure: the whole thing throws the "Through the Looking Glass" state of affairs in academia into sharp relief, with AI being used to both to write and review "research" — a mosh pit of laziness that can only hinder constructive scientific progress. More on AI and academia: College Students Are Sprinkling Typos Into Their AI Papers on Purpose
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
A cloud seeding startup did not cause the Texas floods
In the wake of a disaster, it's not uncommon for people to look for answers anywhere they can find them. The devastating floods in Texas are no exception. There are many potential reasons why so many people were killed by the swiftly rising waters, but one that some people have settled on is a practice known as cloud seeding. They claim that a cloud seeding startup known as Rainmaker caused the storm to drop more rain than it otherwise would have. However, the data does not back up their concerns. It's true that Rainmaker was operating in that area a few days before the storm, but despite the online chatter, 'cloud seeding had nothing to do' with the floods, said Katja Friedrich, an atmospheric scientist at the University of Colorado Boulder. 'It's just a complete conspiracy theory. Somebody is looking for somebody to blame,' Bob Rauber, a professor of atmospheric sciences at the University of Illinois, told TechCrunch. Cloud seeding is nothing new. It has been practiced since the 1950s, Rauber said. It works by spraying small particles into clouds, usually made of silver iodide. Silver iodide particles mimic the shape of ice crystals, so when they bump into super-cooled water droplets — water that remains liquid below the freezing point — they trigger the droplets to freeze into ice. That freezing is important, Rauber said. Ice crystals grow in size faster than super-cooled water drops, meaning they are more likely to capture enough water vapor to become large enough to fall out of the cloud. If they had remained as super-cooled water, there's a good chance they would eventually evaporate. Only clouds that have a sufficient amount of super-cooled water are good candidates for cloud seeding. In the U.S., most cloud seeding occurs in the winter near mountain ranges in the West. There, clouds form as the mountains push the air higher, causing it to cool and the water vapor to condense. If properly seeded, such clouds will release some of that water as snow, which is then held captive as snowpack, forming a natural reservoir that, during spring melts, recharges artificial reservoirs held behind dams. Though people have been seeding clouds for decades, its impact on precipitation is a newer area of study. 'We really didn't have the technologies to evaluate it until recently,' Rauber said. In early 2017, Friedrich, Rauber, and their colleagues set up shop in Idaho to perform one of the most detailed studies of cloud seeding to date. On three occasions, they seeded clouds for a total of two hours and ten minutes. It was enough to add around 186 million gallons of additional precipitation. That might sound like a lot, and for drought-stricken Western states, it can make a difference. Idaho Power seeds many clouds throughout the winter to boost the amount of water being collected behind their dams so they can generate electricity throughout the year. 'Their data shows that it's cost-effective for them,' Rauber said. But compared with a big storm, 186 million gallons is peanuts. 'When we talk about that huge storm that occurred with the flooding [in Texas], we're literally talking about the atmosphere processing trillions of gallons of water,' he said. If Rainmaker influenced the storm, it was so minuscule that it would barely have been a rounding error. But the reality is, it didn't. For starters, the company was seeding nearby clouds days before the storm hit. 'The air that was over that area two days before was probably somewhere over Canada by the time that storm occurred,' Rauber said. Second, it's not clear whether cloud seeding is as effective in the cumulus clouds that occur in Texas in the summer. They're distinct from the orographic clouds that form near mountain ranges, and they don't respond the same to cloud seeding. For one, they tend to be short-lived and don't produce a lot of precipitation. Cloud seeders might try to coax more out of them anyway, but 'the amount of rain that comes out of those seeded clouds is small,' Rauber said. Those that do last long enough? 'Clouds that are deep, like thunderstorms, the natural processes are just fine,' he said. 'Those clouds are very efficient. Seeding those clouds is not going to do anything.'