
Could we recycle more rubbish in North West of England?
"The mess that the gulls drop on your vehicles, on your home, onto your driveway, your garden furniture, your washing. "Depending on the wind direction, the smell can vary from mild to absolutely disgusting."Whinney Hill landfill site is run by Suez. It said the firm was regulated by the Environment Agency and also explained that Lancashire has one of the largest seagull colonies in Europe. After the coronavirus pandemic, the gulls came inland to find food. "As the birds are a protected species, we are able to take non-lethal preventative measures to ensure the seagulls do not feed from the site, such as the use of gas canons, blank firing pistols, pyrotechnics, lasers and birds of prey," a spokesman says.
Suez also says it regularly meets the local community to discuss concerns and it manages the smell by covering the waste and has landfill gas controls. However, Mr Hough says residents want it closing down. "Why should we suffer in a residential community from 15 boroughs worth of household waste?"Dr Edward Randviir, senior lecturer in chemistry at Manchester Metropolitan University says: "There is a lot of environmental impacts of landfills."It creates biomethane which gets emitted to the atmosphere. "Sometimes this is captured by the companies. Some waste gets out and gets blown around. "Even though they are encased within these cells, you do get some pollution which leaches out, even though there are mechanisms to try and stop that from happening."
Landfill is seen as the worst option for our black bin waste. We have been burying our rubbish for decades and despite attempts to reduce it, about 8% still goes to landfill. In the North West of England, we send 290 tonnes of household waste to landfill every year. There are 50 landfill sites in the region and 21 are already at capacity. In a bid to reduce how much we send to landfill, councils have been hit with higher charges.
The main alternative is to burn it. We send about 43% of our region's waste to incinerators like the EFW Facility in Runcorn, which is run by Virador. It burns 3.5 million tonnes of rubbish every year, rubbish which can't be recycled.The process creates electricity, but here too some residents are unhappy. The incinerator blocks Ralph Owen's view of the Mersey Estuary."The noise from the plant is incessant," he says."It's a dull, droning noise. I don't open my bedroom windows at night. "The noise is too disturbing…to have actually moved what is a dirty industry so close, beggars belief." He is also worried about the local air quality.
Operators have an obligation to capture any toxic gases. Virador says its operation is preventing millions of tonnes of waste going to landfill and it takes its environmental responsibility seriously. It says it has "state-of-the-art processing and filtration systems that ensure emissions comply with environmental permits and wider regulation".The site here is set to expand to build a carbon capture plant. Mr Owen says that means more industry on his doorstep.So what about levels of recycling? And why aren't they more impressive?We recycle just 45% of household waste in the region. In Greater Manchester about a million tonnes of cans and plastic bottles a year end up at the combined authority's recycling centre in Sharston. Levels of recycling in the region are above the national average though.For example, Stockport recycles about 60% of its household waste.Nationally, levels of recycling are stagnating. Alison Fare, from Recycling Greater Manchester, says: "I think we've hit a point nationally where most places are recycling as much as they can." She says once they have a new materials recovery facility, they will be able to recycle plastic bags, films and wrappings. But the levels are also affected by contaminated loads.
'Collective responsibility'
Daniel Carolan, from Suez, which runs the centre, says: "It's a real shame if the teams have been out for two or three hours and the bin wagon is full. "They might have collected 400 or 500 bins that day, but if 10 of them have the wrong things inside, it affects the whole load."While he thinks people could recycle more he believes the answer is a much bigger issues."We can't recycle ourselves out of trouble," he says. "We need to re- educate ourselves, and ask does this need to be thrown away, or could it be reused or repaired?"And that solution is echoed by many. Dr Randviir says: "We have to have a collective responsibility for waste. "Not least because it is a wicked problem. "It is not just the collectors who have a responsibility, it is us as consumers, it is us as disposers of waste. "We all have a collective responsibility in my view."
Read more stories from Cheshire, Lancashire, Greater Manchester and Merseyside on the BBC, watch BBC North West Tonight on BBC iPlayer and follow BBC North West on X.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Sun
10 hours ago
- The Sun
Royal Mail deliveries AXED in seaside village after terrified posties are forced to take drastic action
POSTIES are dodging deliveries in a street where aggressive seagulls keep dive-bombing them. There have been so many attacks that villagers have been asked to collect their letters from the depot or get them delivered elsewhere. 2 2 The birds are said to have been nesting in Wright Close in Caister, Norfolk, for a decade. But experts say they are particularly aggressive at this time of year as they are protecting their chicks. It has led Royal Mail to tell staff not to feel under pressure to make deliveries in the street. Villager Marion Gibbs, 75, said: 'I was out walking and a gull hit me on the head.' Chairman of Caister Parish Council Kevin Wood said: 'I get dive-bombed when I'm walking my dogs. I put an umbrella up. People sometimes put spikes on their roofs, but that doesn't work. 'It happens all over Caister. There's nothing we can do.' A Royal Mail spokesman said: 'The activities of seagulls in the area is, at times, making it difficult for our postmen and women to safely deliver to some addresses. 'We are still attempting deliveries. Customers can nominate a different delivery address or collect their mail from the delivery office.'


BBC News
a day ago
- BBC News
Could we recycle more rubbish in North West of England?
It is a warm afternoon and the sky above the Whinney Hill landfill site near Accrington is full of seagulls. Hundreds of them fly across the site, some landing to forage amongst the bags of rubbish. The air smells rancid. The site has been operating since the 1970s and takes household waste from across East Lancashire, but it has grown and it is now expanding towards residential areas."It's best described as being horrific," says local resident Gary Hough when I ask him what it is like to live near the site. "The mess that the gulls drop on your vehicles, on your home, onto your driveway, your garden furniture, your washing. "Depending on the wind direction, the smell can vary from mild to absolutely disgusting."Whinney Hill landfill site is run by Suez. It said the firm was regulated by the Environment Agency and also explained that Lancashire has one of the largest seagull colonies in Europe. After the coronavirus pandemic, the gulls came inland to find food. "As the birds are a protected species, we are able to take non-lethal preventative measures to ensure the seagulls do not feed from the site, such as the use of gas canons, blank firing pistols, pyrotechnics, lasers and birds of prey," a spokesman says. Suez also says it regularly meets the local community to discuss concerns and it manages the smell by covering the waste and has landfill gas controls. However, Mr Hough says residents want it closing down. "Why should we suffer in a residential community from 15 boroughs worth of household waste?"Dr Edward Randviir, senior lecturer in chemistry at Manchester Metropolitan University says: "There is a lot of environmental impacts of landfills."It creates biomethane which gets emitted to the atmosphere. "Sometimes this is captured by the companies. Some waste gets out and gets blown around. "Even though they are encased within these cells, you do get some pollution which leaches out, even though there are mechanisms to try and stop that from happening." Landfill is seen as the worst option for our black bin waste. We have been burying our rubbish for decades and despite attempts to reduce it, about 8% still goes to landfill. In the North West of England, we send 290 tonnes of household waste to landfill every year. There are 50 landfill sites in the region and 21 are already at capacity. In a bid to reduce how much we send to landfill, councils have been hit with higher charges. The main alternative is to burn it. We send about 43% of our region's waste to incinerators like the EFW Facility in Runcorn, which is run by Virador. It burns 3.5 million tonnes of rubbish every year, rubbish which can't be process creates electricity, but here too some residents are unhappy. The incinerator blocks Ralph Owen's view of the Mersey Estuary."The noise from the plant is incessant," he says."It's a dull, droning noise. I don't open my bedroom windows at night. "The noise is too disturbing…to have actually moved what is a dirty industry so close, beggars belief." He is also worried about the local air quality. Operators have an obligation to capture any toxic gases. Virador says its operation is preventing millions of tonnes of waste going to landfill and it takes its environmental responsibility seriously. It says it has "state-of-the-art processing and filtration systems that ensure emissions comply with environmental permits and wider regulation".The site here is set to expand to build a carbon capture plant. Mr Owen says that means more industry on his what about levels of recycling? And why aren't they more impressive?We recycle just 45% of household waste in the region. In Greater Manchester about a million tonnes of cans and plastic bottles a year end up at the combined authority's recycling centre in Sharston. Levels of recycling in the region are above the national average example, Stockport recycles about 60% of its household levels of recycling are stagnating. Alison Fare, from Recycling Greater Manchester, says: "I think we've hit a point nationally where most places are recycling as much as they can." She says once they have a new materials recovery facility, they will be able to recycle plastic bags, films and wrappings. But the levels are also affected by contaminated loads. 'Collective responsibility' Daniel Carolan, from Suez, which runs the centre, says: "It's a real shame if the teams have been out for two or three hours and the bin wagon is full. "They might have collected 400 or 500 bins that day, but if 10 of them have the wrong things inside, it affects the whole load."While he thinks people could recycle more he believes the answer is a much bigger issues."We can't recycle ourselves out of trouble," he says. "We need to re- educate ourselves, and ask does this need to be thrown away, or could it be reused or repaired?"And that solution is echoed by many. Dr Randviir says: "We have to have a collective responsibility for waste. "Not least because it is a wicked problem. "It is not just the collectors who have a responsibility, it is us as consumers, it is us as disposers of waste. "We all have a collective responsibility in my view." Read more stories from Cheshire, Lancashire, Greater Manchester and Merseyside on the BBC, watch BBC North West Tonight on BBC iPlayer and follow BBC North West on X.


The Sun
a day ago
- The Sun
Locals who live near overgrown & derelict theme park inspired by King Arthur say it's better than the council's new plan
A DERELICT theme park inspired by Arthurian legend is set to be demolished - but locals aren't happy. Residents living near Camelot theme park in Chorley have expressed their frustration with the proposed plans. 8 8 8 8 Having closed down over a decade ago, the derelict site has become overgrown and littered with graffiti. It has turned the once-popular theme park into a hot spot for urban explorers and rebellious locals. Despite the 140-acre land laying unused since 2012, locals have protested against new planning proposals that could see the site repurposed. The plan centres on an £80 development that would see 350 homes built on the site. Plans were put forward by Developers Story Homes to Chorley Borough Council on June 20. However, similar plans have twice been rejected - once in 2014, and again in 2017 - since the developers bought the site in 2009. In planning documents they claim it is "well positioned" to support wider regional growth and a "prime location" for a residential development like this. They plan to keep half of the new homes as "affordable" housing after the estimated seven-year project. The developers also hope it will lead to more wide-ranging benefits for the area, bringing in jobs and higher household expenditure. Despite the optimistic proposals, residents in nearby Heskin have argued against the project, with 25 objections to the proposals and just one supporting. They are primarily concerned about the destruction of wildlife on greenbelt land. Others were worried about increased noise and traffic, with the village's population of 1,000 people having "insufficient infrastructure" to cope with new residents. One resident commenting on the proposals said: "There are not enough amenities to cope. How will the schools, GPs, roads cope? They added: "Please leave our greenery and woodland and nature alone." Other residents expressed similar concerns, with one writing: "The development lacks clear provision for new schools, healthcare or transport links - failing to meet the needs of the existing population, let alone new residents." Another resident raised concerns about existing drainage problems in the area. While the report does consider flood risks to the site, they feel it has not adequately considered risk to the existing properties. They wrote: "We have issues with drainage already and with the aforementioned sites we have no idea how this is going to impact the communities with flooding and future issues." Residents generally would rather the site be used to enhance the existing community, for example with a leisure centre, or dedicated woodland trails. Out of the 27 comments on the planning proposal, only one local expressed support for the development. They wrote: "There are some who say there isn't the infrastructure to make this development viable. I would say, there are numerous engineers whose job it is to ensure that there will be enough electricity/drainage etc to ensure the development will be ok. "As long as the development is sympathetic to the local nature, I think it is an ideal use of a brown field site." The planning application does contain reference to a 186.9 square metre community hub "with associated habitat creation, landscaping, open space, parking, footpaths / cycleways, drainage and other infrastructure." 8 8 8 8