Tyler to help 'rescue' Enid in Wednesday season 2 as fans predict reunion
The much-anticipated second season of Wednesday is on the horizon, and Netflix has just dropped a spine-chilling trailer hinting at Wednesday Addams' (portrayed by Jenna Ortega) next adventure.
Haunted by a premonition of her best mate Enid Sinclair's (Emma Myers) demise, Wednesday is determined to thwart this grim future.
A poignant fan theory circulating suggests that despite Wednesday's efforts, Enid might still face her end as the season progresses. Yet, there's a glimmer of hope that Wednesday could rescue Enid, with speculation rife that she'll turn to an unexpected source for assistance.
In the climactic conclusion of the first series, Tyler (Hunter Doohan) was unmasked as the Hyde monster wreaking havoc at Nevermore Academy, reports the Mirror.
Following his exposure, Tyler found himself confined to Willow Hill Psychiatric Hospital, where his mother had been a patient, leaving Wednesday questioning whether he could be trusted.
Reddit users have been buzzing with the idea that Wednesday might find herself in a position where she has no choice but to seek Tyler's aid to save Enid.
HappyChaosOfTheNorth posited: "I think that against her better judgment and out of desperation, Wednesday is going to reluctantly enlist in Tyler's help in saving Enid."
They continued: "Thoughts? I personally can't think of any other reason she would give him the time of day except to maybe try and get clues about her stalker or something."
Echoing this sentiment, Kitkatloren2009 concurred: "I mean. It is a classic formula. Not bad, I actually like it. It's logical too.
"The protagonist goes to an old enemy to stop another, even bigger enemy or gets help to save someone."
Soft_Interaction_437 chimed in: "I agree that it'll be interesting to see how's he's relevant. We've only ever seen clips of him in the asylum, but we know that he gets out because we see the Hyde.
Watch Wednesday on Netflix for free with Sky
from £15
Sky
Get the deal here
Product Description
"So either they are keeping their cards with him close to the chest, or most his scenes outside the mental hospital are in part two. If your theory is correct then maybe one of the final scenes of part one will be Wednesday breaking him out?".
Yet, another enthusiast has a different take on why Wednesday might be monitoring Tyler.
Caesar_Seriona speculated: "No. Wednesday is going to make the mistake of assuming Tyler is now hunting Enid since Enid was getting the upper hand in her fight.
"Someone pitched the idea that a rogue Hyde can only be tamed by the one who beats it. Well technically Tyler lost to his dad however in the fight itself, it was Enid.
"I bet Wednesday is tracking Tyler not only because she is p***** off she got tricked but now the timetable is being accelerated thinking Tyler wants Enid's a**."
The question remains whether Tyler will emerge as Enid's protector or become her greatest peril.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
12 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Four tragic theories on what REALLY happened to Amy Bradley after she vanished on cruise
In March 1998, Amy Lynn Bradley vanished in the middle of the night while on a cruise ship with her family and was never found. A new Netflix documentary has explored the main theories behind the case, from sex slave fears to a website riddle and last sighting The sad disappearance of Amy Lynn Bradley, a 23-year-old from Virginia who vanished from the cruise ship Rhapsody of the Seas, remains one of the most perplexing unsolved cases in true crime history. Despite being last seen on her cabin's balcony aboard a ship filled with potential eyewitnesses, Amy's trail went cold almost instantly. Now, a new Netflix docuseries explores the leading theories in the 1998 case that continues to grapple the world. "There are no easy answers in this story," producer Phil Lott admits. "Getting to meet [the people on the ship] and interview them at length just made the stories that much more interesting, rich, deep - and raised more questions." Here, we take a look at four theories that have been suggested in the years following her mysterious disappearance. Theory 1: Amy fell or jumped overboard One of the earliest and most contested theories is that Amy may have accidentally fallen or intentionally jumped overboard. Her shoes were left on the balcony, and a table had been moved, suggesting she may have leaned over the railing. However, no physical evidence was ever recovered from the sea, and her family firmly rejected the notion she would have died by suicide or put herself in danger. Officials insisted if she had of fell overboard, remains would have washed up on shore due to the tide that evening. Theory 2: Involvement of cruise entertainer A significant portion of the docuseries revisits the theory involving Alister "Yellow" Douglas, a cruise ship entertainer seen dancing with Amy the night she vanished. Their interaction was captured on video inside the ship's nightclub. Lori Thompson, another passenger, told investigators she also saw Amy with Douglas earlier that night. Though the FBI questioned Douglas and he voluntarily took a polygraph test, the results were inconclusive. He was released without charge and has consistently maintained his innocence. "Every single person who worked on this was conflicted about what happened to Amy... that sort of whiplash made this particularly surprising," says producer Ari Mark. Theory 3: Human trafficking One of the most chilling theories comes from retired US Navy officer Bill Hefner, who believes he encountered Amy in January 1999 - ten months after she vanished. Hefner claims he met a distressed young woman in a Curaçao bar who told him, "My name is Amy Bradley. I'm from Virginia." The woman was quickly taken away by unidentified men. Hefner's tip circulated in true crime circles for years but was never explored on camera until now. The possibility that Amy was abducted and trafficked has gained traction as similar reports and unverified sightings surfaced over the years. Theory 4: Amy left the ship voluntarily A more recently considered theory is that Amy chose to leave the ship of her own accord. Though once dismissed, the documentary highlights a surprising new piece of evidence: a pattern of IP addresses traced to Barbados repeatedly logged into a forum on during family anniversaries and holidays. The site, founded by online investigator Anthony Willis in 2018, was designed to centralize tips. The IP activity has led some to speculate that Amy could be alive and living in secrecy. "I don't think the notion of her willingly walking off the ship was ever presented as a possibility until the [documentary]," says Mark. "And I don't believe that the eyewitness testimony or the IP information was really ever presented in any way to anyone." "It's very uncommon to have that many scenarios that feel possible," Mark said. "I dare anybody to look at those scenarios and argue me off one of them because there's enough information to suggest that any of those scenarios could be possible. It drove us nuts." In 1999, Amy's family filed a lawsuit against Royal Caribbean, alleging negligence in the handling of her disappearance. The company maintained that it had acted appropriately at all times. The lawsuit was ultimately dismissed, and no charges have ever been filed in connection with the case. For Amy's relatives, the pain of her disappearance remains raw. Through interviews with friends and loved ones, the series paints a portrait of a young woman whose presence is still deeply missed. "It's one thing to talk about the void of Amy, and it's another thing to experience it," adds Mark. "This is a family who really deeply believes in what they're saying, and what they're saying is, 'She's out there, we're going to find her, and we're ready.'' Amy Bradley Is Missing is now streaming on Netflix.
South Wales Guardian
36 minutes ago
- South Wales Guardian
Lightsaber fight sees Star Wars film reclassified due to ‘moderate violence'
The reclassification was revealed in the BBFC's 2024 annual report, which said the 1999 film's starship dogfights, use of laser weapons, and the battle, which shows brief 'bloody detail' and a 'non-graphic' shot of a villain's dissected body, had led to it being labelled PG for its cinema re-release last year. PG means the film should not unsettle a child aged eight or above, but some scenes may be unsuitable for more sensitive children, while U means a movie is suitable to all. Another film which saw its classification change was 1937's A Star Is Born, which went from U to 12, meaning it is not generally suitable for children aged under 12, because of the implied suicide of one of the film's characters, which was described as 'visually discreet'. The phrase 'son of a bitch' and drug references saw US TV comedy series Fraser go from a PG to a 12, over a change in the guidelines for classification, while both The Crow (1995) and Fight Club (1999) saw their classifications lowered from 18 to 15 because of the updated guidelines. It comes as last year saw the BBFC classify the highest number of films in its 112-year history, with new guidelines regarding the classification of sex scenes at the 12/15 border, violence across the categories, and certain depictions of drug misuse. Natasha Kaplinsky, president of the BBFC, said: '2024 was the BBFC's 112th year of helping people across the UK view what's right for them – and what a remarkable year it was. 'We classified more cinema features than ever before, and we have made significant progress towards extending the coverage of trusted BBFC age ratings on streaming services through new deals with Prime Video and Netflix. 'We launched our revised Classification Guidelines – ensuring that the standards we apply when classifying content continue to reflect the views of UK audiences. 'Perhaps most exciting of all, we have continued our pioneering work with AI, ensuring that the BBFC remains at the forefront of film and digital content regulation. It has been a genuine privilege to lead the organisation at such an exciting and transformative time.'
Rhyl Journal
41 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
Lightsaber fight sees Star Wars film reclassified due to ‘moderate violence'
The reclassification was revealed in the BBFC's 2024 annual report, which said the 1999 film's starship dogfights, use of laser weapons, and the battle, which shows brief 'bloody detail' and a 'non-graphic' shot of a villain's dissected body, had led to it being labelled PG for its cinema re-release last year. PG means the film should not unsettle a child aged eight or above, but some scenes may be unsuitable for more sensitive children, while U means a movie is suitable to all. Another film which saw its classification change was 1937's A Star Is Born, which went from U to 12, meaning it is not generally suitable for children aged under 12, because of the implied suicide of one of the film's characters, which was described as 'visually discreet'. The phrase 'son of a bitch' and drug references saw US TV comedy series Fraser go from a PG to a 12, over a change in the guidelines for classification, while both The Crow (1995) and Fight Club (1999) saw their classifications lowered from 18 to 15 because of the updated guidelines. It comes as last year saw the BBFC classify the highest number of films in its 112-year history, with new guidelines regarding the classification of sex scenes at the 12/15 border, violence across the categories, and certain depictions of drug misuse. Natasha Kaplinsky, president of the BBFC, said: '2024 was the BBFC's 112th year of helping people across the UK view what's right for them – and what a remarkable year it was. 'We classified more cinema features than ever before, and we have made significant progress towards extending the coverage of trusted BBFC age ratings on streaming services through new deals with Prime Video and Netflix. 'We launched our revised Classification Guidelines – ensuring that the standards we apply when classifying content continue to reflect the views of UK audiences. 'Perhaps most exciting of all, we have continued our pioneering work with AI, ensuring that the BBFC remains at the forefront of film and digital content regulation. It has been a genuine privilege to lead the organisation at such an exciting and transformative time.'
