
Inside Trump's last 24 hours as he willed his agenda bill over the finish line
'What are the Republicans waiting for??? What are you trying to prove??? MAGA IS NOT HAPPY, AND IT'S COSTING YOU VOTES!!!' Trump posted on social media at midnight, as the vote seemed stalled.
Fourteen hours later, the bill had passed, with only two Republican defections.
Trump is expected to sign it in a major ceremony on Friday afternoon at the White House – punctuated by a fly-over of the B-2 bombers who dropped bunker-buster bombs on Iranian nuclear facilities last month, according to a White House official.
The spectacle will only underscore what a consequential stretch of days it has been for the president, who now appears at the height of his political power roughly six months into his second term.
Last week's Supreme Court decision paved the way for even more expansive use of executive authority. His strikes on Iran's nuclear sites appear to have created new momentum toward a ceasefire deal in Gaza. A NATO summit last week, tailored to his preferences, resulted in new defense spending commitments after years of pressure from Trump.
At home, Trump is presiding over an economy that continues to create jobs, despite continued unease over the threat of tariffs. His hardline immigration enforcement tactics, decried by opponents as inhumane or illegal, have reportedly brought down unlawful crossings at the US southern border to historic lows.
'I think I have more power now, I do,' Trump said outside Air Force One Thursday, hours after his agenda bill passed the House.
To Trump's detractors, his unshakeable grip on Republicans and his strong-arming of US allies abroad add up to an authoritarian-in-waiting, unchecked by the systems in place to ensure the country doesn't descend into autocracy.
But to his supporters, the last two weeks have amounted to a thrilling culmination of his unlikely return to power and a rapid-pace fulfillment of the promises he made to his voters last year.
'He's getting his agenda passed to a greater extent than he did his first term. He has better control over the apparatus,' said Asa Hutchinson, the former Arkansas governor who challenged Trump for the presidency last year.
'Part of it, I think, is that he's a second-term president, and he knows how to wield that power and use the office of the president. And you got a Supreme Court that's backed him up,' Hutchinson went on. 'It's a very powerful position that he's in. People recognize that. He also recognizes he has a very short amount of time, because he's only got four years now.'
No longer restrained by skeptical members of his own party, Trump is free to pursue his agenda and interests in ways that even some Republicans worry will come to haunt them in next year's midterm elections.
Both supporters and opponents of Trump's bill seem to agree that — for better or worse — the measure passed Thursday will now form a major part of Trump's domestic legacy.
It passed after intensive involvement from the president himself, who appeared acutely aware of the stakes for his own presidency and took to calling lawmakers into the night to convince them to vote yes. A senior White House official called Trump 'the omnipresent force behind this legislation.'
'Dinner after dinner, engagement after engagement at Mar-a-Lago — you know, those relationships, and the president's focus on relationships, carried us through in kind of a cascade here,' the official said, adding they had lost count of the number of meetings Trump held on the bill.
Democrats have already begun formulating plans to tether Trump and Republicans to the new law's changes to Medicaid, singling out individual cases of Americans' deprived of care. Their argument was encapsulated by House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries' marathon speech on the House Floor on Thursday.
'Leadership requires courage, conviction, compassion — and yet what we have seen from this administration and co-conspirators on the Republican side of the aisle is cruelty, chaos and corruption,' Jeffries said in his address, which broke a record for the longest floor speech in modern history.
Polling shows Americans are broadly skeptical of the bill, creating a task for Trump in the months ahead to change perceptions of the bill he worked assiduously to get passed.
He could be aided by the bill's strategic sequencing, which enacts the tax cuts in the near-term but pushes off major changes to Medicaid and food assistance programs until after next year's midterm elections.
Yet recent history is littered with presidents who, after using congressional majorities to push through major legislation meant to burnish their legacy, later lamented not doing enough to sell the bill to the American public – after their party members paid the price at the ballot box.
Trump did, at various points over the last week, appear concerned that slashing the social safety net too deeply might pose political challenges for Republicans.
'I don't want to go too crazy with cuts,' he told CNN on Tuesday. 'I don't like cuts.'
Even in private, Trump has told Republicans that making changes to Medicaid, Medicare and Social Security would be a losing political message, according to officials. In conversations with Republican lawmakers, White House officials sought to emphasize that changes to Medicaid wouldn't be felt for years, giving states and hospitals time to sort through the changes. Officials also reminded lawmakers that states had a significant role in dictating how Medicaid dollars are spent, and therefore control how and whether individuals lose coverage.
Officials said Trump's team had taken lessons from a failed attempt to repeal Obamacare in 2017, working with Republicans on messaging and trying to present them with a clearer view into why the bill would work.
Still, Trump's priority has largely been getting his own agenda enacted, not the political fortunes of Republicans in Congress. Any worries about next year's election were mostly put to the side as Trump squeezed GOP holdouts using both charm and threats of political retribution.
White House officials privately acknowledged that the Democratic messaging on the bill has been effective, but noted that the focus from their party so far has not been on messaging, but on getting the bill passed.
'We now have to shift to explaining the bill and how it will benefit our voters,' one official said. 'We are confident once we get that messaging across, the public perception of the bill will shift.'
From the beginning, Trump and his allies framed support for the bill as a loyalty test, advising senators in an official notice last week that failure to pass the measure would amount to an 'ultimate betrayal.'
Trump treated Republican holdouts harshly, threatening to support primary challengers to Sen. Thom Tillis and Rep. Thomas Massie after the said they would oppose the bill.
Ultimately Tillis announced last week he would retire, opting out of Trump's test of fealty. He warned from the Senate floor afterward that Trump had been 'misinformed' about the effects of his bill, calling it 'inescapable this bill will betray the promise Donald Trump made.'
Trump's hardline approach shifted Wednesday, when he hosted House Republicans at the White House. In those sessions, he appeared to adhere to an old adage as he worked to convince lawmakers to vote for his mega-bill: you catch more flies with honey than with vinegar.
In meetings in the Cabinet Room and Oval Office, a magnanimous Trump signed place cards, took photos and paid his visitors compliments on their television appearances, according to people familiar with the sessions. He handed out mementos and showed guests around the constantly redecorated Oval Office.
But he was also firm that after weeks of back-and-forth between the two chambers of Congress, there would be no more changes to the bill.
'He wanted to get this done, and that was clear,' one lawmaker who met with Trump said.
'The message he sent to all of them was very clear, that this bill has been negotiated a lot, but there's not going to be any more changes to it,' Rep. Steve Scalise, the House Majority Leader, said Thursday on Capitol Hill. 'The time for that is over, and I think it took them still a few hours after to realize he was serious.'
When discussing the bill, the president urged the lawmakers to maintain GOP unity and avoid giving Democrats a victory by denying him his signature legislation, one person familiar with the meetings said.
Outside Air Force One on Thursday evening, Trump said he offered 'no deals – what I did is we talked about how good the bill is.'
And while Trump's threat of backing primary challenges to opponents of his bill remained ever-present in many Republicans' minds, the president opted to leave the warning mostly unsaid as he cajoled members in the West Wing on Wednesday.
'The president was wonderful, as always,' Tennessee Rep. Tim Burchett said in a video posted after the two-hour meeting. 'Informative, funny, he told me he likes seeing me on TV, which was kind of cool.'
However, as the night went on and lawmakers argued at the Capitol, one source briefed on the conversations with conservative members said it was conveyed that if members held up this bill, they would be primaried – a message that moved some members towards a vote.
'He is in the strongest position of anybody in generations – probably ever – in terms of impacting primaries for Congress,' the source said. 'So anybody coming from a hard-right district, which is most of the conference, will have to deal with that. And he's just not going to tolerate anyone going against his agenda.'
A White House official pushed back on the notion that there were any direct primary threats but acknowledged that the prospect always loomed over conversations.
One person familiar with the meetings with House lawmakers said Trump spoke about the importance of the bill to Republicans' agenda and argued that economic growth would eclipse any concerns about expanding the deficit — arguments he and his team have been making publicly.
He also promised hardline fiscal hawks he would use his executive authorities to vigorously enforce certain phaseout provisions for green energy tax credits to convince them to vote yes.
'He did a masterful job of laying out how we could improve it, how he could use his chief executive office, use things to make the bill better,' Rep. Ralph Norman of South Carolina, who originally planned to vote against the legislation but ultimately supported it, said on CNBC.
Some Republicans had been vocal in their opposition to the Senate's slower timeline to phase out some energy tax credits, and Norman said it was important for them to get assurances on that from the White House. He said it was a major sticking point in the final hours of deliberations.
'Up until late in the night, we were negotiating, you know, things that could change with, you know, the tax credits, which all were put in by Joe Biden, which needed to be extinguished,' Norman said.
In the dark hours of Thursday morning, Trump's patience in convincing holdout Republicans seemed to be wearing thin.
'FOR REPUBLICANS, THIS SHOULD BE AN EASY YES VOTE,' he wrote at 12:45 a.m. ET. 'RIDICULOUS.'
A few phone calls later, the holdouts had relented. And Trump's signature bill was on track to pass.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
South Korea trade minister to leave for U.S. on Friday as tariff deadline looms
SEOUL (Reuters) -South Korea's Trade Minister Yeo Han-koo will leave for the United States on Friday for tariff talks, just days ahead of the July 9 deadline when U.S. tariffs could rise sharply. Yeo said he would consider requesting an extension of the reciprocal tariff pause, depending on the progress of negotiations with U.S. officials. South Korea has sought exemptions from U.S. President Donald Trump's punishing tariffs on imports of automobiles and steel products, as well as a 25% "reciprocal" levy on the Asian ally currently paused for negotiations. Washington is demanding better access to the agriculture and car sectors, and improved market access and non-discriminatory treatment in the digital sector, Yeo told a parliamentary hearing on Friday. "The government will respond flexibly by taking into account the level of the U.S. demands and domestic political security sensitivities," he said. Asked about whether South Korea could meet the July 9 deadline, Yeo said the substance of negotiations mattered more than the deadline. Yeo said he would ask the U.S. to take time and accelerate talks to reach a "win-win" deal.


Boston Globe
13 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Democrats see Trump's big bill as key to their comeback. It may not be so easy.
Indeed, in political battlegrounds across Alaska and Iowa, Pennsylvania and California, Democrats have already begun to use Trump's bill to bludgeon their Republican rivals. Democrats are promising that the package — Trump's biggest domestic policy achievement to date — will be the defining issue of every major election between now and next fall's high-stakes midterms. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up 'One thing is abundantly clear: Republicans own this mess and it's an albatross around their necks heading into the midterms,' Democratic National Committee Chair Ken Martin told The Associated Press. 'This is the least popular legislation in modern history, and the more voters learn about it, the more they hate it. That's a clear directive for Democrats -- we're going to make sure every single voter knows who is responsible.' Advertisement Even with early public opinion on their side, however, it's far from certain that the Republican budget bill will be the political winner Democrats hope. Advertisement The Democratic brand remains deeply unpopular, the party has no clear leader, its message is muddled and core elements of the Democratic base are frustrated and drifting. Some of the bill's changes won't take effect until after the 2026 midterms, so voters may not have felt the full impact by the time they vote. At the same time, it's unclear how many voters are paying attention to the Washington-based debate. The Democratic super PAC Priorities USA warned this week that Democrats must work harder if they want their message to break through the polarized media environment. 'We can't just assume that because we're angry that the voters that we need to communicate with are angry. Everyone needs to step up and realize the enormous challenge that's in front of us,' Executive Director Danielle Butterfield said. 'We're nowhere near a good starting place.' At its core, the bill's priority is $4.5 trillion in tax breaks enacted in Trump's first term that would expire if Congress failed to act, along with new ones. This includes allowing workers to deduct tips and overtime pay. The package includes $1.2 trillion in cutbacks to Medicaid and food stamps and a massive rollback of green energy investments. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimates the package will add $3.3 trillion to the deficit over the decade. Democrats in Congress were united against the bill, and even some Republicans expressed concerns. But ultimately, Trump persuaded the conservative holdouts to fall in line. Democrats' challenge on display Privately, some Democrats conceded that Republicans were smart to pass the bill on the eve of a holiday weekend when fewer voters would be paying attention. And as some Democrats in Washington predicted a fierce political backlash across America, the response was somewhat muted Thursday at a Democratic event in Iowa, barely 10 miles from the Iowa State Fairgrounds where Trump later drew thousands for an evening rally. Advertisement An audience of roughly 100 people listened as local Democratic officials railed against the legislation and called on voters to oust Republican Rep. Zach Nunn, the local congressman, for supporting it. Audience member Michael Rieck, 69, said Iowa Democrats left him a message about the rally, but when he went online to learn more, 'there was nothing.' 'I texted back to them that I didn't see any advertisement,' he said. 'They slowly corrected that. I'm still not impressed with what they did to advertise this event.' Rieck said he wants to see different factions of the party better coordinate their message. Meanwhile, progressive activists were moving through Minnesota in a big green bus as part of Fair Share America's 29-stop 'stop the billionaire giveaway' tour. The group is focused on Republican-led congressional districts where elected officials have largely stopped having in-person town halls with constituents. Fair Share Executive Director Kristen Crowell said the crowds, even some Trump supporters, have been receptive. Still, she acknowledged many people don't know what's in the bill. 'We know we're fighting upstream,' she said. 'But when people hear exactly what's in this bill, they're adamantly opposed. I mean, I can tell you, in 17 stops, I've not had one person come up to me and say, 'You are on the wrong side of this.'' What the polls say The GOP's bill is generally unpopular, according to polling conducted throughout the month of June, although some individual provisions are popular. Advertisement For example, a Washington Post/Ipsos poll found that majorities of U.S. adults support increasing the annual child tax credit and eliminating taxes on earnings from tips, and about half support work requirements for some adults who receive Medicaid. On the other hand, the poll found that majorities oppose reducing federal funding for food assistance to low-income families and spending about $45 billion to build and maintain migrant detention centers. The price tag could be a sticking point. About 6 in 10 U.S. adults in the poll said it was 'unacceptable' that the bill is expected to increase the U.S. national debt, currently at $36 trillion, by about $3 trillion over the next decade. But polling indicates that most Americans aren't paying attention to the nuances of the bill, either. The Washington Post/Ipsos poll found that only about one-third of U.S. adults have heard 'a great deal' or 'a good amount' about it. Democrats are planning a summer of organizing The Democratic National Committee and its allies plan an 'organizing summer' that will feature town halls, training and voter registration drives in at least 35 competitive congressional districts. The message will be focused heavily on Trump's bill. Democratic groups also are expected to unveil a new round of digital attack ads targeting vulnerable Republicans in the coming days. Kansas Gov. Laura Kelly, who leads the Democratic Governors Association, said her party must keep the bill's contents at the forefront of people's minds to ensure it's an issue in the 2026 midterm elections — and even the next presidential election in 2028. 'We'll just have to keep that on the radar,' she said. Meanwhile, progressive groups are planning a 'Family First' day of action for July 26 in all 50 states. They'll highlight vulnerable Americans hurt by the new Medicaid cuts and hold a 60-hour vigil at the U.S. Capitol. Advertisement 'Because people call Medicaid something different in every state, a lot of people didn't realize — until this very moment — that their health care was at stake,' said one of the Family First organizers, Ai-jen Poo, president of the National Domestic Workers Alliance. 'We have made a promise to each other and to future generations that there will be a safety net in place when we need it. And this is what's being ripped away. And people will not stand for it.' Peoples reported from New York. AP writers Amelia Thomson DeVeaux in Washington; John Hanna in Topeka, Kansas; and Marc Levy in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, contributed.

Associated Press
16 minutes ago
- Associated Press
A year before declaring independence, colonists offered 'Olive Branch' petition to King George III
NEW YORK (AP) — Alarmed by the policies of President Donald Trump, millions turned out last month for protests around the United States and overseas. Mindful of next year's 250th anniversary of American independence, organizers called the movement 'No Kings.' Had the same kind of rallies been called for in the summer of 1775, the response likely would have been more cautious. 'It ('No Kings') was probably a minority opinion in July 1775,' says H.W. Brands, a prize-winning scholar and chair of the history department at the University of Texas at Austin. 'There was a lot of passion for revolution in New England, but that was different from the rest of the country,' says Pulitzer Prize-winning historian Joseph Ellis. 'There were still people who don't want to drawn into what they feared was an unnecessary war.' This month marks the 250th anniversary — the semiquincentennial — of a document enacted almost exactly a year before the Declaration of Independence: 'The Olive Branch Petition,' ratified July 5, 1775 by the Continental Congress. Its primary author was John Dickinson, a Pennsylvanian whose writing skills led some to call him the 'Penman of the Revolution,' and would stand as a final, desperate plea to reconcile with Britain. They put forth a pre-revolutionary argument The notion of 'No Kings' is a foundation of democracy. But over the first half of 1775 Dickinson and others still hoped that King George III could be reasoned with and would undo the tax hikes and other alleged abuses they blamed on the British Parliament and other officials. Ellis calls it the 'Awkward Interval,' when Americans had fought the British in Lexington and Concord and around Bunker Hill, while holding off from a full separation. 'Public opinion is changing during this time, but it still would have been premature to issue a declaration of independence,' says Ellis, whose books include 'Founding Brothers,' 'The Cause' and the upcoming 'The Great Contradiction.' The Continental Congress projected unity in its official statements. But privately, like the colonies overall, members differed. Jack Rakove, a professor of history at Stanford University and author of the Pulitzer Prize-winning 'Original Meanings,' noted that delegates to Congress ranged from 'radicals' such as Samuel Adams who were avid for independence to such 'moderates' as Dickinson and New York's John Jay. The Olive Branch resolution balanced references to 'the delusive pretences, fruitless terrors, and unavailing severities' administered by British officials with dutiful tributes to shared ties and to the king's 'royal magnanimity and benevolence.' '(N)otwithstanding the sufferings of your loyal Colonists during the course of this present controversy, our Breasts retain too tender a regard for the Kingdom from which we derive our Origin to request such a Reconciliation as might in any manner be inconsistent with her Dignity or her welfare,' the sometimes obsequious petition reads in part. The American Revolution didn't arise at a single moment but through years of anguished steps away from the 'mother' country — a kind of weaning that at times suggested a coming of age, a young person's final departure from home. In letters and diaries written in the months before July 1775, American leaders often referred to themselves as children, the British as parents and the conflict a family argument. Edmund Pendleton, a Virginia delegate to the Continental Congress, urged 'a reconciliation with Our mother Country.' Jay, who would later help negotiate the treaty formally ending the Revolutionary War, proposed informing King George that 'your majesty's American subjects' are 'bound to your majesty by the strongest ties of allegiance and affection and attached to their parent country by every bond that can unite societies.' In the Olive Branch paper, Dickinson would offer tribute to 'the union between our Mother country and these colonies.' An early example of 'peace through strength' The Congress, which had been formed the year before, relied in the first half of 1775 on a dual strategy that now might be called 'peace through strength,' a blend of resolve and compromise. John Adams defined it as 'to hold the sword in one hand, the olive branch in the other.' Dickinson's petition was a gesture of peace. A companion document, 'The Declaration of the Causes and Necessity of Taking Up Arms,' was a statement of resolve. The 1775 declaration was drafted by Thomas Jefferson, who a year later would be the principal writer of the Declaration of Independence, revised by Dickinson and approved by the Congress on July 6. The language anticipated the Declaration of Independence with its condemnation of the British for 'their intemperate Rage for unlimited Domination' and its vows to 'make known the Justice of our Cause.' But while the Declaration of Independence ends with the 13 colonies 'absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown,' the authors in 1775 assured a nervous public 'that we mean not to dissolve that Union which has so long and so happily subsisted between us, and which we sincerely wish to see restored.' 'Necessity has not yet driven us into that desperate Measure, or induced us to excite any other Nation to war against them,' they wrote. John Adams and Benjamin Franklin were among the peers of Dickinson who thought him naive about the British, and were unfazed when the king refused even to look at the Olive Branch petition and ruled that the colonies were in a state of rebellion. Around the same time Dickinson was working on his draft, the Continental Congress readied for further conflict. It appointed a commander of the newly-formed Continental Army, a renowned Virginian whom Adams praised as 'modest and virtuous ... amiable, generous and brave.' His name: George Washington. His ascension, Adams wrote, 'will have a great effect, in cementing and securing the Union of these Colonies.'