‘Don't care if I am trolled'—BJP leader stands with Diljit Dosanjh as FWICE demands his ouster
Ever since the film's trailer dropped on 22 June, Dosanjh has faced relentless criticism for acting alongside Hania. The trailer has since been removed from YouTube in India, and both the All Indian Cine Workers Association (AICWA) and the Federation of Western India Cine Employees (FWICE) have spoken out against him, calling for a boycott of the film. FWICE went a step further, writing to Prime Minister Narendra Modi and demanding that Dosanjh's citizenship be revoked.
'.@diljitdosanjh is not just a celebrated artist—he's a national asset and a global ambassador of Indian culture. FWICE's call to revoke his Indian citizenship over an inadvertent and pre-incident film shoot is not only unfair but shockingly disproportionate,' the senior BJP leader wrote on X.
New Delhi: Amid backlash against Diljit Dosanjh's upcoming Punjabi film Sardaar Ji 3 , which features Pakistani actor Hania Aamir, BJP national spokesperson RP Singh has come out in support of the singer-actor. Singh criticised the calls to suspend Dosanjh's Indian citizenship.
.@diljitdosanjh is not just a celebrated artist—he's a national asset and a global ambassador of Indian culture. FWICE's call to revoke his Indian citizenship over an inadvertent and pre-incident film shoot is not only unfair but shockingly disproportionate.
The film featuring a…
— RP Singh National Spokesperson BJP (@rpsinghkhalsa) June 27, 2025
'No individual who publicly aligns with voices that glorify terrorism and insult India's sovereignty should be permitted to carry the credentials of Indian nationality,' FWICE stated.
Singh, however, contends that this is a mere 'publicity stunt' by FWICE.
'Who has given the right to some organisation to ask for his citizenship [to be revoked]? Boycott his film, do not show [it] on any OTT [platform], and if he speaks [anything] anti-India, do criticise him. But the citizenship bit is taking it too far,' Singh told ThePrint.
'Do not care if I am trolled'
Singh's post has attracted strong reactions online, but the BJP leader is unbothered.
'I don't need a certificate of nationalism or patriotism from anyone. The way Dosanjh presents himself, he is a humble soul, and he represents India wherever he goes. As long as he wears a turban, he is Indian, and we must remember that,' Singh said.
In his X post, Singh also questioned whether there would be similar outrage over Indian cricketers playing against Pakistan in Dubai a month before the Pahalgam terror attack, or against TV anchors who host Pakistani panellists on debate shows.
'This is ridiculous. And I do not care if I am trolled. My views are clear,' he added.
Dosanjh recently completed a successful concert tour with Dil-Illuminati and made international headlines with his Met Gala debut in May this year. He paid tribute to his Punjabi roots with an ensemble that nodded to Maharaja Bhupinder Singh, the erstwhile ruler of the princely state of Patiala.
Meanwhile, FWICE remains firm in its stance.
'We do not want a citizen like him. He thinks he is God. Sardaar Ji 1 and 2 didn't do well. In this film, [Hania] Aamir has been cast so that everyone talks about it. Since he doesn't want to replace her, we will make sure he is replaced, not just from Border 2 and other films, but [from] our country too,' FWICE president BN Tiwari told ThePrint.
FWICE's warning to Dosanjh
Dosanjh has yet to issue an official statement addressing the widespread criticism. But in an interview with BBC Asia, he explained the decision to go ahead with the film's release.
'When the film was being made, the situation was OK. After that, there's been a lot of things…that are not in our hands,' said Dosanjh.
Sardaar Ji 3 will not be released in India while it was released overseas, including in Pakistan, on 27 June. Early reports say the film's initial screenings in the neighbouring country have been 'houseful'.
Meanwhile, FWICE has written a letter to Bhushan Kumar of T-Series, which is backing Border 2. The letter called the decision to retain Dosanjh in the cast a 'blatant violation' of its directive to boycott him.
'By choosing to collaborate with an artist who has so brazenly ignored the ongoing tensions and national sentiment, your production has directly undermined the stand taken by the Indian film industry in solidarity with the nation,' read the open letter, dated 24 June.
Border 2 is the sequel to JP Dutta's cult classic war film Border (1997), set during the India-Pakistan war of 1971. Dosanjh plays a key role in the film.
'We have written to the National Defence Academy and [Defence Minister] Rajnath Singh about not giving permission to Border 2 for shooting. Dosanjh is challenging the entire country. It is a matter of national security,' said Tiwari.
FWICE has not yet received a response from either the government or the makers of Border 2.
The film workers' union also issued a letter to Dosanjh on 26 June. 'As an Indian, your first responsibility is towards your country. You have failed in that regard, and your professional choices have made it abundantly clear that the nation's interest is not your priority,' the letter states.
It goes on to inform Dosanjh of the punitive measures being initiated. 'FWICE hereby issues a Non-Cooperation Directive against you with immediate effect. All associations affiliated with FWICE and their members are instructed not to cooperate with you on any current or future projects until such time as you publicly disassociate from the said collaboration and issue an unconditional apology to the Indian film fraternity and the citizens of India,' it further warns.
(Edited by Prashant)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
19 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trade war: 'Not planning to extend tariff pause after July 9', says Donald Trump; India's trade team extends US stay
US President has said he does not plan to extend the 90-day pause on additional global tariffs beyond July 9, even as India's trade delegation extended its stay in Washington in a final push to iron out differences before the deadline. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The in-person negotiations between Indian and US officials, initially scheduled to run through June 27, were extended by a day, raising hopes of an interim trade agreement, Bloomberg reported, quoting officials. India is seeking full exemption from the additional 26 per cent reciprocal tariff announced by the US on April 2. While the tariff was suspended for 90 days, the 10 per cent baseline tariff imposed by Washington remains in place. Meanwhile Trump, in an interview with Fox News said he does not plan to extend the pause. "I don't think I'll need to," he said. "I could, no big deal." Letters notifying countries of the upcoming tariffs will begin going out "pretty soon," he said. "We'll look at how a country treats us — are they good, are they not so good — some countries we don't care, we'll just send a high number out," Trump told Fox News. Those letters, he said, would state: "Congratulations, we're allowing you to shop in the United States of America, you're going to pay a 25 per cent tariff, or a 35 per cent or a 50 per cent or 10 per cent." The high tariffs, first announced on April 2, are set to be enforced unless individual countries reach trade agreements with the US. "There's 200 countries, you can't talk to all of them," Trump said. The Trump administration had set a goal of reaching 90 trade deals in 90 days Meanwhile, the Indian side continues to resist key US demands, including Washington's push to open India's agricultural market to genetically modified crops — an ask New Delhi has rejected, citing risks to farmers. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now India is also unwilling to sign a deal that doesn't address both sectoral access and reciprocal tariffs on its exports, Bloomberg earlier reported. Despite the challenges, Trump said last week that "a very big" deal with India was likely soon. Why deal matters For India, the goal is to protect sensitive sectors while gaining entry into the US market, the largest for global consumers. For the United States, the focus is on narrowing trade deficits, increasing its exports, and strengthening ties with a strategic partner as trade frictions with China continue. What are USA's demands The United States is urging India to open up sectors such as agriculture, dairy, and energy, and to reduce tariffs on products like soy, wheat, corn, ethanol, and apples, many of which are significant US exports to China. Washington is also seeking market access for genetically modified (GM) crops in India. India, however, is resisting these demands, particularly in agriculture and dairy, citing the importance of safeguarding farmers and maintaining the Minimum Support Price (MSP) mechanism. Negotiations have at times been marked by tension, as TOI reported earlier. What India wants At the beginning of the negotiations, the Indian government aimed to secure zero-duty access for several key export items, including textiles, leather products, pharmaceuticals, certain engineering goods, and auto parts. As TOI reported earlier that while American negotiators have shown interest in concluding the deal, they have conveyed to their Indian counterparts that the Trump administration is not in a position to offer zero tariffs immediately. Separately, India has also sought protection from any future tariff measures once an agreement is reached. Moreover, agriculture and dairy sectors are difficult and challenging areas for India to give duty concessions to the US. India has not opened up dairy in any of its free trade pacts signed so far.
Time of India
20 minutes ago
- Time of India
Meet Panchayat's highest-paid actor, who left IIT & MNC job for acting, has net worth of Rs 70000000
Jitendra Kumar's net worth: India's most loved web series, Panchayat, has returned with Season 4, bringing back the heartwarming tales of Phulera village. Known for its simplicity, emotional depth and humorous storytelling, the show has become a fan favourite. One name that has stood out across all seasons is Jitendra Kumar, who plays the beloved character of Sachiv Ji. From humble beginnings to becoming one of the highest-paid actors of Panchayat, his journey is nothing short of inspiring. Panchayat Season 4: What Makes This Season Special? The fourth season of Panchayat digs deeper into emotions like loneliness, friendship, and the political tensions of rural India. It blends subtle humour with powerful storytelling, keeping viewers hooked. Fans have praised Jitendra Kumar's performance once again, making him a standout star in the show's success. Who Is Jitendra Kumar? Early Life, Education and Career View this post on Instagram Jitendra Kumar was born in a small village in Rajasthan. Since childhood, he had a natural love for acting, often imitating stars like Shah Rukh Khan and Amitabh Bachchan. But like many Indian kids, he was pushed towards a 'secure' career. He moved to Kota to prepare for engineering entrance exams and eventually cracked the prestigious IIT JEE. He studied Civil Engineering at IIT Kharagpur, one of India's top institutions. Later, the Shubh Mangal Zyada Saavdhan actor joined the 'Hindi Technology Dramatic Society' at the same university, where he followed his passion for acting with theatre and stage performances. After graduation, he took up a job at a multinational company. However, he soon realised that the 9-to-5 corporate life was not for him. The Turning Point: From IIT to TVF to Panchayat During his time at IIT, Panchayat's Sachiv ji was active in drama and theatre. His interest in acting grew stronger when he met Biswapati Sarkar, a key member of The Viral Fever (TVF). With support and encouragement, he took a leap of faith and quit his MNC job to follow his passion for acting. He started his acting journey with TVF shows like: Kota Factory Permanent Roommates Pitchers Bachelors Humorously Yours F.A.T.H.E.R.S. Jitendra also appeared in several films, including Shubh Mangal Zyada Saavdhan, Jaadugar, Gone Kesh, Chaman Bahaar, Dry Day, and Lantrani. Jitendra Kumar's Income and Net Worth from Panchayat View this post on Instagram Jitendra Kumar is now counted among the Panchayat's highest-paid actors. As per Business Standard, he earned Rs 70,000 per episode in Panchayat Season 3, totalling Rs 5.6 lakh for the season. With Season 4, his income has likely increased even further. On the other hand, other stars of Panchayat, Neena Gupta, who played the role of Manju Devi, reportedly paid Rs 50,000 per episode. Raghubir Yadav, who played Brij Bhushan Dubey, popularly known as Pradhan Ji in the series, charges Rs 40,000 per episode. Chandan Roy plays Vikas, and Faisal Malik, who plays Prahlad Chacha, reportedly paid Rs 20,000 per episode, as reported in TOI. According to ABP Live and Zee News, Jitendra Kumar's net worth is approximately Rs 7 crore, which he has earned through web series, films, brand deals, and more. A Look at Jitendra Kumar's Luxury Car Collection Success has brought Jitendra not just fame but also luxury. According to TOI, he has a stunning car collection, including: Mercedes-Benz GLS 350D – Rs 88.18 lakh – Rs 88.18 lakh Mercedes-Benz E-Class – Rs 82.10 lakh – Rs 82.10 lakh Toyota Fortuner – Rs 48.43 lakh – Rs 48.43 lakh Mini Countryman – Rs 42 lakh These expensive cars show how far he has come since leaving his engineering career behind. From IITian to Panchayat Star View this post on Instagram Jitendra Kumar's journey from an IIT graduate to Panchayat's leading star proves that following your passion can lead to great success. He has become a household name thanks to his talent, hard work, and grounded personality. With Panchayat Season 4 winning hearts across the country, fans eagerly await what's next for this rising star.
Mint
20 minutes ago
- Mint
Indian Embassy clarifies Navy officer's remark on IAF ‘losses' during Operation Sindoor: ‘Misrepresented'
The Indian Embassy in Indonesia issued a clarification on Sunday, addressing reports concerning comments made by its Defence Attaché, Navy Captain Shiv Kumar, regarding Indian Air Force losses during Operation Sindoor. The embassy stated that the captain's remarks had been taken out of context and misrepresented by the media. In a statement posted on X, the embassy emphasised that the presentation delivered by Captain Kumar at a recent seminar was misunderstood. 'We have seen media reports regarding a presentation made by the Defence Attaché at a seminar. His remarks have been quoted out of context and the media reports are a misrepresentation of the intention and thrust of the presentation made by the speaker,' the embassy said. The statement further clarified that the presentation highlighted the principle that the Indian Armed Forces operate under civilian political leadership, unlike some other countries in the region. It also explained that the objective of Operation Sindoor was to target terrorist infrastructure, and that India's response was deliberately non-escalatory. During a presentation on 10 June, India's Defence Attaché to Indonesia, Captain Shiv Kumar of the Indian Navy, disclosed that the Indian Air Force (IAF) lost 'some aircraft' during Operation Sindoor, the May 7 strikes targeting terror sites in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK). He claimed that these losses occurred because the political leadership had instructed the armed forces not to target Pakistani military infrastructure or air defences in the initial strike. 'Only because of the constraint given by the political leadership to not attack the military establishment or their air defences,' Captain Kumar said, clarifying why the IAF suffered fighter jet losses. He further stated that following these losses, the Indian armed forces adjusted their tactics. 'We went for the military installations... we first achieved suppression of enemy air defences and then... all our attacks could easily go through using BrahMos missiles,' he added. The Defence Attaché's candid remarks sparked criticism from the opposition Congress party, which accused the BJP-led government of misleading the nation. Congress leader Jairam Ramesh questioned, 'Why is the PM refusing to preside over an all-party meeting and take the Opposition into confidence? Why has the demand for a special session of Parliament been rejected?' Senior Congress leader Pawan Khera also took to X, calling the defence attaché's comments a 'direct indictment.' He asserted, 'They know they've compromised national security, and they're terrified of what the Congress Party will expose before the people of India.' Captain Kumar's statements came during a seminar titled 'Analysis of the Pakistan-India Air Battle and Indonesia's Anticipatory Strategies from the Perspective of Air Power'.
