Optimism grows for Gaza ceasefire but serious obstacles remain
prime minister
Binyamin Netanyahu
will leave for Washington at the weekend amid indications that a
Gaza
ceasefire and hostage release deal could be close after almost 21 months of fighting.
His planned meeting with US president
Donald Trump
at the White House on Tuesday will be the third time they have met since Trump took office in January.
Speaking about the visit outside the White House on Tuesday Trump sounded optimistic that a breakthrough was close.
'We hope [a ceasefire] is going to happen and we're looking for it to happen sometime next week,' he said. 'We want to get our hostages back.'
READ MORE
He added that they would also discuss 'the great success we had in
Iran
'.
Netanyahu believes the 12-day war with Iran has also opened the way for a possible deal to end the Gaza war, telling cabinet ministers on Monday 'exploiting success is no less important than achieving success'.
[
The origins of Israel's conflicts with Iran, Hamas and Hizbullah
Opens in new window
]
Despite the optimistic noises, neither Israel nor
Hamas
have changed the fundamental negotiating positions that appear to be holding up an agreement. Israel has still not committed to ending the war as part of a ceasefire deal and Hamas has not agreed to disarm or to the exile of its leaders from Gaza.
[
Two tribes: How Israel and Iran became enemies
Opens in new window
]
The war began after 1,200 people were killed and 251 taken into captivity during a Hamas attack on southern Israel on October 7th, 2033. Fifty hostages remain in captivity, of whom 20 are believed to be alive. Israel's military assault has killed more than 56,000 people, according to the Hamas-run health ministry.
The
Israel Defense Forces
(IDF) controls almost 75 per cent of Gaza. The military has told political leaders that a decision needs to be taken either to end Israel's longest war with a deal or to order an expansion of the operation.
However, IDF chief of staff Ltn Gen Eyal Zamir has warned ministers that an escalation in the fighting would endanger the hostages' lives. 'There's a conflict between the hostages and continuing the manoeuvre. We might endanger the hostages. There's been worse abuse of the hostages. Their condition is very bad,' he said.
Far-right ministers Itamar Ben Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich responded angrily to the general's remarks. Ben Gvir said that more pressure would help to free the hostages, not harm them. Smotrich said: 'We want the hostages too, but we aren't prepared to forsake the entire country. The IDF is steering the political echelon towards what to decide.'
Opposition parties have offered Netanyahu a parliamentary safety net if he brings a Gaza ceasefire to a Knesset vote in defiance of his far-right coalition partners.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RTÉ News
4 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Trump urges Hamas to agree 'final' Gaza ceasefire proposal
US President Donald Trump urged Iran-backed Hamas militants to agree to what he called a "final proposal" for a 60-day ceasefire with Israel in Gaza that will be delivered by mediating officials from Qatar and Egypt. In a social media post, Mr Trump said his representatives had a "long and productive" meeting with Israeli officials about Gaza. He did not identify his representatives but US special envoy Steve Witkoff, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Vice President JD Vance had been due to meet Ron Dermer, a senior adviser to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Mr Trump said Israel has agreed to the conditions to finalise a 60-day ceasefire, "during which time we will work with all parties to end the War." He said representatives for Qatar and Egypt will deliver "this final proposal" to Hamas. "I hope, for the good of the Middle East, that Hamas takes this Deal, because it will not get better — IT WILL ONLY GET WORSE. Thank you for your attention to this matter!" he said. Mr Trump told reporters yesterday that he is hopeful that a ceasefire-for-hostages agreement can be achieved next week between Israel and Hamas militants in Gaza. He is set to meet Mr Netanyahu at the White House on Monday. Hamas has said it is willing to free remaining hostages in Gaza under any deal to end the war, while Israel says it can only end if Hamas is disarmed and dismantled. Hamas refuses to lay down its arms. The war in Gaza was triggered when Hamas-led militants attacked Israel on 7 October, 2023, killing 1,200 people and taking 251 hostages, according to Israeli tallies. The two sides have shown little sign of a readiness to budge from their entrenched positions. The US has proposed a 60-day ceasefire and the release of half the hostages in exchange for Palestinian prisoners and the remains of other Palestinians. Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar said earlier this week Israel has agreed to a US-proposed 60-day ceasefire and hostage deal, and put the onus on Hamas to accept it. Mr Trump and his aides appear to be seeking to use any momentum from US and Israeli strikes on Iran nuclear sites, as well as a ceasefire that took hold last week in that conflict, to secure a lasting truce in the war in Gaza. Mr Trump told reporters during a visit to Florida that he would be "very firm" with Mr Netanyahu on the need for a speedy Gaza ceasefire, while noting that the Israeli leader wants one as well. "We hope it's going to happen. And we're looking forward to it happening sometime next week," he told reporters. "We want to get the hostages out." Gaza's health ministry says Israel's military assault in response to the 7 October 2023 attack has killed over 56,000 Palestinians. The assault has also caused a hunger crisis, internally displaced Gaza's entire population and prompted accusations of genocide at the International Court of Justice and of war crimes at the International Criminal Court.
Irish Examiner
4 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Austerity budgets are a gift to populists
Time after time, austerity budgets have provided populist political parties with political openings. In the United Kingdom, France, Poland, and elsewhere, populists have used austerity budget cuts to browbeat 'fiscally responsible' governments. Because of this dynamic, it is hard to believe Elon Musk thought US president Donald Trump's interest in Musk's Department of Government Efficiency was motivated by a genuine commitment to saving public money. His sense of betrayal was nevertheless strong enough that he lambasted Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act — which is forecast to add trillions of dollars to the US federal budget deficit and national debt — as a 'disgusting abomination'. Even Steve Bannon, a key architect of Trump's populist 'Make America Great Again' (Maga) agenda and Musk's ideological adversary, has made similar criticisms of the bill, as have prominent Senate Republicans like Rand Paul and Ron Johnson. Such dissent from the right is unusual. Of course, Republicans have vigorously denounced the spending plans of past Democratic administrations. But when Republican presidents are in power, these affordability concerns instantly vanish. 'Deficits don't matter,' as former US vice-president Dick Cheney, the principal architect of the Iraq War, famously put it. While Republicans understand banging the drumbeat of fiscal austerity is a political instrument, Democrats have been more earnest — or naive — about its virtues. True, there is good political reason to join Republican dissenters in arguing the bill's tax cuts for the rich are 'unaffordable'. A protester burns a police car during a demonstration by soccer fans and retirees demanding higher pensions and opposing austerity measures implemented by Javier Milei's government in Buenos Aires, Argentina, in March Picture: AP/Rodrigo Abd But history suggests the Democratic Party may soon lose sight of the strategic character of such ideological alliances and end up playing an unfortunate role in a twisted morality play authored by the right. Since Ronald Reagan, every Republican president has dramatically increased the deficit through tax cuts and military spending. By contrast, Democratic administrations have done the work of reining in the country's growing debt, largely by slashing public investment and weakening the social safety net. Lawrence H Summers, who served as treasury secretary under President Bill Clinton, was convinced the economic revival of the 1990s was due to Clinton's commitment to balancing the budget. As director of President Barack Obama's National Economic Council, Summers successfully pushed the same approach. Following a decade of economic stagnation, President Joe Biden's administration broke from this pattern and tried to rouse the American economy from its pandemic-induced torpor with a massive fiscal stimulus. Summers led a media offensive against the policy, warning of an inflationary surge. But Biden stuck to his guns, and, although inflation did jump up briefly, no catastrophe unfolded, thanks to the United States' unique ability to run large budget deficits, owing to the dollar's centrality in the global financial system. Time and again over the past half-century, America has been able to sustain higher levels of debt than many anticipated. After Biden bowed out of the 2024 presidential election, the elevation of Kamala Harris, his vice president, to the top of the Democratic ticket signified a possible return to the economic-policy orientation of the Clinton and Obama eras. But Harris lost the race, leaving America — and the world — with Trump, the self-proclaimed 'king of debt.' Given this, it is not surprising many former Democratic officials have sounded the alarm about Trump's spending bill. In the New York Times, Peter Orszag, who served as director of the Office of Management and Budget under Obama, argued the national debt was now reaching a level that could undermine global investors' willingness to hold dollar assets. Summers has likewise warned Trump's bill implies 'debt on a massive scale that we can't afford'. Of course, any government's capacity to finance deficits is finite. Former British prime minister Liz Truss learned that the hard way in 2022, when her government's mini-budget triggered a sharp rise in borrowing costs, leading to the swift demise of her premiership. But Trump is not heading for a Truss-like incident. The dollar is far more critical to the world economy than the pound. And the US Federal Reserve's commitment to ensuring the liquidity of the Treasury market, in concert with foreign central banks and treasuries, bolsters the greenback's too-big-to-fail status. The recent decision by Moody's to downgrade the US sovereign credit rating was significant. If unrestricted borrowing, coupled with endless tariff uncertainty, fuels inflation and slows growth, more downgrades will follow, making it more expensive for the US government to finance its debts. The fact so many prominent Republicans are objecting to Trump's spending bill reflects the hollow ideological core Maga shares with other right-wing populist movements. Picture: AP /Manuel Balce Ceneta Although this would have adverse consequences for America, it doesn't represent an existential threat, which means Democrats' calls for fiscal rectitude will not gain traction among Republicans. The party's resolve to rebalance the books will, however, influence intraparty debate. Leaders of the Democratic establishment such as Harris, Gavin Newsom, and Rahm Emanuel would fall over one another to reprise the Obama years. But that era's institutionalisation of the bailout state and prolonged fiscal austerity would push the country into another recession — providing fertile ground for popular discontent and further political polarisation. The US is not alone, of course. Across Europe and elsewhere, governments' embrace of socialism for the rich and austerity for everyone else has fuelled the rise of Maga-like populist movements. But the fact so many prominent Republicans are objecting to Trump's spending bill reflects the hollow ideological core Maga shares with other right-wing populist movements. A motley collection of intense grievances does not easily translate into a coherent economic strategy. Instead, the Democratic Party should focus on building a progressive economic policy platform that can mobilise electoral support. Bidenomics was a good but imperfect start, not a mistake to be regretted. The Democrats — and democrats worldwide — must offer a more appealing vision of the expansive use of the public purse. Otherwise, they may not get their hands back on the levers of fiscal policy for some time to come. Martijn Konings is professor of Political Economy and Social Theory at the University of Sydney and the author, most recently, of 'The Bailout State: Why Governments Rescue Banks, Not People' (Polity, 2025). Copyright: Project Syndicate, 2025.
Irish Times
5 hours ago
- Irish Times
Trump says Israel has agreed to conditions to finalise 60-day Gaza ceasefire
United States president Donald Trump said on Tuesday that Israel had agreed 'to the necessary conditions to finalize' a 60-day ceasefire in Gaza during which efforts will be made to end the US ally's war in the Palestinian enclave. 'Israel has agreed to the necessary conditions to finalize the 60 Day CEASEFIRE, during which time we will work with all parties to end the War,' Trump said on social media. 'The Qataris and Egyptians, who have worked very hard to help bring Peace, will deliver this final proposal. I hope, for the good of the Middle East, that Hamas takes this Deal, because it will not get better — IT WILL ONLY GET WORSE.' - Reuters
