_2023_12_11_13_09_45.jpg&w=3840&q=100)
Palace cites need for transparency in PH government transactions
Malacañang highlighted Tuesday the need for transparency in government transactions, including budget processes.
During a press briefing, Palace Press Officer Undersecretary Atty. Claire Castro was asked about the call of some lawmakers to open bicameral deliberations to the public as the budget season comes near. Branded by some lawmakers as the #OpenBicam campaign, the call has been endorsed by Speaker Ferdinand Martin Romualdez.
"We respect the independence of the Congress pero kapag po ang pinag-usapan ay pagsasapubliko ng anumang transaksiyon patungkol sa gobyerno mas maganda po talaga na maging transparent ang bawat galaw ng taumbayan (We respect the independence of Congress but if we're talking about making information on government transactions available to the public, it's better to have transparency with every move)," Castro said.
The House of Representatives has said the proposal seeks to allow Filipinos to watch in real time how lawmakers reconcile the national budget between the two chambers of Congress.
The bicameral conference committee on the national budget conducts final deliberations among lawmakers after the Senate and the House pass separate versions of the General Appropriations Bill.
Romualdez has said he would push for the institutionalization of the #OpenBicam campaign.
"Transparency and accountability must be the cornerstones of the budget process," Romualdez said in an earlier press release.
"I support the move to make bicameral conference committee discussions open to the public. This is a crucial step in restoring public trust and ensuring that the national budget truly reflects the will and welfare of the people," he added. — VDV, GMA Integrated News
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
GMA Network
3 hours ago
- GMA Network
Dingdong Dantes tapped as ambassador for 'Panatag Pilipinas' disaster risk communication campaign
Dingdong Dantes will serve as ambassador for the Office of Civil Defense (OCD)'s new campaign, "Panatag Pilipinas," which is aimed at expanding the knowledge of Filipinos in responding to calamities and disasters. According to Athena Imperial's report on "24 Oras," Wednesday, the Philippines' geographic location in the Pacific Ring of Fire makes the country particularly susceptible to various natural calamities. To enhance public action and preparedness for these events, the OCD initiated the Risk Communication Advocacy campaign. Initially available on online platforms, the "Panatag Pilipinas" campaign is expanding its reach significantly and will now be screened in cinemas and public spaces such as transport terminals. "These are very important venues where we can exchange or show itong ating mga mensahe," OCD Asec. Bernardo Rafaelito Alejandro IV said. "I appreciate the fact that it is now a multimedia campaign. One of the goals is also to make it accessible, to make it, of course, relatable and not intimidating," Dingdong said. During the program launch, Department of Science and Technology Secretary Renato Solidum stressed the critical role of science in hands-on disaster preparedness. "It is with your action that makes science more powerful and practical. The greatest strength lies in knowing when and how to utilize these tools effectively," he said. The Department of National Defense (DND) also stressed the importance of making actions during disasters a muscle memory for safety. "Our message remains clear and powerful: Alam ng Pinoy ang dapat gawin para maging ligtas sa panahon ng sakuna. These efforts must not only happen during times of disaster, they must begin before disaster strikes," DND USec. Irineo Espino said. —Carby Rose Basina/MGP, GMA Integrated News
GMA Network
3 hours ago
- GMA Network
Impeachment prosecutor Chua: No legal basis for 2nd certification requirement
The Senate impeachment court's requirement that the House of Representatives submit another certification, one stating that it is still willing to pursue the impeachment of Vice President Sara Duterte in the 20th Congress, has no legal basis, a member of the House prosecution panel said. "Sa akin kasi yung second requirement na binabanggit nila, actually to be honest with you, itong nire-require po sa amin, we believe na parang medyo hindi... may problema talaga, questionable," Impeachment Prosecutor Rep Joel Chua of Manila 3rd district told reporters in an interview. "Wala namang legal basis eh," he added. (For me, this second requirement that they are talking about, to be honest with you, we believe that there's a problem with it; it's questionable. There no legal basis for it.) Chua declined to comment on whether this new requirement was a "trap," as stated by Akbayan Representative Chel Diokno, who is expected to join the House prosecution panel. But Chua said the prosecution team is studying how to comply with the requirement as it does not want to be accused of delaying the impeachment proceedings. "But just the same, the reason why we are complying with it, because ayaw naman namin na mapagbintangan kami na [we don't want it said that] we are delaying the hearing, the impeachment hearing. So kaya nga sa feeling namin, in fact, pati yung submission ng certification na hindi naman kailangan eh, di ba?" Chua said. (So we feel like we have to comply, including with the submission of the certificate that isn't needed, right?) "How can we comply with the second requirement when the 20th Congress has yet to start, di ba? So maybe, pag-aaralan na lang namin kung ano yung proper na next step na gagawin namin [we will have to look into what our next proper step should be]," he added. Chua said the House prosecution panel is extra careful with its moves. "What is the effect if we will comply? So we have to balance everything. We have to be very careful. Baka mamaya... lahat na lang binibigyan nila ng ano. So alam mo, yung impeachment kasi hindi naman dapat sobrang higpit. [The impeachment should not be that strict.] This is not a court of law," he explained. Chua insisted that there is no legal impediment for the impeachment trial to proceed. "When we transmitted the Articles of Impeachment to the Senate, there is always a presumption of legality. So wala kami nakikita doong [We don't seen any] legal impediment. So dapat under the Constitution , under the law, dapat they should have proceeded with the trial," he said. On the Senate Impeachment Court's statement that it cannot convene while the House prosecutors have not yet been elected, Chua replied, "Yung sa election ng House prosecutors, while I understand na 11 ang kailangan, but then again yung siyam, yung existing na nine, puwede pa naman silang mag-function. Pwede naman kami mag-function pa eh, di ba?" (As to the election of House prosecutors, I understand that 11 are needed, but the existing nine can still function. We can still function, right?) Chua also believes that trial can be held even before Congress is officially constituted on July 28. "Sa akin kasi, I believe that the Senate is a continuing body. So iba naman yung legislative function namin dito sa impeachment. Dahil dapat nagtutuloy-tuloy na ito eh. We should be proceeding with the trial already," he stated. (The Senate's legislative function is different from its impeachment function. This should be continuing.) Chua added that the House prosecutors will be filing motions in the next few days, including one for holding a pre-trial. 'Enough of delays' ML Party-list Representative Leila de Lima also criticized the Senate impeachment court, saying it expects the House of Representatives to comply with its requirements even if these have no constitutional or legal basis. "It's one ultra vires [beyond their power] act after another being committed by the Senate as an impeachment court. The Senate is treating the House's role in the impeachment like a dog-and-pony show, that the House should perform whatever it demands even if these are not found anywhere in the Constitution or its own Rules of Impeachment. We are not here for their amusement. The House is here to perform a constitutional mandate and prosecute an impeached official. The House has done and is doing its job. The Senate should do theirs as well," de Lima told GMA Integrated News. De Lima also said the Senate should not use the House's non-submission of the second certification to justify the impeachment court's delays. "Huwag dapat nilang ginagawang rason ng tila ba pattern of delay on the Senate's part yung supposed still non-compliance by the House of certain orders," de Lima said. She called on the Senate to convene the impeachment court, hold the trial, and render a verdict. "Insofar as the House is concerned, nagawa na nito ang kanyang trabaho sa pag-initiate ng impeachment complaint at pag-transmit ng Articles of Impeachment sa Senate, dahil yan ang utos ng Konstitusyon. Gawin na rin dapat ng Senado ang tatlong utos sa kanila ng Konstitusyon: 1. Convene (or re-convene as an impeachment court; 2. Hold impeachment trial; and 3. Render a verdict," de Lima said. "Enough of delays and excuses!" she added. — BM, GMA Integrated News
GMA Network
7 hours ago
- GMA Network
No oath taking of new senator-judges sans new SP in 20th Congress —Tongol
There will be no oath taking of new senators who will serve as judges in the impeachment trial of Vice President Sara Duterte until the 20th Congress begins session and a new Senate President gets elected, Senate impeachment court spokesperson Atty. Regie Tongol said Wednesday. This was in response to the call of Senator Risa Hontiveros for Senate President Francis 'Chiz' Escudero, who sits as presiding officer of the impeachment court, to already conduct the oath-taking of the new senator-judges. According to Tongol, the swearing in of the new senator-judges depend on the existence of a presiding officer or a Senate president. Since a new Congress is set to open, Escudero may either be reelected or get replaced as the top leader of the upper chamber come the 20th Congress. '[The] senator-judges will have to take their oath before the presiding officer. And as you know, if one Congress adjourns and another begins, the Senate president is going to be elected or reelected again, so kailangan po nating hintayin kung kanino manunumpa [we have to wait who they will swear in to],' Tongol said. 'Ayaw po ng presiding officer na magkaroon ng kwestyon doon sa proseso o sa step na 'yun ng panunumpa na maaari pang makwestyon at magkaroon ng legal impediments kapag nagpatuloy na ang proseso. So gusto ng presiding officer, as a matter of prudence and diligence, na gawin na lamang 'yun kapag nag-elect ng Senate president,' he added. (The presiding officer does not want any questions to be raised in the process or in that step of oath taking and raise possible legal impediments when the process continues. So the presiding officer, as a matter of prudence and diligence, wants to do that when a Senate president gets elected.) Tongol clarified that the earliest date that the new senator-judges may take their oath is on July 29—a day after the 20th Congress opens on July 28, coinciding with the fourth State of the Nation Address (SONA) of President Ferdinand 'Bongbong' Marcos Jr. He, however, clarified that Escudero currently remains to be the impeachment court presiding officer as a matter of 'holdover principle.' Asked if Escudero will not do anything impeachment-related until the 20th Congress opens, Tongol said: 'Well as of today, I think ganon 'yun [that will be the case]…and as based on the pronouncements of the Senate president himself during his presscon last week, I think that is the policy that he is taking for the mean time.' 'However, in the next few weeks, hindi natin alam. We cannot second guess kung ano 'yung…baka may makapag-persuade sa kanya, so hindi ko alam,' he continued. (However, we don't know what may happen in the next few weeks. We cannot second guess what can happen. Maybe someone can persuade him, so I don't know.) The House of Representatives impeached Duterte on February 5, with over 200 lawmakers endorsing the complaint. The Vice President was accused of betrayal of public trust, culpable violation of the constitution, graft and corruption, and other high crimes. The Senate impeachment court convened on June 10, with the trial proper expected to begin in the 20th Congress. —AOL, GMA Integrated News
