India's armed forces target full ammunition self-reliance by 2025-end
ADVERTISEMENT Speaking on the issue, Lieutenant General Amardeep Singh Aujla, Master General Sustenance of the Indian Army, said, 'The first phase is that by 2025 — that is, the end of this year — we should be 100% indigenous for all our needs. But everything I have spoken about does not come without challenges. These challenges today are in terms of our production capacities — what we state and what we actually produce.'
He added that there are also deficiencies in critical raw materials such as propellants, explosives, and fuses. 'When we talk about propellants — whether it's NC, NG, single base, double base, triple base, or ball powder — we are falling short. The gap between our requirement and what is being produced is significant. I believe we need to scale it up by about five to six times,' he said.
Other defence officials have echoed these concerns, pointing out significant shortfalls in both finished ammunition and key raw materials. They noted that these limitations present ongoing challenges to meeting the 2025 indigenization goal. Nevertheless, they reiterated the Army's aim to achieve 100% indigenization across all categories of ammunition by the end of that year.
Sanjeev Kumar, Defence Secretary (Defence Production), stressed the need to focus on fundamental manufacturing requirements. 'When we interacted with the private sector and also the public sector during the month of May, one thing I realized was that many of us are not able to concentrate or focus on the primary ingredients required in manufacturing. Self-reliance is necessary, and that has been the theme of the government for more than a decade. So, self-reliance not only in platforms, not only in technology and other areas of defence requirements, but also in the field of ammunition,' he said.
According to a report by the International Market Analysis Research and Consulting Group, the global ammunition market was valued at USD 25.8 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 36.1 billion by 2033, at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 3.44%. With this backdrop, India is not only aiming to meet its own military needs but also to tap into export opportunities, ensuring that the country's defence forces are never again constrained by supply limitations.
(With inputs from PTI)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


News18
37 minutes ago
- News18
Russia ends moratorium on intermediate-range missile deployment
Last Updated: Moscow, Aug 4 (PTI) Russia on Monday announced that it was withdrawing from its self-imposed moratorium on the deployment of intermediate-range missiles. The move comes after US President Donald Trump ordered the repositioning of two American nuclear submarines closer to Russian shores, escalating tensions between the two Cold War-era rivals. 'Russia does not consider itself anymore bound by self-restrictions on deploying intermediate- and shorter-range missiles (INF) as conditions to preserve this moratorium have disappeared," the Russian Foreign Ministry said in a statement. The Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty, signed between the USSR and the US in 1987, did not allow the deployment of missile launchers, ground-launched ballistic missiles, and cruise missiles with a range of 500 to 5,500 km. The US withdrew from the agreement in 2019. In a statement, the Russian Foreign Ministry said its repeated warnings on the matter have been ignored and the situation is moving toward the actual deployment of US-made intermediate- and shorter-range ground-based missiles in Europe and the Asia-Pacific region. The Foreign Office in Moscow said that actions by the West in the sphere of proliferating such missiles create a 'direct threat" to Russian security, requiring certain measures on Moscow's part. On Friday, Trump wrote on his Truth Social post that he had ordered the redeployment of US submarines 'to appropriate regions" allegedly over 'extremely provocative statements" by former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev, who is also the deputy chairman of the Russian Security Council. PTI VS GRS GRS GRS view comments First Published: August 05, 2025, 00:15 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
'True Indian wouldn't say so': Supreme Court rebukes Rahul Gandhi over remarks on Army
The Supreme Court on Monday stayed the proceedings in a criminal defamation case before a Lucknow court against leader of Opposition (LoP) in the Lok Sabha, Rahul Gandhi , in connection with his alleged remarks about the Indian Army during the 2022 Bharat Jodo Yatra. Targeting the government over Chinese action at the line of actual control, Gandhi had reportedly said that "Chinese soldiers are beating up Indian Army personnel in Arunachal Pradesh". Productivity Tool Zero to Hero in Microsoft Excel: Complete Excel guide By Metla Sudha Sekhar View Program Finance Introduction to Technical Analysis & Candlestick Theory By Dinesh Nagpal View Program Finance Financial Literacy i e Lets Crack the Billionaire Code By CA Rahul Gupta View Program Digital Marketing Digital Marketing Masterclass by Neil Patel By Neil Patel View Program Finance Technical Analysis Demystified- A Complete Guide to Trading By Kunal Patel View Program Productivity Tool Excel Essentials to Expert: Your Complete Guide By Study at home View Program Artificial Intelligence AI For Business Professionals Batch 2 By Ansh Mehra View Program Before granting him interim relief, a division bench comprising Justices Dipankar Datta and Augustine George Masih, strongly disapproved of Gandhi's remarks. "Why don't you say this in Parliament? Why do you have to say this on social media posts? How do you get to know when 2,000 sq km was acquired by China? Were you there? Do you have any credible evidence?" Justice Datta verbally remarked. Further cornering Gandhi for his remarks, Justice Datta orally observed: "If you were a true Indian you would not have said this. When there is a cross-border conflict, can you say all this? Why can't you ask these questions in Parliament? ...Being a responsible leader of the Opposition, you cannot say because you have 19(1)(a) [freedom of speech] you cannot say anything". Live Events Appearing on behalf of Gandhi, senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi argued that Gandhi's remarks cannot be a ground for a third party to file a defamation suit. "But you cannot harass somebody like this with defamation charges. The high court says he (complainant) was not a person aggrieved but defamed. The high court's reasoning was not correct," Singhvi argued. Issuing a notice on Gandhi's plea, the bench stayed proceedings pending before a Lucknow magistrate. The matter will come up for resumed hearing after three weeks. The development took place during the resumed hearing of an appeal filed by Gandhi against an Allahabad High Court ruling which had upheld the summons issued by a Lucknow court to Gandhi in connection with the case. The case originated from a complaint filed by lawyer Vivek Tiwari on behalf of Uday Shankar Srivastava, a former director of the Border Roads Organisation with a rank equivalent to an Army Colonel. Tiwari alleged that Gandhi's remarks on December 16, 2022, regarding the December 9, 2022 clash between the Indian and Chinese armies were derogatory and defamatory towards the Indian military forces. A Lucknow magistrate had directed Gandhi to appear on March 24. Aggrieved, Gandhi had petitioned the Allahabad High Court. While dismissing Gandhi's plea against the magistrate's order, the Allahabad High Court had, on June 4, observed that under Section 199(1) of the CrPC, an individual who is not the direct victim of an offence can still be regarded as an "aggrieved person" if the offence has caused them harm or adversely affected them.


The Print
an hour ago
- The Print
HC directs ECI, Centre, J-K govt to file response over ‘delay' in holding bypolls in two seats
Budgam assembly seat fell vacant after Chief Minister Omar Abdullah, who won two seats in the assembly elections held in September 18-October 1, last year, retained the Ganderbal seat and vacated Budgam while taking oath. Justice Sanjay Dhar passed the directions after hearing a writ petition filed by former minister Harsh Dev Singh who alleged by-elections in Budgam and Nagrota have not been held despite a mandate to hold such polls within six months of when the seat went vacant. Jammu, Aug 4 (PTI) The High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh on Monday directed the Election Commission, the central government and the J-K government to file their response within four weeks over alleged delay in holding bypolls in two assembly seats. Senior BJP leader Devender Singh Rana who had won the Nagrota seat died on October 31 last year, necessitating a bypoll from the constituency. Singh, who appeared in person, said the by-elections in the two constituencies have been denied in violation of plethora of rulings of various courts and the provisions of Section 151A of Representation of the People Act (RPA), which mandate holding such elections within a period of six months from the date of occurrence of such vacancies. 'The existing laws required the elections to be held before ending March 2025,' the petitioner said. The next hearing in the case has been listed for September 8. PTI TAS TAS SKY SKY This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.