Hertz faces boycott over AI scanners that can slap $400 fines in minutes
By
Published: |
Hertz is facing a wave of online backlash. Critics are taking aim at the rental company after multiple customers say they were billed hundreds of dollars for minor damage flagged by new AI inspection scanning systems.
On Reddit and Facebook, car renters are now calling for a boycott, accusing the rental giant of using AI to detect trivial damage and charge steep fees — all while making it difficult to speak with a live agent. 'I'm just not comfortable with the new technology that can flag dirt or something that can be rubbed off as damage,' A customer posted on Reddit. Another Reddit user wrote: 'The flagging is half of the problem. The other problem is Hertz using AI to file the claim. What about traditional smaller-than-the-size-of-a-golf-ball dents or bill-size scratches? I can't even speak to a live agent.'
This week, the company confirmed to DailyMail.com it had charged a driver $440 for a one-inch scratch on a wheel. The scuff, commonly caused when a driver brushes a curb while parallel parking, was flagged by the scanner. The bill included $250 for the damage, $125 for processing, and a $65 administrative fee. Another driver claimed they got a $195 fee for a tiny dent when returning a Toyota Corolla. Each driver's experience is part of a larger tech rollout at Hertz, which recently partnered with UVeye , a startup that builds high-speed automated vehicle inspection systems.
Renters drive their cars through the scanners twice: once when they pick up the vehicle, and again when it's returned. Drivers will receive a copy of previously-scanned damage, the company confirmed to DailyMail.com. Hertz wants to use the scanners at 100 rental locations by the end of the year. In April, the rental firm told DailyMail.com that it was rolling out the tech to enhance vehicle safety, not charge customers for minor cosmetic damage .
The company said its policy hasn't changed, despite the $440 and $195 charges. It says most drivers who have used the UVeye scanners haven't received a charge. 'Over 97 percent of cars scanned with this technology have not detected any billable damage, proving a vast majority of rentals are incident-free,' a spokesperson for the company said. 'Vehicle damage has long been a common pain point across the car rental industry for customers and companies alike.
'At Hertz, we're using this technology to address this friction head-on and our goal is to always improve the customer experience while ensuring customers are not charged for damages they did not cause and by bringing greater transparency, precision, and speed to the process when they do.' In April, the company also told DailyMail.com that the systems will ensure their customers always receive safe cars. UVeye's scanners can more accurately assess underbody damage and tire tread degradation than human inspectors.
But independent analysts worry the tech solution isn't inspiring a ton of human trust. 'A line is crossed when AI applications become overly aggressive and prioritize efficiency over customer fairness and satisfaction,' David Linthicum, an AI analyst, previously told DailyMail.com. 'Customers value fairness and human interaction.' Hertz declined to comment on this article. Instead, the company pointed to its loss damage waiver, which typically costs between $20 and $30 per rental day, as a way to avoid surprising fees.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
JAMnews
an hour ago
- JAMnews
UK warns: businesses in Georgia and Armenia aiding Russia's sanctions evasion will be sanctioned
UK to Georgia and Armenia regarding Russia sanctions The UK government has published special guidance for non-British businesses operating in Georgia, Armenia, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, and Kyrgyzstan. The document aims to help local entrepreneurs understand the UK's sanctions against Russia and how violations could affect their business operations, including outside the UK. The document, available on the UK government's official website, outlines practical steps and provides concrete examples of what constitutes assistance in evading sanctions. It clearly states: anyone helping Russia circumvent sanctions will themselves be subject to sanctions. The British Embassy in Georgia published a post on its Facebook page, stating: 'The UK has published new sanctions guidance to support businesses in Georgia. The guidance aims sets out Georgian and UK laws relevant to sanctions and identifies practical steps for businesses to manage sanctions risks and promote compliance.' Summary of the UK's new guidance on sanctions compliance regarding Russia The document outlines several tactics used by Russia to circumvent sanctions, including: Indirect delivery routes Falsification of end-user destinations Professional evasion networks According to the guidance, this may involve the following scenario: A company operating in Georgia receives an order from a Russian importer for goods that fall under UK sanctions and therefore cannot be delivered directly from the UK. The local company then orders the goods from a UK supplier without informing the supplier—or other relevant parties such as banks, insurers, or freight companies—that the final consumer is in Russia. The UK supplier exports the goods to the local company, which subsequently re-exports them to Russia. The guidance also outlines the risks that may affect local businesses. While only UK nationals are legally required to comply with UK sanctions, non-UK nationals who help circumvent them face certain risks, including: The UK may impose sanctions directly on you as an individual or on entities you own or control if you are involved in activities that support Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Even if you are not a UK national, being sanctioned by the UK can have serious consequences for your business and financial operations. UK sanctions apply to UK citizens and entities worldwide. Every UK bank—and many international banks—may freeze your assets and deny you any services. If UK companies are part of your insurance or shipping/freight supply chain, they will also refuse to work with you if you or any related party or goods are under sanctions. According to the guidance, as a result of the above, many UK companies will refuse to do business with such individuals or entities unless they can prove they have taken effective steps to prevent any goods or services from being forwarded to Russia or to Russia-linked parties. News in Georgia News in Armenia
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Fired federal workers lobby for help on Capitol Hill – is anyone listening?
The Tuesday Group was feeling something familiar as its members milled around a bank of elevators in the bustling basement of a Senate office building: rejection. They had often been told no over the past months – when the government moved to fire them with Donald Trump's blessing, when judges rejected challenges to that decision and when the lawmakers who they have taken to tracking down on Capitol Hill once a week when Congress is in session would turn a deaf ear to their pleas. More than 59,000 federal workers have lost their jobs since Trump took office, according to government data, but those in power have not changed their tune. This Tuesday morning, it was staffers of Maine's Republican senator Susan Collins who had told them no, even after they staged an impromptu sit-in in her office for the better part of a half hour. So they proceeded five floors down to the basement of the Dirksen Senate Office Building, hoping that some senator – any senator – would give them a moment of their time. Then the elevator doors opened and who should come out but Collins. 'Senator Collins!' someone in the group yelled. Another tried to introduce themselves: 'I'm a fired federal worker.' But the senator began waving her hands in front of her in an unmistakable sign of: I don't have time for this. 'Thank you,' Collins said, as she made her way down the hall. 'It's somewhat typical,' observed Whitt Masters, a former USAID contractor who has been unemployed since the end of March, when the company employing him decided to file for bankruptcy after its client began to shut down. 'You know, I don't expect every senator to stop and speak with us. I wish she'd been a bit more approachable, especially since we had spent some time in her office earlier today.' What's been dubbed the Tuesday Group has come around the Capitol since mid-February, as Trump and Elon Musk's campaign to thin out the federal workforce began to bite. Some who show up have been fired, others are on paid leave while a judge considers whether it is legal to fire them, and those who work for USAID expect to officially lose their jobs next Tuesday, when the agency shuts down. Democrats often welcome them, but when it comes to the Republicans who control Congress – and are weighing legislation to codify some cuts and make deeper ones in the next fiscal year – the reception has been uneven. They've been ignored, blown off and belittled – all things they would experience last Tuesday, their 17th visit to the Hill. Their encounter with Collins fruitless, the group formed something of a gauntlet at the intersection of a hallway leading between office buildings and to the Senate subway, a place where lawmakers were sure to pass on a scorcher of a day. They would call out to any face they recognized, but the group of 10 was nothing a determined senator couldn't handle. Montana Republican Tim Sheehy speed-walked by with a reporter and cameraman in pursuit; Washington Democrat Patty Murray pounded past in sneakers; and Arkansas Republican John Boozman ambled through alone, displaying no sign that he knew the group was even there. 'Would you like to hear how we are impacting your constituents?' asked Stephie Duliepre, who was fired from her Science for Development fellowship program at USAID, when Tennessee Republican Marsha Blackburn came around the corner. The senator pushed on, the answer apparently being no. John Hoeven, a Republican from North Dakota, exited a stairwell that deposited him right in the middle of the group. He appeared to recognize them – on a previous visit, attendees said that Hoeven had discussed his support for folding a major USAID food assistance program into the state department. 'I see you're still working on it,' he quipped, before heading off. The Democrats they encountered uttered words of encouragement, and a few stopped to talk. 'Don't give up,' Dick Durbin of Illinois said when he encountered the group. 'I'm with you,' Tammy Baldwin of Wisconsin called out. South Carolina Republican Lindsey Graham attempted the silent treatment as he came past, but Amelia Hertzberg, who was on administrative leave from her job in the Environmental Protection Agency, was not having it. She followed him down the hall, and started prancing around to get his attention. 'You have a bright future,' Hertzberg recalls the senator saying. 'Well, I was going to have a bright future, and then I was fired,' she replied. The group spotted Josh Hawley, a Missouri Republican and prominent Trump ally. 'Senator Hawley, these are fired federal workers. Do you have a second to talk to them?' asked Melissa Byrne, a community organizer who had put together the group. 'No,' he replied. The group was aghast, but they'd been treated worse. When Mack Schroeder encountered Indiana Republican Jim Banks one Tuesday and introduced himself as having been fired from the Department of Health and Human Services, the senator replied, 'You probably deserved it,' before calling him 'a clown'. That was in April. The incident made the news, Banks refused to apologize, and the Tuesday Group kept showing up. 'I've spoken to the media and been on the radio. I've called my senators, my representatives, and it feels a little bit like shouting into a void,' said Hertzberg, who has made about 12 visits to the Capitol now. 'So it feels good to go into senator's offices and be there and take up space for a while and make them see, or their staff see that there is a person behind all this.'
Auto Blog
an hour ago
- Auto Blog
Is Your State On The List? The Top 10 States Rideshare Users Are Losing Patience
Uber and Lyft are not impressing everyone Ridesharing is becoming increasingly common, and companies like Waymo and Tesla are advancing the service by integrating autonomous technology. However, a new study reveals that some states are far better than others when it comes to this platform's customer support. Blakely Law Firm analyzed online search trends across all 50 U.S. states for over 10 keywords related to 'Uber Customer Support' and 'Lyft Customer Support.' 0:09 / 0:09 The top 10 best value used cars in 2025 Watch More Using data from Google Keyword Planner, the research identified where rideshare users are most actively seeking help, ranking states based on average monthly support-related searches per 100,000 residents. The top ten states where riders are most desperately seeking support, ranked from worst to best, were Georgia, New York, Maryland, Nevada, Illinois, Florida, New Jersey, Connecticut, Massachusetts, and Texas. Uber headquarters, California — Source: Getty New York is having a rough time with ridesharing Regarding the second-worst ranked state, New York, a spokesperson at Blakeley Law Firm said: 'New York is showing a clear sign of growing frustration among rideshare users who are increasingly turning to the internet in search of customer support. Behind each search is a rider facing an unresolved issue—whether it's a billing error, a safety concern, or a lost item. The high concentration of support-related searches in this state suggests deeper systemic concerns with how quickly and effectively these services respond to user needs. To improve the customer experience and restore rider trust, it's essential for rideshare companies operating in New York to invest in more accessible support channels, streamline issue resolution processes, and provide clearer guidance to users facing challenges.' New York City residents also face expensive rideshare service charges, with a one-way run from Manhattan to JFK costing anywhere from $75 to over $100. However, the state's unfavorable placement at the top of this study's rankings could be partially attributed to how companies like Lyft and Uber treat their drivers. Lyft app — Source: Getty Autoblog Newsletter Autoblog brings you car news; expert reviews and exciting pictures and video. Research and compare vehicles, too. Sign up or sign in with Google Facebook Microsoft Apple By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. A Bloomberg investigation last October found that Uber and Lyft routinely locked drivers out of their apps to erase some of the drivers' working time from records, allowing the companies to boost profits and circumvent New York City's minimum pay rule. The city's minimum pay rule for rideshare drivers is based on the ratio of time spent driving versus waiting. Locking workers out of the apps made it appear as if drivers were busier, reducing the minimum amounts Uber and Lyft had to pay. This week, New York City's Taxi and Limousine Commission voted to raise minimum pay standards for Uber and Lyft drivers by 5% and adopt new regulations curbing app lockouts. Final thoughts While states like New York were surveyed as struggling with rideshare service satisfaction among customers, recent changes to New York City laws aiding drivers could boost the platform's quality of service, reducing the likelihood of problems emerging requiring customer support. Still, according to the survey, companies like Uber and Lyft need to improve response times in several states and provide more precise guidance to those seeking assistance. It's also fair to wonder why these resources weren't available when these two companies posted their strongest financial results ever in 2024. Uber and Lyft's reported customer service struggles in states like Georgia also give emerging autonomous rideshare players, such as Waymo, a chance to enter these markets and gain traction with quality rider support. About the Author Cody Carlson View Profile
