Students at Netanyahu's former high school campaign for his removal from hall of fame
The students submitted a petition to the Cheltenham High Alumni Association last month to have a photo of the alumnus removed from the school's hall of fame, the New York Times reported on Friday.
The campaigning students cited Netanyahu's arrest warrant issued by the International Criminal Court (ICC), which accuses him of war crimes and crimes against humanity in the Gaza Strip, as well his indictment on corruption charges in Israel.
The New York Times reported that students sent an email to the alumni association that read: "When students see these alumni on the wall of fame as we walk past every day, we understand that these are people we should look up to, and we strive to be like them one day.
"As such, we feel it is not right for him [Netanyahu] to continue to be recognised in our school."
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
Netanyahu attended the high school for four years and graduated in 1967 while his family lived in Cheltenham Township. He was elected to the hall of fame in 1999, when he was serving his first term as prime minister.
A decision is expected to be made in a closed-door meeting between officers from the alumni association and school district officials on 25 July.
Middle East Eye reached out to the school for comment but did not receive a response by time of publication.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Middle East Eye
an hour ago
- Middle East Eye
US court rules that Trump's ban on birthright citizenship is unconstitutional
President Donald Trump's executive order to end birthright citizenship was deemed unconstitutional by a federal appeals court in San Francisco on Wednesday. The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled 2-1 that Trump's order violates the Constitution's 14th Amendment – the latest blow to Trump in a series of legal back-and-forth rulings on the issue. Under the 14th Amendment of the US Constitution, all children born in the US automatically become American citizens, but the Trump administration is looking to abolish that right for people who are in the country illegally or temporarily. However, opposition has been fierce. Several district judges have blocked Trump's attempt to end birthright citizenship. The appeals court on Wednesday affirmed a Seattle district court's nationwide injunction, calling the measure "necessary" to protect states from potential harm if Trump's order took effect. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Late last month, the US Supreme Court curbed the power of lower court judges to pause executive orders issued by Trump, while hearing the birthright case. In its 6-3 ruling, which was ideologically divided with liberal judges dissenting against the ruling, the court said that nationwide injunctions or pauses issued by district court judges "likely exceed the equitable authority that Congress has granted to federal courts". Trump hailed the ruling as a "giant win". US Supreme Court limits judges from blocking Trump order on birthright citizenship Read More » But this week, according to the appeals court, an injunction limited to the state level is as ineffective as not blocking the order at all, because of the complications that can arise if people move between states with different citizenship rules. "The district court correctly concluded that the Executive Order's proposed interpretation, denying citizenship to many persons born in the United States, is unconstitutional. We fully agree," Judge Ronald Gould wrote. In the Supreme Court's June ruling, the judges did not rule on the constitutionality of Trump's executive order to end "birthright citizenship". This loophole has consequently prompted a raft of class action lawsuits to be filed challenging the legality of the Executive Order itself. Earlier this month, a federal judge granted class-action status to any child who would potentially be denied citizenship under Trump's order, and issued a preliminary halt to it as legal proceedings carry on.
Al Etihad
an hour ago
- Al Etihad
Arab League condemns Israel's Knesset approval of declaration to impose sovereignty over occupied West Bank
24 July 2025 23:00 CAIRO (WAM)Ahmed Aboul Gheit, Secretary-General of the League of Arab States, strongly condemned the Knesset's vote yesterday on a draft law to impose Israeli control over the West Bank, which has been occupied since a statement issued on Thursday, Aboul Gheit said that the draft law is part of a continuous plan to impose a de facto reality aimed at perpetuating the occupation and annexing the occupied Palestinian affirmed that the occupation's attempts to change the legal status of the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, are unacceptable and have no legal basis. He emphasised that the West Bank is considered occupied territory under international law and recognised as such by the United Nations, and that the Knesset's laws will not alter this unequivocal Gheit called on the international community to firmly confront such legally invalid and morally reprehensible measures. He stressed the importance of adhering to United Nations Security Council resolutions—most notably Resolutions 242 (1967) and 2334 (2016)—as a foundation for ending the occupation, in the face of Israel's efforts to normalize the legal status of the occupation through the annexation of the West Bank. He warned that 'the settler and religious extremist movements inside Israel will drag the entire region into catastrophic religious confrontations if they are not confronted and their obsessive ambitions are not checked.'
Middle East Eye
2 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Still a chance at reaching ceasefire agreement despite Israeli stalling, Hamas says
A senior Hamas source told Reuters on Thursday that there was still a chance of reaching a Gaza ceasefire agreement but it would take a few days because of what he called Israeli stalling. The source said Hamas' response to the latest ceasefire proposal included requesting a clause that would prevent Israel from resuming the war if an agreement was not reached within the 60-day truce period. - Reporting by Reuters
