Trump questions Juventus on women in men's team; players exchange awkward glances- Watch video
During a White House visit on Wednesday, Juventus football players and staff found themselves in an awkward moment when US president
Donald Trump
turned their ceremonial visit into a political talking point.
The Italian club, currently in Washington, DC, for the Club World Cup, was invited to the Oval Office ahead of their match against Al Ain of the UAE. With players, including US internationals Weston McKennie and Timothy Weah, standing behind him, Trump shifted from general remarks to controversial territory—transgender participation in women's sports.
Turning to the team, Trump asked, 'Could a woman make your team, fellas?' The players stayed quiet, exchanging awkward glances.
He repeated the question, this time directing it at Juventus General Manager Damien Comolli. Trying to steer clear of controversy, Comolli replied, 'We have a very good women's team,' referring to Juventus Women, the reigning Serie A champions.
Trump pressed again: 'But they should be playing with women?' Comolli did not respond. 'See, they're very diplomatic,' Trump quipped.
The incident comes hours after the US Supreme Court allowed Tennessee's ban on gender-affirming care for minors to stand—a ruling seen as a major blow to transgender rights. Trump has made restricting transgender participation in women's sports a key focus of his second-term agenda.
In February, he signed an executive order titled 'Keeping Men Out of Women's Sports,' which has triggered policy changes at the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) and lawsuits in several states.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
16 minutes ago
- Business Standard
'Let them sail': Russian lawmaker shrugs off Trump's nuclear sub threat
A senior Russian lawmaker has said that Russia has enough nuclear submarines at sea to handle any potential threat from the two US subs ordered into position by President Donald Trump, news agency PTI reported. Viktor Vodolatsky, a member of the Russian Parliament (Duma), told state news agency TASS that there is no need for a response from Russia to Trump's decision. "The number of Russian nuclear submarines in the world's oceans is significantly higher than the American ones, and the subs that US President Donald Trump ordered to be redirected to the appropriate regions have long been under their control,' he said. 'So no response from the Russian Federation to the American leader's statement about the submarines is required." Vodolatsky also said: 'Let the two US subs sail, they have been in the crosshairs for a long time now.' Trump orders US nuclear submarines on alert On Friday, Trump posted on his social media platform Truth Social that he had ordered the movement of two US nuclear submarines to 'appropriate regions'. He said the decision was in response to what he described as 'extremely provocative statements' made by former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev, now the deputy chairman of the Russian Security Council. In his post, Trump wrote: 'Based on the highly provocative statements of the Former President of Russia, Dmitry Medvedev... I have ordered two Nuclear Submarines to be positioned in the appropriate regions, just in case these foolish and inflammatory statements are more than just that." Russian minister backs peaceful approach, warns against direct conflict Responding to comments made by US Secretary of State Marco Rubio in a Fox News interview, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov welcomed the US position that a direct military clash with Russia must be avoided. 'We wholeheartedly concur with this position. Such shared understanding has been facilitated through constructive Russian-American dialogue,' Lavrov said. 'While Europeans are hysterically pushing for Ukraine's integration into NATO... Marco Rubio recently reaffirmed a responsible stance, explicitly stating that a direct military confrontation between the United States and Russia must be avoided," he said. Trump slams Medvedev, India and Russia In another post on Thursday, Trump attacked both India and Russia, calling them 'dead economies' and suggesting they could 'take their dead economies down together'. He also criticised Medvedev. 'Russia and the USA do almost no business together. Let's keep it that way. Tell Medvedev, the failed former President of Russia, who thinks he's still President, to watch his words. He's entering very dangerous territory!' Trump said. In response, Medvedev dismissed Trump's remarks, saying they showed nervousness. 'If some words from the former president of Russia cause such a nervous reaction from the supposedly mighty president of the US, then Russia is doing everything right,' he wrote on Telegram. He also reminded Trump of Russia's Cold War-era nuclear capability, designed to retaliate even if the country's leadership were destroyed in a first strike. Mocking Trump's interest in pop culture, Medvedev added: 'He should remember his favourite films about 'The Walking Dead' and think about how dangerous a 'dead hand' can be, even one that doesn't exist in nature,' ending his post with a laughing emoji. (With agency inputs)
Economic Times
16 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Trump's 25% Tariff on Indian Exports: A headline risk, not a structural threat
Exports to the U.S. account for just around 2% of India's GDP. Jimeet Modi says Trump's proposed 25% tariff on Indian exports is a headline risk, not a structural threat. With strong domestic demand, diversified trade, and policy support, India's economy and capital markets are well-positioned to absorb such external shocks without long-term disruption. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Sectoral Impact: Short-Term, Not Structural Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads A Reality Check: The Numbers Tell the Story Strategic Positioning & Policy Backstop Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Implications for the Capital Market Conclusion (Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this column are that of the writer. The facts and opinions expressed here do not reflect the views of .) The recent announcement by U.S. President Donald Trump of a proposed 25% tariff on select Indian exports has understandably stirred concerns among market participants tracking India's capital markets. While the headlines may sound alarming, it's important to put this development into perspective and assess its true economic me begin by stating clearly: this is not a significant threat to India's economic engine or its long-term investment there could be short-term headwinds for specific export-intensive sectors—particularly engineering goods, pharmaceuticals, auto components, textiles, and select metals and chemicals. These industries may face margin compression, supply chain friction, and temporary stock price the broader foundation of the Indian economy remains intact and resilient.*India's nominal GDP has crossed USD 4 trillion, positioning it as the fifth-largest economy in the world.*In FY 2024–25, India recorded total exports of USD 824.9 billion, which includes both goods and services. This constitutes roughly 20% of GDP, meaning that 80% of GDP is driven by domestic demand—a testament to India's robust internal economic activity.*Of the total goods exports, shipments to the U.S. stood at USD 87.4 billion, while imports from the U.S. were USD 41.8 billion.*Thus, exports to the U.S. account for just around 2% of India's GDP. Even if a subset of these is impacted by the tariffs, the macroeconomic fallout remains limited.*It's also worth noting that key growth sectors like IT services, digital exports, mobile phones, agri-tech, and clean energy remain largely untouched by these proposed tariff external trade diversification is another buffer. Exporters are actively expanding into markets across the Middle East, Africa, Southeast Asia, and Latin America, reducing over-reliance on Western diplomatic engagement continues. The 6th round of U.S.-India trade talks is scheduled for August 2025, and historical precedent suggests a realistic possibility of a rollback or sector-specific reprieve—as seen during earlier interactions with the Trump refusal to open its agriculture and dairy markets reflects a confident and principled trade stance. This underscores India's emergence as a credible global economic initiatives like Atmanirbhar Bharat, PLI schemes, infrastructure investments, and digital transformation are significantly boosting India's manufacturing competitiveness and supply chain independence. These initiatives act as policy cushions against external should differentiate between sentiment-driven volatility and long-term structural some export-led stocks may experience corrections in the near term, India's broader market indices remain supported by:*Robust domestic consumption*Stable macroeconomic indicators*Healthy credit growthMoreover, foreign portfolio investments (FPIs) continue to flow into domestic-facing sectors like financials, infrastructure, consumption, and energy transition, reaffirming global investor confidence in India's long-term proposed U.S. tariff is a tactical disruption, not a strategic derailment. With:*Low GDP exposure to impacted goods*Policy preparedness*Expanding trade partnerships, and*Strong domestic demandIndia is well-equipped to weather such external should view this episode as a short-term sentiment overhang—not a fundamental threat. The Indian growth story remains robust, broad-based, and attractively poised for the long term.
Time of India
16 minutes ago
- Time of India
India continuing to buy oil from Russia: Report rebuts Trump's 'good steps' claim - The Economic Times Video
Hours after US President Donald Trump claimed that he had heard that India is no longer going to buy oil from Russia, government sources said oil refiners continue to purchase crude from Russian suppliers. "Indian oil refiners continue to source oil from Russian suppliers. Their supply decisions are guided by price, grade of crude, inventories, logistics and other economic factors," sources were quoted as saying by news agency ANI. Earlier, Trump had said while speaking to reporters on Friday, "Well, I understand India no longer is going to be buying oil from Russia. That's what I heard. I don't know if that's right or not, but that's a good step. We'll see what happens."
