logo
Ohio Bill Seeks to Ban and Criminalize Abortion: What We Know

Ohio Bill Seeks to Ban and Criminalize Abortion: What We Know

Newsweek19-06-2025
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Republican lawmakers in Ohio have introduced a bill that seeks to ban almost all abortions in the state and criminalize the procedure.
State Representatives Levi Dean and Johnathan Newman introduced the Ohio Prenatal Equal Protection Act on Wednesday. The bill would grant legal protections from the moment of fertilization, meaning abortion would be treated as homicide, in a challenge to an abortion rights amendment to the State Constitution that voters approved in 2023.
Newsweek reached out to Dean and Newman for comment via email.
Why It Matters
Since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, anti-abortion activists have been pushing measures to enshrine the rights of fetuses in a bid to end abortion nationwide.
Ohio voters enshrined abortion protections in 2023, prompting judges to strike down abortion bans in the state. Abortion is legal up to 20 weeks from fertilization in Ohio.
While Republicans in Ohio have historically passed abortion restrictions and bans, legislation in the past has been aimed at penalizing abortion providers rather than the people who have them.
But the new bill, if enacted, would change that. It could also affect in vitro fertilization (IVF) and some forms of contraception.
Demonstrators gather in front of the U.S. Supreme Court as the justices hear arguments in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health on December 1, 2021.
Demonstrators gather in front of the U.S. Supreme Court as the justices hear arguments in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health on December 1, 2021.What To Know
End Abortion Ohio, which collaborated with Dean and Newman to draft the bill, says the constitutional amendment approved in 2023 violates the U.S. Constitution's Equal Protection Clause.
Austin Beigel, the president of End Abortion Ohio, told Newsweek the bill is "a very, very simple piece of legislation" that "grants personhood to all human beings."
The bill would ensure that "from the moment of fertilization, when you have a new, distinct living organism, you have personhood rights, and you have the equal protection of the law," he said. "So the same laws that protect a born infant will protect that same person inside their mother's womb."
Beigel added that while the bill does not explicitly mention IVF, the "natural consequence of personhood rights for all human beings includes those currently living in petri dishes and cryochambers across our country and our state."
Abortion rights advocates say the bill goes against the will of Ohio voters.
"Ohioans spoke loud and clear that we want our access to reproductive healthcare protected, not attacked when we passed the Ohio Reproductive Freedom Amendment in 2023," Kellie Copeland, the executive director of Abortion Forward, which worked to pass the amendment, said in a statement to Newsweek.
Beigel said that his organization is not concerned about going against what voters want because "the will of the majority of voters was for something evil."
"They were asking for the right to murder another person...and so we are proud to stand against evil, even when evil is the majority," he added.
Other groups that support abortion bans—Ohio Right to Life and Citizens for Christian—do not support the legislation, according to The Cincinnati Enquirer.
What People Are Saying
Abortion Forward executive director Kellie Copeland, in a statement to Newsweek: "Voters in Ohio sent a clear message in 2023 we must be free to make our own decisions, define our own path in life, and safely care for our families and communities. Deciding if, when, or how to become a parent is one of the most important decisions we make. These decisions should be up to each individual Ohioan, not government.
"These out-of-touch anti-abortion extremists want to give legal rights to fertilized eggs, embryos and fetuses. This would strip Ohioans' ability to make decisions for our lives, health, and well-being, including banning all abortion care, banning some types of birth control, and denying IVF treatment that helps people build their families.
"Bills like this embolden law enforcement to surveil and investigate people for their actions during pregnancy – families and loved ones could be targeted by law enforcement for helping someone access an abortion, miscarriage care, or even IVF. Black people, other people of color and immigrants are most likely to be targeted, questioned, and harmed by policies like this."
End Abortion Ohio, in a statement: "Ohio's pro-abortion constitutional amendment should be treated as null and void because it flagrantly violates the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution by denying preborn persons the right to life. In appealing to the 14th Amendment, the Ohio Prenatal Equal Protection Act appeals to a higher law; the U.S. Constitution.
"But even so, we appeal to the highest law; the law of God. In the Holy Scriptures, All men are created equal, being made in the image of God."
Ohio Right to Life President Mike Gonidakis told The Cincinnati Enquirer: "We have never supported criminalizing a woman for having an abortion, and we never will. It's completely out of bounds and inappropriate."
Democratic National Committee chair Ken Martin, in a statement: "Mere days after an anti-abortion fanatic targeted and killed reproductive rights advocates, Republicans in the Ohio legislature have decided that women who receive abortions are the actual threat. Ohio Republicans intend to charge women who receive abortions with homicide, ban IVF, and even some forms of contraception, as they proudly go against the people of Ohio. Nearly three years ago, Donald Trump opened the door to these extreme anti-choice policies through the overturning of Roe v. Wade. Now, with Trump's blessing, the far-right has declared war on women's rights."
What Happens Next
Beigel said the legislation has garnered seven co-sponsors so far. But while Republicans control both chambers of the Ohio Legislature, it remains to be seen whether the bill will have enough support to pass.
Republican House Speaker Matt Huffman told the Enquirer it's too early to know where House Republicans stand on the bill.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

DNC chair says Elon Musk's third party 'could be successful' and should be taken seriously
DNC chair says Elon Musk's third party 'could be successful' and should be taken seriously

Business Insider

time34 minutes ago

  • Business Insider

DNC chair says Elon Musk's third party 'could be successful' and should be taken seriously

As Elon Musk pledges to form a new political party, the chair of the Democratic National Committee says it's worth taking seriously. "I don't think we should take it lightly or just suspect — as many of these attempts in the past have failed — that it's going to fail," DNC Chair Ken Martin said on a Monday episode of "Endless Urgency," an online show hosted by Democratic operative Mike Nellis. The chair laid out two key reasons why Musk's "America Party" could succeed: resources and frustration with both parties. "You have the richest man in the world, who's going to dump a lot of money and resources trying to stand this up," Martin said. "And my sense of it is that there's definitely frustration in both parties right now with a two-party system, and it could be successful." Musk spent nearly $300 million to elect President Donald Trump and other Republicans in 2024. Martin also said that Musk's nascent efforts to create a new party were indicative of the divisions within Trump's coalition. "It's laying bare that there are deep divisions within this Republican Party," Martin said. "There are the mega-Trumpers, and then there are the sort of conservative traditional Republicans, and then there's the sort of libertarian wing that has also creeped into their party." The tech titan's political alliance with Trump culminated in the launching of DOGE, only to unravel in epic fashion after several months over Musk's objections to the " Big Beautiful Bill." Musk has yet to formally register a new political party, but he wouldn't be the first prominent businessman to try to take on America's two-party system. Trump has dismissed the idea, calling Musk a "train wreck" while saying that the American political system "seems not designed" for third parties. That may be a mistake, according to Martin. "I'm not sure how it will impact the elections in the future, but if Elon Musk is serious about this and he's going to dump in billions of dollars, it's going to have to be taken serious by both parties," the Democratic Party leader said.

Breaking down claim foreign press started calling Republicans the 'American Fascist Party'
Breaking down claim foreign press started calling Republicans the 'American Fascist Party'

Yahoo

time36 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Breaking down claim foreign press started calling Republicans the 'American Fascist Party'

Why is there not a rating on this post? There's not enough verified evidence for us to definitively confirm or debunk this rumor. Contact us if you have credible information to share. We'll update this post as necessary. In early July 2025, a rumor began circulating online claiming that foreign news outlets started referring to the Republican Party, or Grand Old Party (GOP), as the "American Fascist Party." "The Republicans are now being referred to as the American Fascist Party by the foreign press, and I'll be calling them this as well," one Facebook post (archived) read, reaching over 18,000 reactions, 1,800 comments, and 2,500 shares. (Facebook page U.S. Democratic Socialists) Similarly, another Facebook post (archived) with over 13,000 reactions, read, "Republicans are now being referred to as the American Fascist Party by foreign media (and they would know). Guess we better do the same. Just to avoid any confusion." Other posts (archived) made more specific references to "European media." The claim spread across multiple platforms, including Bluesky, Facebook, Instagram, X and Threads. However, none of the posts included specific examples of which foreign or European news outlets referred to the Republican Party as the "American Fascist Party." They did not cite any country, language, publication name, or article where such a label was being used. Our review of international news articles in multiple languages found no indication that this term had been adopted by mainstream foreign news outlets, either in English or in other languages. The phrase does not appear to be in common use across international media. The popularization of the term "American Fascist Party" likely stems from a 2023 opinion article by former U.S. Labor Secretary Robert Reich, published in the British newspaper The Guardian. However, this was an individual commentary, not an example of widespread usage in foreign press. We performed a Google search in over 20 European languages (English, Bulgarian, Croatian, Czech, Danish, Dutch, Estonian, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Hungarian, Irish, Italian, Latvian, Lithuanian, Maltese, Polish, Portuguese, Romanian, Slovenian, Spanish and Swedish). The search returned no relevant results showing that mainstream news media in these languages referred to the Republican Party as the "American Fascist Party." The phrase "American Fascist Party" seemed to trace back to commentary by Reich. In an April 2023 opinion piece for The Guardian, a British newspaper, Reich wrote that the Republican Party was "hurtling toward fascism." He wrote that "Donald Trump is not singularly responsible for this dangerous trend, but he has legitimized and encouraged the ends-justify-the-means viciousness now pushing the GOP toward becoming the American fascist party." Reich has repeated similar phrasing in other opinion pieces and social media posts on Instagram, YouTube and Facebook. "My friends, the Republican Party is no longer committed to democracy. It is rapidly becoming the American fascist party," Reich wrote in an article published on Substack and Common Dreams. But these reflected his personal opinion, not an editorial position of a news organization — and certainly not a trend among foreign media. Additionally, while European news outlets like The Independent or Le Monde have discussed concerns about the GOP's direction and mentioned fascist rhetoric or tactics, they had not referred to the GOP as the "American Fascist Party" as a matter of journalistic framing or categorization. For instance, journalist Patrick Cockburn wrote in a 2021 article for The Independent that the "nullification of elections is only the latest step in the Republican Party's strange voyage towards becoming a genuine fascist party." However, the phrase "American Fascist Part" was mostly used in social media posts, comments, and blog articles — not in reputable news publications or mainstream news outlets. Over the years, we fact-checked numerous viral claims involving fascism. For instance, in August we debunked a claim that Winston Churchill once said that the "fascists of the future will call themselves anti-fascists." In December 2020, we looked at claims that in an interview that published widely in 1976, David Bowie said he believed in fascism and that "Adolf Hitler was one of the first rock stars." Additionally, in January 2024, we investigated whether a viral video showed hundreds of people performing a Fascist salute in Rome on Jan. 7, 2024. Evon, Dan. "Did Winston Churchill Say 'The Fascists of the Future Will Call Themselves Anti-Fascists?'" Snopes, 7 Aug. 2018, Google Search. Accessed 7 Jul. 2025. ---. Accessed 7 Jul. 2025. Is Trumpism a Form of Fascism? Two Historians Debate. 3 May 2025. Le Monde, Lee, Jessica. "Did Bowie Say He Supported Fascism and Praise Hitler?" Snopes, 23 Dec. 2020, Opinion | The United States Now Has a Fascist Political Party | Common Dreams. Accessed 7 Jul. 2025. Reich, Robert. "Is the GOP Becoming the American Fascist Party?" Robert Reich, 10 Apr. 2023, "The Republican Party Has Turned Fascist – It Is Now the Most Dangerous Threat in the World | Patrick Cockburn." The Independent, 23 Jun. 2021, "---." The Independent, 23 Jun. 2021, Wrona, Aleksandra. "Is 2024 Video of Hundreds Performing Fascist Salute in Rome Real?" Snopes, 10 Jan. 2024,

Commentary: 3 risks for Trump from his own tax bill
Commentary: 3 risks for Trump from his own tax bill

Yahoo

time39 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Commentary: 3 risks for Trump from his own tax bill

President Trump notched a big win when the Republican-controlled Congress passed his 'big, beautiful' tax bill on July 3, right on Trump's own deadline. Trump muscled Republican detractors into line and demonstrated dominance of his own party that most presidents can only envy. The new tax law gives Trump several bragging points. It fulfills campaign promises, such as eliminating the income tax on tips and overtime pay, up to certain limits. It averts a 'tax cliff' that would have occurred if temporary individual tax cuts enacted in 2017 expired on schedule at the end of this year. There will be no standoff this year over raising the US borrowing limit, since the law boosted the debt ceiling by $5 trillion. Businesses now have more certainty about tax rates and a few other factors for the foreseeable future. Read more: What is the US debt ceiling, and how does it impact you? But the bill is still a risky gambit for Trump. There's a lot that could go wrong, even in the short term leading up to the 2026 midterm elections. Here are three of the biggest risks for Trump: The bill's critics turn out to be right about the economic damage it causes. The tax bill will add at least $4 trillion to the national debt during the next decade, on top of $22 trillion in added debt that is coming from plain old deficit spending. There has to be a breaking point, and when we hit it, the mimimum effect will be higher interest rates than we'd otherwise have. We may have arrived there already, and it could get a lot worse. Financial markets could malfunction, causing sharp stock market sell-offs and unpredictable knock-on shocks. Democratic economists Laura Tyson and Lenny Mendonca wrote recently that 'Trump has wrecked the US economy.' They argue that Trump's tax bill is 'horrendous legislation' that will make the poor poorer, revoke health insurance for millions, and take food aid from several million needy Americans. 'A good economy that Trump turned bad is about to get a lot worse,' they said. Not everybody thinks the sky is falling. Economists in general think the economy will grow more slowly this year and next than it did in 2024. That isn't a recession call. But slower growth means fewer jobs, weaker income growth, and less prosperity. Some Americans who feel like the Trump tax cuts are doing nothing for them will start to think that Trump's critics are right. And there will be no shortage of critics eager to persuade them. The Trump healthcare cuts hit home. To reduce the budgetary cost of the tax cuts in the Trump bill, Congress cut healthcare benefits by $1 trillion over the next decade — the biggest rollback in federal health benefits ever. Most of the cutbacks come from Medicaid, the healthcare program for the poor. There are also reductions in subsidies for people buying insurance through Obamacare. Overall, the number of uninsured Americans could rise by 16 million by anybody notice? Oh yes, they will. Republicans are already worried about voters losing coverage in their states and districts. Rural hospitals in swing states such as Pennsylvania, Minnesota, and Michigan are in danger of closing for lack of funding. White House economist Kevin Hassett addressed these concerns recently by saying 'the best way to get insurance is to get a job,' even though only 54% of companies offer healthcare benefits and just 54% of workers are covered by an employer plan. There are many gaps in the employer coverage system, including exemptions for small firms and part-time workers, plus coverage that's too expensive for some workers to afford. Democrats are already running ads in 35 congressional districts blaming the Republican bill for jeopardizing rural healthcare. The availability of healthcare has faded as a top campaign issue in recent years as more people have gotten coverage and the uninsured rate has declined. But Republican cutbacks could make it an issue again, and 'get a job' is a pretty lousy pitch to voters who can't afford healthcare. The bill becomes a blame magnet. Most voters will never know all the details of what's in the Trump tax cut bill. They will know that it made some pretty big changes affecting incomes and healthcare. So when people notice those types of changes in their own lives, many will conclude Trump's tax bill is the cause. Joe Biden had this problem with the $2 trillion stimulus bill he signed just a few months into his presidential term. That went over fine until inflation started spiking a year or so later. The Biden bill was just one of four COVID-era stimulus bills that pumped roughly $6 trillion into the economy. Trump signed the first three, yet voters blamed Biden for overstimulating and single-handedly causing inflation. Biden's mistake, in retrospect, was giving voters a fat legislative target to blame for everything that went wrong later in his presidency. The Trump tax bill could end up as the same sort of albatross for Republicans. The bill is already unpopular, with opinion running nearly 2 to 1 against. That's a worse start than Trump's 2017 tax cut law, which was mildly unpopular when Congress passed it. The problem with that bill was that many Americans felt it favored businesses and the wealthy too much. The 2025 version is even more skewed because of the healthcare cuts, which will disproportionately affect lower earners. Republicans thought voters would love their 2017 tax law and reward them at the polls. They guessed wrong. Democrats enjoyed a wave election in the 2018 midterm elections and retook control of the House of Representatives. Will it be different this time around? Trump seems unworried. Yet he just signed a bill with many provisions Americans don't want, and one way or another, there will be consequences. Rick Newman is a senior columnist for Yahoo Finance. Follow him on Bluesky and X: @rickjnewman. Click here for political news related to business and money policies that will shape tomorrow's stock prices. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store