
US House Passes Tax Bill, Sending It to Trump
00:00Eventually we got this. The president had said there was going to be no more negotiations. This was going to be done by the July 4th holiday. It is July 3rd in the afternoon, and at least passage of the bill is now complete. What's next? The next thing is the president plans to sign the legislation tomorrow. And you can bet that there's now going to be a giant message war between Democrats and Republicans over whether this is good for America or bad for America. We already had 8 hours and 35 minutes of Hakeem Jeffries speaking about how this was disgusting, just to use one of the phrases. But he essentially railed against this bill the entire time. What are the most contentious aspects of this bill? So the Democratic case is that this is essentially a Robin Hood in reverse religious legislation that it takes from the poor and gives to the rich. And indeed, a lot of the direct benefits from this book go to wealthy people and companies. And a lot of the safety net cuts will wind up hurting relatively low income Americans. The Republican view is, hey, there's $4.5 trillion in tax cuts here to goose the economy, get growth going, and that growth will ultimately we're down to the benefit of Americans. And in fact, we had Treasury Secretary Scott Bessant on Bloomberg TV just a few minutes ago, just before this bill was passed. And he mentioned that when the CBO was scoring the bill, it didn't even take into account any revenue from tariffs that could ultimately be up to $2 trillion, which would also help to offset some of the costs. I'm curious, how did the president win over holdouts? Because there came a time when there were no more negotiations and still the members of the House Freedom Caucus did seem to fall into line. So there were very strong disagreements on parts of this legislation, some from conservatives and some from moderate. But generally most of the Republicans were very much in favor of the tax cuts and the increases in defense spending and immigration enforcement that are the core of the bill. The disagreements were the fiscal conservatives often felt like, hey, this is going to add more than $3 trillion to the deficit. That's a lot of money. We want to see more spending cuts on the moderate side from Republicans. People who are vulnerable to challenges in swing districts were saying, hey, we're going to cut $1,000,000,000,000 from Medicaid. This is going to wind up hurting people and costing us in the election. So you had one camp saying we want to cut more spending and the other camp saying, hey, you're cutting too much. But at the end of the day, they wanted these tax cuts. President Trump has huge sway over the Republican Party. This is the one piece of legislation he wants. He cranked up the pressure and they more or less agree with the main pillars of it. Should we expect executive orders or anything like that? Was anything promised in the background that might appear over the next two weeks, two months? So there were these discussions with the fiscal conservatives in which they received reassurances about executive action. Now, they haven't detailed exactly what those promises are, so we don't know exactly. But for instance, one of them was talking about the president's going to take a very hard line on clean energy permitting and things to make sure that there aren't too many clean energy projects that became eligible for clean energy tax credits before they expire in about a year or so, particularly for wind and solar installations. There were also received assurances. So they say that the Medicaid stuff will be stringently enforced and consequently reduce Medicaid spending as much as possible. But we haven't heard that from the president and we haven't gotten, you know, very clear examples of that. And then, you know, it depends on what he actually does. Well, exactly, Mike. And to that point is this now peak Trump. Will his supporters, the MAGA supporters, see any benefits or any portions of them see any benefit from this bill immediately? And if not, what does it mean for the midterms? Well, there were a lot of the things that appeal to populists were front loaded in the beginning of the bill. So, for instance, elderly Americans will get a bigger standard deduction on their income taxes. Workers who get tips or overtime pay will get it for the next four years. A portion of that pay exempted from taxes for a lot of Americans with families. There'll be an increase in the maximum child tax credit. So there are some tangible things that help. The sort of rank and file Trump voters, and they will come early. The spending cuts will be backloaded more.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
How are Lubbock businesses doing halfway through 2025? Here's what you need to know.
Wondering how Lubbock businesses are doing halfway through 2025? Here's what you need to know. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Rahway looks to enhance downtown safety with new surveillance cameras
RAHWAY – The city is taking a step toward enhancing public safety downtown by installing upgraded closed-circuit TV cameras. The project is part of a commitment by Mayor Raymond A. Giacobbe and the Rahway City Council to provide a safe and secure environment for everyone who lives, works and visits the city, officials said. The Rahway Police Department, under a contract with JCT Solutions, a technology firm specializing in security systems for municipalities and public agencies, is carrying out the project. "By strengthening our safety infrastructure, we're creating peace of mind and a stronger sense of security across our community," Giacobbe stated. The new system replaces the city's aging surveillance equipment with high-resolution cameras and modern safety tools designed to support faster, more effective emergency responses. The cameras are placed to enhance visibility in public spaces, supporting both prevention and protection efforts throughout the downtown district. City officials said the project is being funded through state appropriations funneled through the New Jersey Department of Community Affairs but did not provide the exact cost. More: Veterans Memorial Square in Rahway getting facelift before America's 250th birthday The new cameras also build on the city's existing infrastructure, by improving the quality, reliability, and range of coverage, officials said. Camera placement was guided by public safety goals and coordinated closely with the Rahway Police Department to focus on areas with the greatest need for enhanced oversight. The technology is designed to protect shared spaces – not to monitor individuals. It reflects the city's ongoing commitment to safeguard the community in a responsible, respectful way that prioritizes public trust and transparency, officials said. The installation also includes long-term support and specialized training, ensuring the system will be maintained and operated effectively for years to come. Email: srussell@ Suzanne Russell is a breaking news reporter for covering crime, courts and other mayhem. To get unlimited access, please subscribe or activate your digital account today. This article originally appeared on Rahway NJ installing new surveillance cameras downtown
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Insider shares new details on Steelers, Dolphins blockbuster trade
More details from the Steelers' blockbuster acquisitions of TE Jonnu Smith and Jalen Ramsey have now been revealed. On a recent episode of The Rich Eisen Show, insider Tom Pelissero explained that the Dolphins were almost forced into a player-for-player type trade scenario — as any trade partner would be more willing to take Ramsey's expensive contract if Miami took a high-salary player in return. Advertisement After trade negotiations with the Rams and Chargers fell through, Pelissero pointed to the perfect scenario that presented itself with Pittsburgh's Minkah Fitzpatrick — but it may have come down to the Pro Bowl tight end: "It just so happened that the Dolphins also had a situation with Jonnu Smith — who happens to be Steelers offensive coordinator Arthur Smith's favorite tight end — where he, too, became available," Pelissero said. "The Steelers had a guy in Minkah Fitzpatrick, who's due $15.5 million this season — his ball production in particular over the last couple of years has not been the same. Minkah is still only 28, but maybe not quite the same player he was the first time around in Miami. "[The Steelers] get a more versatile player, albeit one who's being paid more, in Jalen Ramsey. They think they can do a lot of different things with him, and a bonus out of that trade is they get a guy in Jonnu Smith, who's coming off a productive season in Miami." While some have criticized the Steelers for exchanging aging DBs, one has to wonder — after hearing Pelissero's insight — if Pittsburgh would have even entertained trading Fitzpatrick unless Smith came along as well. Advertisement For up-to-date Steelers coverage, follow us on X @TheSteelersWire and give our Facebook page a like. This article originally appeared on Steelers Wire: Steelers pulled off Ramsey, Smith trade with key twist, per insider