Opinion: Steer clear of difficult people and eat more berries
So, I thought I'd pop some of the material into this column in the hope you'll benefit from it too.
Research over the past 20 years has shown repeatedly how important it is for us to maintain a good social network as we grow older, because loneliness and isolation are seriously bad for our mental and physical health.
In fact, it's often said they are as dreadful for us as smoking.
We're aware therefore that we should meet people face to face as much as possible – especially if we live alone.
And one of the best ways of doing that is to join a number of clubs and societies.
Last month, I gave positive ageing talks at both Colchester and Royston U3A branches.
U3A is a terrific association for older people, and I highly recommend it.
Every one of their groups I've spoken at – and there have been a lot – has been packed with bright, enthusiastic, engaged, friendly, proactive individuals living later life to the full.
My recent reading revealed there is now even more good news about getting together with like-minded people in groups, because a new study has shown that belonging to such organisations can protect us against cognitive decline.
It doesn't matter whether we sing in a choir, or sit on the parish council, or go to a book group, drama club, the WI, a horticultural or music appreciation society, or join a Spanish class, all these group activities and countless others, are great for our brain power.
So, if you don't do anything regularly with other people who have similar interests, do consider becoming a member of something you'd enjoy.
I think the protective element against cognitive decline may well be intensified by the sense of belonging we feel when we are part of something.
There is something about saying "we" rather than "I" that tends to lift our spirits and give us a warm glow of being part of a community rather than alone.
Another thing I learned in the past few days was that unpredictable and difficult people can adversely affect our own health.
I've often mentioned in the past how helping others and being kind, compassionate and caring to them increases our own sense of self-esteem and improves our mood.
This is because these actions generate the production in our brain of more of the chemicals serotonin and dopamine, often called the "happy hormones".
But it turns out that not everyone we try to help, or be with, is good for us.
Last week saw the publication of research which stated that we should steer clear, when we can, of people who are always negative, or hassle us, or puzzle us because one day they seem friendly and loving and another, out of the blue, ignore us or even become hostile.
I'm sure we've all known folk like that and probably tried to help them.
But this new American study claims that contact with such individuals can trigger a chronic inflammatory response that makes us more prone to heart disease and other ageing illnesses.
So, we need to remember that, and do all we can to surround ourselves with positive people who enhance our lives, rather than mix with those who distress or drag us down.
Finally, I've been reading about fruit, and berries in particular.
I don't know how long ago it was that we were first advised to eat five fruit or veg every day.
But apparently, only a quarter of men in the UK actually achieve this target.
And plenty of women miss it too.
I found this surprising because there is so much information these days about how fruit and veg are great for gut health, increasing vitamin levels, and providing us with essential polyphenols and antioxidants, which protect our cells from damage.
Not just that, they're good at improving our skin, and surely everyone wants that.
At this time of the year, we're surrounded by berries – strawberries, raspberries, blackberries, blueberries and so on – and the advice is that we should eat our fill of these because berries are the fruits most nutritionists value above all others.
Not only are they delicious but they provide an impressive list of health benefits.
They're low in calories, they protect our bodies against harmful inflammation, they're commonly believed to help lower our cholesterol levels and they add much-needed fibre to our diets.
But what I also learned this week is that you don't have to confine these fruits to the summer months, and you shouldn't, because their frozen versions, available all year round obviously, are often even fresher than the ones we're buying currently from greengrocers or farmers' markets.
The reason being that frozen food companies routinely freeze berries on the very day they're picked.
And there's a further benefit; typically, a portion of frozen berries costs less than half the price of fresh ones.
It's a win-win situation!

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Associated Press
16 minutes ago
- Associated Press
The National Council for Occupational Safety and Health Receives an International Award at the 25th ORP Conference in Colombia
The National Council for Occupational Safety and Health (NCOSH) participated in the 25th Annual Conference of the International ORP Foundation (Occupational Risk Prevention), held from July 31 to August 1, 2025, in Cartagena de Indias, Colombia. The ORP Conference is one of the most prominent international events dedicated to occupational safety and health in South America. CARTAGENA, CO / ACCESS Newswire / August 4, 2025 / The National Council for Occupational Safety and Health (NCOSH) participated in the 25th Annual Conference of the International ORP Foundation (Occupational Risk Prevention), held from July 31 to August 1, 2025, in Cartagena de Indias, Colombia. The ORP Conference is one of the most prominent international events dedicated to occupational safety and health in South National Council for Occupational Safety and Health Receives an International Award at the 25th The National Council for Occupational Safety and Health (NCOSH) participated in the 25th Annual Conference of the International ORP Foundation (Occupational Risk Prevention), held from July 31 to August 1, 2025, in Cartagena de Indias, Colombia. The NCOSH was represented by its Secretary-General, Eng. Majed bin Ibrahim Alfuwaiz, who shared Saudi Arabia's experience in advancing its occupational safety and health ecosystem. The presentation highlighted key national initiatives and achievements in line with the objectives of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia's Vision 2030. At the conclusion of the conference, Eng. Alfuwaiz accepted the 'ORP Recognition 2025" award on behalf of the Council. This prestigious international award is presented annually by the ORP Foundation to organizations that have demonstrated impactful efforts in promoting safe and healthy workplaces. This recognition marks a milestone in NCOSH's efforts to strengthen the culture of occupational safety and health in the Kingdom, through coordination with national stakeholders and the adoption of global best practices in pursuit of Vision 2030 objectives. This achievement stands as a distinguished addition to Saudi Arabia's international record, placing NCOSH alongside renowned institutions that have previously received this award, including International Labour Organization (ILO), International Commission on Occupational Health (ICOH), World Health Organization (WHO), Institution of Occupational Safety and Health (IOSH UK), International Social Security Association (ISSA) and German Social Accident Insurance (DGUV) On this occasion, Eng. Majed Alfuwaiz expressed his pride in this national achievement, stating that it was made possible-first by the grace of Allah, then through the continuous support of the Kingdom's leadership and the guidance of His Excellency the Minister of Human Resources and Social Development (HRSD), who chairs the Council, along with His Excellency the Vice Minister of HRSD. Their leadership has been instrumental in enabling NCOSH to fulfill its mission effectively. He also extended his gratitude to the NCOSH Secretariat and all those who contributed to the Council's initiatives. He affirmed the Council's continued commitment to enhancing worker protection and achieving sustainable institutional excellence in this vital field Contact Information PUREMINDS Agency المجلس الوطني للسلامة والصحة المهنية | Ncosh [email protected] +966 55 180 6364 SOURCE: National Council for Occupational Safety and Health press release


CNN
44 minutes ago
- CNN
Eating minimally processed meals doubles weight loss even when ultraprocessed foods are healthy, study finds
Food & health UKFacebookTweetLink Follow People in the United Kingdom lost twice as much weight eating meals typically made at home than they did when eating store-bought ultraprocessed food considered healthy, the latest research has found. 'This new study shows that even when an ultraprocessed diet meets nutritional guidelines, people will still lose more weight eating a minimally processed diet,' said coauthor Dr. Kevin Hall, a former senior investigator at the US National Institutes of Health who has conducted some of the world's only controlled clinical trials on ultraprocessed foods. 'This (study) is the largest and longest randomized controlled clinical trial of ultraprocessed foods to date,' Hall added. Hall's past research sequestered healthy volunteers from the world for a month at a time, measuring the impact of ultraprocessed food on their weight, body fat and various biomarkers of health. In a 2019 study, he found people in the United States ate about 500 calories more each day and gained weight when on an ultraprocessed diet than when eating a minimally processed diet matched by calories and nutrients. The weight loss from minimally processed food in the new study was modest — only 2% of the person's baseline weight, said study first author Samuel Dicken, a research fellow at the department of behavioral science and health and the Centre for Obesity Research at University College London. 'Though a 2% reduction may not seem very big, that is only over eight weeks and without people trying to actively reduce their (food) intake,' Dicken said in a statement. 'If we scaled these results up over the course of a year, we'd expect to see a 13% weight reduction in men and a 9% reduction in women.' Men typically have more lean muscle mass than women, which along with testosterone often gives them a quicker boost over women when it comes to weight loss, experts say. The study, published Monday in the journal Nature Medicine, provided free ultraprocessed or minimally processed meals and snacks to 55 overweight people in the UK for a total of eight weeks. After a short break, the groups switched to the opposite diet for another eight weeks. Study participants were told to eat as much or as little of the 4,000 daily calories as they liked and record their consumption in a diary. By the end of the study, 50 people had spent eight weeks on both diets. While the number of participants may seem small at first glance, providing 16 weeks of food and implementing randomized controlled clinical trials can be costly. For the first eight weeks, 28 people received daily deliveries of minimally processed meals and snacks, such as overnight oats and homemade spaghetti Bolognese. Minimally processed foods, such as fruits, vegetables, meat, milk and eggs, are typically cooked from their natural state, according to NOVA, a recognized system of categorizing foods by their level of processing. Concurrently, another 27 people received a daily delivery of ultraprocessed foods — such as ready-to-eat breakfast bars or heat-and-eat lasagna — for eight weeks. Ultraprocessed foods, or UPFs, contain additives never or rarely used in kitchens and often undergo extensive industrial processing, according to the NOVA classification system. Because ultraprocessed foods are typically high in calories, added sugar, sodium, and saturated fat and low in fiber, they have been linked to weight gain and obesity and the development of chronic conditions including cancer, cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes and depression. Such foods may even shorten life. Researchers in this study, however, did something unusual, said Christopher Gardner, Rehnborg Farquhar Professor of Medicine at Stanford University in California who directs the Stanford Prevention Research Center's Nutrition Studies Research Group. 'They tried to make a healthy ultraprocessed diet by picking ultraprocessed foods with the recommended number of fruits, veggies and fiber and lower levels of salt, sugar and saturated fats,' said Gardner, who was not involved in the study. Both the ultraprocessed and the minimally processed meals had to meet the nutritional requirements of the Eatwell Guide, the UK's official government guidance on how to eat a healthy, balanced diet. The United States has similar dietary guidelines, which are used to set federal nutritional standards. 'This is a very solid study, matching dietary interventions for nutrients and food group distribution, while varying only the contribution of ultra-processed foods,' said Dr. David Katz, a specialist in preventive and lifestyle medicine, in an email. Katz, who was not involved in the study, is the founder of the nonprofit True Health Initiative, a global coalition of experts dedicated to evidence-based lifestyle medicine. The study's goal was weight loss, which often comes with improved cardiovascular readings, such as lower blood pressure, cholesterol and blood sugar levels. That happened, but in rather odd and surprising ways, said Marion Nestle, the Paulette Goddard professor emerita of nutrition, food studies and public health at New York University, who was asked to write an editorial to be published with the study. Instead of gaining weight, people on the ultraprocessed diet chose to eat 120 fewer calories a day, thus losing a small amount of weight. People on the minimally processed diet, however, ate 290 fewer calories a day, thus losing even more weight and some body fat as well. 'One possible explanation is that (people on the minimally processed diet) did not like the 'healthy' meals as much as their usual diets,' Nestle, who was not involved in the research, wrote in the editorial. 'They deemed the minimally processed diet less tasty,' Nestle said. 'That diet emphasized 'real' fresh foods, whereas the ultra-processed diet featured commercially packaged 'healthy' ultra-processed food products such as fruit, nut, and protein bars; sandwiches and meals; drinking yoghurts, and plant-based milks.' Less than 1% of people in the UK follow all of the government's nutritional recommendations, according to the study, often choosing ultraprocessed foods as the basis of their normal daily intake. In the US, nearly 60% of an adult's calorie consumption is from ultraprocessed foods. 'People in this study were overweight or obese and were already eating a diet high in all kinds of ultraprocessed foods,' Gardner said. 'So the ultraprocessed diet in the study was healthier than their typical normal diet. Isn't that an odd twist?' People on the minimally processed diet had lower levels of triglycerides, a type of fat in the blood linked to an increased risk of heart disease and stroke, but other markers of heart health didn't vary much between the two diets, according to the study. There was one notable exception: low-density lipoprotein, or LDL, known as 'bad' cholesterol because it can build up in arteries and create blockages to the heart. 'Surprisingly, LDL cholesterol was reduced more on the ultra-processed diet,' said dietitian Dimitrios Koutoukidis, an associate professor of diet, obesity and behavioral sciences at the University of Oxford, who was not involved in the study. 'This might imply that processing is not as important for heart health if the foods already meet the standard UK healthy eating guidance,' Koutoukidis said in a statement. 'Further research is needed to better understand this.' According to Hall, the results fit quite nicely with preliminary results from his current study that is still underway. In that research, Hall and his team measured the impact of four configurations of ultraprocessed foods on the health of 36 volunteers. Each lived for a month in the Metabolic Clinical Research Unit of the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center in Bethesda, Maryland. 'When you modify an ultraprocessed diet to have lower energy (calorie) density and fewer highly palatable foods, you can offset some of the effects of ultraprocessed foods in causing excess calorie intake and weight gain,' Hall said. In other words, choose healthier foods regardless of the levels of processing. 'People don't eat the best ultraprocessed foods, they eat the worst ones, so the take home here is to follow the national guidelines for nutrient quality,' Gardner said. 'Read your nutrient label and choose foods that are low in salt, fat, sugar and calories and high in fiber, and avoid foods with too many additives with unpronounceable names. That's the key to a healthier diet.' Sign up for CNN's Eat, But Better: Mediterranean Style. Our eight-part guide shows you a delicious expert-backed eating lifestyle that will boost your health for life.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Sir Roger Daltrey is afraid he won't make it to the end of The Who tour
Sir Roger Daltrey fears he won't make it to the end of The Who tour because he fears he has "the potential to get really ill".