Europe unveils a deal for more food and fuel for Gaza. Israeli strike kills 15 outside a clinic
The children's deaths drew outrage from humanitarian groups even as Israel allowed the first delivery of fuel to Gaza in more than four months, though still less than a day's supply, according to the United Nations.
'The killing of families trying to access life-saving aid is unconscionable,' UNICEF's chief, Catherine Russell, said. 'These were mothers seeking a lifeline for their children after months of hunger and desperation.'
The Israeli military said it was targeting a militant when it struck near the clinic.
Security camera footage outside the clinic in the central Gaza city of Deir al Balah showed about a dozen people squatting in front of the clinic when a projectile explodes a few meters (yards) away, leaving bodies scattered.
Meanwhile, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu prepared to leave Washington after meetings with President Donald Trump, apparently without finalizing a temporary ceasefire advocated by the White House.
The deal announced by European officials could result in 'more crossings open, aid and food trucks entering Gaza, repair of vital infrastructure and protection of aid workers,' said Kaja Kallas, the 27-member EU's top diplomat.
'We count on Israel to implement every measure agreed,' she said in a post on social media.
Aid groups say Israeli military restrictions and recurring violence have made it difficult to deliver assistance in Gaza even after Israel eased its 2 1/2 month total blockade in May. Experts have warned the strip is at risk of famine, 21 months into the Israel-Hamas war.
Kallas said the deal would reactivate aid corridors from Jordan and Egypt and reopen community bakeries and kitchens across Gaza.
She said measures would be taken to prevent the militant Hamas group from diverting aid. Israel has long accused Hamas of stealing aid and selling it to finance militant activities. The U.N. says there is no evidence for widespread diversion.
Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar acknowledged the deal while at a conference in Vienna, saying it followed 'our dialogue with the EU' and that it includes 'more trucks, more crossings and more routes for the humanitarian efforts.'
Neither Saar nor Kallas said whether the aid would go through the U.N.-run system or an alternative, U.S.- and Israeli-backed mechanism that has been marred by violence and controversy.
The U.N. said Israel had permitted a team to bring 75,000 liters of fuel into Gaza, the first delivery allowed in 130 days. U.N. spokesman Stephane Dujarric warned it wasn't enough to cover a single day's energy needs in the territory and that services would shut down without more shipments.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South Wales Argus
20 minutes ago
- South Wales Argus
‘Alarm bells' over revamped farming scheme
Samuel Kurtz, the Conservative shadow rural affairs secretary, warned of broken trust over the heavily criticised and protest-plagued sustainable farming scheme. Ponting to a poll showing only three per cent of farmers trust Labour Welsh ministers, he said the industry waited more than seven years for clarity on replacements for EU subsidies. Mr Kurtz, who is from a farming family, criticised plans to cut the basic payment scheme (BPS) by 40 per cent for those who choose not to sign up to the SFS. He said: 'This reflects what would have happened had the SFS launched in 2025 but it didn't launch… so, now farmers are being punished for that failure.' He expressed concerns about the total £340m budget which would be worth closer to £500m if it had increased with inflation. He suggested the revised SFS prioritises tree planting over food security. Huw Irranca-Davies, Wales' deputy first minister, said: 'We've analysed the potential impacts of the scheme and that has helped us make the decisions that we've come to." He told the Senedd an impact assessment will be published in September.
Spectator
an hour ago
- Spectator
The irony of the Afghan resettlement scandal
If there is one wholesale conclusion to be drawn from the Afghan resettlement scheme scandal, it's that a problem we have today is not so much a profusion of 'misinformation' but rather the suppression of genuine information. In Britain now, it's not 'fake news' that causes widespread resentment and anger, but moves made by successive British governments to silence real news. Ever since the masses decided to vote against their overlords in Britain and America in 2016 in the EU referendum and US presidential election of that year, the elites have propagated the belief that an unintelligent populace has been vulnerable to 'misinformation'. This is the idea that the suggestible lower orders have only become persuaded by populism because they get their news from unreliable social media outlets. Notwithstanding that there are myriad, genuine reasons behind the populist turn of the past ten years, what indisputably generates current indignation and fury are efforts to withhold information from the public. The decision by the previous Conservative administration to allow thousands of Afghans into the country secretly, and then by the successive Labour government to cover it up, is but the latest in a long line of fateful decisions to withhold the truth from the people. Many became aware of this increasing inclination towards state secrecy during the last decade, as revelations of the grooming gangs scandal began to emerge. Not only did the extent of these horrors come fully to light in January this year, but so too did the lengths to which local authorities and police forces had gone to keep these crimes quiet. While their failure to act, out of fear of accusations of racism, became a further source of outrage, revelations made by Dominic Cummings last month that Whitehall officials wanted to go to court in 2011 to cover up the whole episode have heaped yet more disgrace upon the state. The cowardly and deceitful response to these crimes by those in charge – a response going right to the top – is as much remembered now as the crimes themselves. Yet dishonesty, evasiveness and an active determination to withhold facts seem to have become the norm among those in charge. This was made clear after the mass stabbing and murder of three girls in Southport last July, the chief suspect of which, the public was simply and repeatedly told, was 'from Cardiff'. Were we told this because the authorities didn't want to let it be known that the chief suspect, Axel Rudakubana, was born in the Welsh capital to Rwandan parents? Merseyside police and countless politicians knew shortly after the attack that he was in possession of terrorist material, but on the advice of the Crown Prosecution Service, the public was not told. It was the failure to disclose this information, one borne perhaps from a fear that it might inflame anti-immigrant sentiment, that paradoxically fanned the flames of anger which led to the riots that actually followed. The online rumour mill had indeed gone into overdrive, but it did so because many people don't trust the government to tell them the truth about these matters anymore. The public had become especially driven to cynicism and disbelief following the Islamist attacks in Britain and Europe in the 2010s, after repeatedly being informed that the perpetrators had 'mental health issues' or other such mendacities. Yet still the authorities continue to make matters worse out of fear that the truth must not out, lest the easily-aroused hoi polloi fly into a rage. Elsewhere this week we've read that the Home Office has refused to share the location of asylum hotels with food delivery companies such as Deliveroo, citing 'safety concerns' for hotel occupants. And only yesterday the Daily Telegraph reported that ministers once more fear riots will break out in Britain following the disclosures of the Afghan resettlement debacle. There is indeed much anger in Britain today about immigration. Yet the anger has seldom been conspicuously directed towards the incomers themselves – the assaults against immigrants after Southport last year were remarkable because they were unusual. However, the ire has mostly and increasingly been aimed at the liberal overclass who first decided that large-scale immigration was a good idea – for ideological reasons and stemming from vested economic interests – and then have lied and continued to lie about its consequences. When the general public do voice their resentment at the ballot box, or via mainstream or social media, the elites then have the audacity to accuse the masses of being stupid or ill-informed. The ultimate irony of our situation today, one in which the smothering of information has become the norm and expectation, is that it feeds a genuinely counter-factual, conspiratorial mindset. The language of 'government cover-ups' is rapidly becoming common parlance. This is the direct fault of governmental deceit and dishonesty over actual facts.
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Pressure on Labour to respond to landmark Palestine occupation ruling
They have written to ministers to say that Britain's failure to respond to a landmark international legal ruling on the occupied Palestinian territories serves to 'entrench occupation and facilitate annexation' by Israel. The UK Government was sent a letter by 15 civil society organisations and one trade union, the Public and Commercial Services union, demanding it respond to the International Court of Justice's (ICJ) advisory opinion on the Israeli occupation of Palestine. The occupation of territory outwith the borders of Israel agreed in 1948 is illegal and widely recognised as such, including by the UK Government. However, the ICJ ruling from July 19, 2024 demanded that governments take action against Israel in a bid to force an end to its annexation of Palestinian land. The letter, which has been signed by groups such as Christian Aid, Islamic Aid and Quakers in Britain, demanded that the UK Government stops selling arms to Israel and ends trade with the occupied territories. It said: 'The UK Government has continued transferring arms to Israel, including F-35 parts which it admits are used in military activities in the [occupied Palestinian territories]. 'The UK continues to allow the import of goods from the illegal settlements, and has taken no steps to prevent investment or involvement by UK companies in the illegal settlement project and occupation. READ MORE: Armed police threaten woman with terror charge for holding Palestinian flag 'The UK has failed to suspend its trade deal with Israel, or even announce a review of it, despite the text of that agreement requiring respect for human rights as an 'essential element'. 'Our organisations demand that the UK Government acts with the utmost urgency to identify and prevent financial, commercial, trade, diplomatic, military, logistical or other support that aid or assist the maintaining of Israel's unlawful occupation of Palestinian territory, in violation of international law.' It warned that Britain's abstention on a UN motion endorsing the ICJ opinion had served to embolden Israel as it continued its genocide in Gaza and expanded its illegal settlements in [[Palestine]] – with accompanying violence. The letter said: 'The failure of the UK and other influential states to respond to the AO [advisory opinion] with the urgency it demands has encouraged Israel to defy the ruling. 'With impunity, Israel is in fact deepening its illegal occupation and accelerating the accompanying displacement of Palestinians. State and state-backed settler attacks on Palestinian West Bank communities continue to soar – with more than 1000 Palestinians including over 200 children so killed since October 2023 and 30 Palestinian West Bank communities forcibly transferred in the same period.' A letter, signed by more than 100 MPs and peers has also been sent to the UK Government – with signatories crossing party boundaries – urging it to respond to the ICJ opinion. It said: 'The failure of the government to publish its response on the advisory opinion and address the unlawful situation occurring in the [occupied Palestinian territories], as well its own obligations under international law to avoid complicity, needs to be rectified. 'Over the last year, since the opinion was issued, Israel has accelerated its violations of international law including the Fourth Geneva Convention in the [occupied Palestinian territories].' Signatories include mother of the House Diane Abbott, Scottish Labour's Richard Baker, Patricia Ferguson and Brian Leishman (currently suspended), the entirety of the SNP group, former Scottish secretary Alistair Carmichael and Tory former Cabinet minister Kit Malthouse. And 80 MPs and peers on Thursday wrote to the Foreign Secretary with a list of specific sanctions including suspending the Israel-UK trade agreement, cutting trade with illegal settlements and imposing travel bans and asset freezes on people and companies "complicit" in the occupation. The UK Government was approached for comment.
