&w=3840&q=100)
DNA matches confirm 32 victims in Air India plane crash, including Former Gujarat CM
Air India plane crash: According to Captain Steve, the pilots may have accidentally retracted the flaps instead of the landing gear during the initial climb, a move he described as 'a tragic mistake.' AFP
Authorities have confirmed the identities of 32 victims from the Air India AI171 plane crash through DNA testing, officials said on Sunday (June 15), as the death toll from the disaster rose to 250.
Twelve of the matched bodies have been handed over to family members, while authorities continue to await the arrival of relatives of the others to collect the remains, Dr Rajneesh Patel, additional superintendent of Ahmedabad Civil Hospital, told reporters.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
'A special team has been allocated for each family of the deceased,' Patel said. 'The team includes a senior officer, a police official and a professional counsellor to ensure that the handover process is conducted with dignity.'
Gujarat Home Minister Harsh Sanghvi confirmed on Sunday that the DNA of former Gujarat Chief Minister Vijay Rupani matched around 11:10 am local time. Rupani was among the 241 people killed in the crash of the Air India Boeing 787 Dreamliner, which went down shortly after takeoff from Ahmedabad airport on June 12.
'Former Gujarat CM Vijay Rupani lost his life during the Air India crash in Ahmedabad on 12th June. Today, at around 11:10 a.m., his DNA has matched. He worked for the people of the state for several years,' Sanghvi told reporters.
The aircraft, operating as flight AI171 to London's Gatwick Airport, was carrying 242 people, including 230 passengers, 10 crew members and two pilots. Only one survivor has been confirmed so far.
Earlier on Sunday, hospital officials also confirmed the deaths of four medical students from BJ Medical College, raising the official death toll to 250. Authorities have not provided further details on the identities of the remaining victims as the identification process continues.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Investigations into the cause of the crash are ongoing, with India's Directorate General of Civil Aviation and the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau involved in the probe
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
Gaurav Taneja, aka Flying Beast, denied a house a day before moving in because owner thinks he committed child abuse
YouTuber Gaurav Taneja, better known as Flying Beast online, revealed that he was denied a house despite having paid the advance for it, because the owner spotted an old news article about him. In 2022, an article that called into question his character was posted online, and after Gaurav filed a lawsuit, the publication in question was directed to take the article down. It made a reference to alleged child abuse, after Gaurav pierced the ears of his elder daughter on camera. The Court ruled that piercing a child's ears doesn't qualify as abuse. More recently, Gaurav was also involved in a controversy surrounding his wife, Ritu Rathee. It was rumoured that the two were headed for a divorce. He said that both these stories still exist online, and can paint him in a negative light. In his latest vlog, he spoke about moving houses, and said, 'Let me tell you about the tragedy that happened with us. Yesterday was supposed to be our last day in this house. But we are still in this house, and we'll probably stay here for four or five more days. Everything has been packed, but the house that we were supposed to move into, they cancelled our deal at the last minute. Everything is packed in the house, but we don't have a place to move.' Also read – Gaurav Taneja aka Flying Beast freezes as he simulates Air India Flight 171 crash: 'All you can do is watch the ground come at you' He continued, 'It's a tough situation to be in. It sounds insignificant, but imagine. Now we have to look for a new house. Let me tell you what happened. The house was finalised, we'd paid the security deposit. Then, the man we were leasing the house from must have googled me. Somebody forwarded him a link and said, 'This guy is evil, he's been accused of child abuse'. This was the lawsuit that happened a few years ago, when the Delhi High Court told a newspaper to take down an article about me. Articles from that time still exist online, and the guy saw one of them. He refused to give us the house.' Gaurav concluded, mentioning the controversy around his relationship with Ritu, 'Social media is so powerful. Even the divorce controversy that happened, lots of meme pages and paparazzi pages posted stuff about our separation. Those videos were circulated to millions, and it doesn't matter that I made a clarification later, because millions still believe that I'm a bad guy.' Ritu clarified the rumours in a video, and said that nobody has the right to comment on their relationship. Reacting to the rumours, Gaurav had shared on social media, 'I will remain quiet for my kids and the mother of my child. Ready to live with all the negativity and hate for my entire life. Please don't expect any public explanation.' He added, 'Men are made villains very fast. Social media is not a place to discuss family matters. I have nothing to say.'
The Print
3 hours ago
- The Print
Waiting for closure on AI 171 crash, India is still flying blind on aviation safety
There's mystery surrounding the black box as well, particularly regarding the analysis of the data captured in its recorders. As this data would be critical in revealing the cause of the crash, the location of where the black box has been opened and analysed is a talking point. A week after the crash, the civil aviation ministry had said that the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) — under the civil aviation ministry —would decide on where the data would be decoded. When reports started surfacing about the black box being sent to the United States, officials clarified that the data was actually being analysed in India. Was there a change of mind — and if so, why? Conspiracy theories on social media and elsewhere on what caused the crash have complicated matters in the absence of any official indication so far, despite the black box being found without much damage soon after the accident. According to reports, there were two black box units on the aircraft that crashed — one was recovered on June 13 and another on June 16. Numerous 'preliminary reports'' are doing the rounds, highlighting a range of reasons for one of the biggest air disasters. The blame has been fixed on everything from sabotage to faulty seat configurations, pilot error to engine malfunctioning in these reports, which are being flagged as artificial intelligence-generated fake content. Within a week or so, the preliminary report on the crash of Air India flight 171 is expected to be out, but it may or may not be conclusive. Until there's closure on the June 12 crash of the Boeing 787 — which went down seconds after takeoff from Ahmedabad airport, killing 241 people on board and 34 on the ground — millions who saw the plane burst into a ball of fire in repeated television replays may struggle to get their confidence back in flying. The truth about what triggered the fatal crash of the Dreamliner should not only help bring the guilty to book, but also outline the future course of action in aviation safety. At this point, the truth is elusive. As a recent report in Business Standard pointed out, a key recommendation after the Kozhikode air crash in August 2020 —in which Air India Express aircraft from Dubai overshot the runway during landing in heavy rain, killing 21 people—was that India must develop its own laboratory to analyse flight data and cockpit voice recorders (black box). In April 2025, about two months before the Ahmedabad crash and five years after the Kozhikode accident, a black box laboratory (as part of the AAIB) was inaugurated. The confusion around where the black box would be decoded ended up putting a question mark on the efficiency of the black box lab, which came into being some 13 years after the AAIB was set up in New Delhi. People in the aviation community claim they have a fair idea of what caused the crash last month. While the preliminary report has to come out within a month of the accident, which is July 12 in this case, many experts believe there's no reason to wait that long if the black box data has already been analysed. That brings us to the significance of communication during a crisis. In the initial days after the crash, Air India was perceived as non-communicative. N Chandrasekaran, chairman of Tata Sons and Air India, admitted as much in a media interview and said the airline was doing a course correction. Soon after, Air India Chief Executive and Managing Director Campbell Wilson reached out to passengers through mailers explaining the reasons for flight cancellations, and assuaging their fears with 'sorry'' and 'thank you'' notes. Chandrasekaran is reportedly doing a lot of heavy-lifting himself after the crash, a lot of which is on the communication front, both internal and external. But it's not about Air India alone. The many instances of plane diversions, emergency landings and narrow escapes in Indian aviation over the past month are almost unprecedented. Whatever the reasons — faulty rostering, fearful pilots or technical glitches — it's time for the regulator, Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA), to prioritise air safety over everything else. Rather than taking knee-jerk decisions after a major accident, safety of fliers and a smooth aviation system in India should be its top agenda. Equally, making effective communication a part of the drill in times of crisis may not be a bad idea. As experts have observed, the aviation sector is growing by leaps and bounds. Domestic air passenger traffic grew from around 67 million in 2014 to 161 million in 2024, according to data from the regulator. Against this backdrop, trained and experienced human resource — including pilots and engineers —is not keeping pace with the requirement. While refraining from commenting on the Air crash, aviation experts have been raising the bigger and critical issue of regulatory oversight, which needs to improve significantly. The latest air crash, followed by a series of aviation incidents, may be a wake-up call for India to have an autonomous body like the UK Civil Aviation Authority created by an Act of Parliament. In that case, the civil aviation ministry would have to take a back seat. Nivedita Mookerji @nivmook is the Executive Editor of Business Standard. Views are personal.
Hindustan Times
16 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
‘Monster in my eyes': Huge uproar as Diddy verdict fumes netizens, but will he spend 20 years behind bars?
Sean "Diddy" Combs's bombshell federal trial in sex trafficking case resulted in a conviction for transportation to engage in prostitution but not for sex trafficking or racketeering, igniting uproar on social media. Diddy was found guilty of two prostitution-related offenses and faces a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison. He faces a maximum term of 10 years for each count of conviction, which may potentially sum up to 20 years.(File/AFP) A Manhattan jury, including eight men and four women, sent a letter to the judge stating that they had unanimously decided all of the charges. A memo sent to the court stated, 'We have not reached a verdict on count 1 because we have unpersuadable jurors on both sides.' The charge is under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act, which is usually used to convict drug cartels and gangs. Diddy was found guilty of two prostitution-related offenses and faces a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison. He faces a maximum term of 10 years for each count of conviction, which may potentially sum up to 20 years. A combination of guilty and not guilty verdicts here Racketeering conspiracy: not guilty Sex trafficking of Cassie Ventura: not guilty Transportation for prostitution of Ventura and others: guilty Sex trafficking of woman known as "Jane": not guilty Transportation for prostitution of "Jane" and others: guilty The founder of Bad Boy Records was first charged with conspiring to commit racketeering, sex trafficking by force, deception or coercion, and transportation to engage in prostitution, all of which carried a possible penalty of life in prison. Also Read: Kate Middleton, Prince William get massive Royal power from King Charles in fresh snub to Prince Harry; What is it? Diddy may be sentenced to months not years: expert According to an expert, Diddy is probably going to get a term of months rather than years. The rapper is expected to receive a far lesser sentence under the law on federal sentencing than the maximum of 20 years he faces for the two prostitution crimes he was found guilty of Wednesday morning, stated former federal prosecutor Mitchell Epner, NY POST reported. However, Combs has already been imprisoned for approximately ten months since his detention on September 16 and may have already completed the most of his term when he is sentenced, which is probably going to happen in a few months. Epner also stated that he thinks Combs' motion for bail may be granted by Judge Arun Subramanian. 'I think that the court may grant it, given that Sean Combs has been held in MDC – one of the worst prisons in America and likely would serve any additional sentence at a low security prison or possibly even a barracks-style camp,' the attorney claimed. Netizens react to Diddy verdict Meanwhile, several netizens expressed rage over the Diddy trial verdict, with one writing: 'The verdict for Diddy is a message to all women that they are not believed. Sorry to the women out there. The victims especially, they deserved better.' 'Diddy found not guilty on the biggest charges, Donald Trump doing the devil's work in office, and Andrew Tate still alive…….God help us,' another wrote. 'Diddy a monster in my eyes, no matter what the outcome of this trial is,' a third user commented.
