‘If anyone has a problem, they need to learn to deal with it': Uddhav Thackeray on alliance with Raj
'If someone has a problem with the two of us brothers coming together, they should deal with their discomfort. Together, we will work for Maharashtra's betterment and take the right decisions at the right time,' Uddhav Thackeray said in the second part of his interview with his party's newspaper, Saamana.
On July 5, 2025, Uddhav shared the stage with his cousin Raj for the first time in 20 years. They held a victory rally in Mumbai over the Maharashtra government's U-turn on introducing Hindi as a third language in primary schools.
When asked directly about discussions with Raj regarding a political alliance, Uddhav said,'Yes, we have spoken. The very fact that we have come together after 20 years is significant. Sometimes, unity in appearance says more than a thousand words.'
He, however, added, 'Not everything needs to be turned into a political arrangement. But for the sake of the Marathi language, identity, and pride, I am ready to do whatever it takes.'
On the Hindi-Marathi language issue, Thackeray stated that while he is not opposed to Hindi, he would stand up against any injustice perpetrated against the Marathi language.
'The Marathi community has a distinct character. We are not aggressive, not rebellious, and we don't commit injustice against others. But we don't tolerate injustice either. Patience has its limits. The Marathi community has risen again, just like during the Samyukta Maharashtra movement,' he said.
Dismissing claims that the Shiv Sena is anti-Hindi, Thackeray said, 'We are not against the Hindi language. My grandfather always encouraged learning multiple languages but never by force. I have spoken in Hindi in front of my uncle, and Sanjay Raut speaks Hindi in Parliament. The issue is not Hindi , the issue is its imposition.'
On the broader narrative of a Maharashtra vs. other states conflict, Thackeray was quick to blame the BJP for stirring tensions.
'There is no Maharashtra versus other states conflict, but the BJP is trying to create one. We don't hate any language. We are Marathi in Maharashtra, and when we think of the nation, we are Hindus and united.'
He also stated that his reconciliation with his once estranged cousin had an impact on the state's polity.
'After 20 years, we came together on the Marathi issue. This was welcomed not just by Marathi people, but also by non-Marathis and even Muslims. Some may not like it; that is their issue. But because of this protest, the Central government had to withdraw its Hindi language enforcement plan,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
28 minutes ago
- Indian Express
19 years after Mumbai train attack, there is no closure — only unanswered questions
Nineteen years ago, sophisticated bombs ripped through seven local trains in Mumbai within 11 minutes. They killed 189 people, and injured 816. In less than three months, the Anti-Terrorism Squad of Maharashtra Police arrested 13 individuals, named another 15 in hiding as accused, and claimed to have cracked the case. Stringent anti-terror laws, from the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act to the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, were invoked, and the investigators claimed the accused had confessed to their crimes. They were subsequently tried and awarded sentences of life imprisonment and the death penalty in 2015. On Monday, the Bombay High Court acquitted 12 men, highlighting critical procedural lapses in the investigation. The 617-page verdict raises important questions about how an investigation in a case that shook the nation is riddled with worrying loose ends and gaps. Justice Anil S Kilor begins with a disquieting assessment of the case: 'Punishing the actual perpetrator of a crime is a concrete and essential step toward curbing criminal activities, upholding the rule of law, and ensuring the safety and security of citizens. But creating a false appearance of having solved a case by presenting that the accused have been brought to justice gives a misleading sense of resolution. This deceptive closure undermines public trust and falsely reassures society, while in reality, the true threat remains at large.' The High Court ruling points to a series of serious lapses in the investigation, from picking and choosing eyewitnesses, reliance on maps allegedly recovered from the accused, and how confessional statements were obtained. The court notes the serious allegations and medical evidence of custodial torture of the accused. The ruling shows that even the basic element of the case — the nature of the bombs used — was not established with cogent evidence by the prosecution. The state did not have adequate reasons or material evidence, the court held, to grant sanction to prosecute the accused under MCOCA. This is a crucial step in the process when stringent anti-terror laws are invoked. These are laws enacted with the stated goal of combating terror threats that give the state wide powers. They reverse the burden of proof, allow prolonged detention and powers of invasive surveillance, and relax evidentiary standards. It is worrying that Maharashtra Police could not establish the case even to this standard. 'The prosecution has utterly failed to establish the offence beyond a reasonable doubt against the accused on each count, it is unsafe to reach the satisfaction that the Appellants/Accused have committed the offences for which they have been convicted and sentenced,' the court said. Strict anti-terror laws provide a legal framework for the state. But rigorous and fair investigations are crucial for their effectiveness and legitimacy. It is true that there is immense pressure on the state when a gruesome attack, such as this one, is perpetrated on the people. But that makes it even more important that it holds itself to high standards of investigation. Botched investigations and trials that span decades do an added injustice to the victims. The state has a right to appeal the verdict before the Supreme Court, where the final word lies. For now, 19 years later, there is no closure for families of the victims.
Indian Express
28 minutes ago
- Indian Express
July 22, 1985, Forty Years Ago: Plane Broke Apart
An analysis of the recordings of communications between the Air India jumbo and the air traffic control tower at Shannon airport in Ireland has indicated that the aircraft broke apart before crashing into the Atlantic. Paul Turner, an American expert investigating the crash, is quoted in a newspaper as saying that the tapes recorded at Shannon airport showed the plane's transmitter sent out radio impulses intermittently for five or six seconds after the digital flight data recorder and the cockpit voice recorder had stopped. That would indicate that the power supply to the recorders had been cut off suddenly. Police Firing Eleven persons were killed in Ahmedabad — nine of them in police firing in the Dariapur area — as violence continued to rock communally sensitive localities of the walled city for the fifth successive day. After a relatively peaceful night, trouble erupted when bombs were hurled and shots fired at a passing police vehicle. The police returned fire and nine persons were killed in the incident ,while four were admitted to hospitals with bullet injuries. Flash Floods Toll The death toll in flash floods and unprecedented rains in Punjab and Himachal Pradesh rose to 55 while major rivers in Bihar, fed by overnight heavy rains, are likely to worsen the flood situation in the state. In Uttar Pradesh, all major rivers were rising at different places but were still under the danger mark. BJP Bats For Bomb The Bharatiya Janata Party wants the government to develop 'our own'' nuclear bomb because it feels that the threat of a Pakistan N-bomb is 'real'. The party said the country could no longer afford to adopt a policy of drift and escapism in this 'serious matter'.
Hans India
28 minutes ago
- Hans India
Indisciplined in party will face stick, warns TG BJP president
Hyderabad: BJP Telangana chief N Ramchander Rao stated that if anyone in the party is indisciplined, disciplinary action will be taken and emphasized that there is no distinction between old and new members, claiming that such differences are narratives created by some individuals. Addressing the media in the national capital on Monday, he affirmed that any leader who harms the party or violates discipline will face consequences. As state president, he aims to resolve any minor issues that arise within the party. He also mentioned that if there are problems concerning leaders and workers, the national leadership will address them. In his first visit to Delhi after assuming office as BJP Telangana State President, he addressed the media, expressing his desire to seek blessings and guidance from the party's central leadership to strengthen the party in the state. During his visit, he met with Sunil Bansal, Arvind Menon, and Nitin Gadkari. He noted that he would meet BJP National President JP Nadda and Union Home & Cooperation Minister Amit Shah in Parliament the following day. Rao criticized Congress party leaders for misleading the people of the country and Telangana, pointing out that while significant issues were being discussed in Parliament, the main opposition leader was absent, making their criticisms of the BJP seem unreasonable. He highlighted that Chief Minister Revanth Reddy had visited Delhi 46 times in the last 19 months. Yet key Congress leaders, including Rahul Gandhi, did not grant him an appointment; on the other hand, Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Union Ministers did. He said that preventing Rahul Gandhi from meeting with Telangana Chief Minister, Revanth Reddy, is an insult to the people of Telangana. Rao also criticized the Congress government for blaming the central government regarding the 42% reservation for backward classes (BCs). A bill was introduced in the Assembly to provide 42% reservation in local body elections, which the BJP fully supported. However, Rao expressed concern about a conspiracy to implement 10% reservation for Muslim minorities even before the ordinance is finalized, stating that the BJP opposes religious and political reservations. Congress leaders have proposed that to grant 42% reservation to Backward Classes (BCs), it should be included in the 9th Schedule of the Constitution. Rao questioned whether legal advice had been obtained during the Cabinet discussions, emphasizing that granting a 42% reservation would exceed the 50% cap imposed by the Supreme Court. He stated that for the increase in BC reservation percentages, amending Section 285 of the Panchayati Raj Act is necessary. Despite this, Rao pointed out that the Congress government is now considering bringing an ordinance on BC reservations without a clear understanding of the 9th Schedule process. He reminded that in 1973, the Supreme Court clarified in the Kesavananda Bharati case that even if a law is included in the 9th Schedule, it is still subject to judicial review. He cited the ongoing pending case regarding the reservation law, included in the 9th Schedule in Tamil Nadu by Jayalalithaa, emphasizing that the final decision has yet to be made. Rao accused the Congress government of misleading the people regarding the 42% BC reservation and asserted that Congress should apologize for deceiving the BC community. He criticized Congress leaders for being aware of the Supreme Court verdict and the need to amend Section 285 but still not engaging in substantive discussions. He advised that the Congress party, instead of blaming the central government, focus on implementing the promised 42% reservation. The BJP, he reiterated, remains against religious reservations.
